Donald Trump's words have come back to haunt him as Jon Stewart ripped into the president for a claim he made last year.
The president bragged about Iran's nuclear capabilities being "totally obliterated" in June 2025 — but it seems the threat is still very real, Stewart said Monday. Steve Witkoff, the United States' Special Envoy to the Middle East, is now claiming Iran is just a week away from having "bomb-making capabilities," despite the strikes.
The talk show host grilled the president's team on these claims, questioning whether the public should believe what the administration claims about Iran. Stewart said, "I remember Trump saying we 'totally obliterated their nuclear program,' yelling at people who questioned it.
"Which makes me wonder, how obliterated was it?" A clip of Trump saying Iran's nuclear capabilities were "obliterated like nobody has ever seen before" was then played.
Stewart continued, "So the kind of obliteration that, somehow, rebliterates? Almost immediately? No one has ever seen that before. So is our plan now to re-obliterate their nuclear program every few months? Or is there a longer-term strategy?
"Our peace through strength will force Iran, let's call it, an Iran nuclear deal. I think I remember that phrase from when we made a nuclear deal with Iran. Whatever happened to that?" A clip of Trump confirming the US had withdrawn from the Iran nuclear deal then plays.
An expert previously told Raw Story that Trump's plan for Iran is unpredictable. Professor Anthony Glees said, "It is not at all clear what would happen if Trump decided to take on the Islamist rulers of Iran. By toppling Maduro but replacing him with someone from his side of the political divide in Venezuela, Trump showed a canniness of some quality.
"However, he can't do this in Iran. There are no US-friendly ayatollahs. It is, however, perfectly possible that he will run out of road and be forced into military action."
An executive order approved by Donald Trump has undermined RFK Jr.'s support, with Make America Healthy Again supporters turning on the Health Secretary.
Jillian Michaels, a health and wellness expert who previously said RFK Jr sincerely "wants to make America healthy again," has turned on the Health Secretary after he backed Trump's order that will see glyphosate, a controversial chemical used in weed killer, allowed for use in the food supply.
"Donald Trump’s executive order puts America first where it matters most—our defense readiness and our food supply," RFK Jr. had said. "We must safeguard America’s national security first, because all of our priorities depend on it."
Health experts and former advocates for RFK Jr.'s plan for American fitness have since criticized the Trump administration. Michaels, speaking to The Hill, said, "This is actually devastating; it is not a conspiracy theory that glyphosate is linked to cancer.
"There are hundreds of studies that have illustrated now it increases risk significantly for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.
"We also know through whistleblowers and numerous lawsuits, of which there have been over 170,000, that the chemical company knew this and tried to bury the information, tried to go after the independent researchers, created ghost studies to try to tell a different story and essentially, they now have to pay $7.25 billion the makers of glyphosate to the victims.
"I don’t buy that we we have a bevy of ultra processed crops, corn, soy, wheat; there’s unfortunately no shortage, which of course has to do with hundreds of billions in the subsidy dollars, and I think that somebody powerful called up someone else powerful after paying out $7.25 billion and essentially saying this is an existential threat we need to call in this favor, and they did and it’s exceptionally upsetting.
"This doesn’t just affect farmers, this is omnipresent. It’s you, they would probably find it in yours and my urine right now if they tested for it."
Fellow industry insiders aired their concerns over glyphosate being used in food production. Kelly Horton, senior vice president of public policy and government relations at the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, said, "It’s an exciting time where nutrition has become a real national dialogue, but at the same time, the resources to be able to do that and to effect the changes we want to see are being pulled out from underneath us."
President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs policy brought Ohio farmer Chris Gibbs into the national spotlight in Trump's first term, when he sent a message asking Trump to consider how his global trade war hurt American agriculture.
After Trump returned to the White House last year and enacted a stream of even more aggressive — if fluctuating — tariffs on global trade, Gibbs felt the need to speak out again.
“It’s such a déjà vu moment,” Gibbs said, “because we're right back in the same situation, right back there, right now, the same doggone thing as 2018.”
Gibbs was then a Republican but told Raw Storyhe came out “swinging pretty hard” in Trump’s first term when retaliatory tariffs caused the value of his soybeans to plummet 20 percent overnight.
“The party didn't want to stand behind that. They wanted to stand behind the president. I said, ‘No, I gotta protect my business,’ so I ended up leaving the party,” Gibbs said.
Chris Gibbs (provided photo)
Last Friday, after the U.S. Supreme Courtissued a 6-3 decision striking down Trump’s attempt to justify his tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, Trump proceeded to announce a new global tariff of 10 percent, then 15 percent, under different legislation.
After blasting the Supreme Court justices who ruled against him in virulent terms, Trump seems certain to focus on the issue again in his State of the Union address, to Congress at the Capitol on Tuesday night.
Gibbs said: “The one thing I agree with Trump, and that is the Supreme Court got it all wrong, and what I mean by that is it should have been 9-0, not 6-3 because the president … never had that authority, and why there were still three Supreme Court justices that couldn't see that is disconcerting to me.”
‘I’m not going back’
Now chair of the Ohio Democratic Party Rural Caucus, Gibbs is continuing to speak out against tariffs, featuring in a new $5 million ad campaign from the Small Businesses Against Tariffs, a project from Defending Democracy Together Institute, an advocacy group formed by anti-Trump conservatives.
“I'm justified,” Gibbs said. “I'm not going back. I am where I'm going to be. I'm in the Democratic Party. I can make a difference here.
“I'm a Democrat because I want to be part of a party that looks for solutions for people, not retribution or revenge against individuals. It's just that simple.”
Gibbs has farmed in Maplewood, Ohio, for nearly 50 years, growing soybeans, corn and wheat and raising cattle. He said tariffs raise the prices of steel, lumber, machinery and other materials used on his farm.
Uncertainty fostered by Trump’s tariffs also strains relations with overseas trading partners, which in turn hurts the grains and agriculture industry in the U.S., Gibbs said.
“We’re on the verge of not becoming the first choice for agricultural supplies. We're now in an agricultural deficit, a trade deficit, which is very odd,” he said.
“The whole time that I've been in farming we were always proud of the trade surplus that agriculture had, and now we’ve moved that back to a trade deficit, so when we have adverse relationships with trading partners, that's how that backs up to me.”
Undeterred by the Supreme Court’s decision, on Monday, Trump said countries who “play games” over U.S. trade deals will face even higher tariffs under different laws.
“This has thrown the whole supply chain, trading sector, trading partners into absolute chaos,” Gibbs said.
Small businesses especially suffer under “ad hoc” and “unpredictable” trade policies, he added.
For the past four years, Gibbs said, his farm’s cost of production has been higher than his income.
“We don't know where we're at, as a farmer, number one for things that we use that come from overseas, but what about the crops that we want to sell into these other countries based on these handshake deals?” Gibbs said.
“It's chaos, and we are in limbo.”
‘Worst thing you can do’
Even as an established farmer with other sources of income such as a federal retirement account from working with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Gibbs said he is struggling to pay his monthly bills.
Thinking about farmers with less cash flow who might need to rely on government assistance “makes me wake up in the middle of the night in a cold sweat,” he said.
“That's the worst thing you can do for an independent rancher is to put the government in a place where it's their only choice to seek relief is the taxpayer.
“There is nothing more demeaning, nothing more heart-wrenching. I call it the silent killer of the soul. That's what's happened before our eyes, to our nation's farmers.”
Donald Trump's ambassador to France and Monaco has had his access to French government officials revoked after failing to commit to the role.
Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot confirmed Charles Kushner — the father of Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner — would no longer have direct access to French politicians after no-showing a summons order from the government. The Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs confirmed the ban on Kushner earlier on Monday.
"In light of this apparent failure to grasp the basic requirements of the ambassadorial mission and the honor of representing one's country, [Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot] has requested that he no longer be allowed direct access to members of the French government."
The reason for the ban on Kushner's contact with ministers appears to be the US ambassador's failure to appear for a summons.
A source reported by France24 said, "Following the publication by the US embassy of comments on a tragedy that occurred in France and concerns only our national public debate – which we refuse to allow to be exploited – ambassador Charles Kushner was summoned today to the ministry. He did not show up."
The ministry has made it clear it would welcome Kushner back should he enter into discussions with the government to work through the issues of the current administration.
Their statement reads, "It remains, of course, possible for Ambassador Charles Kushner to carry out his duties and present himself at the Quai d’Orsay, so that we may hold the diplomatic discussions needed to smooth over the irritants that can inevitably arise in a friendship spanning 250 years."
The French ministry's move against Kushner comes after the death of a right-wing activist in Lyon on February 14. Quentin Deranque, 23, died from head injuries following clashes during a demonstration against the left-wing France Unbowed party.
Six men suspected of involvement in Deranque's death have been handed preliminary charges over the incident. Trump condemned the killing with a Truth Social post, suggesting it was an example of "violent radical leftism" in France.
The US embassy in France also confirmed it was monitoring the case, while the US State Department's Bureau of Counterterrorism echoed Trump's "radical leftism" claim.
Barrot challenged the claims made by Trump and the admin, saying on Sunday, "We are going to summon the United States ambassador to France, since the US embassy in France commented on this tragedy ... which concerns the national community."
Donald Trump has suffered the biggest loss of his presidency to date, according to talk show host Jimmy Kimmel.
The comedian returned to his late-night show after a week-long absence and said that during his vacation, the president suffered one of the most grueling blows to his term so far after the Supreme Court voted 6-3 against Trump's use of tariffs.
Speaking during the opening monologue of his show, Kimmel said, "As just about everyone except him expected, the Supreme Court ruled that the tariffs he is so inexplicably proud of are unconstitutional, the very conservative Supreme Court ruled against him 6-3; this was Donald Trump's most humiliating legal defeat yet.
"Even more than the one with the porn star, where he farted through the whole trial. Trump was angry, he lashed out at his own campaign justices, he called them fools and lapdogs and said they were an embarrassment to their families, and as father to Eric and Don Jr., that is a man that knows an embarrassment to his family."
Kimmel says the loss in the Supreme Court is just the start of trouble for Trump, who must now ease business worries.
The talk show host continued, "The whole thing is a mess because these companies want refunds for the tariffs they paid, but no one knows how to go about getting one, and Donald Trump doesn't give refunds.
"If he gives a refund, it's like when Rumpelstiltskin says his own name. He shrivels up and disappears. So what do you do in a situation like that? You get smacked down very publicly by your own conservative court."
Kimmel went on to mock Trump's dwindling approval rating, with the president seeing some of his lowest polling figures to date.
He said, "This guy has a weird pathological reflex to jack up the numbers. It's so automatic that even when it's like, a bad number, he jacks it up to a slightly less bad number. '36%? How dare you say 38%, there's no way I'm at 40%.'"
A former federal pardon attorney flagged the "cynical purpose" of President Donald Trump's latest batch of pardons during a podcast interview on Monday.
Liz Oyer, the former pardon attorney in the Biden Department of Justice, discussed Trump's decision to pardon five former NFL football players, one of whom was deceased, last week during a new episode of "The Daily Beast Podcast" with Joanna Coles. She argued that there was no legally justifiable reason for the pardons and noted that the five players were surprised to have been granted pardons because they had not applied for them.
But there seemed to be a higher purpose for the move, Oyer argued.
"He clearly thought that there was some constituency that he could ingratiate himself with by pardoning these former football players, but there really wasn't any specific request," Oyer said. "It seems like for the pardons, there wasn't any specific need that he was addressing. He just decided to do it, probably for some cynical purpose that involved appealing to a certain constituency of maybe NFL fans."
The move occurred as Trump and the Republican Party are gearing up for a midterm election that is shaping up to be contentious, at best. Trump has alarmed election experts with his efforts to take election data from the Fulton County, Georgia, election offices. He also threatened to send ICE agents to polling centers during the midterm election itself.
President Donald Trump's latest attack against a top Democrat on Monday night left analysts and observers astounded.
Trumpposted on Truth Social that California Gov. Gavin Newsom had dropped out of the 2028 presidential race, a campaign that Newsom has yet to confirm that he is running. The post came after MAGA piled on Newsom for making a comment about his intelligence that they construed to be a negative comment about Black people.
"Wow! Gavin Newscum just dropped out of the Presidential Race!!! President DJT," Trump wrote on Truth Social.
Analysts and observers reacted to the post on social media.
"Trump just blinked. He's scared," journalist Oscar Gonzalez posted on X.
Michael McDonald, a political science professor at the University of Florida, posted on Bluesky that Newsom "can now declare Trump just resigned."
"Our president's AI-generated reality continues apace, I guess," economist Sky Marchini posted on Bluesky.
"He did?!" independent journalist Chris Cilliza posted on X. "Uh...."
Trump's attacks came as public polling showed the president losing support as the midterms approached. In public remarks on Monday, Trump said polls showing he has an around 40% approval rating are "wrong," and claimed that his approval is "much higher" without providing evidence.
President Donald Trump wants to project a certain image on the global stage, and some world leaders have learned how to use that to their advantage, according to one expert.
Trump wants to appear as a ruthless leader on par with strongmen like Russia's Vladimir Putin or China's Xi Jinping, according to Fiona Hill, Trump's Russia advisor during the first administration. Hill said during an interview on the "The Court of History" podcast on Monday that Trump's desire to be seen in this light gives world leaders a psychological advantage when they interact with the U.S. president, because they have turned that desire for adoration into currency.
"Putin, I think, understands it perfectly," Hill said. "Because if you look at Putin, he rations out his access to him for Trump. He kind of dangles things out of there, plays just hard to get all the time because he knows that Trump, more than anything else, wants his adulation and respect, and Putin's just not going to give that because that's currency. That's extraordinarily valuable."
Hill recalled being on phone calls between Trump and Putin and noticing that the Russian leader had "so much of an advantage" against Trump. It also appears that "he knows this" as well, Hill said.
"He is not that ruthless," she continued, referring to Trump. "He wants to be treated as if he is, but he's just not that ruthless. And that's why he is intimidated by Putin, because he wants everybody else to think of the United States in that same manner. He doesn't want to be benign and benevolent. If he can't be respected, he wants to be feared. He doesn't want to be made fun of or to become a meme."
MS NOW's Rachel Maddow previewed one of the side curiosities about President Donald Trump's State of the Union Address: the designated survivor, or the sole member of the Cabinet who is hidden in a safe room during the speech, to be sworn in as president in case there is an attack that takes out the Capitol building.
It's normally a fairly mundane Cabinet official, Maddow noted — but the problem for Trump is, even his most mundane Cabinet officials are steeped in scandal this year.
"The whole idea of it is very dystopian and weird, but they do it every year," said Maddow. "And, you know, you'd think, given the responsibility associated with being the designated survivor, you'd think they'd pick like the most widely respected person. They'd pick the person who everybody agrees would be the best choice to take over the country in the wake of an unimaginable disaster. You'd think it would be like a really high-profile person they picked every year. They don't do that, actually. Kind of the opposite. The person does get some attention for being picked as the designated survivor every year, but usually the person is kind of not well known."
"And so like in this Cabinet, you might expect that they'd pick maybe the Labor Secretary, right?" said Maddow. "Labor is not a particular area of interest for this president, or really for any Republican president. So maybe they just, you know, keep things quiet, pick somebody low-key, make the Labor Secretary the designated survivor this year. Could they do that? Oh no no no no no, can't do that. Trump's Labor Secretary is Lori Chavez-DeRemer. And if they pick Lori Chavez-DeRemer as the designated survivor, then people will Google Lori Chavez-DeRemer. And this is what they will find."
"Headline: Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer under investigation for, quote, 'inappropriate relationship with employee,'" wrote Maddow. "These are reports that started with a complaint that was reportedly filed with the inspector general of the Labor Department. Trump Labor Secretary, quote, 'accused of drinking in her office during the workday' and committing travel fraud by having her chief of staff and deputy chief of staff, both of whom are now on leave, quote, 'make up official trips to destinations where Chavez-Deremer can spend time with family or friends on the taxpayer's dime.'"
"Do you want to put a spotlight on that hot mess right now?" Maddow said. "That absolutely radioactive scandal engulfing everything related to Trump's Labor Secretary? Yeah. Maybe not. Maybe it's not going to be her. Maybe instead you go with another, you know, low-profile department, one of those departments where only real government geeks even know what the department does. Like maybe you'd go with something really obscure, like the Commerce Department."
"Again, headline: New details from Epstein files reveal Trump Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick had yearslong business tie with sex offender," said Maddow. "Oh, yeah, that's the Commerce Secretary. So maybe we can't have the Commerce Secretary be the designated survivor either."
The Saturday announcement that PreCheck would halt at 6 a.m. Sunday sparked immediate outrage from Democrats and air travel groups. By Sunday morning, passengers discovered the program was running normally anyway, leaving everyone scrambling to figure out what was actually happening.
The botched rollout raised eyebrows among security experts, including former DHS official Juliette Kayyem, who blasted the move, saying it "made no sense, given the explanation they gave." She claimed the agency was trying to score "political points" against Democrats. "If your goal is to process many people as efficiently as possible to limit the number of staff you need, you would actually enhance or quickly clear the TSA lines," Kayyem said, adding that "the division that we see between the secretary's office and the operational experts continue."
Lewandowski dodged questions about his role in the fiasco, telling The Post that the department's policy is to "prioritize the general traveling public to make sure they travel through the line as quickly as possible" on a "case-by-case basis."
The chaos underscores broader management troubles at DHS. Noem faces mounting scrutiny following her handling of the killing of U.S. citizen Alex Pretti by immigration agents in Minneapolis, and the agency is hemorrhaging staffers as key deputies abandon ship.
The Justice Department's chaotic rollout of millions of Epstein files has exposed sensitive information about vulnerable victims, including the name of a woman who accused President Donald Trump of sexually assaulting her as a child, according to reporting from investigative journalist Roger Sollenberger.
The woman's identity appeared in at least one document that has since been redacted, Sollenberger reported on his Substack. However, he said another identifying detail remains unredacted in the database. She's uniquely marked "PROTECT SOURCE" in case files, a designation given to no other victim or witness in the Epstein files.
An explosive FBI email from July lists Trump as the first name among "positive case hits" of famous people in the files, noting that "one identified victim claimed abuse by Trump but ultimately refused to cooperate." Former senior DOJ officials told Sollenberger the language suggests prosecutors approached the woman about pursuing a criminal child sex trafficking investigation against Trump, which she declined.
The woman cited "fear of retaliation" when Trump's name surfaced in her FBI interview. She sued Epstein's estate in 2019 and received a financial settlement, but did not publicly name Trump in her complaint.
Prosecutors gave convicted Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell's legal team four FBI interviews with the Trump accuser, but released only one to the public. The DOJ withheld three accompanying FBI notes despite stating in court that these original case files aren't subject to protective orders governing the Maxwell case and could legally be released.
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche dismissed questions about releasing the remaining materials at a press conference, stating "there's nothing I can do about that."
Trump has issued blanket denials of sexual assault in the past, claiming they “never, ever happened” and that all accusations against him are fabricated lies or politically motivated attacks.
President Donald Trump's insistence on raising taxes because the Supreme Court told him not to is going to wreck his party, former Trump administration DHS staffer Miles Taylor told MS NOW's "The Weeknight" on Monday.
Trump has already signaled his intent to use other statutes to restore his voided global tariffs — even though analysts are skeptical he has sufficient legal footing.
"What Democrats are seeing, they are buoyed by the success that the voters are responding to their message," said anchor Symone Sanders-Townsend. "I think they're also responding to Trump and the Republicans' message, which is basically we don't give a — you know, this is a family show. So I understand, I think it is good news that there is so much energy out there that the Democrats think that they can expand the map here, and that's what they're doing."
"Well, and of course, and, and look at what Donald Trump has given them this past week," said Taylor, a longtime critic of the president he once served. "There's been a lot of bad news, but it's been the worst week for Donald Trump. And instead of reading the room, and I don't just mean the judiciary and the Supreme Court, instead of reading the room, Americans saying, 'please stop taxing me to death.' He says, 'no, you took away my tariffs. You took away my taxes. I will tax you more. I will tax you harder.' The guy is digging his own political grave here by making it a real bad midterm election."
"I had a conversation with friend of the show, Paul Begala, who — you know, Paul's forecasted a lot of elections before," said Taylor. "And we were having a chat and he said, 'You know what? This could be one of the biggest waves we've seen.' He's like, 'I don't say that to get people hyped up.' But you look at the fundamentals, the fundamentals being you have a president who is so directly saying, not only am I owning these tariffs and taxes, I am increasing them on you."
"Rarely have Democrats had such a great ability to directly tie a president to the economic harm people are seeing," he added. "Donald Trump is giving them that on a silver platter."
Republicans in vulnerable congressional districts are increasingly worried President Donald Trump has set a trap for his own party that is set to blow up in all their faces just before the midterms, Politico reported on Monday.
Specifically, after the Supreme Courtstruck down Trump's power to unilaterally issue tariffs under emergency powers law, Trump has scrambled to re-implement and double down on his import taxes — and Democrats have already moved for a devastating offensive with voters over the issue.
"Trump has only doubled down on his tariff plans in the wake of the court decision, saying Friday that he would use Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 to impose a 15 percent global tariff," said the report. "But that would expire after 150 days unless Congress extends it — a vote that could squeeze vulnerable members just months before the November midterm. Vulnerable Republicans and GOP strategists who quietly cheered the Friday court decision are worried that they’re heading into a heated, economy-focused election on their back foot."
All of this comes at a time when Democrats are strategizing a huge messaging war over the president's handling of the economy.
"Democratic operatives point to a series of off-cycle victories late last year in New Jersey, Virginia and elsewhere, where candidates made cost-of-living central to their pitch," said the report. "And a torrent of polling suggests Trump’s tariffs are unpopular with the electorate. In a November POLITICO Poll, a 45 percent plurality of Americans said higher tariffs are damaging the U.S. economy — in both the short and long term."
At the same time, Democratic officeholders, like Gov. J.B. Pritzker (D-IL), have begun demanding Congress authorize a "refund" of Trump's tariffs in the form of checks to American households — something that puts Republicans in a further bind.
“When someone takes money that wasn’t authorized and does it in a way that harms you, they’ve stolen from you, and that is what the Trump administration has done for the last year,” Rep. Steven Horsford (D-NV) told Politico.