All posts tagged "xi jinping"

'Technically world war': UK's ex-foreign secretary gives ominous Trump warning

A third world war could soon “technically” come to pass if Donald Trump’s presence in the White House encourages China to attack Taiwan, a former UK Foreign Secretary said.

“To me, there is a very dangerous scenario in which [Russian President Vladimir] Putin gets something he can describe as a win in Ukraine and China thinks that they will have a crack at Taiwan while Trump is still president, because they don't think in a month of Sundays he would actually send American troops to defend Taiwan,” Jeremy Hunt said.

“If that happened, it would potentially be technically a world war, because you could have conflict in Europe and in Asia at the same time, with a whole set of alliances behind Ukraine and Taiwan and another set of alliances behind China and Russia.”

Trump has long opposed US aid to Ukraine in its fight against Russian invaders. Amid widespread speculation about the US president’s apparent closeness to Putin, Trump has also failed to deliver on campaign trail promises to swiftly end the war.

Trump's commitment to Taiwan, long close to the U.S., has long been questioned. U.S. intelligence reportedly believes Chinese president Xi Jinping has told generals to be ready to invade the self-governing island by 2027.

Hunt was speaking to the One Decision podcast, hosted by Kate McCann, a reporter, and Sir Richard Dearlove, a former head of the British intelligence service MI6.

Hunt, a Conservative, was foreign secretary from July 2018 to July 2019, while Trump was first in the White House. From October 2022 to July 2024, Hunt was chancellor of the exchequer. Though his party is now out of power, he remains an MP.

On One Decision, Dearlove described Trump’s “achievement” in “bully[ing] the Europeans, particularly Germany” to “up their defense spending” in the face of Russia’s growing threat.

Though Hunt agreed with Dearlove that Trump was “a problem solver” on issues such as immigration, he said he “profoundly disagree[d] with [Trump on] Ukraine.”

Describing a liking for playing “fantasy politics,” about what he would do were he still in office, Hunt said: “It's very clear that Trump doesn't want to defend Europe, and doesn't doesn't believe it's his job to defend Europe, but we know that we cannot defend ourselves because we're totally dependent on the US military presence in Europe and Ukraine is completely dependent on US military support.

“So therefore the most important thing is to play for time, because what would be catastrophic is an immediate American withdrawal of support. We could perhaps cope if they withdrew it in five or 10 years time, while we ramp up our own defensive capabilities.

“But the most important thing is, therefore, not to do anything that provokes an immediate withdrawal. And I just wonder if that's the reason why, when Trump started his 'Liberation Day' trade war, the EU was uncharacteristically emollient to America compared to China, which immediately slapped on retaliatory tariffs.”

Hunt also described a “cloak and dagger meeting” he had while foreign secretary with the late Oleg Gordievski, who he called “probably the greatest spy of the Cold War.”

“He was briefly KGB station chief in London,” Hunt said, “and he was spying for us during that period, and I went to meet him, and the thing he said to me which really stuck in my mind, was this thing that the only thing that Putin respects is strength.

“So I think from our point of view, we absolutely do need to show that we're serious about our military capabilities, and we don't tempt him to think, ‘Maybe I could make a play for Estonia while NATO is in chaos.’”

Hunt also described consultations with Henry Kissinger, in which the late US Secretary of State and National Security Adviser warned of a scenario very like the one Hunt said could lead to “technical” world war.

“Kissinger said to me that when Ukraine was invaded, some very senior people in the Communist Party leadership in China thought the West was trying to provoke an invasion of Taiwan,” Hunt said, “… because they thought we wanted to sanction China like we were sanctioning Russia.”

That, Hunt said, was “absolute nonsense.”

“But Russia is the worst for conspiracy theories. I mean, Putin, I think there is a side to him that thinks that … the West is out to get him, and attack is the best form of defense. And so I think you have to balance ramping up your strength with enough dialogue to make sure you don't have misunderstandings that lead to war.”

'Extortionist!' Columnist flags Trump move 'deserving of an exclamation point'

President Donald Trump's dealings with everything from Ukraine to Ivy League universities amount to blatant extortion, Washington Post columnist Kathleen Parker wrote Friday.

"Trump isn’t a dealmaker; he is closer to an extortionist," Parker wrote. "At least he meets the definition of the term: someone who uses coercion or punishment to get what he wants."

Parker explained how Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky's "first lesson in the art of the deal" came in 2019, "when Trump essentially threatened to withhold $400 million in military aid if Zelensky didn’t investigate — or at least say he was investigating — Hunter Biden’s business dealings in Ukraine."

Zelensky's second lesson came, according to Parker, when President Trump demanded Ukraine's mineral rights, as well as hundreds of billions of dollars, in exchange for continued U.S. military aid.

Parker noted that Trump has since moved on to higher education, where he is demanding an end to academic freedom in exchange for billions in federal funding.

ALSO READ: 'Promoted our tormenter': MAGA fans vent disgust at Trump official's latest move

"In addition to requiring the elimination of diversity, equity and inclusion programs, Trump wants universities to ban masks at protests and ensure merit-based hiring practices. As though Trump can claim bragging rights on the latter," Parker wrote.

She added, "He also wants to audit student and faculty viewpoints (if there were ever a sentence deserving of an exclamation point)! Is Trump, the nonreader, going to start reviewing term papers and dissertations? I’d like to watch."

Next up, China, which Parker argued, "like Harvard, has a healthy endowment — a $17.8 trillion gross domestic product — and leverage resulting from the decline in the United States’ value to China’s export economy."

She concluded, "Our extortionist, winning-obsessed president could lose — bigly — to China’s superior position and the patience of ancients. It seems unpatriotic to pull for the 'enemy,' but this time the greater danger lies within."

Read The Washington Post opinion piece here.

'Absurd': Ex-Treasury secretary says Trump's plan will drive allies into 'China's arms'

The "major winner" in Donald Trump's trade war will be Chinese President Xi Jinping, according to Lawrence Summers, former treasury secretary under President Bill Clinton.

Summers spoke with CNN's Boris Sanchez on Monday.

"I do wonder what you make of Trump and some of his administration officials saying that Canada is inciting this trade war through their actions. Do you see it that way at all?" Sanchez asked.

Summers answered, "It's absurd. Canada is our friend. Canada is not an important source of illegal immigrants. Canada is not an important source of illegal drugs. Canada is an important market for American products. Canada is a crucial co-producer with American automobile companies that enable North America to compete with Asia and Europe. This whole policy is of the 'stop, or I'll shoot myself in the foot,' kind. It represents a self-inflicted supply shock, a wound on the American economy. It is very dangerous. The major winner will be Xi Jinping.

ALSO READ: 'Driven to self-loathing': Inside the extremist website believed to 'groom' teen attackers

"Why do you say that?" Sanchez asked.

"Because we are, with our tariffs on China, giving him an excuse for their poor economic performance and ability to blame it on us, because by alienating all our traditional allies and creating uncertainty about whether we can be relied on, we're driving people into China's arms."

Summers said Americans will start feeling the financial impact of the tariffs "within a small number of weeks."

He posted to X, "It is pretty rare to formulate a policy that is lose for American consumers, lose for American producers, lose for American influence in the world and only is benefiting our adversaries who are getting a great deal of satisfaction out of seeing this spectacle of traditional alliances being torn apart with these kind of threats."

The tariffs on Canada and China were set to go into effect at midnight Monday. Mexico worked out a one-month reprieve with Trump in exchange for 10,000 Mexican National Guards troops at the border.

Watch the clip below via CNN.

TikTok disinformation is no more dangerous than this Fox News disinformation

The U.S. House of Representatives has voted overwhelmingly to require TikTok to divest its Chinese ownership or be banned in the U.S. because of national security concerns.

The security risks identified by the bill’s sponsors include a Chinese law that gives Xi Jinping legal access to user data, along with China’s ability to meddle in U.S. elections.

The standard First Amendment debate asks: When does one person’s right to spew misinformation yield to another person’s right not to be harmed by it? In the context of elections, if Congress interferes with a foreign-owned media platform such as TikTok in the name of election security, why should a domestic corporation such as Fox News, also guilty of rampant election misinformation, be spared the same scrutiny?

Online disinformation campaigns

Over the past few years, the most aggressive online disinformation campaigns in the U.S. have targeted COVID vaccines, climate science and elections. Millions of Americans are influenced by manufactured information campaigns every day. Pew Research shows that the share of U.S. adults who want the federal government to restrict such false information has risen, from 39 percent in 2018 to 55 percent in 2023.

COVID and climate manipulation can be countered fairly easily since death rates, increasing wildfires and disappearing aquifers can’t lie.

ALSO READ: 11 ways Trump doesn’t become president

Election misinformation is another story. Of all the disinformation campaigns online at any given hour, election lies are the most difficult to regulate because political speech is afforded the highest legal protection under the 1st Amendment.

Paradoxically, political disinformation presents the greatest threat to the 1st Amendment, as politicians in a position to curb it sometimes become top disinformation purveyors.

Consider that Donald Trump started claiming the 2020 election was rigged months before the first votes were cast. Since then, an initially resistant GOP has begun to see the political expediency in parroting his claims: Republicans have not won the popular vote in a presidential election in decades, and it’s easier to falsely decry “stolen election” than to adjust policies enough to widen their political appeal.

ALSO READ: Convicted January 6 felon wants to storm the Capitol again — as an elected congressman

The GOP’s strained relationship with the truth is further complicated by deep-pocket political donors who demand outcomes different from what ordinary voters want — and are willing to finance massive public disinformation campaigns to achieve those outcomes.

As a direct result of widespread election disinformation, 40 percent of Americans still think Trump won the 2020 election, and 64 percent of election officials say their jobs are now more dangerous. Not only does election misinformation weaken domestic political processes, it has been weaponized by lawmakers on the right to justify new voter suppression laws in a self-serving, closed-loop information feed.

Why should Fox ‘News’ be spared?

TikTok may downplay its interest in U.S. domestic politics. But when it encouraged users to flood U.S. representatives’ offices with angry calls, TikTok parent company ByteDance demonstrated both its interest and its ability to influence American political outcomes when it wants to.

Its lobbying force in Washington, D.C., is formidable and growing, and even includes a former professional football player.

It’s also evident that TikTok’s algorithms suppress themes that aggravate Chinese leaders. As reported by the New York Times, researchers compiled information about popular TikTok videos on topics commonly suppressed inside China, such as the fate of China’s Uyghur population and public protests in Hong Kong. They found that these topics were underrepresented on TikTok compared to other social networks, including Instagram. The research emerged from TikTok’s own “Creative Center,” and after the under-representation was reported, TikTok quietly reigned in its own research tool rather than address the subterfuge.

As Congress grapples with such foreign data manipulation, why should domestic manipulation by Fox News be treated differently? Fox News admitted to peddling massive voter disinformation during the last presidential election, and it appears they are at it again.

Fox News admitted lying about Trump’s 2020 loss

Dominion Voting Systems sued Fox for defamation following Fox News’ rampant election misinformation during the 2020 election. Dominion alleged, with strong evidence, that Fox News orchestrated and published stolen 2020 election claims after it knew them to be false, repeatedly scapegoating Dominion voting machines in the process.

Dominion introduced explosive documentary evidence that key Fox anchors and executives told each other that Trump’s buffoonish stolen election claims were a joke, but told their viewers something quite different.

Fox luminaries texted, emailed or commented to each other that Trump’s stolen election lies and the fraudsters supporting them were “Ludicrous” and “totally off the rails”(Tucker Carlson); “F—g lunatics” (Sean Hannity); “Nuts” (Dana Perino); “Complete BS” (Fox Producer John Fawcett); “Kooky” (anchor Maria Bartiromo); “Mind Blowingly Nuts” (Raj Shah, Fox Corporation VP); and, “There is NO evidence of fraud. None” (Bret Baier).

And yet, these same luminaries continued to promote Trump’s stolen election lies on-air, just to attract low-information viewers.

Carlson didn’t tell Fox viewers that Trump was “off the rails.” Instead, he donned his trademark injured puppy face, poured his hurt eyes into the camera, and cried, “The stolen election was the single greatest crime in American history with millions of votes stolen in a day. Democracy destroyed. The end of our centuries old system of government.”

Fox viewers, believing their votes and democracy itself were stolen, were understandably triggered.

Election threats within

Trump and Fox News continued to goad MAGA voters into believing their votes were “stolen” until they violently attacked the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

The insurrection, during which multiple people lost their lives, was the direct result of election misinformation, leaving Fox News with at least some culpability for the attack.

And yet, even as Congress expresses deep concern over TikTok’s potential for election interference, there has been no discussion about Fox News. The TikTok bill’s lead sponsor, Mike Gallagher (R-WI) told NPR that that the TikTok app had been used to interfere in elections.

ALSO READ: A criminologist explains why half of America does not care about Trump's crimes

Post-2020, there is no serious question about whether Fox also interferes in elections or plans to interfere with them again, as Trump and President Joe Biden speed toward a rematch in November.

TikTok has more reach than Fox, as nearly half of America’s population uses TikTok. Fox News, for its part, is the top-rated cable network, averaging 1.85 million viewers daily during primetime hours. Fox & Friends has been the most viewed cable-news morning show for 22 years.

As instruments of social and political manipulation, TikTok and Fox News target similar audiences. TikTok attracts hormonal teens with addictive, homegrown videos, while Fox targets their low-education parents and grandparents. Both outlets manipulate their audience by selling infotainment as news.

If the TikTok bill makes it through the U.S. Senate, it will face a stiff legal challenge. Under long-established 1st Amendment precedent, the government will need to show a compelling government interest, and that forced divestment — or a ban — represents the least restrictive means of advancing that interest.

Under any legal analysis, there are few concerns more compelling to the U.S. federal government than preserving free elections and the democratic system. What’s glaringly missing from the debate about online disinformation, at least so far, is why election interference from TikTok is any more dangerous than election interference from Fox News.

Sabrina Haake is a columnist and 25 year litigator specializing in 1st and 14th Amendment defense. Follow her on Substack.

'Flaccid performance': Trump slammed in op-ed for failing to handle Chinese leader

On the heels of President Joe Biden’s comprehensive exchange with Chinese President Xi Jinping, the Daily Beast issued a stark reminder to any Americans thinking about hopping back into bed with Donald Trump.

“Biden ... in both his press conference following the Xi meeting and in his remarks throughout the summit, showed a complete, confident mastery of an enormous range of issues," David Rothkopf writes.

“That’s a far cry from Trump’s flaccid performance.”

Rothkopf’s opinion piece published Friday heaped praise on Biden’s handling of diplomatic relations with China both as a Vice President and the nation’s commander-in-chief.

The Daily Beast writer celebrated Biden’s successful bid to improve communications with the powerful nation, his mastery of complex international politics, and actionable gains on key issues that include resumed military-to-military communications and joint efforts to curtail the spread of fentanyl.

ALSO READ: What is Trump planning if he gets a second term? Be worried. Be really worried.

“[Biden] was a gracious host. He laid out an agenda that had been carefully negotiated and orchestrated by his excellent diplomatic team,” Rothkopf wrote. “In short, Biden did one other thing that Trump never mastered. He was presidential.”

The author argues that things would have gone very differently had the nation been represented by Trump: A golf course would likely have been involved, as would strange praise for North Korean leader Kim Jong Un and tensions over the former president's racist moniker for the coronavirus.

There was however one element of the diplomatic exchange the U.S. could not have escaped.

“I have no doubt that the headline from the event would have been unchanged. It would have been: ‘He’s a dictator,’” Rothkopf quipped. “The only difference is it would be Xi Jinping who was saying it to describe Trump.”

Read the full piece here

.

Pandas could return to U.S. after Xi-Biden summit

Chinese President Xi Jinping appears ready to deploy his country's soft power after his summit with U.S .President Joe Biden -- in the form of cuddly pandas.

Tensions between Washington and Beijing mean that only a handful of the black and white bears remain in the United States, with three having left the national zoo in Washington earlier this month.

But Xi told a dinner after meeting Biden in California on Wednesday that China could send new pandas as "envoys of friendship between the Chinese and American people."

The White House said it would be happy to have more bamboo-chewing bears.

"Should the decision be made by the PRC (People's Republic of China) to restore some of the pandas to the United States, we would absolutely welcome them back," National Security Council spokesman John Kirby told reporters.

"That's got to be a decision that obviously President Xi makes."

China has been using so-called "panda diplomacy" since 1972, when the first animals were sent to the United States in 1972 as a gift, following then-president Richard Nixon's historic visit to the Communist nation.

Strained relations between the rival superpowers in recent years have however led Beijing to call some of the pandas back home.

All three giant pandas at the Smithsonian National Zoo in Washington -- Mei Xiang and Tian Tian, who arrived in 2000, and their three-year-old cub Xiao Qi Ji ("Little Miracle" in English) -- flew back on a cargo plane to China earlier this month.

"I was told that many American people, especially children, were really reluctant to say goodbye to the pandas, and went to the zoo to see them off," Xi said after a dinner with CEOs in San Francisco on Wednesday.

Xi then hinted that new pandas could be coming back to the U.S. west coast.

"I also learned that the San Diego Zoo and people of California are very much looking forward to welcoming the pandas back," he said.

"We are ready to continue our cooperation with the United States on panda conservation, and do our best to meet the wishes of the Californians so as to deepen the friendly ties between our two peoples."

The last remaining pandas currently in the United States, at a zoo in the southern city of Atlanta, are due to return to China by late 2024.

© 2023 AFP

Video: Trump praises China’s president at Mar-a-Lago gala

Donald Trump, who openly admires and envies the world’s dictators and strongmen, chose the week of Joe Biden’s summit with Xi Jinping to lavish praise on the Chinese president — and trash the U.S. president.

After mocking Biden as confused, Trump, the former president and Republican frontrunner for 2024, said during a gala at his Mar-a-Lago home that Xi is “like a piece of steel — strong, smart,” according to a video obtained by Raw Story.

“There’s nobody in Hollywood who could play the role,” Trump added.

Biden, who turns 81 next week, and Xi have their first in-person meeting in more than a year Wednesday in California, with tensions high between the countries.

"We have a man who can't put two sentences together ... we have a guy who can't speak," Trump said of Biden. "It's very dangerous for our country."

Meetings between U.S. presidents and foreign heads of state are not traditionally times when a political candidate of any stripe would praise the foreign leader and denigrate the American president. Trump's campaign did not immediately answer a request for comment from Raw Story.

But Trump has previously praised an all-star lineup of autocrats, including Vladimir Putin of Russia, Kim Jong Un of North Korea, Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia and Recep Tayyip Erdoğan of Turkey.

ALSO READ: Nazis bullied a conservative Tennessee town. Locals punched back. Trump should be worried.

Before Putin’s invasion of Ukraine last year, Trump called him “smart.”

“I mean, he's taking over a country for $2 worth of sanctions,” Trump said. “I'd say that's pretty smart. He's taking over a country — literally a vast, vast location, a great piece of land with a lot of people, and just walking right in.”

But while praising political strongmen, Trump, 77, himself has recently become confused.

"Viktor Orbán, did anyone ever hear of him, he is probably one of the strongest leaders anywhere in the world. He is the leader of Turkey," Trump said at a campaign rally last month in New Hampshire, as noted by Business Insider. Orbán is the leader of Hungary. Turkey's president is Erdoğan. Trump later fixed his mix-up.

For Trump, his admiration of autocrats dates back to his entry into presidential politics.

In a 2016 political rally in Iowa, Trump famously praised Kim as deserving “credit” for his dispensing of political rivals.

ALSO READ: Revealed: Bomb-loving neo-Nazi is now menacing children

“How many young guys — he was like 26 or 25 when his father died — take over these tough generals and all of a sudden, you know, it’s pretty amazing when you think of it,” Trump said.

In 2018, as the sitting president, Trump said of the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi, “It could very well be that (Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman) had knowledge of this tragic event — maybe he did and maybe he didn’t! We may never know all of the facts surrounding the murder of Mr. Jamal Khashoggi. In any case, our relationship is with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.”

As a sitting president in 2020, Trump said of Erdogan, “He’s tough, but I get along with him. And maybe that’s a bad thing, but I think it’s a really good thing.”

From Jimmy Carter to Bill Clinton to George W. Bush, former presidents have occasionally criticized their successors.

But the critiques were typically mild compared to those of Trump and almost never contrasted the performance of a sitting president with that of a foreign adversary.

Biden will push China to resume military ties with U.S., official says

WASHINGTON (Reuters) — U.S. President Joe Biden wants to re-establish military-to-military ties with China, White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan said on Sunday, days before the president and the Chinese leader are set to meet.

Biden will meet Chinese President Xi Jinping in person for the first time in a year on Wednesday during the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in San Francisco.

It will be only the second in-person meeting between the two leaders since Biden took office in January 2021.

China says imperative to stabilize Sino-U.S. relations

BEIJING (Reuters) — China's Foreign Minister Qin Gang said on Monday it is imperative to stabilize Sino-U.S. relations after a series of "erroneous words and deeds" threw ties back into a deep freeze.

Qin, in a meeting in Beijing with U.S. ambassador Nicholas Burns, stressed in particular that the United States must correct its handling of the Taiwan issue and stop the hollowing out of the "one China" principle.

The relationship between the world's two biggest economies sank to a low last year when then speaker of the House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi paid an official visit to democratically governed Taiwan, angering China, which claims the island as its territory.

In response, Beijing severed formal communications channels with the United States including one between their militaries.

The tension between the two superpowers eased in November when U.S. and Chinese leaders, Joe Biden and Xi Jinping, met at a G20 summit in Indonesia and pledged more frequent dialogue.

"A series of erroneous words and deeds by the United States since then have undermined the hard-won positive momentum of Sino-U.S. relations," Qin told Burns, the Chinese foreign ministry said in a statement.

"The agenda of dialogue and cooperation agreed by the two sides has been disrupted, and the relationship between the two countries has once again encountered cold ice."

Tensions flared in February when a Chinese high-altitude balloon appeared in U.S. airspace and in response U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken cancelled a visit to Beijing.

Last week, Blinken appeared to offer hope of a visit, telling the Washington Post that it was important to re-establish regular lines of communication at all levels.

Also last week, U.S. climate envoy John Kerry said China had invited him to visit "in the near term" for talks on averting a global climate crisis, offering hope of resetting one of the world's most important state-to-state relationships.

"Sino-U.S. relations are of great significance not only to China and the United States, but also to the world," Qin said.

"The top priority is to stabilise Sino-U.S. relations, avoid a downward spiral and prevent any accidents between China and the United States."

(Reporting by Ryan Woo; Editing by Christian Schmollinger)

Ukraine war: As Russia tightens ties with China, West offers $16 billion lifeline to Kyiv

(Reuters) — China's President Xi Jinping was due to depart Moscow on Wednesday after a grandiose display of solidarity with Russian President Vladimir Putin against the West, but without offering direct support for Putin's war in Ukraine.

During his two-day visit Xi barely mentioned the Ukraine conflict and said on Tuesday in final remarks that China had an "impartial position".