GOP Rep. Anna Paulina Luna deletes social media posts featuring Russian fighter jets

The office of Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) deleted two of the congresswoman’s social media posts after Raw Story reported that the airplane silhouettes used in her happy birthday message to the U.S. Air Force were actually Russian fighter jets.

“Happy Birthday United States Air Force! As an Air Force Veteran myself, I’m especially thankful for everything I learned while serving in this incredible branch of our Armed Forces,” Luna, an influencer on Instagram before being elected to Congress last year, wrote on her posts.

RELATED ARTICLE: Republican congresswoman used Russian fighter jet images in salute to U.S. Air Force

Rob Young, historian for the National Air and Space Intelligence Center at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base near Dayton, Ohio, and a retired Air Force lieutenant colonel, said the jets were a model developed in the old Soviet Union that evolved over the years and are still in use.

An image of a Sept. 18, 2023, Instagram post — now deleted — from Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL). Instagram

“As I examine them, the silhouettes look most like MiG-29s,” Young said.

Multiple messages from Raw Story to Luna’s office before publication were not returned.

Late Tuesday night, Edie Heipel, Luna’s communications director, sent a response via email.

“This post was published without approval from me as the comms director, via a junior staffer,” Heipel wrote. “Rep. Luna is a US Air Force veteran who worked in airfield management and her husband is a Bronze Star/Purple Heart Combat Controller. To suggest she doesn’t know the difference between American and Russian fighter jets is asinine.”

The posts had been online since Sept. 18.

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

Author and journalist Michael Wolff says he’s been unable to serve a subpoena to First Lady Melania Trump as part of a legal fight stemming from dueling lawsuits between the two. Wolff, who is being sued by Melania Trump for $1 billion over statements about her past, claims process servers have been blocked from delivering papers at both the White House and Trump Tower, with servers refusing to proceed once they realized the target was the first lady. Wolff suggested her extensive security detail has made routine legal service effectively impossible.

Watch the video below.

Michael Wolff says he can’t serve subpoena to Melania Trump despite multiple attempts

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

The internet erupted on Friday after House Oversight Democrats warned of legal action against the Trump administration over trying to cover up the Jeffrey Epstein files.

In a joint statement from Oversight ranking members Robert Garcia (D-CA) and Jamie Raskin (D-MD), the lawmakers said that President Donald Trump's administration and Attorney General Pam Bondi more specifically were violating federal law after attempting to conceal facts and evidence about the deceased child abuser Jeffrey Epstein. The files were slated to be released Friday, which the Department of Justice was legally mandated to do.

Social media users had immediate reactions to the news:

"Legal note: Immediate go to court to start contempt proceeding," Abraham Stein, advocate for seniors, wrote on X.

"WHY ARE THEY OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE?? @realDonaldTrump @PamBondi @FBIDirectorKash," TJ Adams-Falconer, former President Barack Obama aide and U.S. House of Representative candidate for California's new District 38, wrote on X.

"Don’t move the goal post. Hold them accountable today," user Danny Hulse wrote on X.

"Trump clearly guilty, why would he go to such lengths to avoid releasing the Epstein Files if they were so damming to the Dems?" User Luca Migo wrote on Bluesky.

"Well, we suspected this would happen. I remember watching the survivors speaking at the White House. The lawyers mentioned that if the survivors agree, they would release the files. Why can’t that happen?" Noreen Folan Essenberg wrote on Bluesky.

"IMHO, the ranking members should have been examining options well before now..." user Mickey Hodges wrote on Bluesky.

A Tennessee woman's baby remains in state custody weeks after prosecutors dropped charges that led to her arrest and detention by immigration officials.

Esther Lopez-Sanchez is being held at a South Louisiana processing center while her daughter remains in the custody of Tennessee’s Department of Children’s Services (DCS), and she is pleading to be reunited with the child, who is a citizen because she was born in the U.S., reported WZTV-TV.

"This has destroyed her," said migrant advocate Zeinab Al-Mathkour. "She had her baby for only two and a half days."

Lopez-Sanchez was arrested last year while pregnant, and she went into labor after being taken to Rutherford County jail and gave birth at a nearby hospital.

Court records show Lopez-Sanchez was arrested Aug. 15, 2024, with her partner, Roberto Nunez-Gomez, on drug and firearm charges, but the charges against her were dropped Nov. 12, 2025, while Nunez-Gomez was convicted.

Al-Mathkour told the station Nunez-Gomez is the baby’s father but said the pair are no longer together.

However, DCS and the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), which is holding Lopez-Sanchez in custody, have refused to return the child a month after she was told she would face no additional action.

Lopez-Sanchez has asked authorities to place her child with family members, but Al-Mathkour told the TV station DCS has resisted.

"(DCS) told her those won't work because one of them is undocumented," Al-Mathkour said. "The other one lives with someone who is undocumented."

Lopez-Sanchez is weighing whether to return to Mexico or fighting deportation, Al-Mathkour said, but conservative political analyst Steve Gill told the TV station that DCS faced a difficult decision.

"The real focus has to be is best for the child, whether it is being under foster care here in the U.S. while the mother is back in Mexico or whether it is dispatching the child to Mexico, which is a hard call," Gill said.

Immigration attorney Andrew Rankin agreed the courts should decide custody based on the interest of the child, but he said migrants deserved an opportunity to be heard before a judge.

"There is an argument that as a matter of due process, parents have the right to parent their child," said Rankin, adding that family members should be next in line.

- YouTube www.youtube.com

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}