Supreme Court

Supreme Court just opened the door for the government to grab guns: legal expert

Reacting to the Supreme Court's stunning birthright citizenship ruling that now opens the door to an avalanche of lawsuits because the conservative court failed to rule on the reach of the 14th Amendment, one MSNBC legal analyst said the court may have opened a can of worms.

Speaking with host Ana Cabrera, Danny Cevallos explained that a non-Donald Trump administration could apply Friday's ruling to test the limits of the 2nd Amendment.

Cevallos noted a dissent from Justice Sonia Sotomayor made a solid point about the majority's ruling written by Justice Amy Coney Barrett.

"Sotomayor makes a compelling point that it should factor in," he told the host. "This is a great example of something that the government is so likely to lose on. And one of the other things I thought she raised that I thought was important was think about this going the other way?"

"What if the next president, a Democrat president, for example, says, 'I hereby issue an executive order: we're collecting all the guns. We're collecting them all tomorrow, we're going house to house, and we interpret the Constitution. The Second Amendment is saying, well, we're only talking about militia. And that's, oh, I don't know, the National Guard. Therefore, your AR-15 is now going to be collected by our authorities.'"

"Imagine the same thing," he suggested. "Someone would immediately go to a district court to challenge that as unconstitutional and so now what does this mean that we now need to wait for as the attorney general or Solicitor General John Sauer said, for these cases to percolate up through the system?"

You can watch below or at the link right here.

- YouTube youtu.be

Professor issues chilling prediction about Trump targeting 'every right' we have

University of Michigan Law Professor Barbara McQuade issued a stark warning on MSNBC Friday following the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that delivered a victory to President Donald Trump’s effort to eliminate birthright citizenship, implying that all constitutional rights may now be in danger.

“We are going to have people who are immigrants giving birth to children without knowing what their status is,” McQuade said on MSNBC Reports. “One of the things that is also so important about this opinion is it’s not going to end with birthright citizenship; as Justice (Sonia) Sotomayor writes in her dissent, this means every constitutional right is an issue.”

Keep reading... Show less

Supreme Court releases ruling that opens the door to ban Bibles from school

In a case involving a Muslim family in Maryland, Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the 6-3 majority that having LGBTQ books in schools places an additional burden on families that oppose LGBTQ people.

In Mahmoud v. Taylor, the court ruled that the "parents in this case are likely to succeed in their challenge to the school board's policies foreclosing the opt-out option," explained SCOTUS blog's Amy Howe.

Keep reading... Show less

'To do with babies of slaves': Trump announces 'giant win' with history lesson

Donald Trump on Friday announced his big win at the Supreme Court in a birthright citizenship case.

"GIANT WIN in the United States Supreme Court! Even the Birthright Citizenship Hoax has been, indirectly, hit hard," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "It had to do with the babies of slaves (same year!), not the SCAMMING of our Immigration process."

Keep reading... Show less

Supreme Court sets off 'alarm bells' that it's 'in the bag' for Trump: analyst

In a discussion about the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in the birthright citizenship case, legal analysts explained that the court's ruling should be setting off "alarm bells" about this court.

Speaking on MSNBC, host Ana Cabrera noted that there were numerous nationwide injunctions related to executive orders issued under Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden. She asked why now does the court decide to change these rules.

Keep reading... Show less

'Enabling our demise': Justice Jackson rips high court over citizenship decision

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson accused the high court's conservative majority of hastening the "demise" of government institutions by handing President Donald Trump a huge victory in its decision on birthright citizenship.

In a 6-3 decision Friday, the court held that universal injunctions were improper and exceeded the power of the federal courts. In other words, lower courts must now "fight out" citizenship issues.

Keep reading... Show less

Supreme Court drops major ruling on Trump's birthright citizenship order

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday gave the Donald Trump administration a major victory in its attempt to end birthright citizenship.

The U.S. Constitution says that any person born in the U.S. is considered an American.

Keep reading... Show less

'Especially vocal' Supreme Court Justice alienated from her colleagues: expert

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has been “especially vocal” against President Donald Trump’s agenda, and CNN Chief Supreme Court Analyst Joan Biskupic believes it's alienated her from her colleagues on the high court.

The remarks came ahead of the final days of the Supreme Court’s term, according to CNN This Morning anchor Audie Cornish.

Keep reading... Show less

'Nothing to see here': Legal experts outraged by Supreme Court's new ruling

The Supreme Court ruled against transgender youth on Wednesday by upholding a ban that the Tennessee legislature passed into law.

Legal analysts were deeply disturbed by the justification using the Equal Protection Clause to decide United States v. Skrmetti on Wednesday.

Keep reading... Show less

'We'll see': Hegseth suggests he could disobey Supreme Court on troops in cities

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth suggested to Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-HI) that he might ignore an order from the U.S. Supreme Court requiring him to withdraw troops from U.S. cities.

During a Wednesday hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee, Hirono noted that Hegseth had a "tough start" in his position.

Keep reading... Show less

'Forcefully disagrees': Liberal justice breaks Supreme Court protocol in dissent

Supreme Court Justice Sonya Sotomayor was so upset with the majority conservative decision upholding a Tennessee ban on gender-affirming care for minors, that she broke a longstanding protocol when writing her dissent.

The court voted 6-3 Wednesday. Sotomayor wrote the dissent for the liberal justices.

Keep reading... Show less

'We've been watching this case': Supreme Court issues ruling in reverse bias row

The U.S. Supreme Court sided with a straight woman who filed a “reverse discrimination” lawsuit against her employer after her gay boss passed over her for a promotion that went to a gay colleague.

The unanimous decision issued Thursday would make it easier to file such challenges in some parts of the country, and CNN's Paula Reid explained the implications of the case as president Donald Trump has made it a priority to roll back diversity, equity and inclusion programs.

Keep reading... Show less

'I'm the movement': Reporter exposes Trump's reasons for feud with GOP mainstay

President Donald Trump has been privately fuming about the U.S. Supreme Court justices he nominated and publicly feuding with the conservative mainstay that recommended them, and a veteran reporter explained why the rift has developed.

The president has been griping for at least a year about justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and, especially, Amy Coney Barrett, according to multiple sources, and his anger has been fueled by right-wing allies like Laura Loomer, who have been telling Trump they're not in line with the MAGA movement, and NOTUS reporter Evan McMorris-Santoro told "CNN This Morning" what's fueling this dynamic.

Keep reading... Show less