RawStory

Supreme Court

'Error': JD Vance accused of breaking the law during UK fishing trip

Vice President JD Vance is on his eighth vacation in the six months he has spent in office, and this time, he may have broken local laws.

The BBC reported on Wednesday that Foreign Secretary David Lammy admitted he didn't have a rod licence when he went fishing with Vance. So, when the two took out their rods, they broke the law.

Keep reading... Show less

'Very messy': Experts predict Supreme Court's next same-sex marriage action

The United States Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case that brings same-sex marriage back into the national debate, featuring a familiar face for those who have followed this issue over the past dozen years. However, one retired Harvard constitutional law scholar thinks he knows what will unfold once the high court rules.

For the past ten years, same-sex couples have had the same freedoms as straight couples, including access to civil marriage and the legal protections that come with it.

Keep reading... Show less

Supreme Court just 'buried' a 'cryptic order' putting 'nail in coffin' of key law: expert

The Supreme Court recently signaled what could be the end of the Voting Rights Act, according to one expert.

James Sample, a professor of constitutional law at Hofstra University, appeared on MSNBC on Saturday to discuss Texas GOP "re-redistricting," and other key topics. Earlier in the interview, Sample said the current war over gerrymandering in Texas, California, and other states is the result of Chief Justice John Roberts' Supreme Court.

Keep reading... Show less

'Invitation to villainy': Chief Justice John Roberts accused of causing huge political war

The current war over gerrymandering in Texas, California, and other states is the result of Chief Justice John Roberts' Supreme Court, according to a legal expert.

James Sample, a professor of constitutional law at Hofstra University, appeared on MSNBC on Saturday to discuss Texas GOP "re-redistricting," and other key topics.

Keep reading... Show less

'It's always been nonsense': John Roberts' long-running claim blown up by editor

Chief Justice John Roberts claims to be a moderate but is in fact in Donald Trump's pocket, according to a Salon editor.

Alex Galbraith, Salon's nights and weekends editor, is also author of the outlet's free daily newsletter, Crash Course. On Thursday, Crash Course took aim at Roberts, whom it says "has overseen the death of the Voting Rights Act, the end of abortion protections in the United States and the last semblance of potential consequences for criminal American presidents."

Keep reading... Show less

'Mysterious order' could give Clarence Thomas an excuse to undo voting rights

U.S. Supreme Court justice Clarence Thomas has long telegraphed his desire to gut crucial portions of the Voting Rights Act, and he might finally get a chance to undermine protections ensuring equal rights for Black and Hispanic voters.

Thomas first laid out his objections to those protections in 1994, when only the late Antonin Scalia signaled a willingness to go along with him, but president Donald Trump has since packed the court with fellow right-wing ideologues, and a new case could give him a pretext to achieve his longtime goal, reported CNN.

Keep reading... Show less

'What's up with Justice Jackson?': Billionaires said to be 'fearful' of jurist

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) praised Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Wednesday for exposing what he called a “billionaire-funded scheme” to pack the court with “billionaire-agreeable justices.”

“What's up with Justice Jackson? She started making her mark and speaking out early, and some of her dissents are so pointed (that Justices Elena) Kagan and (Sonia) Sotomayor don’t even join them,” Whitehouse said in a social media post on X. “The far right is out for her, and even Republican justices are getting snarky.”

Keep reading... Show less

Judge blocks Trump's birthright citizenship order

A judge ruled from the bench on a lawsuit in New Hampshire on Thursday morning that tested a Supreme Court ruling on President Donald Trump's birthright citizenship order.

The move sidesteps the ruling from last month which declared that lower courts could not issue nationwide injunctions. It did so by declaring the case before the judge a class-action lawsuit — meaning it affects everybody with a possible claim.

Keep reading... Show less

Legal experts torch Supreme Court for relying on literal 'witch burner' judge

In a scathing legal analysis published Wednesday by Slate, legal experts and journalists tore into the conservative-controlled Supreme Court for “cherry-picking historical evidence” in making its decisions, including its past reliance on an actual “witch burner” and pro-rape judge.

“You’ve got the conservative majority doing history and tradition – what they call ‘originalism’ – in a totally illegitimate way: butchering the historical record, cherry-picking historical evidence that supports their position, starting with the outcome they want and just working backward,” wrote Mark Stern, who covers courts and law for Slate.

Keep reading... Show less

Trump nemesis flags 'overlooked' Supreme Court findings that will hurt president

A former White House ethics lawyer who has been a persistent thorn in the side of Donald Trump is actually celebrating parts of the Supreme Court's recent rulings widely seen as favorable to the president.

Legal expert Norm Eisen, who worked in the White House as special counsel and special assistant to the president for ethics and government reform, is also known for responding to Trump's direct attacks against him. In one instance, Trump said of the attorney, "He’s been after me for nine years."

Keep reading... Show less

Supreme Court just opened the door for the government to grab guns: legal expert

Reacting to the Supreme Court's stunning birthright citizenship ruling that now opens the door to an avalanche of lawsuits because the conservative court failed to rule on the reach of the 14th Amendment, one MSNBC legal analyst said the court may have opened a can of worms.

Speaking with host Ana Cabrera, Danny Cevallos explained that a non-Donald Trump administration could apply Friday's ruling to test the limits of the 2nd Amendment.

Cevallos noted a dissent from Justice Sonia Sotomayor made a solid point about the majority's ruling written by Justice Amy Coney Barrett.

"Sotomayor makes a compelling point that it should factor in," he told the host. "This is a great example of something that the government is so likely to lose on. And one of the other things I thought she raised that I thought was important was think about this going the other way?"

"What if the next president, a Democrat president, for example, says, 'I hereby issue an executive order: we're collecting all the guns. We're collecting them all tomorrow, we're going house to house, and we interpret the Constitution. The Second Amendment is saying, well, we're only talking about militia. And that's, oh, I don't know, the National Guard. Therefore, your AR-15 is now going to be collected by our authorities.'"

"Imagine the same thing," he suggested. "Someone would immediately go to a district court to challenge that as unconstitutional and so now what does this mean that we now need to wait for as the attorney general or Solicitor General John Sauer said, for these cases to percolate up through the system?"

You can watch below or at the link right here.

- YouTube youtu.be

Professor issues chilling prediction about Trump targeting 'every right' we have

University of Michigan Law Professor Barbara McQuade issued a stark warning on MSNBC Friday following the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that delivered a victory to President Donald Trump’s effort to eliminate birthright citizenship, implying that all constitutional rights may now be in danger.

“We are going to have people who are immigrants giving birth to children without knowing what their status is,” McQuade said on MSNBC Reports. “One of the things that is also so important about this opinion is it’s not going to end with birthright citizenship; as Justice (Sonia) Sotomayor writes in her dissent, this means every constitutional right is an issue.”

Keep reading... Show less

Supreme Court releases ruling that opens the door to ban Bibles from school

In a case involving a Muslim family in Maryland, Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the 6-3 majority that having LGBTQ books in schools places an additional burden on families that oppose LGBTQ people.

In Mahmoud v. Taylor, the court ruled that the "parents in this case are likely to succeed in their challenge to the school board's policies foreclosing the opt-out option," explained SCOTUS blog's Amy Howe.

Keep reading... Show less