Top Stories Daily Listen Now
RawStory
RawStory

All posts tagged "arizona"

These states avoided ICE as Trump eyes a bigger prize

Last month it was Greenland. This month it’s Nevada’s election. Donald Trump’s always trying to grab something he has no right to grab.

One way Trump could help assure Republicans retain their grasp of both the House and Senate would be to do something about the cost of living.

But affordability obviously bores him.

So instead of focusing on that, Trump has been bloviating about how he wants to “nationalize the voting” and take charge of elections in multiple states.

“We should take over the voting in at least 15 places,” he said.

He hasn’t named all of them. But you know Nevada’s on his list.

It always is.

Trump began trying — by lying — to undermine democracy in Nevada and discredit the state’s election procedures (and workers) during the 2020 campaign, when it dawned on him that Joe Biden would beat him in Nevada, just as Hillary Clinton beat him in Nevada in 2016.

Trump’s been attacking Nevada voters and their elections ever since, most infamously by organizing an attempted smash and grab on Jan. 6, 2021. The criminal assault on the Capitol was an attack on democracy and the rights of voters in the entire nation. But the voters most directly violated by Trump’s insurrection were voters in Nevada and the six other states where Trump ordered fake electors to send fake certificates to Congress. It was the votes from those states that Trump tried to nullify.

Currently Nevada is one of the states Trump’s weaponized and paradoxically named Department of Justice is suing and badgering to obtain confidential data about voters. It’s part of Trump’s effort to intimidate officials into disenfranchising voters who might be deemed not reliably MAGA by Trump minions.

In the hands of the Trump administration, the data of course would also be bitterly twisted through lies and deceit into false allegations built around one of Trump’s favorite fictional characters, the mythical non-citizen voter.

In addition to whipping up fear and loathing among one part of America for the other, DOJ harassment of Nevada also is a malicious effort to throw more shade on an election system Trump has spent years trying — and lying —so hard to destroy.

In his bellowing this week about wanting to “nationalize” the elections, Trump is echoing a performance he gave for a few news cycles in August. Announcing he was going to get rid of mail ballots — a declaration he said was inspired by one of his flirty chats with Vladimir Putin, no less — Trump said on Truth Social:

“…the States are merely an ‘agent’ for the Federal Government in counting and tabulating the votes. They must do what the Federal Government, as represented by the President of the United States, tells them, FOR THE GOOD OF OUR COUNTRY, to do.”

Trump’s proclamation, rendered in his customary off-with-their-heads Queen-of-Hearts dramatics, prompted state election officials, including Nevada’s, to point out that the Constitution of the United States explicitly empowers states to administer elections.

You might expect a governor to be protective of rights authorized to states in the Constitution — as a former Nevada Republican governor, Brian Sandoval, was this week.

“Nevada has the capability and experience to conduct elections in every county, and I trust our state is best equipped to collect ballots, count votes and certify our elections,” Sandoval said, in his capacity as co-chair of Democracy Defense Project in Nevada.

Current Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo, by contrast, said nothing.

To be fair, for Lombardo, when it comes to protecting his state from Trump, saying nothing might be an improvement.

During Trump’s holy war against mail ballots last summer, in which Trump was declaring states “must do” whatever he says, Lombardo gushed “I would — of course — support President Trump’s efforts to end universal mail-in voting.”

“Ooh, but Lombardo must be Trump-whispering and that’s the only reason ICE isn’t going bonkers in Nevada like it has been in Minnesota,” is a thing people seem to think.

Maybe so, maybe no.

It’s worth noting there has also been no Minnesota-style ICE “surge” in Arizona, New Mexico, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, or North Carolina. All are battleground states like Nevada, some with substantial immigrant populations, none with a Republican governor.

Also worth noting: though the first year of Trump’s second term seems to have been very, very long, he’s got three more.

And yet another thing worth noting is a statement Tuesday by Steve Bannon, a member of Trump’s shadow cabinet of right-wing media personalities who seem to have as much sway with the president as his official cabinet of, well, right-wing media personalities:

“You’re damn right we’re gonna have ICE surround the polls come November.”

Trump’s role models are not just autocratic kleptocrats (or kleptocratic autocrats) but mob bosses, so he threatened to take Greenland “the easy way” or “the hard way.”

Greenland, Denmark, and the other NATO nations stood up to him, and he declared a phony victory and backed off.

Standing up to Trump can work, as Europe, China, Brazil, the Wall Street Journal, Jerome Powell, Harvard, and Minnesota, to name a few, have demonstrated.

Sucking up to Trump is pointless, because he can’t be trusted.

Not only is there no guarantee that sucking up to Trump works. It’s also unforgivable public policy.

Whatever consideration Trump gives to international relations, tariffs, interest rates, snooty universities, or whatever other shiny object momentarily attracts his diminishing faculties, the central issue that has always been dearest in his heart — a priority both overriding and underlying the actions and edicts of His Malevolence — is democracy’s destruction.

If he’s allowed to accomplish that, then destroying other things — Congress, the courts, the Constitution, the press, your freedom, your rights, your savings, your safety — and attaining supreme authority over the U.S. (or what’s left of it) comes easy.

Blood found in Savannah Guthrie's mom's home as new details in missing case emerge

Investigators in Arizona discovered blood inside the Tucson home of Nancy Guthrie, the mother of "Today" host Savannah Guthrie, according to reports Tuesday.

The finding suggested that the 84-year-old could be a victim of foul play, The Los Angeles Times reported. Authorities believe she could have been forced out of her home sometime in the middle of the night between Saturday and Sunday.

It's unclear whose blood was inside the house, according to The Times. Officials said there were signs that someone had forced entry inside the home.

“At this point, investigators believe she was taken from the home against her will, possibly [in the] middle of the night,” Kevin Adger, department spokesperson, told The Times. “Detectives are looking into a possible kidnapping or abduction.”

Sheriff's department homicide investigators were at the home Monday and said that a "crime scene" had been discovered at her residence in Pima County, Arizona.

Authorities called the circumstances involving the disappearance suspicious.

"We do in fact have a crime," Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos said during a press conference Monday.

She was last seen on Jan. 31, and her family was notified that something was wrong when she did not attend church on Sunday morning. More details about her disappearance were not immediately released.

Nanos said that authorities were relying on the community and technology to find Nancy. She has limited mobility and needs medication, which, if she doesn't have in 24 hours, could be fatal.

"She did not leave on her own, we know that," Nanos said.

Authorities found Guthrie's phone, and investigators were looking at cameras located at the home, asking community members to help provide any information.

Her family was cooperating with authorities to investigate her disappearance. The incident was not related to mental illness.

"This is not dementia-related. She is sharp as a tack," Nanos added.

Anyone with information was asked to contact the Pima County Sheriff's Department at 520-351-4900.

Eye-popping new theory behind disappearance of Savannah Guthrie's mom floated by expert

A law enforcement and intelligence expert on Monday revealed a new theory into the disappearance of journalist and "Today" host Savannah Guthrie's 84-year-old mother in Tucson, Arizona.

CNN law enforcement analyst John Miller suggested that the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie could have been "an abduction" that is potentially tied to "a well-known figure," her daughter. The theory could involve a "ransom," or something of that nature, Miller explained. Investigators have not released further information about any details tied to this suggestion.

Authorities called the circumstances involving Nancy's disappearance suspicious, and said that homicide investigators were examining a crime scene at her home.

"We do in fact have a crime," Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos said during a press conference Monday.

She was last seen on Jan. 31, and her family was notified that something was wrong when she did not attend church on Sunday morning. Further details about her disappearance and what cops found at the home were not released.

Nanos said that authorities were relying on the community and technology to find Nancy. She has limited mobility and needs medication, which, if she doesn't have in 24 hours, could be fatal.

"She did not leave on her own, we know that," Nanos said.

Authorities found Guthrie's phone, and investigators were looking at cameras located at the home, asking community members to help provide any information.

Her family was cooperating with authorities to investigate her disappearance. The incident was not related to mental illness.

"This is not dementia-related. She is sharp as a tack," Nanos added.

Anyone with information was asked to contact the Pima County Sheriff's Department at 520-351-4900.

Alarming new details revealed as Savannah Guthrie's mom missing: 'We have a crime scene'

Homicide investigators Monday were asking the public for help after Nancy Guthrie, mother of Today journalist Savannah Guthrie, went missing. Police said a "crime scene" had been discovered at her home in Pima County, Arizona.

Authorities called the circumstances involving the disappearance suspicious.

"We do in fact have a crime," Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos said during a press conference Monday.

The 84-year-old woman was last seen on Jan. 31. More details about her disappearance and what cops found at the home were not released.

Nanos said that authorities were relying on the community and technology to try and find Guthrie, who has limited mobility and needs medication.

"She did not leave on her own, we know that," Nanos said.

Her family was cooperating with authorities to investigate her disappearance. Officials were looking at cameras located at the home. The incident was not related to dementia.

"This is not dementia-related. She is sharp as a tack," Nanos added.

Border Patrol shooting leaves one in critical condition in Arizona: report

A person was in critical condition on Tuesday after a shooting involving U.S. Border Patrol in Arizona.

The incident happened in southern Pima County at around 7:30 a.m., NBC News reported.

The Pima County Sheriff and Santa Rita Fire District did not release the person's name or if they were a target of ICE action. It's unclear if any federal officers were injured.

"Patient care was transferred to a local medical helicopter for rapid transport to a regional trauma center," the fire department said in a statement. "The incident remains under active investigation by law enforcement agencies."

The Pima County Sheriff's Department and the Federal Bureau of Investigation were investigating the shooting, according to KVOA.

Immigration agents are mired in controversy after two people were killed in separate shootings in Minneapolis this month.

Trump's admin just revealed how rotten it really is

On Monday, the social media account of Pete Hegseth’s so-called “Department of War” posted that the department is investigating Sen. Mark Kelly (D-AZ), a retired Navy officer.

Kelly’s supposed offense? He participated in a video reminding members of the armed forces that they have no duty to follow illegal orders — a concept enshrined in the Code of Military Justice, the shameful case of Lt. William Calley and the My Lai massacre during the Vietnam War, the Geneva Conventions, and the Nuremberg Trials.

I’ve known Mark for several decades. I saw him pilot rockets into space. I gave a blessing at his marriage to Gabby Giffords.

I visited with Mark soon after Gabby was shot, in Tucson in 2011. He was brave, steadfast. If she survived (which wasn’t at all clear at the time), he was determined to go on with their lives together, doing whatever needed to be done. He has done that. Today, although not entirely recovered, she lives a reasonably full life, and they continue to support each other in every way.

When Mark ran for Senate, he was equally determined to go on with the work Gabby had begun as a member of Congress.

Few people are more dedicated to the ideals of America and the principles of the Constitution than Mark Kelly.

As for Pete Hegseth, well, the less said the better.

The contrast between Mark Kelly and Pete “Whiskeyleaks” Hegseth or Donald “Bonespurs” Trump couldn’t be larger.

The social media announcement put out by Hegseth’s “Department of War” mentioned “serious allegations of misconduct” against Kelly, suggesting that Kelly could be recalled to active duty “for court-martial proceedings or administrative measures.”

This is a dangerous move — almost as dangerous as putting federal troops into American cities over the objections of their mayors and governors or killing sailors on vessels in international waters because they’re “suspected” of smuggling drugs.

Trump likes military tribunals because they don’t require the same extent of due process as regular trials — and Trump has shown his contempt for due process.

In the 2024 presidential campaign, Trump called for those he perceives to be his enemies to be prosecuted in military tribunals. He said former representative Liz Cheney was “guilty of treason” because she participated in the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Kelly has posted:

“When I was 22 years old, I commissioned as an Ensign in the United States Navy and swore an oath to the Constitution. I upheld that oath through flight school, multiple deployments on the USS Midway, 39 combat missions in Operation Desert Storm, test pilot school, four space shuttle flights at NASA, and every day since I retired—which I did after my wife Gabby was shot in the head while serving her constituents.

“In combat, I had a missile blow up next to my jet and flew through anti-aircraft fire to drop bombs on enemy targets. At NASA, I launched on a rocket, commanded the space shuttle, and was part of the recovery mission that brought home the bodies of my astronaut classmates who died on Columbia. I did all of this in service to this country that I love and has given me so much.

“Secretary Hegseth’s tweet is the first I heard of this. I also saw the President’s posts saying I should be arrested, hanged, and put to death.

“If this is meant to intimidate me and other members of Congress from doing our jobs and holding this administration accountable, it won’t work. I’ve given too much to this country to be silenced by bullies who care more about their own power than protecting the Constitution.”

Kelly refuses to be silenced by a disreputable secretary of defense and a twice-impeached occupant of the Oval Office who’s been convicted of 34 felonies.

I believe Mark Kelly would make an excellent president.

  • Robert Reich is a professor of public policy at Berkeley and former secretary of labor. His writings can be found at https://robertreich.substack.com/.
  • Robert Reich's new memoir, Coming Up Short, can be found wherever you buy books. You can also support local bookstores nationally by ordering the book at bookshop.org

'Intense frustration': Republican shakeup may test Trump's 'tight grip' on GOP

Rep. David Schweikert (R-AZ) expressed his "intense frustration" with the Republican Party on Tuesday, leading to a shakeup in which he decided not to seek re-election, ultimately testing President Donald Trump's "tight grip" on the GOP, according to a report.

Schweikert announced Tuesday his campaign for Arizona governor, leaving his seat in the competitive Arizona 1st Congressional District in the U.S. House of Representatives and a vacancy that could impact control of Congress, according to The Washington Post.

“I’ve grown to believe Washington ... is unsavable. I do believe Arizona is savable,” he told Axios Arizona, describing his run as due to "intense frustration" after more than a decade in the House.

"Schweikert, who represents the Phoenix suburbs, enters a gubernatorial primary where Donald Trump has already weighed in, testing the president’s tight grip on the Republican Party. He is campaigning as a more traditional Republican, trumpeting a focus on fiscal conservatism that has faded under Trump," The Post reports.

The GOP lawmaker described Congress as “intellectually calcified." His longtime priority has been addressing the national debt, and he says that leaders are uninterested in seriously fixing it.

Schweikert previously received an endorsement from Trump but says his run for governor would not focus on the president. He would instead face off against another Republican, U.S. Rep. Andy Biggs — a MAGA favorite endorsed by Turning Point USA's political action committee, Axios reports.

Schweikert claims he is not confident that Biggs or Karrin Taylor Robson, who has established herself as a Trump loyalist, can win the general election in November 2026.

Democrats are eyeing the vacancy as a path to obtain another seat in Congress, as his exit from the race leaves Republicans without a Congressional candidate in the swing state.

Marlene Galán-Woods, Amish Shah, Mark Robert Gordon, Rick McCartney and Jonathan Treble are all Democrats contending for the Congressional district.

'Massive move to the left': Data expert says Arizona election reflects nationwide response

CNN's data guru is saying a "massive move to the left" is happening following the large Democratic turnout in Arizona — a reflection of what's happening nationwide.

"What a massive move to the left, to the Democratic side we're talking about here," statistician Harry Enten reported early Wednesday. "My goodness gracious."

He pointed to Latino voters in Arizona showing up in droves, saying "Democrats doing much better than they were doing in Latino districts. A lot of Latinos live in Arizona, seventh district, and not surprisingly, Grijalva doing 17 points better than Kamala Harris did back just a little less than a year ago."

He compared the results from Arizona's election Tuesday night to Kamala Harris' results in the 2024 presidential election.

"Democrats are doing on average, get this, 18 points better than Kamala Harris did back in 2024," he said. "So the 17 point over-performance last night matches the average that we see. The 18 point over-performance that Democrats have had in U.S. House elections. Again, this is one of the best signs that Democrats have had so far. When people vote, Democrats are doing significantly better than they did, just a little bit less than a year ago."

It's a major shift for Democrats ahead of midterm elections, he said, pointing to history as a marker for what's to come.

"What it says is if a party outperforms in special elections going all the way back since the 05-06 cycle, they go on to win the U.S. House of Representatives five out of five times," he said. "We'll see if it becomes six out of six. But the bottom line is history says that the Democrats outperforming just like they did last night in Arizona. Seventh district, the presidential baseline is a very, very good sign. As these districts move very much to the left."

Adelita Grijalva, who is the daughter of longtime late Arizona congressman Raúl Grijalva, who died after battling cancer, won the race Tuesday to succeed him. This further narrows the gap for the Republican majority in the House, the New York Times reports.

The House now has 219 Republicans, 214 Democrats and two remaining vacancies left.

'We riot': Shock over admission AriZona's 99-cent iced tea may not 'survive' Trump tariffs

AriZona's famously low-priced iced teas may not be around for long, according to company leadership.

The New York Times on Sunday published an article called, "Can AriZona’s 99-Cent Iced Tea Survive Trump’s Tariffs?" in which the outlet notes that "the price has been AriZona’s calling card for nearly three decades," yet Trump's touted "50 percent tariff on imported aluminum may change that."

The report notes that company co-founder Don Vultaggio may not have an option in increasing prices.

"The Trump administration’s 50 percent tariff on aluminum imports may leave him no choice," according to the report. "If the price of a tallboy of AriZona Iced Tea had kept pace with inflation, the company would today be selling it for $1.99. Instead, the 99-cent price remains so central to the company’s identity that the numbers are displayed on the can boldly and prominently."

According to the report, "AriZona uses more than 100 million pounds of aluminum a year for its cans, and about 20 percent of that comes from Canada."

"Mr. Vultaggio is hopeful that the tariff dispute will be resolved, but if it is not, he said, 'at some point the consumer is going to have to pay the price,'" it states.

The report continues:

"'I hate even the thought of it,' Mr. Vultaggio, 73, said, adding, 'It would be a hell of a shame after 30-plus years.'"

Scott Lincicome, the director of general economics and Cato's Herbert A. Stiefel Center for Trade Policy Studies, responded to the admission from the company co-founder by saying, "Trump's aluminum tariffs may force AriZona’s famous 99-Cent Iced Tea to increase in price for the first time in 3 decades."

"If they come for the Costco hotdog meal, we riot," he added.

Read the report here.

One Arizona man showed the power of marching for your beliefs

The last time I saw Alfredo Gutierrez was at this year’s May Day rally outside the State Capitol.

He was standing toe-to-toe with a MAGA supporter who had shown up at the protest and was marching through the crowd, wielding an oversized Trump flag, determined to start trouble.

While I couldn’t hear what he was telling the man over the din of the protestors, it was clear Alfredo wasn’t having it. Even at his advanced age, Alfredo let the surly MAGA loyalist know he wasn’t about to let him cramp the enthusiasm of rally-goers, even going so far, at one point, as to jerk down the man’s flag before onlookers stepped in to keep the face-off from escalating.

The incident was quintessential Alfredo Gutierrez, who died this week at 79 of cancer.

To say that Alfredo Gutierrez was passionate about social justice would be a colossal understatement. A follower of civil and human rights icons like Cesar Chavez, Mahatma Gandhi and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., the arc of Alfredo’s life was driven by the struggle for civil rights here and nationwide.

Booted out of Arizona State University in the 1970s for helping lead a student protest to raise the wages of laundry workers — though he returned last year to complete his undergraduate degree — Alfredo possessed a piercing and daunting intellect.

Born in Miami, Arizona, a small mining town east of Phoenix, to engage Alfredo was to know that this was a man who spent a great part of every day pondering the state of the world. He was never afraid to share his opinion, whether on stage or from the audience — and when he stood to speak, he commanded attention.

There was a presence about him, a physical and intellectual quality that ensured he would not be ignored, attributes that no doubt came in handy later as a state legislator, lobbyist and born-again protest leader.

After an extended stint as a businessman, Alfredo returned to grassroots activism with unfettered passion in the 2000s, eager to fight against the state’s growing anti-immigrant tilt. Partnering with other established Latino leaders and a deep bench of young, up-and-coming immigrants rights activists, Alfredo helped organize the largest protest march in Arizona history in 2006. By some accounts, as many as 100,000 people marched that day in support of immigrants rights.

Later, Alfredo would help organize Arizona’s opposition to Sheriff Joe Arpaio and Senate Bill 1070, then the most stringent anti-immigrant bill in the nation. More recently, he’s been a vocal critic of right-wing, Trump-era policies against immigrants.

In his later years, his reputation as a firebrand evolved not so much to temper but refine his unquenchable spirit.



I didn’t always agree with Alfredo — like when he once suggested that Latino voters should step away from voting as a way to remind party leaders of the value and power of our burgeoning electoral bloc — but I always knew that he had arrived at his points of view honestly and logically.

As confrontational as he could be, he was also capable of great humility. I saw an example of this up close at a luncheon honoring former Arizona Gov. Raul H. Castro, the state’s first and only Latino governor, when Alfredo approached our table to show his deep respect for the aging ex-governor despite a decades-long rift between the two men.

At heart, Alfredo was the consummate Chicano activist, a true believer in El Movimiento. Despite his forays into Democratic Party politics and later as a lobbyist, he always remained convinced that marching in the streets could effect change.

In a fictionalized version of Alfredo in my play, American Dreamer: The Life & Times of Raul H. Castro, I imagined him making this point to Castro:

GUTIERREZ: Your problem is you think the system is here to help you. All that talk about the founding fathers. They’re not my founding fathers. My people are proud mestizos, who, despite the rejection of this country at almost every turn, had the courage to push off the yoke of our oppression so we could live our lives with dignity.

CASTRO: How? By marching in the streets?!

GUTIERREZ: Sí, hombre, sí. How do you think we passed the Civil Rights Act? The Voting Rights Act. It’s because we marched in the streets. We didn’t need an army or guns to do it. All we needed was the people’s army and our faith in justice man, justice.

Rest in justice, Alfredo Gutierrez, rest in peace.