Top Stories Daily Listen Now
RawStory
RawStory

All posts tagged "arizona"

This Trump fool is the reason for Savannah Guthrie's continued misery

Until Sunday, it wasn’t clear to me why Savannah Guthrie’s mom was still missing nearly a month after her disappearance. Then came images of the FBI director, Kash Patel, partying with members of the US Olympic hockey team after they won the gold medal.

Then it all started to make sense.

Why wouldn’t Nancy Guthrie’s kidnapping remain unsolved given the country’s leading lawman doesn’t take the law seriously? He thinks the FBI gives him access to things other people can’t, as if law and order were an exclusive membership card to an elite club.

Meanwhile, real people suffer.

For all we know, Nancy Guthrie could be dead.

If you haven’t heard, Patel took a taxpayer-funded jet to Italy to watch the men’s hockey final. His office said he was checking on security. His people accused reporters of lying when they reported the news. Their boss, with images of his partying, exposed their lies.

Sunday’s episode was only one instance of a larger pattern of lawlessness that's getting so big that the Times noted that Patel has “shown little willingness to curb or even conceal his jet-setting." He "has offered comparable explanations" (ie, lies) "to provide SWAT team protection for his girlfriend, Alexis Wilkins, a country singer and rightwing activist, as well as for his heavy use of federal resources for travel that has at times appeared to blur professional lines.”

The Times said that "over the summer, he flew on a government jet from the Washington area to Inverness, Scotland, for a getaway at the exclusive golf resort, the Carnegie Club, with friends ... He has also taken flights, at taxpayer expense, to a private hunting ranch in Texas and to a wrestling match in State College, Pa., to watch a performance by Ms. Wilkins.

The Times and others say Patel’s bad behavior comes in spite of “multiple, fast-developing crises.” These include Americans in Mexico being told to shelter in place after a drug cartel leader was killed by the military. Closer to home, police killed a Florida man who tried to enter Mar-a-Lago with a shotgun and a gas can. Scott MacFarlane added more context:

The FBI is being pushed by Epstein survivors to do more to investigate some of the people … that have come out in the released batch of Epstein files, which show the circle that surrounded Jeffrey Epstein as he prayed on girls and young women … All these things, not to mention crime nationwide, opioid crisis, gun crimes, child pornography, drug running, gun running, are happening as the FBI director is ... partying with his buddies.

But I think it’s the other way around. It’s not that Patel’s lawlessness is happening in light of these crimes. They are happening in light of his lawlessness. Why care about the law, or criminal consequences, when the country’s leading lawman shows so much contempt for it?

The Times reported that Patel was cheering Team USA when he tweeted that the FBI would dedicate “all necessary resources” to investigating the Mar-a-Lago incident. The implication is that he’s falling down on the job, as “all necessary resources” clearly didn’t include him.

But consider the message he's sending — that law enforcement is just empty talk. That's more consequential than falling down on the job. With his actions, Patel is saying that as long as you’re hooked up to the right people, you can do all the criming you want. Even if you’re not hooked up, just wait. When the cops are away, the criminals can come out to play.

This message was deepened by Patel’s (almost certainly fictional) claim that he was invited by the men’s hockey team to celebrate their victory with them. A different FBI director would have refused such an invitation out of concern that accepting it would not only compromise the bureau’s standing with the American people but also appear to encourage lawlessness. But public trust means little to a man who acts like he will never face public accountability.

Lawlessness isn’t harmless.

An FBI director who properly feared public accountability would never have let an Arizona sheriff investigate Nancy Guthrie’s disappearance without the FBI’s aid. He or she would have given Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos a choice: save yourself the humiliation of failure by accepting that the FBI is “the premier agency to deal with kidnappings,” as one expert described the bureau, or I will open my own investigation and guarantee your humiliation.

Instead, the FBI joined the investigation many days after Guthrie went missing, a debilitating loss of time, critics told the New York Post, that allowed for serious errors — for instance, surrendering the crime scene too soon, “with everyone from reporters to true-crime sleuths able to walk right up to Guthrie’s front door with no security or crime scene tape.”

As things stand, Nancy Guthrie’s disappearance is now approaching a month in duration. Her family seems increasingly desperate. Savannah Guthrie herself is forced to make public pleas to her mom’s kidnappers that yield no results. Nanos and Patel are both humiliated, but only Nanos, who faces future reelection as a sheriff, will be held accountable. Meanwhile, Patel jet-sets on the taxpayer dime, hastening the decline of public faith in law enforcement.

These states avoided ICE as Trump eyes a bigger prize

Last month it was Greenland. This month it’s Nevada’s election. Donald Trump’s always trying to grab something he has no right to grab.

One way Trump could help assure Republicans retain their grasp of both the House and Senate would be to do something about the cost of living.

But affordability obviously bores him.

So instead of focusing on that, Trump has been bloviating about how he wants to “nationalize the voting” and take charge of elections in multiple states.

“We should take over the voting in at least 15 places,” he said.

He hasn’t named all of them. But you know Nevada’s on his list.

It always is.

Trump began trying — by lying — to undermine democracy in Nevada and discredit the state’s election procedures (and workers) during the 2020 campaign, when it dawned on him that Joe Biden would beat him in Nevada, just as Hillary Clinton beat him in Nevada in 2016.

Trump’s been attacking Nevada voters and their elections ever since, most infamously by organizing an attempted smash and grab on Jan. 6, 2021. The criminal assault on the Capitol was an attack on democracy and the rights of voters in the entire nation. But the voters most directly violated by Trump’s insurrection were voters in Nevada and the six other states where Trump ordered fake electors to send fake certificates to Congress. It was the votes from those states that Trump tried to nullify.

Currently Nevada is one of the states Trump’s weaponized and paradoxically named Department of Justice is suing and badgering to obtain confidential data about voters. It’s part of Trump’s effort to intimidate officials into disenfranchising voters who might be deemed not reliably MAGA by Trump minions.

In the hands of the Trump administration, the data of course would also be bitterly twisted through lies and deceit into false allegations built around one of Trump’s favorite fictional characters, the mythical non-citizen voter.

In addition to whipping up fear and loathing among one part of America for the other, DOJ harassment of Nevada also is a malicious effort to throw more shade on an election system Trump has spent years trying — and lying —so hard to destroy.

In his bellowing this week about wanting to “nationalize” the elections, Trump is echoing a performance he gave for a few news cycles in August. Announcing he was going to get rid of mail ballots — a declaration he said was inspired by one of his flirty chats with Vladimir Putin, no less — Trump said on Truth Social:

“…the States are merely an ‘agent’ for the Federal Government in counting and tabulating the votes. They must do what the Federal Government, as represented by the President of the United States, tells them, FOR THE GOOD OF OUR COUNTRY, to do.”

Trump’s proclamation, rendered in his customary off-with-their-heads Queen-of-Hearts dramatics, prompted state election officials, including Nevada’s, to point out that the Constitution of the United States explicitly empowers states to administer elections.

You might expect a governor to be protective of rights authorized to states in the Constitution — as a former Nevada Republican governor, Brian Sandoval, was this week.

“Nevada has the capability and experience to conduct elections in every county, and I trust our state is best equipped to collect ballots, count votes and certify our elections,” Sandoval said, in his capacity as co-chair of Democracy Defense Project in Nevada.

Current Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo, by contrast, said nothing.

To be fair, for Lombardo, when it comes to protecting his state from Trump, saying nothing might be an improvement.

During Trump’s holy war against mail ballots last summer, in which Trump was declaring states “must do” whatever he says, Lombardo gushed “I would — of course — support President Trump’s efforts to end universal mail-in voting.”

“Ooh, but Lombardo must be Trump-whispering and that’s the only reason ICE isn’t going bonkers in Nevada like it has been in Minnesota,” is a thing people seem to think.

Maybe so, maybe no.

It’s worth noting there has also been no Minnesota-style ICE “surge” in Arizona, New Mexico, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, or North Carolina. All are battleground states like Nevada, some with substantial immigrant populations, none with a Republican governor.

Also worth noting: though the first year of Trump’s second term seems to have been very, very long, he’s got three more.

And yet another thing worth noting is a statement Tuesday by Steve Bannon, a member of Trump’s shadow cabinet of right-wing media personalities who seem to have as much sway with the president as his official cabinet of, well, right-wing media personalities:

“You’re damn right we’re gonna have ICE surround the polls come November.”

Trump’s role models are not just autocratic kleptocrats (or kleptocratic autocrats) but mob bosses, so he threatened to take Greenland “the easy way” or “the hard way.”

Greenland, Denmark, and the other NATO nations stood up to him, and he declared a phony victory and backed off.

Standing up to Trump can work, as Europe, China, Brazil, the Wall Street Journal, Jerome Powell, Harvard, and Minnesota, to name a few, have demonstrated.

Sucking up to Trump is pointless, because he can’t be trusted.

Not only is there no guarantee that sucking up to Trump works. It’s also unforgivable public policy.

Whatever consideration Trump gives to international relations, tariffs, interest rates, snooty universities, or whatever other shiny object momentarily attracts his diminishing faculties, the central issue that has always been dearest in his heart — a priority both overriding and underlying the actions and edicts of His Malevolence — is democracy’s destruction.

If he’s allowed to accomplish that, then destroying other things — Congress, the courts, the Constitution, the press, your freedom, your rights, your savings, your safety — and attaining supreme authority over the U.S. (or what’s left of it) comes easy.

Blood found in Savannah Guthrie's mom's home as new details in missing case emerge

Investigators in Arizona discovered blood inside the Tucson home of Nancy Guthrie, the mother of "Today" host Savannah Guthrie, according to reports Tuesday.

The finding suggested that the 84-year-old could be a victim of foul play, The Los Angeles Times reported. Authorities believe she could have been forced out of her home sometime in the middle of the night between Saturday and Sunday.

It's unclear whose blood was inside the house, according to The Times. Officials said there were signs that someone had forced entry inside the home.

“At this point, investigators believe she was taken from the home against her will, possibly [in the] middle of the night,” Kevin Adger, department spokesperson, told The Times. “Detectives are looking into a possible kidnapping or abduction.”

Sheriff's department homicide investigators were at the home Monday and said that a "crime scene" had been discovered at her residence in Pima County, Arizona.

Authorities called the circumstances involving the disappearance suspicious.

"We do in fact have a crime," Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos said during a press conference Monday.

She was last seen on Jan. 31, and her family was notified that something was wrong when she did not attend church on Sunday morning. More details about her disappearance were not immediately released.

Nanos said that authorities were relying on the community and technology to find Nancy. She has limited mobility and needs medication, which, if she doesn't have in 24 hours, could be fatal.

"She did not leave on her own, we know that," Nanos said.

Authorities found Guthrie's phone, and investigators were looking at cameras located at the home, asking community members to help provide any information.

Her family was cooperating with authorities to investigate her disappearance. The incident was not related to mental illness.

"This is not dementia-related. She is sharp as a tack," Nanos added.

Anyone with information was asked to contact the Pima County Sheriff's Department at 520-351-4900.

Eye-popping new theory behind disappearance of Savannah Guthrie's mom floated by expert

A law enforcement and intelligence expert on Monday revealed a new theory into the disappearance of journalist and "Today" host Savannah Guthrie's 84-year-old mother in Tucson, Arizona.

CNN law enforcement analyst John Miller suggested that the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie could have been "an abduction" that is potentially tied to "a well-known figure," her daughter. The theory could involve a "ransom," or something of that nature, Miller explained. Investigators have not released further information about any details tied to this suggestion.

Authorities called the circumstances involving Nancy's disappearance suspicious, and said that homicide investigators were examining a crime scene at her home.

"We do in fact have a crime," Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos said during a press conference Monday.

She was last seen on Jan. 31, and her family was notified that something was wrong when she did not attend church on Sunday morning. Further details about her disappearance and what cops found at the home were not released.

Nanos said that authorities were relying on the community and technology to find Nancy. She has limited mobility and needs medication, which, if she doesn't have in 24 hours, could be fatal.

"She did not leave on her own, we know that," Nanos said.

Authorities found Guthrie's phone, and investigators were looking at cameras located at the home, asking community members to help provide any information.

Her family was cooperating with authorities to investigate her disappearance. The incident was not related to mental illness.

"This is not dementia-related. She is sharp as a tack," Nanos added.

Anyone with information was asked to contact the Pima County Sheriff's Department at 520-351-4900.

Alarming new details revealed as Savannah Guthrie's mom missing: 'We have a crime scene'

Homicide investigators Monday were asking the public for help after Nancy Guthrie, mother of Today journalist Savannah Guthrie, went missing. Police said a "crime scene" had been discovered at her home in Pima County, Arizona.

Authorities called the circumstances involving the disappearance suspicious.

"We do in fact have a crime," Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos said during a press conference Monday.

The 84-year-old woman was last seen on Jan. 31. More details about her disappearance and what cops found at the home were not released.

Nanos said that authorities were relying on the community and technology to try and find Guthrie, who has limited mobility and needs medication.

"She did not leave on her own, we know that," Nanos said.

Her family was cooperating with authorities to investigate her disappearance. Officials were looking at cameras located at the home. The incident was not related to dementia.

"This is not dementia-related. She is sharp as a tack," Nanos added.

Border Patrol shooting leaves one in critical condition in Arizona: report

A person was in critical condition on Tuesday after a shooting involving U.S. Border Patrol in Arizona.

The incident happened in southern Pima County at around 7:30 a.m., NBC News reported.

The Pima County Sheriff and Santa Rita Fire District did not release the person's name or if they were a target of ICE action. It's unclear if any federal officers were injured.

"Patient care was transferred to a local medical helicopter for rapid transport to a regional trauma center," the fire department said in a statement. "The incident remains under active investigation by law enforcement agencies."

The Pima County Sheriff's Department and the Federal Bureau of Investigation were investigating the shooting, according to KVOA.

Immigration agents are mired in controversy after two people were killed in separate shootings in Minneapolis this month.

Trump's admin just revealed how rotten it really is

On Monday, the social media account of Pete Hegseth’s so-called “Department of War” posted that the department is investigating Sen. Mark Kelly (D-AZ), a retired Navy officer.

Kelly’s supposed offense? He participated in a video reminding members of the armed forces that they have no duty to follow illegal orders — a concept enshrined in the Code of Military Justice, the shameful case of Lt. William Calley and the My Lai massacre during the Vietnam War, the Geneva Conventions, and the Nuremberg Trials.

I’ve known Mark for several decades. I saw him pilot rockets into space. I gave a blessing at his marriage to Gabby Giffords.

I visited with Mark soon after Gabby was shot, in Tucson in 2011. He was brave, steadfast. If she survived (which wasn’t at all clear at the time), he was determined to go on with their lives together, doing whatever needed to be done. He has done that. Today, although not entirely recovered, she lives a reasonably full life, and they continue to support each other in every way.

When Mark ran for Senate, he was equally determined to go on with the work Gabby had begun as a member of Congress.

Few people are more dedicated to the ideals of America and the principles of the Constitution than Mark Kelly.

As for Pete Hegseth, well, the less said the better.

The contrast between Mark Kelly and Pete “Whiskeyleaks” Hegseth or Donald “Bonespurs” Trump couldn’t be larger.

The social media announcement put out by Hegseth’s “Department of War” mentioned “serious allegations of misconduct” against Kelly, suggesting that Kelly could be recalled to active duty “for court-martial proceedings or administrative measures.”

This is a dangerous move — almost as dangerous as putting federal troops into American cities over the objections of their mayors and governors or killing sailors on vessels in international waters because they’re “suspected” of smuggling drugs.

Trump likes military tribunals because they don’t require the same extent of due process as regular trials — and Trump has shown his contempt for due process.

In the 2024 presidential campaign, Trump called for those he perceives to be his enemies to be prosecuted in military tribunals. He said former representative Liz Cheney was “guilty of treason” because she participated in the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Kelly has posted:

“When I was 22 years old, I commissioned as an Ensign in the United States Navy and swore an oath to the Constitution. I upheld that oath through flight school, multiple deployments on the USS Midway, 39 combat missions in Operation Desert Storm, test pilot school, four space shuttle flights at NASA, and every day since I retired—which I did after my wife Gabby was shot in the head while serving her constituents.

“In combat, I had a missile blow up next to my jet and flew through anti-aircraft fire to drop bombs on enemy targets. At NASA, I launched on a rocket, commanded the space shuttle, and was part of the recovery mission that brought home the bodies of my astronaut classmates who died on Columbia. I did all of this in service to this country that I love and has given me so much.

“Secretary Hegseth’s tweet is the first I heard of this. I also saw the President’s posts saying I should be arrested, hanged, and put to death.

“If this is meant to intimidate me and other members of Congress from doing our jobs and holding this administration accountable, it won’t work. I’ve given too much to this country to be silenced by bullies who care more about their own power than protecting the Constitution.”

Kelly refuses to be silenced by a disreputable secretary of defense and a twice-impeached occupant of the Oval Office who’s been convicted of 34 felonies.

I believe Mark Kelly would make an excellent president.

  • Robert Reich is a professor of public policy at Berkeley and former secretary of labor. His writings can be found at https://robertreich.substack.com/.
  • Robert Reich's new memoir, Coming Up Short, can be found wherever you buy books. You can also support local bookstores nationally by ordering the book at bookshop.org

'Intense frustration': Republican shakeup may test Trump's 'tight grip' on GOP

Rep. David Schweikert (R-AZ) expressed his "intense frustration" with the Republican Party on Tuesday, leading to a shakeup in which he decided not to seek re-election, ultimately testing President Donald Trump's "tight grip" on the GOP, according to a report.

Schweikert announced Tuesday his campaign for Arizona governor, leaving his seat in the competitive Arizona 1st Congressional District in the U.S. House of Representatives and a vacancy that could impact control of Congress, according to The Washington Post.

“I’ve grown to believe Washington ... is unsavable. I do believe Arizona is savable,” he told Axios Arizona, describing his run as due to "intense frustration" after more than a decade in the House.

"Schweikert, who represents the Phoenix suburbs, enters a gubernatorial primary where Donald Trump has already weighed in, testing the president’s tight grip on the Republican Party. He is campaigning as a more traditional Republican, trumpeting a focus on fiscal conservatism that has faded under Trump," The Post reports.

The GOP lawmaker described Congress as “intellectually calcified." His longtime priority has been addressing the national debt, and he says that leaders are uninterested in seriously fixing it.

Schweikert previously received an endorsement from Trump but says his run for governor would not focus on the president. He would instead face off against another Republican, U.S. Rep. Andy Biggs — a MAGA favorite endorsed by Turning Point USA's political action committee, Axios reports.

Schweikert claims he is not confident that Biggs or Karrin Taylor Robson, who has established herself as a Trump loyalist, can win the general election in November 2026.

Democrats are eyeing the vacancy as a path to obtain another seat in Congress, as his exit from the race leaves Republicans without a Congressional candidate in the swing state.

Marlene Galán-Woods, Amish Shah, Mark Robert Gordon, Rick McCartney and Jonathan Treble are all Democrats contending for the Congressional district.

'Massive move to the left': Data expert says Arizona election reflects nationwide response

CNN's data guru is saying a "massive move to the left" is happening following the large Democratic turnout in Arizona — a reflection of what's happening nationwide.

"What a massive move to the left, to the Democratic side we're talking about here," statistician Harry Enten reported early Wednesday. "My goodness gracious."

He pointed to Latino voters in Arizona showing up in droves, saying "Democrats doing much better than they were doing in Latino districts. A lot of Latinos live in Arizona, seventh district, and not surprisingly, Grijalva doing 17 points better than Kamala Harris did back just a little less than a year ago."

He compared the results from Arizona's election Tuesday night to Kamala Harris' results in the 2024 presidential election.

"Democrats are doing on average, get this, 18 points better than Kamala Harris did back in 2024," he said. "So the 17 point over-performance last night matches the average that we see. The 18 point over-performance that Democrats have had in U.S. House elections. Again, this is one of the best signs that Democrats have had so far. When people vote, Democrats are doing significantly better than they did, just a little bit less than a year ago."

It's a major shift for Democrats ahead of midterm elections, he said, pointing to history as a marker for what's to come.

"What it says is if a party outperforms in special elections going all the way back since the 05-06 cycle, they go on to win the U.S. House of Representatives five out of five times," he said. "We'll see if it becomes six out of six. But the bottom line is history says that the Democrats outperforming just like they did last night in Arizona. Seventh district, the presidential baseline is a very, very good sign. As these districts move very much to the left."

Adelita Grijalva, who is the daughter of longtime late Arizona congressman Raúl Grijalva, who died after battling cancer, won the race Tuesday to succeed him. This further narrows the gap for the Republican majority in the House, the New York Times reports.

The House now has 219 Republicans, 214 Democrats and two remaining vacancies left.

'We riot': Shock over admission AriZona's 99-cent iced tea may not 'survive' Trump tariffs

AriZona's famously low-priced iced teas may not be around for long, according to company leadership.

The New York Times on Sunday published an article called, "Can AriZona’s 99-Cent Iced Tea Survive Trump’s Tariffs?" in which the outlet notes that "the price has been AriZona’s calling card for nearly three decades," yet Trump's touted "50 percent tariff on imported aluminum may change that."

The report notes that company co-founder Don Vultaggio may not have an option in increasing prices.

"The Trump administration’s 50 percent tariff on aluminum imports may leave him no choice," according to the report. "If the price of a tallboy of AriZona Iced Tea had kept pace with inflation, the company would today be selling it for $1.99. Instead, the 99-cent price remains so central to the company’s identity that the numbers are displayed on the can boldly and prominently."

According to the report, "AriZona uses more than 100 million pounds of aluminum a year for its cans, and about 20 percent of that comes from Canada."

"Mr. Vultaggio is hopeful that the tariff dispute will be resolved, but if it is not, he said, 'at some point the consumer is going to have to pay the price,'" it states.

The report continues:

"'I hate even the thought of it,' Mr. Vultaggio, 73, said, adding, 'It would be a hell of a shame after 30-plus years.'"

Scott Lincicome, the director of general economics and Cato's Herbert A. Stiefel Center for Trade Policy Studies, responded to the admission from the company co-founder by saying, "Trump's aluminum tariffs may force AriZona’s famous 99-Cent Iced Tea to increase in price for the first time in 3 decades."

"If they come for the Costco hotdog meal, we riot," he added.

Read the report here.