All posts tagged "nato"

'This feels different': Conservative says new scandal knocked Trump off-kilter

Conservative writer Charlie Sykes claimed in a new article that President Donald Trump has been so unnerved by the Iran scandal fueled by his own administration's claims that he can focus on nothing else.

So far, only one of 17 intelligence agencies released reports on the possible effects of last weekend's bombing, yet the Trump administration continues to call it a raging success. When the press has questioned exactly how Trump knows Iran's nuclear capabilities have been wiped out, the president has been going ballistic.

At Wednesday's NATO summit press conference at The Hague, Trump claimed The New York Times, CNN, and MSNBC were out to disparage him and the brave men and women who defend the country.

"Trumpian rage rants are, of course, routine," Sykes wrote. "But Playbook suggests that this time feels different. 'The president posted 21 times on Truth Social yesterday about the supposed success of his military strikes. And at yesterday’s NATO summit — a moment specifically designed by the Western world for Trump to bask in the glory of a huge defense spending boost — he spent most of his public appearances repeating his assertions on Iran.'”

Sykes turned to Politico's reporting to find the reasoning behind Trump's "latest indignant frenzy."

"Critics see a president spooked by a bombshell leak that has undermined his authority," wrote Politico's Jack Blanchard and Dasha Burns.

"Supporters say Trump is genuinely outraged by what he claims is false reporting and wants the record corrected. Either way — he’s using every tool in his arsenal to push back hard: Witness the hammer-like repetition that sites were 'obliterated'; the plentiful use of surrogates like Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio; the vindictive targeting of the journalists and media organizations involved; the barrage of statements from both U.S. and Israeli intelligence chiefs yesterday that the initial report was wrong," the report states.

On CNN Thursday, former Trump official Alyssa Farah Griffin warned that the administration was making matters worse by fighting over how successful the campaign was when the full scope of the strikes still wasn't in.

Read the Charlie Sykes article here.

'Got your timeline mixed up': Dem fact checks CNN anchor to his face

Rep. Adam Smith (D-WA) argued Tuesday that diplomacy was still the best option to ensure Iran's nuclear enrichment program remained below weapons-grade levels, now that a ceasefire has been reached over the nation's nuclear capabilities.

Smith blamed President Donald Trump for tearing up the original diplomatic solution, called the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or the Iran nuclear deal.

Inked during the Obama administration, the action plan gave Iran relief from sanctions in exchange for agreeing not to enrich uranium up to 60%, which is designated bomb-grade levels.

Trump scrapped the plan in 2018, claiming he would come up with his own agreement. At Tuesday's NATO summit in The Hague, however, Trump said he didn't "feel very strongly" anymore about signing an official agreement with Iran.

Smith called Trump's assertion "distressing."

"So, this is all part of Trump's sort of, you know, 'I'm tough. I solve problems just by looking at them.' But the reality is very different. Yes, diplomacy is the key. Iran is on their heels, no doubt about it," Smith said.

CNN's Boris Sanchez asked the lawmaker if Iran "violated the spirit" of the agreement by continuing to enrich uranium to weapons-grade levels as Trump started his second term.

"You got your timeline mixed up there," Smith corrected. "Once Donald Trump tore up the agreement, yeah, Iran violated it. But before Donald Trump tore up the agreement, they had not done what you just said. Now, you can make an argument that just because Donald Trump tore it up, there were, I think, five other countries involved. Iran should have still paid attention to that agreement...but prior to Donald Trump walking out of the agreement, Iran was complying with it."

Smith continued that "the more important point, history aside, we are where we are — and where we are is, we still have Iran and Israel in a conflict, and we still have an Iran capable of building towards a nuclear weapon," which is why diplomacy still matters.

Watch the clip below via CNN.

'New level of cringe': Social media erupts as NATO chief calls Trump 'daddy'

At the Hague on Tuesday, president Donald Trump used the same schoolyard fight allegory to talk about Israel and Iran as he used when talking recently about Russia and Ukraine.

"They're not going to be fighting each other — they've had it. They've had a big fight," Trump said of the bombs exchanged by the two Mideast nations.

"Like two kids in a schoolyard, you know? They fight like hell, you can't stop them. Let them fight for about two, three minutes, then it's easier to stop them."

NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte interjected, "Then daddy has to sometimes use strong language," referring to Trump's F-bomb comment from Monday that neither side knew what it was doing.

"Strong language! Every once in a while, you have to use a certain word," Trump exclaimed.

MAGA reporter Nick Sortor delighted in Rutte's addition to Trump's story, writing, "LMAO! The NATO Chief just called President Trump 'Daddy' following his f-bomb drop. 47 runs this show."

MAGA adherent Eric Daughtery with FLVoiceNews exclaimed, "Omg" with a laughing face emoji.

Pro-Trump commentator Krista Monroe wrote, "NATO chief, Secretary-General Mark Rutte, laughs as he casually endorses Trump’s use of the F Bomb. 'Sometimes Daddy has to use strong language,' he chuckles. I am crying from laughing!!"

The account of MAGA Kitty wrote, "Q: Who’s YOUR DADDY? A: President Trump’s YOUR DADDY!"

Others weren't so sure about Rutte's comment, with the account of @HustleBitch_ writing, "Daddy”?? What the actual HELL is going on?! NATO chief just called Trump 'Daddy' on camera and people are losing it!"

"The NATO chief is now calling Trump "Daddy" - it is a tragic reality that this behavior is regarded by many European leaders as expedient," wrote the account of @Biz_Ukraine_Mag.

@PaulConRO also posted, "A new level of cringe: Rutte calls Trump 'Daddy.'"

Trump is handing the Kremlin a 'gift from the gods': Leading Putin critic

President Donald Trump made Russian President Vladimir Putin a very happy man last week, thanks to major U.S. concessions toward the war in Ukraine. For one, Trump told the Russian dictator by phone that there was no path forward for Ukraine to become a member of NATO, nor did he see Ukraine regaining any territory taken by force. Trump also said face-to-face negotiations to the end the war will begin immediately between Trump and Putin in Saudi Arabia, with Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelinskyy nowhere in sight.

Financier and author Bill Browder told MSNBC's Jen Psaki Sunday, "I would say they're dancing the jig right now in the Kremlin. I mean...they've gone through absolute hell for the last three years."

"They were supposed to win this war in three days. They've lost 850,000 soldiers. They've spent hundreds of billions of dollars, and they didn't know when and how this was going to resolve itself. And then, all of a sudden, it looks like it's going to resolve itself in their favor. This is just like sort of a gift — a gift from the gods — to Vladimir Putin," Browder, once dubbed 'Putin's number oine enemy."

He continued, "But the one thing I can say, though, is that it's a complicated story that's not going to get resolved just by Putin and Trump agreeing something in Saudi Arabia. The Ukrainians have to agree to something, and the Europeans have to agree to something. And so, to sort of have this, you know, sort of individual one-on-one negotiation between Putin and Trump really doesn't get Trump to his, you know, 'solving this war in 24 hours,' that it's a very complicated story with a lot of different objectives. And the Ukrainians potentially depending on how the Europeans decide things over the next couple of days, might decide to just carry on without American support and with European support, and perhaps with more European support."

Watch the clip below via MSNBC.


NATO turns 75 with Ukraine and future on line

NATO’s 75th anniversary summit was meant to showcase the triumph of a larger, stronger alliance. Instead, leaders are coming together in Washington in the shadow of setbacks in Ukraine and electoral headwinds on both sides of the Atlantic.

President Joe Biden, fighting for his political life after a disastrous debate against NATO skeptic Donald Trump, will turn his attention away from campaigning to welcome leaders of the 32-nation transatlantic alliance for three days from Tuesday.

Biden has also invited the leaders of Australia, Japan, New Zealand and South Korea, a sign of NATO’s growing role in Asia in the face of a rising China.

But the star of the summit is set to be Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who is looking for firm signs of support although NATO will not be extending his country an invitation to join.

Founded in 1949 to provide collective defense against the Soviet Union, NATO returned in some ways to its original mission when allies rallied to Ukraine’s defense after it was invaded by Russia in 2022.

Ukrainians heartened most of the West by repelling Russia in its push for a quick victory.

But Moscow’s troops have been grinding on, making advances in the east.A European official acknowledged the mood ahead of the NATO summit has become “gloomy” with Ukraine slipping on a fragile frontline.

“This summit will be very different from the initial plans because it is happening at a critical juncture for European security,” the official said on condition of anonymity.

“Russia is today in a situation which is quite comfortable. They think they can simply wait it out,” he said.

Trump casts shadow

Max Bergmann, director of the Europe, Russia and Eurasia program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said the summit comes at “the best of times, and the worst of times.”

“The best of times, in the sense that the alliance knows what it’s about — deterring Russia. Alliance members are spending more,” he said.

“But it’s also sort of the worst of times — obviously because of the war in Ukraine, challenges of ramping up European defense spending, concerns about the reliability of the United States.”

Trump, who has voiced admiration in the past for Russian strongman Vladimir Putin, has long criticized NATO as an unfair burden on the United States, which spends far more than any other ally.

The 2024 Republican presidential candidate — whose first term was marked by an impeachment over his strong-arming of Zelensky — has insisted he can stop the war, with his advisors floating the possibility of conditioning future US assistance on Ukraine entering negotiations to surrender territory.

Trump has enjoyed a narrow lead against Biden in recent polls. Meanwhile France — where President Emmanuel Macron has mulled sending troops to Ukraine — is also facing a political shift with the strong gains in legislative elections by the far-right, which is historically close to Russia.

Those setbacks come as Putin recently hosted Viktor Orban, the Russia-friendly prime minister of Hungary, which currently holds the EU’s rotating presidency.

The NATO summit is also expected to mark a diplomatic debut for a new leader — British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, after his Labour Party’s landslide election victory.

Finding a path for Ukraine

NATO’s outgoing secretary-general, Jens Stoltenberg, has led efforts to put the alliance itself, not the United States, in the lead in coordinating military assistance for Ukraine.

Stoltenberg also wants allies to commit to provide at least 40 billion euros ($43 billion) per year in military aid to Ukraine, ensuring reliable and consistent support as Kyiv prepares for a long war against Russia.

Diplomats have dubbed such measures as “Trump-proofing” the alliance, although few believe that NATO or support for Ukraine could endure in the same way without the United States, which under Biden has approved $175 billion for Kyiv in military and other assistance.

The summit also comes on the heels of two more nations joining NATO — Finland and Sweden — which both overcame earlier reluctance to formally enter the alliance after witnessing the invasion of Ukraine, which had unsuccessfully sought membership.

Diplomats say that the United States is eager to stage a smooth, drama-free meeting and avoid the bitter recriminations at NATO’s summit last year in Lithuania, where Zelensky failed to win firmer commitments for Ukraine to join the alliance.

Ukrainian officials acknowledge there is no chance of a change of heart in Washington. Biden and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz have led opposition to Ukrainian membership, believing that admitting a country already at war would be tantamount to NATO itself confronting nuclear-armed Russia.

Biden instead has reached a 10-year security agreement with Ukraine, with Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin saying the United States will soon announce $2.3 billion in new military assistance.

Russian Nero: a poem

Vladimir Putin believes he’s exalted —
His rebuild of Empire cannot be halted.
He started out slowly — Abkhazia, Ossetia,
Small, unknown places, like little Transnistria.

He bit off Crimea and eastern Ukraine;
Then his ambition became very plain.
Though he started out slowly, one slice at a time,
Now NATO is building a “Maginot line!”

His bombing in Ukraine is terror of course.
Killing innocents is the approach he endorses.
He squashes opponents — at home and abroad,
Apparatchiks in Moscow just smile and applaud.

He’s a relic of Empire — an Empire fallen.
He’s a KGB thug and a wannabe Stalin.
He arrests those who anti-war sentiments say;
Assassinates those who may get in his way.

This devious, poisonous, treacherous Nero
Murdered an icon, a genuine hero.
He poisoned Navalny, next he’ll go for his wife.
That’s Vladimir Putin, Dictator for Life.

Carolyn McGiffert Ekedahl is the former deputy inspector general for inspections at the Central Intelligence Agency and co-author of “The Wars of Eduard Shevardnadze.”

‘America First’ is Trump first, Russia close second

Less than a week after Donald Trump invited Russia to do “whatever the hell they want” to America’s NATO allies, Vladimir Putin had Alexei Navalny, his strongest political adversary, murdered in a Siberian prison.

Navalny’s death was but one among a series of tragic consequences flowing from Trump’s fealty to Putin, mirrored in turn by the GOP’s fealty to Trump. Entering the 2024 campaign season, Trump enablers have elevated Trump’s political interests over U.S. national security, leaving Ukraine and the U.S. border vulnerable to an unhinged candidate’s lust for retribution.

Trump’s embrace of Putin and antipathy toward Volodymyr Zelensky would be tedious if it weren’t so dangerous. After the Senate passed a defense package for Ukraine, House Speaker Mike Johnson — who spearheaded Trump’s 2020 election fraud — sent members home for a two-week recess rather than allow the House to debate it.

ALSO READ: ‘Grab any cheerleaders?’ Fans decry Trump’s S.C. football appearance as a ‘terrible look’

A few days after Johnson called recess, leaving Ukraine twisting in the wind, Zelensky surrendered Ukraine’s city of Avdiivka to Russian forces, citing lack of ammunition and supplies, tragically abandoning hundreds of Ukrainian fighters in the process.

Camouflaging their refusal to help Ukraine as “fiscal prudence” — despite accruing an unprecedented $8.4 trillion in debt under Trump — House Republicans delivered Putin his biggest military prize in over nine months of high-casualty fighting.

It’s time for mainstream media to take off the gloves, lose the performative neutrality and call Trump’s pro-Putin supporters what they are: traitors.

Amplifying the KGB’s cooked intelligence

While developing the nuclear capacity to wipe out U.S. satellites in space, Putin’s intelligence simultaneously infiltrated the GOP. Either he really is a genius, as Trump insists, or Trump and his supporters are complete morons. The possibilities are not mutually exclusive.

Putin evidently played MAGA congressmen who have spent the past two years trying to impeach President Joe Biden for a supposed bribery scheme — a scheme manufactured and fed to them by Putin’s own intelligence.

In 2020, informer Alexander Smirnov told investigators that the owner of Burisma, the Ukrainian energy company, had agreed to pay $5 million in bribes to both Biden and his son, Hunter Biden.

Even though Trump Republicans were warned that Smirnov’s intelligence was neither credible nor corroborated and could not be trusted, the GOP amplified it across right wing media anyway. Rep. James Comer (R-KY) appeared on Fox News over 200 times with different iterations of the same theme: Biden was crooked (according to Smirnov) and must be impeached.

Last week, Smirnov was indicted on charges that he lied to the FBI about the Bidens, and the FBI is still unraveling whether he was Putin’s plant. According to prosecutors, in addition to planting the bribery story, Smirnov was also actively spreading election misinformation to help Trump, after meeting with Russian intelligence officials in November.

It’s highly suspect that the Republican chairmen of the House Oversight Committee and Judiciary Committee could be so easily duped. Anyone involved with security and intelligence knows — or should know — to suspect some level of mendacity from spies and informants, given that misinformation and espionage are the main currency of foreign intelligence. Either Jordan and Comer’s eager reliance on the cooked intel is plain Trumpian disregard for truth, or it’s something more sinister.

As Tristan Snell, former New York assistant attorney general observed, “Jim Jordan, Chuck Grassley, and James Comer were either duped by Smirnov and the Kremlin — or they were in on it.”

Fox News won’t let facts get in the way

House Republicans have — wittingly or not — served as Russian intelligence assets for Putin. Either they are easy marks for the Kremlin, or they are working with the Kremlin.

It’s equally suspicious that conservative media have barely mentioned Comer and Jordan’s malfeasance, which means 40 percent of the country will continue to believe Biden was bribed.

ALSO READ: 11 ways Trump doesn’t become president

Even after Smirnov was indicted for giving false information to the FBI, Fox News continued to sell the same ‘Biden bribery’ story.

On February 21, days after the Russian disinformation scheme was reported by mainstream media, Fox News ran the headline, “James Comer: Biden 'influence peddling scheme' was done with our world adversaries,” which, 1.) Continues the false narrative that Biden engaged in influence peddling, and 2.) Affirms the credibility of Comer, just revealed to be a clown.

Distasteful as it is to agree with Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, he’s not wrong about Fox News and right wing media’s collusion to block criticisms of Trump. DeSantis said last week: “(Trump) said at some point he could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue and not lose a vote… Well, I think he could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue, and the conservative media wouldn’t even report on it.”

What’s motivating Trump?

Trump’s obeisance to Putin has roots.

U.S. intelligence assessments from both 2016 and 2020 concluded that Russia engaged in extensive social media and intelligence operations to boost Trump’s electoral chances. Given that Trump rewards loyalty above all else, his reciprocal support for Putin was foreseeable.

He’s also motivated to hurt Zelensky. Trump, self-proclaimed master of retribution, asked Zelensky to find political “dirt” on Biden in 2019. When Trump’s blackmail attempt backfired, the fallout led to his first impeachment. Seeking revenge against Biden and Zelensky simultaneously, Trump is pushing MAGA Republicans to impeach Biden for something — anything, doesn’t matter what — to equalize Trump’s own impeachments.

Finally, Trump’s antipathy toward NATO, to the extent he grasps what NATO is about, is foundational. Following the devastation of WWII, NATO allies formed a collective commitment to the rule of law as the best deterrent against dictators with expansionist ambitions.

A man trying so hard to dismantle the rule of law would naturally resent NATO’s steadfast commitment to it.

Containing Russia’s expansion isn’t charity

Trump enablers pretend that withdrawing from NATO, Ukraine and the world will make America safer.

Nothing could be more dangerous.

Even Putin fanboy Tucker Carlson conceded that Putin’s motives for invading Ukraine were not defensive in nature, but were driven by an innate compulsion to restore Russia to its previous glory. Putin sees the fall of the Soviet Union as a catastrophe, the greatest geopolitical tragedy of the 20th century. His maniacal yearning to reconstitute the Soviets Union means NATO members Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, for starters, will be in his sights after Ukraine, with Poland likely to follow.

Tucker Carlson speaking with attendees at the 2022 AmericaFest. (Gage Skidmore/Flickr)

Warning about Putin’s “dark obsessions,”Alexander Gabuev, director of the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center, recently wrote in The Financial Times: “If the Kremlin believes that no major Western power has the resources and will to fight for minor allies like the Baltic States, it may be tempted to test NATO’s Article 5 commitment to collective defense… Especially when Trump’s rhetoric creates a dangerous illusion that America would not intervene if Putin uses military force to divide NATO.”

Abandoning Ukraine now, after forcing it into a position of weakness by cutting off funding, could be the most expensive military blunder America ever makes.

Talking heads who champion Russian life haven’t lived there

In the late 1990s, I represented a Chicago beverage manufacturer with heavy exports to Russia.

During my first business trip to Moscow, I saw the same beautiful subway Tucker Carlson saw.

But unlike Carlson, who must’ve been dropped by limo right outside the entrance, I walked several blocks to the Metro from the Radisson Slavyanskaya. On the way to let-them-starve Stalin’s subway, which is indeed tricked out with chandeliers and oil paintings, I passed hundreds of withered Russian women with watery eyes selling single-serve plastic baggies of soup and vodka. Later that week, a mid-tier adjudicator at Rospatent schooled me on why American clients typically lose in Russian courts: because, under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, they can’t grease a palm, which I took to mean hers.

That trip taught me the connection between official corruption and mass poverty. Corruption skims everything off the top, leaving less than enough for everyone else. Many Russians still can’t afford to heat their homes, and the standard of living for anyone below apparatchik status remains desperate, yet Putin is spending an extraordinary 6 percent of Russia’s GDP to reduce Ukraine to a pile of rubble.

Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump Then-President Donald Trump and Russia's President Vladimir Putin shake hands during a meeting on the sidelines of the G20 Summit in Hamburg, Germany, on July 7, 2017. (AFP)

Putin has been pointing his nuclear weapons at the U.S. and NATO since he invaded Ukraine. Tucker Carlson, Trump and the MAGA clowns in the House are playing a dangerous game they can’t comprehend, and they are playing on Putin’s terms.

It falls to the Fourth Estate to find the kompromat Putin has on Trump, before the entire free world ends up paying for it.

Sabrina Haake is a columnist and 25 year litigator specializing in 1st and 14th Amendment defense. Follow her on Substack.

Forget insurrection. Trump aiding the enemy is treason.

Aleksei Navalny, hero to the free world, has joined the tragic line of Vladimir Putin critics who met untimely poisonings, exploding planes and defenestrations from high-floor windows.

His murder in a Siberian prison makes it all the more disgusting that any American presidential candidate would embrace a thug like Putin, and questions whether enablers of Donald Trump, who just invited Russia to attack the United States’ closest of allies,have any concept of world history.

A basic recollection is essential to understanding this moment.

ALSO READ: 11 ways Trump doesn't become president

In April 1949, the world reeled from unspeakable horrors. An estimated 85 million people suffered agonizing deaths in WWII. Among them: 45 million soldiers smeared across battlefields, 25 million people starved to death and 11 million Jews, gays and other minorities who drew their last breath in Hitler’s maniacal death camps.

Allied forces emerged from the war determined to forge a collective defense for the future. The North Atlantic Treaty established NATO and gave teeth to a free world order governed by the rule of law.

Prized for its armed deterrence, NATO delivered somber recognition that although Hitler was gone, the power-lust, brutality and villainy that drives men like Trump would remain. For NATO signatories still limping from the war, the question wasn’t if Hitler-caliber evil would reappear on the global stage, but when.

Inviting an enemy to attack NATO allies is treason

NATO, sprung from a binding war and peacetime treaty, is more than an aspiration. Under revered and foundational text of the U.S. Constitution, treaties ratified by the U.S. Senate are the supreme law of the land.

For 75 years, America and her European allies have pledged under the treaty that an armed attack against any NATO member would trigger the same military obligations from all NATO members. Under NATO’s article 5, in the event of such an attack, each member state vows to take “such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.”

Last week, in insult to and derogation of this commitment, an ex-president who tried to stay in power by force publicly encouraged Russia, a present enemy, “to do whatever the hell they want” to NATO allies, to punish them for failure to dedicate 2 percent of their GDP to defense spending.

Since he invaded Ukraine in 2022, Putin has threatened America and NATO with the use of nuclear weapons. Any such attack by Russia at Trump’s behest would trigger NATO’s collective military obligations and activate wartime responses with unfathomable consequences.

ALSO READ: Prison president: How Donald Trump could serve from behind bars

Putin is a war criminal and murderous KGB agent. As he brandishes his world-annihilating nuclear arsenal, he is wanted before the International Criminal Court for war crimes. Trump’s suggestion that Putin attack NATO allies wasn’t just stupid. It put America and her allies in real danger, in aid and comfort to a current enemy.

It was treason.

Treason is a term often tossed around but little understood.

Its constitutional definition is straightforward. As Article III, Section 3, Clause 1 states: “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”

What could give Putin more ‘aid and comfort’ than Trump’s encouragement- shot across the free world- to attack our allies? Small wonder Putin saw the green light to murder his most formidable challenger. Even though Putin poisoned Navalny with a KGB nerve agent known as “Novichok” in 2020, one waits for Trump to post on Truth Social that Navalny died at the hands of a Biden-orchestrated “witch hunt.”

An alarmed world reacts to Trump’s ignorance

Trump’s new level asininity hit the world stage just as the American intelligence community was learning about Russia's potential nuclear capacity to disable American defense space satellites.

Trump’s demonstration of ignorance sent shockwaves around the world. The rebukes were swift:

Jens Stoltenberg, NATO Secretary General: Trump’s comments “undermine all of our security including that of the U.S., and puts American and European soldiers at increased risk.”

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz: “Any relativization of NATO’s guarantee of assistance is irresponsible and dangerous and is solely in Russia’s interests.”

Charles Michel, president of the European Council: “Reckless statements on #NATO’s security and Art 5 solidarity serve only Putin’s interest. They do not bring more security or peace to the world…”

President Joe Biden: Trump just “sent a dangerous, and shockingly, frankly, un-American signal to the world… The whole world heard it… No other president in history has ever bowed down to a Russian dictator…”

Any of these world leaders might have educated Trump, as well as America’s ignorant, that the only time the NATO mutual defense pact has ever been invoked was when European allies came to the aid of the United States after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

We didn’t go to war for NATO allies. NATO allies went to war for us.

Receiving NATO benefits for decades then refusing to reciprocate makes us look like an addled bully unfit to lead.

Trump’s weird Putin bromance

Trump, who continues to argue before the United States Supreme Court that he is above the law, admires dictators. He has fought NATO’s anti-dictator objectives for years.

In 2020, according to Politico, Trump told European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen that “if Europe is under attack we will never come to help you and to support you,” adding, “By the way, NATO is dead, and we will leave, we will quit NATO.”

Two years later, after Russia invaded Ukraine, Trump praised Putin as “a guy who is very savvy.” He said he considered Putin’s invasion of Ukraine “genius.”

Trump — close to securing the Republican Party’s 2024 presidential nomination while facing 91 felony counts — has long fawned over Putin.

The admiration appears to be mutual. Despite clear evidence that Russia deployed social media bots to interfere in the 2016 presidential election on Trump’s behalf, Trump handed Putin “an unalloyed diplomatic triumph” by rejecting the conclusions of America’s own intelligence, per the Washington Post.

Since then, Putin’s online troll army has not relented. As Thom Hartmann detailed:

Putin uses his internet troll army to convince the GOP base to demand their politicians abandon Ukraine and NATO … Just a few months ago, the US intelligence community released a report to 100 countries letting them know that Russia is attacking democracies by trying to sow dissent and mistrust among their people, largely through social media and sympathetic influencers. The (report advised that) Russia is pursuing operations to degrade public confidence in the integrity of elections themselves. For Russia, the benefits of these operations are twofold: to sow instability within democratic societies, and to portray democratic elections as dysfunctional and the resulting governments as illegitimate.

In seeking to destroy democratic governments, Trump isn’t the only useful idiot at Putin’s disposal. Right-wing media idiots such as Tucker Carlson are also in the game, and it’s working. After the Senate approved $60 billion in bipartisan aid to Ukraine last week, Trump’s Capitol Hill mouthpiece, Speaker Mike Johnson, promised it would not see a vote in the House.

Using defense spending is a ruse

After Trump tried to sic Putin on America’s allies, MAGA tried to justify the unjustifiable, by stressing that 19 of NATO’s 30 members are spending below the target of 2% of their annual GDP on defense.

But this talking point ignores Europe’s nearly $47 billion in financial and budgetary support, humanitarian aid, macro-financial economic aid and emergency assistance to Ukraine to keep its economy afloat as it fights bombs and an outsized army of conscripted Russian convicts.

ALSO READ: Biden has a new Gen Z super weapon — and occasional critic

Several NATO members are already exceeding NATO’s 2% guideline. Poland spends over 3.9% of its annual GDP, more than the United States. Romania, Hungary, Finland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia each spend between 2.3 percent and 2.7 percent.

All NATO nations had already begun moving toward spending 2 percent after Putin illegally annexed Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula in 2014. Trump had nothing to do with it.

Trump would start WWIII to serve his own ego

Trump has invited Russia, a current enemy, to attack American allies while urging his congressional supporters to aid Russia by turning their backs on Ukraine.

Trump’s ignorance has put American interests at risk. Simply suggesting that the United States will disavow its military obligations instantly weakens our alliances.

Given Trump’s instability, and the social fissures he has worked so hard to cultivate, our longtime European partners may in fact be safer by distancing themselves from the United States, emboldening not only Putin’s Russia, but China, Iran, North Korea and terrorist proxies in the Middle East. Damage is already done. Whether it can be contained remains to be seen.

My grandfather, Gus Wirthwein, fought in WWII. One of the lucky ones, he got to come home with both legs to his farm in Huntingburg, Ind. At day’s end he liked to drink beer (Pabst) in front of a campfire and carve walnuts. He’d talk about the crops, the neighbor’s foal, the weather — near anything, except he would never talk about what happened to him during the war.

I only pray that wherever he is now, he doesn’t know what Trump has done, and will do to our NATO allies if given another chance.

Sabrina Haake is a columnist and 25 year litigator specializing in 1st and 14th Amendment defense. Follow her on Substack.

Trump will not abandon NATO, Republican-allied senator says in Munich

One of former president Donald Trump's fiercest defenders in Congress assured NATO allies they can count on the support of the United States in the event of an attack — even if Trump wins a second term in November.

"Obviously, we love our NATO allies and I think we value the NATO alliance, and that's true across the political spectrum," Republican Senator J.D. Vance said on the sidelines of the Munich Security Conference on Sunday.

But he said the message from Trump and his fellow right-wing Republicans was "that Europe has to be a little bit more self-sufficient" when it comes to their defense."

Trump plots controversial global shakeup behind closed doors: report

A Trump 2.0 White House term would reportedly launch a wrecking ball into U.S. foreign policy — altering or even doing away altogether with decades long foreign policy mainstays. That purported plan includes a radical NATO makeover and an expedited accord to end the Russia-Ukraine war.

Bloomberg News reported that former President Donald Trump is entertaining stripping the forged ties with some NATO countries, specifically establishing a two-tiered NATO alliance model.

It would mean that the charter's Article 5 — which obligates all members in the alliance to defend any member under siege — would have to pony up and meet their defense-spending benchmarks, according to Bloomberg's cited sources.

ALSO READ: 'Unconstitutional overreach': Trump VP contenders clash on Jan. 6

Others in Trump's ear are said to be pushing for bulkier tariffs on any of the countries slacking off on their 2% suggested contribution to defense spending. Countries are encouraged to contribute to their own militaries as part of a collective effort based on a formula that factors in their own GDP.

Speaking at a Saturday rally in Conway, South Carolina, Trump recounted a story about an anonymous NATO member asking if he would withhold U.S. support if their country didn't pay their 2% to NATO.

Trump said he would cheer on Russia to attack a NATO ally.

“You didn’t pay? You’re delinquent?" Trump claimed he said. "No, I would not protect you. In fact, I would encourage them to do whatever the hell they want. You gotta pay. You gotta pay your bills."

The pay-to-stay-safe sentiment isn't being sounded by Trump alone.

"Where I come from, alliances matter," Keith Kellogg, a retired lieutenant general and onetime chief of staff of the former president's National Security Council, told Reuters. "But if you're going to be part of an alliance, contribute to the alliance, be part of the alliance."

Also, should the president defeat former UN Ambassador Nikki Haley and then pull off a second bid against incumbent President Joe Biden — he would reportedly move to accelerate an end to the battle raging between Ukraine and Russia — specifically a sit-down with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and Russian President Vladimir Putin to hash out a potential peace deal.