Top Stories Daily Listen Now
RawStory
RawStory

All posts tagged "brazil"

Black Sun Rising: How a Nazi terror plot led to an American being held in Brazil

“Terrorism for accelerationism, then we get the military supplies to everyone and start war,” a group chat leader wrote on the encrypted platform Signal in October 2024, to almost 150 members spread across Europe, the United States and Australia.

“People need to see lone wolves acting to become empowered,” he continued.

Using a slur, the chat leader added that the conspirators needed to set an example by carrying out acts of violence against Jews.

He also suggested “attacking mosques” to “make Muslims more angry.” If Muslims were agitated, he reasoned, it would only serve to radicalize more white people.

The screed also included a list of chemicals, with the advice that lye would work well for burning the faces of Jewish people.

“Need to spray them with some water to dissolve the powder, but not too much to dilute it (so we want maximum flesh eating),” the post read.

Promoting a longstanding white supremacist conspiracy theory that Jews control the governments of Western democracies, the chat leader wrote: “We must weaken them, spread them out, create chaos for them, destroy their infrastructure, their media, raid their military depots, bomb their banks, we must be smart and destroy them using the edges that we have.”

The Signal group was named Black Sun Rising Militia. “Black Sun” refers to the sonnenrad, an ancient European symbol used by the Nazis during World War II.

Written on Oct. 12, 2024, the Signal messages were meant to rally group members for what was described as a planned coordinated strike against targets across Western Europe and the United States, to take place four days later.

A target list posted in the group shows that the leader was preoccupied with terrorizing Jewish people, while seeking to strike at institutions that underpin Western democracies.

Target categories included “all synagogues”; “all Jewish centers and schools”; “all Israeli embassies and consulates”; “all mosques”; “all migrant centers/camps/housing”; “all big banks/finance companies”; “all big pharma companies”; “all big tech companies”; “all big media/news companies” and “all Western government buildings.”

But on Oct. 14, after advising one group member that he would “basically be slicing necks,” the leader suddenly went quiet.

With the planned attack only two days away, chat members grew nervous.

“Surprising to see members here don’t know much about the owner and leader of this group,” one wrote on Oct. 15. “Meaning if he’s arrested or dead, black sun militia dies.”

Another member waved off such concerns.

“Why would it die?” they wrote. “The members keep it alive.”

“No worries,” they added. “Tomorrow in the US will be some fun, but not for Jews. You can be sure you will hear from him tomorrow. That will be nice.”

As it turned out, the leader — a man named Vincent Weidlich, in his mid-thirties, raised in America — had gone quiet for a reason. He had been arrested in Brazil.

A double life

Weidlich appeared to have led a double life. While assembling a network of violent Nazis preparing for a global race war, he was also pursuing a career as an academic researcher focused on artificial intelligence and neuroscience.

Raised in California by parents from Germany and Brazil, Weidlich obtained a bachelor’s degree in business management from Kingston University in London in 2020, according to his Academia profile.

Beginning around 2023, he began to intensify his work on artificial intelligence by enlisting contributors for an academic paper, forming a company and sharing ideas with global counterparts through the gaming platform Discord.

Few if any of his research associates appeared to have known of his other life, which culminated in his arrest in Brazil.

Michele Prado, a special advisor at the NUPVE-MPRS (Extreme Violence Prevention Unit) in the public prosecutor's office for the Brazilian state of Rio Grande do Sul, confirmed to Raw Story that Weidlich was charged with terrorism following an investigation by Brazil’s Federal Police Cyber Hate Crimes Repression Unit, as first reported by the Swedish public broadcaster SVT Nyheter.

Weidlich had previously been identified by freelance journalist My Vingren in a 2023 story for Expo, a Swedish organization that combats racism, after Vingren infiltrated an online group called the Nordic Federation that Weidlich organized while living in Norway.

SVT Nyheter reported that Weidlich was convicted in São Paulo of “planning and preparation for acts of terrorism and for publicly inciting genocide.”

Weidlich’s lawyer, according to the report, argued that he could not be held criminally liable on the basis of insanity. The outlet reported that Weidlich was sentenced to “forensic psychiatric care indefinitely.”

Weidlich's legal proceedings are subject to a judicial secrecy order issued by the Brazilian courts, said Flávio Rolim, head of the Brazilian Federal Police Cyber Hate Crimes Unit, which handled the initial phase of the investigation.

As a result of the secrecy order, Rolim told Raw Story he was unable to "provide information regarding the investigation or the status of the judicial proceedings."

Raw Story reached out to Weidlich’s lawyer in Brazil, but did not receive a response.

Reached by phone, Georg Weidlich, Vincent’s father, denied that his son was convicted on terrorism charges.

“All slander,” he told Raw Story, before warning of “legal action” and cutting off the conversation.

A thwarted attack

Vingren, the journalist, alerted the Swedish Security Service about the planned terrorist attacks before Vincent Weidlich was arrested in Brazil, SVT Nyheter reported.

Raw Story also reviewed the Signal chats. Shortly before Oct. 16, 2024, Raw Story passed the information on to an intermediary believed to have contact with federal law enforcement and global security personnel.

After Oct. 16 saw no reports of significant terrorist attacks, the Black Sun Militia chat descended into squabbling.

One member suggested the leader’s disappearance showed the project had been nothing more than a charade. Others insisted everyone should feel empowered to carry out strikes on their own.

“It’s true that he hasn’t been online for a while,” another member wrote, “but I don’t think we should go crazy over it. We just need to do our thing. And today is the day!”

At least one splinter cell appears to have continued to plan. Three members set up a separate Hungarian “branch” with its own Signal group.

“You don’t have to worry about Hungarians bro,” one member posted in the general group. “We are doing what we want. Relax.”

Black Sun Rising Militia members discuss plans for a coordinated attack on Oct. 16, 2024, in Signal posts obtained by Raw Story

One week after Oct. 16, six Hungarian “young people” armed with “airsoft and deactivated weapons” were detained by authorities, suspected of planning an attack targeting “protected persons,” according to Index, a Hungarian news outlet.

It’s not clear that the planned Budapest attack was linked to the neo-Nazi terror plot, but at least one member of the Black Sun Rising Militia seemed to think so.

“It seems that the Hungarian group is quiet for a reason,” a member posted on Oct. 23, adding a link to a story about the arrests.

Index reported that Hungarian authorities had received a notice from the U.S. Secret Service about two weeks earlier, warning of an attack on Oct. 23, the anniversary of the 1956 Hungarian uprising against the Soviet Union.

Russia links

At the time he launched a neo-Nazi Signal group rife with talk about radicalizing white people and driving people of color out of Europe and the U.S., Weidlich was also cultivating a community of scientific researchers that included individuals from India and at least two Asian students studying at American universities.

In both the Black Sun Rising Militia Signal group and a Discord channel where he convened researchers, Weidlich posted cryptic messages about plans for operations in Russia.

According to Vingren’s report, police who searched Weidlich’s phone at the time of his Oct. 14, 2024 arrest found “a Russian-language land agreement.” In his home, they discovered a stash of chemical precursors for explosives.

Prior to Weidlich’s arrest, Vingren reported, Weidlich had written in the Black Sun Rising Militia Signal group: “We have bought a large piece of land in Russia, and we are building our village now.”

Raw Story found evidence of Weidlich’s interest in Russia in his efforts to build a professional network around AI and neuroscience research.

In September 2023, after Weidlich relocated to Brazil from Norway, the Unlimited Research Cooperative Discord server launched. At least two members — a college student in the U.S. and a high school student in India — would be listed as co-authors with Weidlich and his father on an academic paper. There is no suggestion any of the other co-authors were aware of or endorsed Vincent Weidlich’s neo-Nazi activities.

Entitled “AI-Driven Physics-Informed Bio-Silicon Intelligence System,” the paper describes a project that matches the mission of Synthetic Intelligence Labs, a company Vincent Weidlich incorporated in summer 2024 in Sheffield, U.K. and Palo Alto, California.

On the paper and on the articles of incorporation, Weidlich used a pseudonym: Vincent Jorgsson.

“Envision connecting a rat’s brain to a computer to form an integrated system capable of playing a complex game like Doom,” an AI-generated narrator says in a video on the company’s TikTok channel. “It’s not science-fiction. It’s the reality we’re building.”

A screengrab from the Unlimited Research Cooperative Discord server obtained by Raw Story indicates that in the same month Weidlich incorporated Synthetic Intelligence Labs, he discussed a project in Russia.

“For legal purposes, the off-grid lab community will be under another company that we don’t do business with, due to Russian-western political stuff,” the post reads. “There will be open communication between Synthetic Intelligence Labs and the other company in Russia.”

Vincent Weidlich. Picture: Academia.edu

On Sept. 11, 2024, though, Weidlich said he was leaving the Unlimited Research Cooperative Discord server.

“Things are progressing very well, but the workload is increasing for me,” he wrote. “I will no longer be able to be regularly using Discord, so I am passing the server ownership and running to our assistant.

“Farewell to all, and if you need to contact me for collaboration and research, feel free to send an email. It was great to meet everyone!”

Only two days earlier, a Telegram channel appeared with an invitation to the Black Sun Rising Militia Signal group.

The goal of the militia, an introductory message explained, was to “kill every single Jew in the world” and to send all Black people and people of color “back to where they came from (or kill them if they refuse).

“Attacks start on October 16, and will not stop until we destroy the Jewish infrastructure and every [Jew] that exists on earth.”

This overlooked exchange hints Trump is eyeing another appalling coup

I just want to put up top that this story is about what it sounds like, which is fantastical and like something out of a spy thriller, and yet there’s nothing we can put past this administration. But it’s also about how The New York Times missed — or chose to ignore — a story staring it right in the face.

When I read reports last weekend about how Jair Bolsonaro, the Brazilian president who’d been sentenced to home confinement after being convicted in a notorious coup plot, had been arrested after an attempted escape, the first person I thought about was Donald Trump.

Trump, of course, is Bolsonaro’s best buddy and fellow authoritarian coup-plotter who, unfortunately for us, was indicted but never convicted because he became president again and killed the cases against himself. And since becoming president, Trump has spent months railing against Brazil and its Supreme Court — even imposing 50 percent tariffs on the country as retribution — demanding Brazil’s current president release Bolsonaro.

But that wasn’t the only reason I thought about Trump. Reports about Bolsonaro’s arrest focused on how his ankle monitor was breached after midnight, and security forces immediately detained him, putting him in a pretty cushy jail, under orders from a judge on the Brazilian Supreme Court who noted that Bolsonaro lives close to the U.S. embassy.

Bolsonaro had in early 2024 slept in the embassy of Hungary — where another authoritarian buddy, Victor Orbán, is president — in what authorities believe was an attempt to evade arrest.

I couldn’t help but think the judge and law enforcement might be aware of a plot involving the U.S., and I discussed it on my SiriusXM show on Monday, speculating that it could have been an attempt by Bolsonaro to get to the U.S. embassy and get asylum from the U.S., which, under Trump, would give it to him.

It wasn’t until Tuesday that I actually saw the video from later in the day on Saturday of Trump, heading to his chopper at the White House, being asked questions by reporters about Bolsonaro, which you can watch right here.

At first, Trump clearly seems not to catch that the reporter is asking about Bolsonaro being arrested the night before and instead thinks it’s just a general question of some sort about his dictator pal.

TRUMP: So I spoke last to the person you just referred to, and we’re going to be meeting, I believe, in the very near future.

Reporter: Sir, are you aware about the president being arrested today?

Trump responds with what is clearly shock, sticking his head out .

TRUMP: What?!

Reporter: I’m talking about the former Brazilian president being arrested today.

TRUMP: No, I don’t know anything about that.

Trump seems a bit stunned, and again says, “I don’t know anything about it,” before asking the reporter, “Is that what happened?”

Then he kind of grimaces, and says, “That’s too bad,” and repeats again, “I Just think it’s too bad.”

The Times published a story about the latest on Bolsonaro’s arrest, but it oddly focused up top on how Trump, supposedly learning the limits of his power, doesn’t have as much interest in Bolsonaro as he used to, and it quoted from the exchange with reporters — but only the part where he says “That’s too bad,” and not the part where he says he just spoke to Bolsonaro:

“That’s too bad.”

It was a telling response from President Trump on Saturday when he learned the news from reporters that his once close ally, the former Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro, had just been arrested.

Did he have any thoughts?

“No,” Mr. Trump replied. “I just think it’s too bad.”

What a difference a few months make.

In July, Mr. Trump sent an angry letter to the current Brazilian president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, demanding that the authorities drop charges that Mr. Bolsonaro had attempted a coup. Mr. Trump slapped 50 percent tariffs on Brazilian imports and imposed sanctions on a Brazilian Supreme Court justice to try to keep Mr. Bolsonaro — a right-wing politician sometimes called the Trump of the Tropics — out of prison.

Five months later, Mr. Trump has all but admitted defeat.

This ia a very strange framing. It completely omits what Trump said before he said “That’s too bad.”

Trump said he’d just spoken with Bolsonaro the night before. And said he they were going to be meeting “very soon.”

How would Trump be able to meet Bolsonaro in home confinement in Brazil?

And how did the Times not catch what would otherwise throw cold water on the framing of its story? After all, far from forgetting about Bolsonaro, Trump was very much thinking about Bolsonaro, having just spoken to him and planning to see him “soon.”

Thankfully, the always sharp Rachel Maddow proved I was not crazy and being conspiratorial. Because when I did a search this morning, after seeing the video, I found that she indeed covered this on her MS Now program, raising all the right questions even as she pointed to what fantastical plot this would be if true.

But where is the rest of the media, and why did the Times not home in on Trump’s highly interesting comments, instead making it appear as if Trump had been giving up on Bolsonaro?

  • Michelangelo Signorile writes The Signorile Report, a free and reader-supported Substack. If you’ve valued reading The Signorile Report, consider becoming a paid subscriber and supporting independent, ad-free opinion journalism.

Brazil's only astronaut begs for help as Trump tariffs threaten to cripple country: Dem

WASHINGTON — Farmers, bankers and international policymakers find themselves in the same camp as President Donald Trump’s international trade war gathers pace: confused, freaked out and lobbying for clarity — if not a carve out.

Just this week, after Trump signed an executive order introducing 50 percent tariffs on most goods from Brazil, a leading Democratic senator met with a handful of concerned Brazilian counterparts, among them a friend from the senator's literally stellar contact book.

“I've met with eight Brazilian senators in my office, and one of them is a guy I’ve known for 30 years, who was the only Brazilian astronaut,” Sen. Mark Kelly (D-AZ), a former U.S. astronaut himself, told Raw Story at the Capitol.

“I worked with him for over a decade. So he brought a bunch of people, because we have a [trade] surplus with Brazil and [yet] … they were told 50%.

“They don't know what to do. Because usually, [tariffs are imposed on] a country where you’ve got a trade deficit. This is the opposite.”

Kelly was a U.S. Navy aviator and flew combat missions in the first Gulf War before becoming a NASA astronaut and taking part in four space missions.

His Brazilian astronaut friend, 62-year-old former air force pilot Marcos Pontes, completed a mission to the International Space Station in 2006.

In 2019, Pontes became Brazil’s Minister of Science, Technology and Innovation. In 2022, he was elected as a federal senator for São Paulo.

Trump announced punitive tariffs against Brazil July 9. On Wednesday he put his order into effect. Some Brazilian products were exempted — including orange juice, some aircraft, wood pulp and energy products.

But a U.S. government fact sheet explicitly linked the tariffs to what it called “the Government of Brazil’s politically motivated persecution, intimidation, harassment, censorship, and prosecution of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro and thousands of his supporters.”

Bolsonaro and seven associates are on trial regarding his attempt to stay in power in 2022, which opponents call an attempted coup similar to the deadly Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol that Trump incited in an attempt to overturn his 2020 defeat by Joe Biden.

In his fact sheet on Wednesday, Trump claimed the current Brazilian government, under President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, known simply as Lula, was guilty of “serious human rights abuses that have undermined the rule of law in Brazil.”

Kelly gave that short shrift.

“There's this whole political component that has to do with Bolsonaro and this prosecution, trying Bolsonaro, but they [Brazilian politicians] can’t interfere with their judicial process,” the senator said.

“They can't interfere. Lula's not going to interfere with their judiciary.

“That's just something that we do. This administration.”

Raw Story asked: “So [your Brazilian friends are] kind of freaked out” by Trump’s tariffs?

Kelly said: “Yeah, they're like, ‘Hey, have you got any advice?’ So I reached out to the Secretary of Commerce [Howard Lutnick] on this because they’d like an extension to try to figure [this] out, so this doesn't get put in at all. And they’re good trading partners.

“If these tariffs go into effect, prices are gonna go up on a lot of things. Depends on the country. Using Brazil as an example, I think something like a third of the coffee in the United States comes from Brazil, so you're gonna see higher coffee prices.”

Raw Story asked: “Are we gonna see now individual nations do like Brazil, ask for a carve out?”

Kelly said: “I think everybody's gonna try to ask for something. And I think some of these might benefit us, but the big picture is incredibly chaotic and haphazard, and not the way you're supposed to run trade policy, and the American people are going to be on the losing end of this.

“But I was trying to, you know, help out my friend of 30 years.”

How Trump's bizarre Brazil tariffs threat exposes his con on U.S. workers

On July 9, President Donald Trump announced that the U.S. would impose tariffs of 50% on all imports from Brazil. In line with the latest round of tariffs announced over the past few days, these tariffs are to take effect on August 1, 2025.

Trump also announced the initiation of an investigation by the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) into Brazil’s digital economy regulations, under Section 301 of the Trade Act.

Trump’s social media post outlines three ostensible reasons for the imposition of such high tariff rates.

First, the supposed “Witch Hunt” against his friend Jair Bolsonaro, the right-wing former president of Brazil, who is currently being prosecuted for allegedly initiating a coup following his electoral loss in 2022.

Second, recent rulings by Brazil’s Supreme Court have sought to cast greater responsibility for content moderation on social media companies.

And, third, a supposed trade deficit with Brazil caused by “many years of Brazil’s Tariff, and Non-Tariff, Policies and Trade Barriers.”

However, a cursory analysis of these reasons makes it clear that Trump’s actions are not motivated by any real economic or legal factors, but are instead about pushing his authoritarian agenda and doling out favors to Big Tech companies and other corporate cronies.

President Trump, given his predilection for authoritarian strongmen, has long supported Brazil’s controversial ex-president Bolsonaro, described by some as the “Trump of the tropics.”

Notably, Trump hosted Bolsonaro in the White House in 2019, while also endorsing his run for reelection in 2021 and 2022, describing him as “one of the great presidents of any country in the world.”

Importantly, however, Bolsonaro, in addition to sharing a scant regard for human rights, also embraced a “strongly neoliberal agenda” during his time in office, initiating many regulatory actions that mirror Trump’s in the U.S., such as weakening environmental protections, gutting labor regulations, and the like. In contrast, Brazil’s current President Luiz Ignacio Lula de Silva has been vocal in calling out Israel’s war on Gaza, while also seeking to strengthen BRICS — something President Trump is not particularly happy about, given the broader geostrategic challenge this represents to the U.S.

Bolsonaro is currently on trial in Brazil for allegedly instigating a coup that led to violent mobs seeking to take over critical institutions following his loss in the 2022 national elections. Trump appears to see parallels in the case against Bolsonaro with the January 6 insurrection of 2021. Trump’s seemingly blatant interference with domestic political and judicial processes has been strongly condemned by President Lula, who quite rightly insists that Brazil’s sovereignty must be respected.

The second reason cited by Trump pertains to Brazil’s recent attempts at regulating the digital ecosystem in the public interest.

Brazil has been at the forefront of countries seeking to find new models of regulation for the digital economy. U.S. Big Tech companies hate Brazil’s proposals to implement a network usage fee and a new digital competition law. It also recently enacted a privacy law that has been called out in an annual U.S. government report that lists supposed non-tariff trade barriers (together with privacy laws in a number of other jurisdictions, such as the E.U., India, Vietnam, etc).

This report, which Trump waved around at his April 2 tariff announcement event, is essentially “Project 2025” for trade policy.

More pertinently, Brazil has been engaged in a standoff with a number of social media companies over the last few years, particularly given the problems of misinformation linked to Brazil’s last election cycle. A number of studies demonstrate how the use of misinformation was widespread during Brazilian elections over the last few years, with Bolsonaro supporters in particular said to have been targeted by propaganda. Brazil’s state institutions have been grappling with how best to address this maelstrom of misinformation, including by threatening to ban X, also known as Twitter, for failing to comply with domestic laws.

More recently, however, Brazil’s Supreme Court has ruled that social media companies have a responsibility to police their platforms against unsafe or illegal content. This goes directly in the face of a model the U.S. has long sought to propagate through the rest of the world — one that replicates its laissez-faire attitude to social media regulation under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.

American law provides a “safe harbor” to platforms for carrying illegal user content, arguably reducing the incentive for social media companies to regulate illicit content (while others argue that the provision reduces privatized censorship). There has been a rigorous debate around Section 230 even in the United States, while a number of countries have or are seeking to move away from this model, as the scale of harm that can be caused by social media becomes more apparent and real. This threatens the profits of big companies such as Meta and X.

By directly linking the imposition of tariffs to Brazil’s attempts at regulating social media, Trump is merely helping out his billionaire tech-bro buddies — part of his shakedown on behalf of Big Tech.

We have seen similar demands aimed at a number of countries that are seeking to regulate the digital ecosystem. For example, a number of digital regulations in the E.U., such as the General Data Protection Regulation, Digital Services Act, and Digital Markets Act, are reported to be under threat in trade negotiations between the U.S. and the E.U. Trump also recently strong-armed Canada to revoke its Digital Services Tax under threat of suspending trade negotiations. The tax was estimated to cost Big Tech companies in the region of CAD 7.2 billion over five years.

Most laughably, Trump reproduces language used in tariff letters sent to a number of other countries, claiming that he needed to impose the 50% tariff as Brazil has a trade deficit with the U.S.

As pointed out by numerous analysts, this is patently wrong. The New York Times notes that “for years, the United States has generally maintained a trade surplus with Brazil. The two countries had about $92 billion in trade together last year, with the United States enjoying a $7.4 billion surplus in goods.”

Brazil was even not on Trump’s own list for higher “reciprocal tariffs” announced in April, as the data published by the USTR noted the U.S. trade surplus with Brazil. Trump’s justification for enacting so-called “reciprocal” tariffs on dozens of countries was that their trade deficits with the U.S. constitute an emergency, granting him sweeping powers. This claim has been rejected by a federal court, with appeals still underway. Brazil’s lack of any deficit, let alone an emergency-justifying one, makes these tariffs on Brazil even more legally questionable.

So, what are Trump’s real motivations for the imposition of these tariffs on Brazil?

As indicated above, he is clearly enamored of Bolsonaro, while he hasn’t been shy of hiding his dislike for Lula. In addition to helping out his authoritarian buddy, Trump is also clearly seeking to repay Big Tech, significant contributors to his inauguration fund. As we have pointed out previously, Trump’s trade policy has essentially been a scheme to bully countries into deregulation, particularly in the tech space. This also accords with the longstanding U.S. policy to see to it that its digital companies are not regulated by foreign countries.

Looking ahead, things are as unclear as they have always been through the course of Trump’s second term in office. While the tariffs on Brazil are scheduled to go into effect this August, Trump appears to have kept the door open to further negotiations. Barring a diplomatic resolution, the USTR’s S 301 investigation will likely find that Brazil created an unjustifiable burden or restricted American interests, though this could take some time. Such a determination could lead to the imposition of new (more legally sound) tariffs or be used to justify the already announced tariffs against Brazil.

Brazil, meanwhile, has already enacted an Economic Reciprocity law that will allow it to take retaliatory action against the U.S., including by imposing tariffs, suspending commercial concessions and investments, and obligations pertaining to intellectual property rights.

It would appear that the Brazilian government is prepared to take steps to protect its sovereignty, though it will also be motivated by the need to ensure continued exports to the U.S., which is an important market for a number of Brazilian products, such as energy, aircraft and machinery, and agricultural and livestock products.

While it is difficult to predict what is likely to happen in the days and months ahead, it’s clear that the Trump administration will continue to threaten tariffs to countries around the world for standing up for their people’s rights on behalf of his billionaire buddies.

The question, however, remains: Will countries stand up to Trump’s bullying and instead protect their sovereign right to regulate in the public interest and will Congress hold him accountable for his con on American workers?

  • Melinda St. Louis is director at Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch

Brazil to host 2027 women's World Cup

Brazil will host the 2027 women's World Cup, FIFA announced on Friday in Bangkok.

For the first time in FIFA women’s World Cup history, the host was decided via a vote between member associations at the FIFA Congress, rather than the FIFA Council.

Brazil won the vote ahead of the only rival, a joint bid between Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands.

Only 78 of the 207 voting members backed having the tournament in Europe, while Brazil received 119 votes.

'Rio de Newjersio': Trump friend mocked for using Brazilian photo to lie about rally size

Longtime Donald Trump friend and confidant Roger Stone came under fire on Sunday after posting an unrelated photo in an effort to show that the state of New Jersey could be won by Trump in the upcoming 2024 election.

Trump spoke in the Garden state on Saturday, and was criticized for his apparent slurring of speech. Conservative lawyer George Conway went as far as to challenge the mainstream media for failing to properly report on the former president's "aphasia."

Trump bragged about the size of the crowd in New Jersey, but it was also reported that some people started leaving early.

ALSO READ: Marjorie Taylor Greene delays financial disclosure day after motion-to-vacate debacle

Stone attempted to Bolster Trump's New Jersey rally on Sunday.

"Yeah, New Jersey is in play for [Trump]. Could Joe Biden draw a crowd like this?" Stone asked, including a photo of a large crowd.

The problem for Stone, however, is that the commenters instantly identified the photo as fake.

@ben_the_dem wrote, "Except this picture is a fake. Go take a shower and put your helmet back on."

"Hey Roger, why you showing us 30 year old pictures of a Rod Stewart concert and trying to pawn it off as a Trump rally? You know A LOT OF people were walking out of Trump's rally while he was speaking, right?" another user wrote Sunday. "He was SO BAD even his own fans got disgusted and left."

The social media platform X ultimately posted a note below Stone's message.

"This is a photo from a Rod Stewart concert almost 30 years ago," according to the platform's alert.

According to Listverse, the photo is actually a representation of a record for what is deemed the "largest music concert in history."

"On December 31, 1994, Rod Stewart performed at Copacabana Beach in Rio de Janeiro in front of an estimated 3.5 to 4.2 million people. The event became the largest free concert in recorded history. It was produced by MTV and performed on New Year’s Eve," the report says.

Conway poked fun at Stone being corrected, saying, "I’ve always wanted to visit Rio de Newjersio. Someday, I’ll get around to it."

Someone asked Conway, "Why do they feel the need to lie?"

The attorney replied, "Why do rest of us feel the need to breathe?"

Death toll climbs over 140 in Brazilian floods with no end in sight

The death toll has risen to 143 following the devastating floods in southern Brazil.

A further 125 were missing and 806 people injured, the Rio Grande do Sul State Civil Defence Department said on Sunday.

As it also rained this weekend, the number of people who had to leave their homes has risen to over 618,000.

In total, over 2 million people have been affected by the floods.

According to the regional government, the largest warship in Latin America arrived in the harbour of the city of Rio Grande on Saturday for humanitarian aid operations.

Brazil will require entry visa for travelers with U.S. passports in 2024

Enjoying samba and caipirinhas in their country of origin will no longer be so easy for U.S travelers. Starting on Jan. 10, 2024, travelers with U.S. passports wishing to vacation in Brazil must first obtain a mandatory entry visa. The Electronic Visa (eVisa) of the Federative Republic of Brazil is a new entry requirement for American, Canadian and Australian travelers, Brazilian authorities announced. The U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Consular Affairs alerted on its social media channels that the Brazilian government “will reinstate a visa requirement for all U.S. nationals visiting Br...

Taylor Swift postpones second night in Rio, 2 hours before show, following death of fan

Taylor Swift on Saturday postponed the second night of her Eras Tour in Brazil citing the scorching heat that has stifled most of the South American country in the past few days.

Swift’s decision — which was announced approximately two hours before her show was scheduled to begin — came less than 24 hours after the death of a 23-year-old fan, who fell ill during Swift’s second song Friday night and was taken to a nearby hospital, where she later died.

Taylor Swift fan dies at show in sweltering Rio de Janeiro

RIO DE JANEIRO (Reuters) — A young Brazilian fan of U.S. singer Taylor Swift died in Rio de Janeiro on Friday night after falling ill inside the superstar's sweltering concert venue, leading the government to order drinking water is provided and made easily accessible at shows.

Ana Clara Benevides, 23, became unwell at the Nilton Santos stadium, event organizer T4F wrote on Instagram.

It said she was promptly attended to by medical staff, and then taken to an on-site medical station, before being transferred to the Salgado Filho Hospital, where she died.