All posts tagged "capitol hill"

White House and GOP leaders reach 'understanding' that halts Epstein file demand: report

House Republican leaders are pushing a vote on whether to compel the Trump administration to release the Jeffrey Epstein files until after the August recess — at the earliest, Politico reported Monday.

Convicted sex offender and former Trump associate Epstein died by suicide in his Manhattan jail cell in 2019.

Reporter Meredith Lee Hill wrote that "GOP leaders have an understanding with White House officials" to hold off on a vote "in order to give the administration time to release documents on its own following President Donald Trump’s move to release grand jury information on the case."

She added that the vote might never make it to the House floor.

Trump instructed Attorney General Pam Bondi to request a judge to release the case's grand jury testimony, which she did last Friday. Trump's request came after the Murdoch-owned Wall Street Journal published a story linking Trump to a racy birthday card for Epstein's 50th birthday in which he allegedly wrote, "Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret.”

Trump claimed "fake news" and filed a libel suit against the Journal shortly after publication.

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) led the drafting of a non-binding Epstein resolution last week. It's believed to provide an "outlet" to "fend off Democratic attacks that the GOP is showing a lack of transparency on the case," Hill wrote.

Reps. Thomas Massie (R-KY) and Ro Khanna (D-CA) are trying to force a workaround to release the Epstein information through a "discharge petition" that would allow them to "bypass leadership to force a vote on the House floor if it receives 218 signatures," according to the report.

One House Republican told Politico that "Johnson is under increasing pressure from a growing number of GOP members to simply put the teed up Massie and Khanna-led resolution to a full House vote 'ASAP.'"

According to Politico, any action on the files will be put off until after the House returns to Capitol Hill.

Read the Politico article here.

Boebert quickly corrects bizarre gaffe while comparing herself to a chihuahua

Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) quickly corrected herself after making a bizarre gaffe when describing herself on a recent podcast.

Host Alex Stein, whose desk featured a watermelon with cotton balls protruding out of it, introduced Boebert as "one of our greatest guests" and "arguably the most attractive woman on Capitol Hill."

Stein told Boebert, "You've always been so nice and, I mean this: you're one of the few people who's not afraid to be outspoken. And, like, you know, I feel like sometimes, because you're an attractive woman, people...they try to put you in a box. But...you have more balls than most of the men on Capitol Hill. And, I mean that with all due respect."

Stein then asked if it was hard for Boebert "to be as outspoken as you are."

"No, it's not hard at all!" Boebert answered. "I'm a mom of four boys, and I think it comes with that, it's kind of like a littler, smaller person mentality, right? It's kind of like a chihuahua instinct. Like, you have to be very forceful and adamant, and I guess maybe a little naggy and nappy — nippy, if you will," she said, correcting herself.

"But there's a lot to do to kind of get your point across when I guess you're a smaller person, if you will. But, this is also Washington, D.C., and nothing here happens without force."

She continued, "So, if you are passive, and mild, and meek, and just want to be a part of the team, and want leadership to appreciate you, well, then you're not going to get very far. Unless you're getting like, kind of some leadership welfare bills that they pass along to you and say, 'Hey, we're going to make sure this passes on your behalf' and 'Don't worry, you'll be recognized as an amazingly efficient member of Congress because you pass what we said you can pass.' So, I kind of go in a different lane and do what the American people sent me here to do."

Watch the Alex Stein interview on the Blaze Network below.

Nonvoting octogenarian vows to run again for House delegate seat

Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D), who has represented the District of Columbia since 1991 and is now a nonvoting congressional delegate, said Tuesday there's no question she planned to run again to keep her seat in the House.

The civil rights icon turns 88 on Friday.

Politico reported that when asked if she would endure another election season, she responded, “Yeah, sure. I’m going to run. I don’t know why anybody would even ask me.”

Norton is one of six delegates currently in Congress who have floor privileges and are permitted to introduce legislation but cannot vote in the full House.

Politico cited multiple recent news reports about Norton's frequent absences on the House floor that have "concerned some local officials and activists."

Even those close to Norton said it may be time to retire. The Washington Post quoted Democratic strategist and Norton confidant Donna Brazile, saying, “It’s time to turn things over. You’ve done it all."

In a statement to the Post, Norton asserted, "To anyone questioning my ability to serve effectively, I have one simple response: My record speaks for itself."

"Given Norton’s stature, many in D.C. political circles and on Capitol Hill have long been hesitant to raise questions about her age and effectiveness," wrote Washington Post reporters Meagan Flynn, Marianna Sotomayor, and Paul Kane. "Their discomfort speaks to a broader political reckoning within an aging Congress: balancing respect for decades of experience and power with the reality of inevitable decline."

Politico reported on a recent gaffe that a Norton spokesperson said was the result of the delegate mishearing a question and answering "no" when asked if the House should vote to fix a shortfall in funding affecting D.C.

Spokesperson "Sharon Eliza Nichols said Norton misheard the question and believed reporters were asking about the D.C.-related bills on the House floor this week," Politico reported. "Nichols said Norton meant to say those bills aren’t of national importance and were contrary to D.C. residents’ own decisions about their government and believed they shouldn’t have been introduced or brought to the House floor."

Read the Politico article here.

'Multiple standing ovations': Speaker Johnson ridiculed for fawning over Trump meeting

Speaker Mike Johnson mostly stood by and nodded as President Donald Trump pitched his spending bill to reporters on Capitol Hill Tuesday, but when he did speak, his praise of Trump was effusive.

"I think this was a tremendous session — you might want to say something," Trump prompted Johnson after the president met with Republican lawmakers.

"It was a great meeting, the party was unified, the House Republican Conference is excited — multiple standing ovations, they love this president, and everybody back home loves what he's doing. It's historic," Johnson said.

EXCLUSIVE: Trump accused of new grift that puts Qatari plane in shade

On X, journalist Aaron Rupar commented, "Mike Johnson goes full North Korean and claims that House Republicans gave Trump 'multiple standing ovations' this morning."

The account of @LucasSa56947288 posted a gif of a North Korean news anchor under Rupar's post, while @ChidiNwatu posted, "The groveling is next level. Even North Korea would be jealous."

NBC News's Gabe Gutierrez seemed to confirm at least one standing ovation.

"He's right now speaking to the Republican conference behind closed doors," Gutierrez said. "We're just getting some video of the ovation that he got as he entered the room. And the president is also saying that he does not expect there to be any meaningful cuts to Medicaid in this one big, beautiful bill that he's touting."


Trump goes off rails on unscripted rant while pushing spending bill on Capitol Hill

President Donald Trump went on an unhinged anti-Joe Biden rant while talking about his "big, beautiful bill" on Capitol Hill — as House Speaker Mike Johnson stood by his side nodding on Tuesday.

The president stopped to talk with reporters on his way to speak with Republican lawmakers about getting the bill passed, as several hard-line Republicans continued to hold out against it.

Trump was in the midst of praising Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) about how he has rallied the Republican Party to support the bill.

"We're going to have a bill. The one big, beautiful bill. I think it's going to be, it's the biggest bill ever passed and we got to get it done. Tremendous tax cuts for people, tremendous incentives, tremendous regulation cuts, all these regulations that are so horrible," Trump said.

EXCLUSIVE: Trump accused of new grift that puts Qatari plane in shade

He then devolved into spewing theories about former President Biden and promising to investigate who signed legislation with the "autopen."

"And now you find out what happened. Because Biden — look, it's a very sad thing what happened," Trump said, presumably about Biden's recent stage-4 cancer revelation.

"But I really — we're going to start looking into this whole thing with who signed this legislation, who signed legislation opening our border. I don't think he knew! I said, there's nobody that could want an open border. Nobody. And now I find out that it wasn't him. He opened it. Who was operating the auto pen? This is a very serious thing. We had a president that didn't sign anything. He had almost everything. He opened the borders of the United States of America, and I kept saying, who would do such a thing? Allowing criminals to pour in from all over the world, not just South America — all over the world.

"They came in from Africa, they came in from Asia, they came from the Congo, the prisons in the Congo, in Africa. These are rough, rough people. The prisons from the Congo are empty. You know where they are? They're in this country. Who would sign this? Nobody would sign it. No sane person would sign it. You know who signed it? Radical left lunatics that were running our country and the autopen signed it.

"And they didn't want him," Trump said of Biden. "And they were disappointed in getting him because they wanted Bernie Sanders. And then after about two weeks, they said, 'Wait a minute, this is a gift. He'll do anything. We're going to use the autopen.' And they use the autopen and everything. He didn't approve this stuff because when Joe Biden was with it, he would never have approved that. You take a look. he would have never approved open borders."

Watch the clip below via CNN.


'Treats us all like ADHD kids': Dem lawmaker says Trump's new plan is just a distraction

President Donald Trump's threat to take over the Gaza Strip is just another distraction to keep the American people off balance, argued Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-FL) on CNN Thursday.

Moskowitz, who sits on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, made the pronouncement while assuring anchor Sara Sidner, "There's not going to be boots on the ground in Gaza — that's not going to happen."

"I do think Donald Trump is trying to shake the system," Moskowitz continued. "We know how he likes to negotiate. It is unorthodox. And I think, what he's trying to do is, he's trying to get he Arab neighbors to step up and take more responsibility in rebuilding Gaza, in the security of of Gaza. And he's saying, 'Look, if you don't want to do it, then we're going to do it.'"

ALSO READ: 'Driven to self-loathing': Inside the extremist website believed to 'groom' teen attackers

"This is also part of the strategy," Moskowitz claimed. "The brilliance of Donald Trump — what he does through the media and up here on Capitol Hill — he treats us all like ADHD kids, right? Like, 'Squirrel! Oh, we're going to buy Greenland! Over here! Oh, we're going to take Gaza! Over here! Oh, we're going to buy TikTok! Over here! Oh, Canada is going to be the 51st state! Over here! And while all of that's going on, there's real stuff that's actually happening that they can accomplish."

Sidner said it sounded like Moskowitz had "tacit approval" of Trump "making these bold statements about owning Gaza. Is that what I heard?" she asked.

"No," Moskowitz answered, "what I'm saying is, it's not going to happen, right? I mean, we're not going to own Gaza. So the more we spend time on his statement of, 'We're going to own Gaza,' the less time we can spend on the real things that are happening."

Watch the clip below via CNN or click here.

'We were blindsided': Capitol police chief says 'intelligence failed' on Jan. 6

Politico reported Tuesday that retired U.S. Capitol police chief Steven Sund is blaming the intelligence community for failing to share warnings about the potential attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

Appearing before the House Administration Subcommittee on Oversight, Sund said that the violence could have been stopped if information was shared ahead of time.

"We were blindsided. Intelligence failed the operations," Sund said. "The Jan. 6 attack at the Capitol was preventable. If the intelligence had been accurately reported — and the FBI and DHS had followed their policies and established practices — I wouldn’t be sitting here today.”

POLL: Should Trump be allowed to run for office?

Sund continued:

"There was a failure to connect the dots on 9/11 and again on Jan. 6. I'm concerned if we do not identify and correct these issues, we may fail again in the future," he also said.

Sund along with other security officials at the Capitol resigned in the wake of the attack, taking the fall for the security breach.

In a new excerpt of a biography on Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT), it was revealed that a senior Pentagon official called Sen. Angus King (I-ME) to warn him that an attack was coming on Jan. 6 and that Romney along with Senate Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) were going to be targeted.

Romney quickly sent a text message to McConnell saying that he hoped there was adequate security to handle it.

“In case you have not heard this, I just got a call from Angus King, who said that he had spoken with a senior official at the Pentagon who reports that they are seeing very disturbing social media traffic regarding the protests planned on the 6th," the text message read. "There are calls to burn down your home, Mitch; to smuggle guns into DC, and to storm the Capitol. I hope that sufficient security plans are in place, but I am concerned that the instigator — the President — is the one who commands the reinforcements the DC and Capitol police might require.”

McConnell reportedly never responded, and there wasn't enough security.

While the biography focuses on the case of Romney, the details about what the Pentagon knew and was telling lawmakers is new information about the attack on the Capitol. The House Select Committee that investigated Jan. 6 and the 2020 election overthrow attempt uncovered that local law enforcement, the FBI, the Secret Service, the Department of Homeland Security, the U.S. Marshal's Service, the White House, and the Pentagon all were aware that violence was coming on Jan. 6.

At no time did the Pentagon contact Vice President Mike Pence or Speaker Nancy Pelosi to warn violence was coming and it was going to be dangerous, said former House Select Committee investigator Tim Heaphy.

Former FBI general counsel Andrew Weissmann has complained in the past week that FBI Director Christopher Wray has never explained why the agency dropped the ball on Jan. 6.

"I would’ve liked some assistance with getting the military to the Capitol," Sund told ranking member, Rep. Norma Torres (D-CA). "I think there are a lot of people that need to accept some responsibility associated with this."

He also called it "surprising" that the FBI still doesn't know who put the bombs at the Democratic National Committee and Republican National Committee buildings.

Rep. Greg Murphy (R-NC) told Sund his problems weren't his fault and he was nothing more than a scapegoat for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. It's a comment that Donald Trump has used when asked why the Capitol wasn't warned ahead of time about the threats.

44 members of Congress to court tech startup communities in September

The worlds of Silicon Valley and Capitol Hill are still separated by more than just thousands of miles. The two cultures – one predicated on agility and risk, the other on process and consultation – occupy opposite…

Keep reading...Show less

Senators' secret plan to give Amgen half a billion in fiscal cliff deal reveals Capitol Hill's 'sordid swamp'

The inauguration of a president is one of those spectacles of democracy that can make us remember we’re part of something big and enduring. So for a few hours this past Monday the pomp and circumstance inspired us to think that government of, by, and for the people really is just that, despite the predatory threats that stalk it.

Keep reading...Show less