All posts tagged "gretchen whitmer"

‘Absolutely essential’: Son of Oath Keeper Stewart Rhodes is all in for Kamala Harris

CHICAGO — Dakota Adams is not your typical Democratic delegate.

First, there’s the superficial: His long, blond hair hangs loose about his shoulder. The 27-year-old wears eye liner, and a metal dumbbell through the bridge of his nose between his eyebrows, and black nail polish. He wears a denim vest over a black T-shirt and nearly matching black parachute pants. His tennis shoes are spattered with white house paint.

More notably is what lies deeper: Adams’ father, Stewart Rhodes, founded the Oath Keepers, a militia group instrumental in helping President Donald Trump attempt to maintain his grip on power after losing the 2020 election. Rhodes is currently serving an 18-year prison sentence for seditious conspiracy for his role in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol.

ALSO READ: 'Powder keg': Massive security presence on display in Chicago amid signs of trouble

Adams has since disowned his father, and he’s here in Chicago as a Democratic delegate representing Montana’s 1st Congressional District. Adams says he’s proud to show his support for Vice President Kamala Harris when she formally accepts the Democratic Party nomination on Thursday.

On Sunday, while waiting at the Hyatt Regency Chicago for the rest of the Montana delegation, Adams had been drinking a beer and sewing a patch for a Montana band Barnaby Jones onto a thrift store vest he recently acquired. The vest also sported a pin from former Montana Gov. Steve Bullock’s 2020 presidential campaign — and a larger Harris-Walz 2024 campaign pin.

Having already signed a nominating petition for Harris before traveling to the convention, Adams noted that his job as a Democratic delegate is, for all practical purposes, complete.

But he said he’s looking forward to networking with other delegates at the convention, so that he can take home ideas for building the Democratic Party in a part of the country that — Sen. Jon Tester (D-MT) not withstanding — isn’t particularly hospitable to Democrats.

ALSO READ: Democrats compete with ultimate Trump billboard during national convention

In addition to serving as a convention delegate, Adams is the Democratic candidate for a seat in the Montana State House. He’s running in the state’s conservative 1st District, located in the northwestern corner of the state — a race that Adams openly acknowledges will be an uphill battle.

While he’s unlikely to win his race against Republican Neil Duram, Adams’ candidacy represents an effort to model progressive politics in bright red part of the country. Adams also wants to assert his own vision of civic responsibility in repudiation to an abusive father who attempted to help overthrow the U.S. government.

Beyond his state House candidacy, which mixes economic populism with support for LGBTQ+ and abortion rights, Adams holds a unique position within the Democratic Party as someone who can speak with unrivaled authority about the dangers that far-right extremism pose to democracy.

After all, he was raised in the far-right militia movement where anti-government paranoia and conspiracy theories defined the reality of the household he shared with his infamous militia leader father, his mother and siblings.

Since then, Adams and his siblings have become estranged from Rhodes. Adams’ mother has also divorced Rhodes. Adams legally changed his name as part of his effort to complete the break with his father, who was an affirmed Trump supporter.

Stewart Rhodes Stewart Rhodes (Photo by Nicholas Kamm for AFP)

“It is absolutely essential that Trump not win, or we will not have a country,” Adams told Raw Story. “The United States, as it exists today, will not be here in two years if Trump wins.”

Adams said he believes his father betrayed the libertarian principles he previously espoused by offering himself up as a willing accomplice to Trump’s authoritarian agenda.

“He was a captain of brown shirts, and he should have known from studying history that the brown shirts always end up getting burned,” Adams said.

As the son of a militia leader who unsuccessfully attempted to prevent the peaceful transfer of power, Adams views the defense of democracy as a two-fold process — winning elections, and then ensuring that they aren’t overturned by militant conspiracy theorists..

“Running the ball forward enough to have a legitimate electoral win is only one half of the battle,” he said. “And the other half is defeating the election overturn attempt and the attempt to steal the election, which I think will inevitably turn violent.”

ALSO READ: Does hosting your political convention in Chicago equal victory? History has an answer

Based on that criteria, and when it became apparent last month that President Joe Biden would drop out of the race, Adams said he initially supported Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer for president “on the grounds of prior experience defeating a state level legislative coup and weathering a militia kidnapping plot, which were two critical pieces of job qualification for this coming election.”

But after the Democratic Party establishment coalesced around Harris, Adams readily embraced her, particularly when “politically active Black American voters” helped marshal “record-breaking grassroots small-donor fundraising,” he said.

“What we’ve got going now is our best shot, not just for defeating Donald Trump,” Adams said, “but for seeing Trump’s supporting conspiracy criminally charged, and for fixing the problems in this country that have had the existence of our nation imperiled by the results of an election for three elections in a row and the societal problems that lead to people going to a strongman like Trump for protection and for an easy fix.”

- YouTubewww.youtube.com

What history says about V.P. picks: senator, governor or wild card?

We know this much: Vice President Kamala Harris will pick her running mate before accepting her party’s presidential nomination in August at the Democratic National Convention.

Harris also has a short list of about a dozen potential candidates she’s vetting, according to CBS News.

So should she choose a U.S. senator, governor, U.S. House representative — or someone else?

Let’s examine the historical record to see which type of vice presidential candidates have helped — or hurt — a presidential ticket.

Since 1945, presidential candidates have made 31 vice presidential picks — not counting vice presidential renominations.

ALSO READ: How much access did $50,000 buy someone at the Republican National Convention?

Of these 31 picks, 19 most recently served in elected office as U.S. senators, four were governors and seven had prior electoral experience only from the House of Representatives, such as Dick Cheney and George H. W. Bush. One did not have experience in any of those offices.

Of their 18 vice presidential selections, Democrats have chosen a U.S. senator in 16 cases since 1945. The Republicans are a little more diverse in their selections, with four U.S. Senate picks — including Donald Trump’s selection of J. D. Vance — four gubernatorial picks and six selections from the House of Representatives.

There’s the adage that a vice president can only hurt you, and he or she can’t help you. Gov. Nelson Rockefeller, who Gerald Ford selected when he replaced President Richard Nixon as president, was not renominated by Ford when he unsuccessfully ran for his own term in 1976 — not that it mattered much in the end.

Historical evidence indicates that the prior job of the running mate makes little difference in victory or defeat — if he or she is a senator or governor. U.S. senators nominated for vice president have won nine times and lost eight times. Governors as vice presidential nominees are split, winning twice and losing twice.

But those without gubernatorial or senatorial experience fare poorly. Picking a candidate from the House of Representatives has only been successful two times in seven tries.

EXCLUSIVE: Trump ‘secretary of retribution’ won't discuss his ‘target list’ at RNC

The one candidate without experience as a governor, senator or representative, Sargent Shriver, lost in 1972 as Democrat George McGovern’s ticket partner.

Republicans picked Vance, and their record with U.S. Senate vice presidential nominees is pretty good: two wins (Richard Nixon and Dan Quayle) and one loss (Bob Dole).

Democrats, however, have seven wins with U.S. senators (Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, Al Gore, Walter Mondale, Hubert Humphrey, Lyndon B. Johnson, and Alben Barkley) against seven losses (Tim Kaine, John Edwards, Joe Lieberman, Lloyd Bentsen, Edwin Muskie, Estes Kefauver and John Sparkman).

Republicans are the only ones since World War II who have picked a governor as a running mate. Two (Mike Pence, Spiro Agnew) won, while two (Sarah Palin and Earl Warren) lost.

U.S. House representatives have largely failed for both parties, with the GOP picking two winners (George H. W. Bush and Dick Cheney) and four losers (Paul Ryan, Jack Kemp, Henry Cabot Lodge Jr., and Bill Miller). Democrats picked one (Geraldine Ferraro) and she lost.

It should also be noted that Bush — UN ambassador, CIA director — and Cheney — secretary of defense, CEO of Halliburton — both had extensive experience in other realms between their stints as House members and selections as vice presidential candidates.

Trump has already made his pick. What should Harris do?

It’s a flip of a coin based on the historical record, so long as she doesn’t pick a U.S. House member.

At present, senators and governors top her shortlist, including Harris can choose North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper, Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear, Sen. Mark Kelly of Arizona, Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, Illinois Gov. J. B. Pritzker, Maryland Gov. Wes Moore, California Gov. Gavin Newsom or even Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz. Some new names include Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo and Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, as CBS reports.

Given that the record shows all things are equal in vice presidential picks, it is probably best to select a running mate from a state that will help you. That would put those candidates from swing states, such as Kelly (Arizona), Shapiro (Pennsylvania), Whitmer (Michigan) and even perhaps Cooper (North Carolina), at the top of the list.

Had Gore picked popular Florida U.S. senator and former Gov. Bob Graham for his VP, he would have very likely won the 2000 election, given Florida’s overriding significance in that race. Taking a running mate from Connecticut in 2000 — Joe Lieberman — made little difference.

Ford might have done better in 1976 with a Texan such as George H. W. Bush instead of a Kansan in Dole, given that Ford lost the Lone Star State to Democrat Jimmy Carter.

For John McCain in 2008, Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Ridge would have been a far better choice than Palin, of then-deep red Alaska. McCain lost the Keystone State (and some Obama-backing moderates).

In a close presidential race, particularly now, vice presidential candidates from swing states may matter more, regardless of prior office experience.

John A. Tures is a professor of political science at LaGrange College in LaGrange, Georgia. His views are his own. He can be reached at jtures@lagrange.edu. His “X” account is JohnTures2.

Major donor believes Democrats 'squandered' chance to draft party's next 'Lebron James'

A big-time donor for President Joe Biden thinks the Democrats missed a big opportunity by passing the ball to Vice President Kamala Harris without a convention, and he won’t be funding her run.

John Morgan, a Florida attorney and major donor for previous Democratic candidates, shared his views with Fox News host Neil Cavuto on Tuesday afternoon on why he’s not giving the Democratic presidential nominee any money.

“Harris brings a lot of great things to the table,” Morgan said. “Is she the best messenger? Is she the best person? Is her way the best way to go forward? And for me, I don’t think so.”

He compared the convention process to a fantasy basketball draft, noting that any smart player’s top draft should be a no-brainer.

“We would pick Lebron James,” Morgan said. “We had that type of opportunity but they seem to be squandering it by taking a lesser pick.”

Read also: ‘I’m out’: Major Biden donor reveals why he’s not backing Kamala Harris

Cavuto pressed Morgan on who he thinks his party’s Lebron James is, and he listed off several party favorites: Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear, Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly and Michigan Gov. Gretchen Witmer – noting that a vetted combination of star players would be the strongest choice.

But that ship has sailed, Morgan said, adding that whoever she picks as a running mate is irrelevant at this point.

“The deal is done. I don’t think there’s anything more that can be done,” Morgan said. “People vote for president, they don't vote for vice president.”

Watch the clip below or at this link.

Exclusive: Harris? Newsom? Whitmer? GOP delegates dish on who they want Trump to face

MILWAUKEE — With Republican faithful preparing for Donald Trump’s presidential nomination acceptance speech tonight at the Fiserv Forum, GOP conventioneers are split on which Democrat — President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, someone else — would be the easiest Democrat to defeat.

Many MAGA faithful want Biden to remain the Democratic nominee because of his perceived frailty. But they aren’t particularly worried, either, about Harris as a potential substitute if Biden drops out, because she’s inextricably linked to the administration’s record, which they view as damaged.

RELATED ARTICLE: ‘Staying in race’: Aides stick to message as stunning report suggests Biden about to quit

Democrats face an urgent crisis around Biden’s candidacy, with more and more party leaders openly questioning whether the 81-year-old president has the physical stamina and mental acuity to serve until 2029, when he’d be 86. Biden’s campaign insisted Thursday that Biden is not quitting despite reports suggesting otherwise.

“I would like to see Donald Trump run against Joe Biden because it would be a win, hands down,” said Donna Russell, an alternate delegate from Washington state, who was taking a break from the convention on the concourse at Fiserv Forum on Wednesday, the same day Biden tested positive for COVID-19, and canceled a campaign event in Las Vegas.

“Donald Trump would win,” Russell told Raw Story. “Joe Biden would stay in the basement.”

Asked if she thinks Harris would be a more formidable opponent for Trump than Biden, Russell waved the thought aside, dismissing the vice president with a misogynist slur.

Ralph Hise, a state senator and delegate from North Carolina, told Raw Story he thinks the Democratic Party is in a bind if Biden drops out of the race. Harris is tied to the administration’s record, he said, and any other choice would fracture party unity.

Others said they would like to see Harris as the Democratic nominee because of her own perceived weaknesses.

“I want to see a candidate like Kamala Harris, who has failed,” said Sam Matthew, an alternate delegate from Michigan. “Anybody else, they can say, ‘Biden is out. The administration has changed to new leadership.’ And they can change the story around and attack Trump.”

Tammy Nichols, a state senator from Idaho, gave Harris some mild props, saying it would be “interesting” to see her debate Trump.

Nichols was posing for photographs in a gown designed by Washington, D.C., fashion designer Andre Soriano, who is also attending the convention. Nichols’ gown featured blue lettering and stars with the words “Make America great again” on the front and “Trump” on the back.

Sara Brady (left) and Idaho state Sen. Tammy Nichols talk about their dresses at the Republican National Convention.(Jordan Green / Raw Story)

Nichols’ friend Sara Brady, also from Idaho, wore a strapless gown modeled after the Appeal to Heaven flag that she made herself. The flag became a symbol of the modern far-right movement when Trump supporters carried it onto the Capitol lawn during the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on Congress, and more recently attracted attention when it was observed flying outside Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito’s New Jersey vacation home last summer.

Brady, who was arrested in Idaho in May 2020 for defying COVID-19 restrictions at a playground, told Raw Story that Biden is her preferred candidate for the top of the Democratic ticket.

“I just don’t think he is any match for Donald Trump,” she said. “So, I think it’s more likely that Trump would win, keeping him as the opponent.”

Brandon Hall, a Michigan delegate, said the potential Democratic opponent his fellow Republicans should fear the most is the governor in his home state.

“I’m from Michigan, and I know the strongest nominee by far the Democrats could put up would be Gretchen Whitmer,” he said. “There’s no doubt about it. She’s a political animal. She’s been on a national book tour, which is timed perfectly.”

Among other outside Democratic contenders, California Gov. Gavin Newsom received a nod as a desirable Trump opponent.

“I wouldn’t mind facing him because I don’t think he wins any other state but California and those very liberal states,” said Jamie Mathis, an alternate delegate from Texas. “He just has a reputation as being so far left.”

How a blue state malaise could spell disaster in the 2024 election

In 2022, Michigan became one of the first states to pass a measure guaranteeing the right to an abortion in the state constitution following the right-wing U.S. Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade.

It was a resounding victory, as Proposal 3 ran stronger than any Democrat on the ballot, earning 57% of the vote, and undoubtedly helped pro-choice Democrats seize control of the Legislature for the first time in almost 40 years.

Michigan’s measure has now become the blueprint for amendments in other states. And Democrats are expecting to see a turnout boost in November in states like Arizona and Florida that have abortion rights ballot questions.

But ironically, Michigan’s status as a reproductive rights trailblazer could end up wounding Democrats’ chances in the swing state this year. New polling from KFF shows that Democratic women in the Mitten State are less motivated to vote than their counterparts in states where abortion rights aren’t protected.

That’s even after Trump has repeatedly bragged about wiping out the federal right to abortion by appointing three far-right Supreme Court justices. “After 50 years of failure, with nobody coming even close, I was able to kill Roe v. Wade, much to the ‘shock’ of everyone,” Trump posted last year.

Call it the blue state malaise.

Now that the Dobbs decision has become the new normal, with every state making its own laws, there’s the beguiling belief that we’re safe if we live in places where abortion remains legal (of course, 1 in 3 women in the U.S. is out of luck).

In these fractured times, there’s even a bit smugness that’s creeped in among some blue state dwellers that we’ve figured out how to craft a civilized society without banning books or health care for women and LGBTQ+ people. (Looking down on those who hold book burnings is always acceptable, however).

And let’s not forget that was the road Republicans were trying to take Michigan down just two years ago. GOP gubernatorial nominee Tudor Dixon’s entire campaign was devoted to bringing a “Don’t Say Gay” law to Michigan classrooms, kicking transgender athletes off teams and banning porn (i.e.LGBTQ+ books).

“How about we Florida our Michigan?” she awkwardly declared at a Lansing campaign rally.

Sure, the election didn’t turn out to be close (Gov. Gretchen Whitmer trounced Dixon by 11 points), but Republicans went all-in on their opposition to Proposal 3 and LGBTQ+ people’s existence. And if gas had spiked above $5 a gallon in October 2022, we could all be calling Dixon “governor” right now.

After all, Michigan is still a purple state — and it’s no secret that Democrats are worried about President Biden being able to carry it again in November.

There’s a reason why Whitmer, one of the leading national voices on reproductive rights, has been spending so much time campaigning on the issue with a very specific message: A vote for Trump is a vote for a national abortion ban.

In other words, it can still happen here.

“If we hand Donald Trump a second term, all of our progress in Michigan, all of the work that you’re doing here in Arizona, is at risk,” she said at a Biden campaign event in Arizona in April. “A national abortion ban will wipe out all of those strides.”

Whitmer has also made the case that Republicans won’t stop at abortion and will move to clamp down on other health care decisions, like birth control, IVF and surrogacy. This isn’t just campaign bluster, by the way. It’s all outlined in great detail in Project 25, a handy how-to guide for authoritarianism assembled by the ultraconservative Heritage Foundation.

One of the most chilling plans is ramping up an “abortion surveillance” system, with former Trump administration official Roger Severino proposing to turn the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention into “a kind of snitch network that would collect data about who had abortions and where — and punish any states that refuse to share that information,” according to Rolling Stone. There also is a proposal to use the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act to “investigate” hospitals and doctors who provide abortions.

If that all sounds too terrible to be true, it isn’t.

But I believe that one rarely discussed advantage Trump has this election is that a not-insignificant number of voters simply refuse to believe warnings about what his second term would mean (especially if they come from annoying wine mom liberals, who are apparently the worst).

At first, this seems completely irrational. After all, we all lived through Trump’s presidency — the Muslim ban, withdrawing from the Paris climate accords, anti-trans executive orders, deficit-busting tax cuts for the rich and of course, his constant stream of invective toward marginalized people.

That was all before COVID hit, when Trump seemingly did everything in his power to mismanage the crisis and prolong suffering, like dismissing the effectiveness of masking and extolling the virtues of quack remedies like bleach and hydroxychloroquine. Trump also egged on gun-toting protests against pandemic health orders (Remember “LIBERATE MICHIGAN!“) and exploited his power to reward his friends in red states and punish his enemies in blue states. It’s no wonder a report on his administration’s policies said 40% of U.S. COVID deaths were avoidable.

I believe that one rarely discussed advantage Trump has this election is that a not-insignificant number of voters simply refuse to believe warnings about what his second term would mean (especially if they come from annoying wine mom liberals, who are apparently the worst).

– Susan J. Demas

And of course, his term ended with endless lies that he didn’t lose the 2020 election (he did) and attempting to foment a violent coup on Jan. 6, 2021.

But in the years that have passed, Americans collectively have done almost all we can do to forget these cataclysmic events. It feels, at times, like we’re all still living through a low-grade depression that we’ve all sworn never to talk about.

There’s no national day of remembrance for the more than 1 million people who died in the pandemic — and I’m increasingly convinced there never will be. The third anniversary of Jan. 6 brought migraine-inducing, both-sides headlines like this one from the Associated Press: “One attack, two interpretations: Biden and Trump both make the Jan. 6 riot a political rallying cry.”

And so since too many of us have whitewashed our memories of the Trump era, it’s easy to assume that things won’t be so bad the second time around. It’s so tempting to believe that we’ll be shielded from any destruction if we live in blue states or cities.

Our old friend, normalcy bias, has come roaring back — but of course, denying the danger that lies ahead won’t save us. It’s just a temporary cope, and an exceedingly dangerous one at that.

Michigan Advance is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Michigan Advance maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Susan J. Demas for questions: info@michiganadvance.com. Follow Michigan Advance on Facebook and X.

The friendships forged in a Democratic women governors group chat

Originally published by The 19th. Subscribe to The 19th's daily newsletter.

In Meghan Meehan-Draper’s first years with the Democratic Governors Association (DGA), she noticed something startling: “We had more governors named John than we had governors who were women,” Meehan-Draper, now the executive director of the DGA, told The 19th.

A few years later, DGA launched the Women Governors Fund, which has put $80 million in Democratic women candidates in general elections. Since its start in 2018, the number of Democratic women governors has quadrupled.

The eight Democratic women leading their states — Maura Healey in Massachusetts, Katie Hobbs in Arizona, Kathy Hochul in New York, Laura Kelly in Kansas, Tina Kotek in Oregon, Michelle Lujan Grisham in New Mexico, Janet Mills in Maine and Gretchen Whitmer in Michigan — have changed what it means for women to win and hold executive office in the United States.

They’re a group marked by notable firsts, too. Three — Healey, Hochul, and Mills — are the first women to hold that office in their states. Lujan Grisham is the nation’s first Democratic Hispanic woman governor. Healey and Kotek are the first elected out lesbian governors in their states.

But what’s perhaps even more remarkable is the way the women in this group have made their relationships with one another a critical part of their own leadership. These eight women are actual friends. They call and text each other to check in and get advice. They get together for dinner — and bring their daughters. They turn to each other when they are going through something challenging and when they need to laugh.

The 19th interviewed Governors Healey, Hobbs, Hochul, Kelly, Lujan Grisham, Mills and Whitmer about their relationships with their peers, how they think about leadership, the issues that matter most to them, and how their families have shaped their work.

Most interviews were via phone; Mills’ responses are via email. Kotek declined to be interviewed. Interviews have been edited and condensed for clarity.

Keep reading...Show less

Sudden sunlight: GOP House hopeful reveals personal finances after Raw Story investigation

A Republican congressional candidate in one of the nation's most competitive 2024 House races has publicly disclosed his personal finances, as required by federal law, after a Raw Story investigation revealed he had failed to do so.

Tom Barrett, a former Michigan state senator and representative who is running for the House seat in Michigan’s 7th District, filed his candidate financial disclosure report on Nov. 2, a day after Raw Story reported he was nearly three months late in filing his disclosure.

Barrett's campaign told Raw Story on Oct. 31 that he was "in the process of filing."

RELATED ARTICLE: Caught: Republican congressional recruit violates financial law

Barrett reported more than three-dozen retirement investments between himself and his spouse, along with up to $15,000 each in two bank accounts, according to the Nov. 2 disclosure. He reported earning $29,000 in contracted services for Valley Strategies, LLC.

Per the guidelines from the House Committee on Ethics and the Ethics in Government Act, Barrett needed to file his financial disclosure 30 days after registering his candidacy with the Federal Election Commission and raising at least $5,000.

According to a Raw Story review of federal election fundraising data, Barrett filed his statement of candidacy on July 7 and raised $5,000 by July 10, meaning his disclosure was due Aug. 9.

The Ethics in Government Act says that “knowing and willful failure to file, report required information on, or falsification of a public financial disclosure report” could be subject to investigation by the Department of Justice.

POLL: Should Trump be allowed to run for office?

Such an offense would have a maximum civil penalty of $71,316 and a maximum criminal penalty of five years in federal prison plus a fine of up to $250,000, according to 2023 guidance from the House Committee on Ethics, although it’s exceedingly rare that this law is enforced to its full extent, if it’s enforced at all.

Nevertheless, numerous members of Congress have themselves violated federal laws governing how federal lawmakers disclosure their personal finances. Some lawmakers have introduced legislation that would stiffen penalties for non-compliance or even ban members of Congress from trading individual stocks.

This will be Barrett’s second time running for the House seat in the Michigan swing district, losing by five points to Rep. Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) in 2022.

He is set to face Democrat Curtis Hertel Jr., a former state senator and legislative director for Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer.

Slotkin will be vacating her seat to run for the U.S. Senate seat currently held by Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-MI).


Busted: GOP congressional candidate in hot race violates financial law

A Republican candidate for a toss-up 2024 U.S. House seat has violated a federal law by failing to file a financial disclosure due nearly three months ago, according to a Raw Story review of federal records.

Tom Barrett, a former Michigan state senator and representative, has yet to file a mandatory personal financial disclosure as required by federal law and the House Committee on Ethics.

Barrett filed his statement of candidacy with the Federal Election Commission on July 7, and he raised $5,000 by July 10 according to a Raw Story review of federal election fundraising data.

Per the House Ethics guidelines and the Ethics in Government Act, Barrett needed to file his financial disclosure 30 days after July 10, meaning his disclosure was due Aug. 9. A review of House financial disclosures shows that Barrett has yet to file as of Wednesday.

POLL: Should Trump be allowed to run for office?

Barrett’s campaign replied to a series of questions from Raw Story with one-word answers. For instance, when asked for comment about numerous members of Congress violating a federal financial disclosure law and how he would ensure compliance if elected, the campaign replied “Yes.”

Barrett’s campaign further indicated that Barrett was “in the process of filing” but did not indicate an anticipated filing date.

The Ethics in Government Act says that “knowing and willful failure to file, report required information on, or falsification of a public financial disclosure report” could be subject to investigation by the Department of Justice.

Such an offense would have a maximum civil penalty of $71,316 and a maximum criminal penalty of five years in federal prison plus a fine of up to $250,000, according to 2023 guidance from the House Committee on Ethics, although it’s exceedingly rare that this law is enforced to its full extent, if it’s enforced at all.

ALSO READ: California congressman loses nearly $10K in mail theft

The campaign said the House Committee on Ethics had not been in touch about the matter.

When reached by Raw Story, Tom Rust, staff director and chief counsel for the House Committee on Ethics, said “no comment.”

Barrett last filed a disclosure report in June 2022 when he ran for the seat last year. Barrett reported earning $79,723 in salary from the State of Michigan and $16,158 from the U.S. Army, along with reporting 10 retirement accounts and a Credit Union account with up to $15,000.

Barrett, who served in the military for 22 years, has frequently expressed his support for first responders and service men and women on social media. He has expressed strong support for law enforcement.


Barrett wrote a letter to Congress in 2021 pushing false claims of voter fraud in the 2020 election but denied stoking supporters of former President Donald Trump who were part of the insurrection of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, Bridge Michigan reported.

Barrett was endorsed by former Vice President Mike Pence in 2022 and rallied with him last November. More recently, former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy endorsed Barrett.

This will be Barrett’s second time running for the House seat in the Michigan swing district, losing by five points to Rep. Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) in 2022.

Slotkin will be vacating her seat to run for the Senate seat currently held by Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-MI), The Hill reported.

The seat is considered a “toss up” by the Cook Political Report, The Hill reported. Barrett is primed to face Democrat Curtis Hertel Jr., a former state senator and legislative director for Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, in the race for Michigan’s 7th District.

Numerous STOCK Act violations

Barrett isn’t the first high-profile congressional candidate to fail to file his financial disclosure report on time.

J.R. Majewski — a 2022 Republican congressional candidate in an highly competitive Ohio district and QAnon conspiracy theory promoter — disclosed two-and-a-half years worth of his personal financial activity only after Insider reported he was violating the same federal law as Barrett.

The same happened with Trump-backed congressional candidate Joe Kent, a Republican running for Congress in Washington state, who filed his financial disclosures months late after the violation was revealed by Insider.

Barrett’s violation also comes at a time when dozens of elected members of Congress have failed to in recent years comply with a decade–old financial disclosure and conflicts-of-interest law, the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act.

During the 117th Congress from 2021 to 2022, at least 78 members of Congress — Democrats and Republicans alike — were found to have violated the STOCK Act's disclosure provisions, according to a tally maintained by Insider.

Raw Story has this year identified 26 members of the 118th Congress who have broken the federal conflicts of interest law.

The ongoing violations have prompted a bipartisan group of lawmakers to introduce several similar bills aimed at banning congressional stock trading. Bills that have been introduced include the Ban Stock Trading for Government Officials Act, Bipartisan Restoring Faith in Government Act, the ETHICS Act, the TRUST in Congress Act and the Preventing Elected Leaders from Owning Securities and Investments (PELOSI) Act.

Barrett’s campaign told Raw Story that Barrett would support a congressional stock trading ban.