RawStory
RawStory

All posts tagged "immigration"

Fury as Trump plans to 'import' more white South African refugees: 'Call it what it is'

The internet was in uproar on Thursday after a new Reuters report disclosed that the U.S. has planned to admit 4,500 applications from white South Africans as refugees.

The Trump administration has pushed to limit refugee applications from other countries. But an unreported State Department document from Jan. 27 revealed a new target for specifically white South Africans.

People sounded off on the Trump administration's move, questioning the decision.

"Ripping Latinos from their homes while importing whites. Let’s call this what it is: ethnonationalism," user Mina, who self-described as "an American woman with wide-ranging interests," wrote one user on Bluesky.

"Gotta import new racists as the older ones in America have been dying off," user S.T. Jones wrote on Bluesky.

"The Trump/MAGA vision: Make the US the Hungary of North America, a nation of, for and by white Christian male racists," systems analyst Ric Steinberger wrote on Bluesky.

"[turns over ‘days since I muttered a bigoted remark about white South Africans’ counter back to zero]," Ryan Cooper, senior editor at The American Prospect, wrote on Bluesky.

"We need to shut it down until someone figures out just what the hell is going on," artist Luke Russell joked on Bluesky.

Economist ‪Tony Yates‬ reacted, "US policy =Black refugees bad; white refugees good."

Labor economist Aaron Sojourner wrote on Bluesky, "POTUS loves exactly one kind of import."

Trump admin wants to bring in thousands of white South Africans as refugees: report

A new report revealed Thursday that the U.S. has planned to admit 4,500 applications from white South Africans as refugees, according to Reuters.

The Trump administration has limited its refugee applications from other countries. This new target, according to an unreported U.S. State Department document from Jan. 27, showed a push to increase refugees from South Africa, Reuters reported.

" Trump has said the U.S. would only admit 7,500 total refugees from around the world in fiscal year 2026, while a much higher cap of 40,000 to 60,000 was discussed internally last year," according to Reuters. "Only 2,000 white South Africans had entered the U.S. as refugees as of January 31 under a program launched in May 2025, although the pace has picked up in recent months."

More than 67,000 people had expressed interest in moving to America, the South African Chamber of Commerce in the U.S. said in 2025.

Trump demanded a stop to refugee admissions after he returned to office in 2025, citing his policy on stopping legal and illegal immigration.

"But weeks later, he launched an effort to bring in white South Africans of Afrikaner ethnicity as refugees, saying they had been violently persecuted in the majority-Black country," Reuters reported. "South Africa's government has rejected that claim, while some refugee advocates have criticized the Trump policy."

‘Weakest Speaker’: Mike Johnson derided on Capitol Hill after latest Trump surrender

WASHINGTON — The Department of Homeland Security remains shut down, but you wouldn’t know it from walking around the U.S. Capitol, where the Epstein files and President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address are the talk of elected officials.

The silence as the DHS shutdown drags into its third week is, in part, because House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune have, once again, outsourced their constitutionally-mandated spending powers to President Trump.

“I'm getting quite used to this. Republican leadership isn't really leading,” Rep. Rick Larsen (D-WA) told Raw Story.

While negotiations are nonexistent, simmering anger on the left is palpable.

“They don't really have any agency,” Rep. Joaquín Castro (D-TX) told Raw Story ahead of a House vote this week. “They’ve voluntarily given up power.

“Johnson really is probably the weakest Speaker, at least in recent memory. Everything is just about Trump and what Trump wants, on their side.”

‘Basic safeguards’

The DHS shutdown began earlier this month after Senate Democrats defeated the no-strings-attached funding extension Republicans squeaked out of the House.

The shutdown means members of key DHS agencies, including the Transportation Safety Administration (TSA) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), are working without pay.

Earlier this week, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said the White House still hasn’t answered a recent offer shipped down Pennsylvania Avenue, with “crickets” in response.

The stand-off is fueled by Democratic fury over recent immigration operations in Minneapolis, prominently featuring violent action by agents of DHS bodies including Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Border Patrol.

Two U.S. citizen protesters — Renee Nicole Good and Alex Pretti, both 37 — were shot and killed in the city last month, fueling anger already stoked by arrest and deportation efforts including shootings of undocumented migrants.

Democrats are demanding reforms including an end to masking by federal agents and the use of judicial search warrants, measures congressional Republicans, the White House and DHS leaders reject.

“We ought to be able to … agree to basic constitutional safeguards like warrants and no masks, identifying themselves,” Castro said. “Those are not unreasonable requests.”

Reasonable or not, the White House remains mum — which has some powerful Republicans pointing fingers.

In a statement, House Appropriations Committee chair Rep. Tom Cole (R-OK), accused Democrats of choosing “to make the security of the American people — and the livelihoods of DHS families — contingent on partisan demands.”

Cole added: “It’s time for my colleagues on the other side of the aisle to return to the basic obligation of governing: keep the nation secure and fund the department charged with doing so.”

Castro, a member of the House Intelligence and Foreign Affairs committees, told Raw Story: “We don't want to see any part of the federal government shut down.

“At the same time, they got $150 billion extra dollars within the last few years, and Donald Trump has been willing to move money around departments since he got to a second term. And so they have the money they need for all the functions they need.”

Last May, a $150 billion infusion of money for anti-immigration measures cleared the House by a one-vote margin. It has been widely pointed out that the DHS shutdown is not affecting operations by ICE, as it benefits from that budget measure.

‘Tone deaf’

Larsen lamented DHS letting “ICE agents run amok” as “tone deaf” Republicans refuse to bend on any of the safeguards Democrats are demanding.

Larsen also pointed to lingering scandals over the behavior of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, which have led to calls for her to be fired.

“I think that part of the problem is Kristi Noem,” Larsen said. “It’s like she doesn't want to run the agency, except for herself. It's how it looks like and the administration refuses to even consider that.”

Noem’s use of DHS resources for her own comfort and close relationship with adviser Corey Lewandowski have been the subject of bombshell reporting. But President Trump seems inclined to stick by her.

Mocking Trump administration responses to the shutdown, Larsen, a member of the House Transportation Committee, said: “You have Kristi Noem saying things like, ‘Well, we're not going to put out business relief dollars. We're going to suspend TSA PreCheck [for air travelers], without checking with the White House, and the White House saying, ‘Yeah, TSA PreCheck’ [will continue].”

It added up to a clear Democratic expectation of slow to no progress in reopening DHS, and paying its key employees, any time soon — particularly as Speaker Johnson and Senate Leader Thune leave talks to Trump.

“I don't think the White House believes, or DHS believes, they have leverage on Congress,” Larsen said. “They sure don't seem to have leverage. The White House knows our position, and we know their position. And so it's in their court.”

This vile Trump sidekick is a gift for Dems

Kristi Noem is the political gift that keeps on giving for Democrats.

They need her running the Department of Homeland Security a lot worse than Donald Trump does. And she does run it worse than anyone else.

Democrats don’t require new messaging for November. They need cameras. They need live feeds. They need a 24/7 loop of Noem and her comically transparent paramour Corey Lewandowski blowing up whatever fleeting hope Republicans have of holding power in the midterms — short of stealing the election.

The most recent canary to beat it for daylight out of Noem’s coalmine was her chief spokesperson, Tricia McLaughlin, who took the job Jan. 31, 2025, calling it “the honor of a lifetime.” In announcing her resignation this week, McLaughlin said the departure had been planned last December.

So, to summarize, McLaughlin had meant to say, “this job is the honor of a lifetime or 10 months, whichever comes first.” But one thing we can all agree upon: You only quit a job like this if everything’s going splendidly.

(It should be noted that McLaughlin had a little baggage of her own. She reportedly was the point person for a $220 million DHS ad contract that allegedly funneled money to her husband’s firm, The Strategy Group.)

But what could possibly not be fulfilling about dealing with the media every day to boast about Noem’s latest achievement? The hits just keep on coming.

NBC News broke the bracing story this week that just days after Noem was confirmed last year, a 23-year-old Coast Guardsman fell overboard into the Pacific. Ships and aircraft surged to find him.

When Noem learned that one of the search planes — a C-130 — was also scheduled to transport detained migrants, she ordered it pulled from the search so it wouldn’t miss the deportation run.

Well, of course, she did.

A young American lost at sea. A rescue under way. Immigration logistics taking precedence. The Guardsman was never found.

What spokesman wouldn’t savor explaining that to the world?

This wasn’t an isolated incident. Under Noem’s leadership, more than 750 Coast Guard flights have reportedly been redirected from search and rescue to deportation runs. Guidance at one air station moved transporting detained immigrants to first priority — and demoted search and rescue, the Coast Guard’s core mission since its founding.

On the bright side for McLaughlin and her team, this fine bit of good judgment did momentarily shift attention from Noem’s scintillating performance in Minneapolis. There, she presided over the deployment of ICE agents with the unabashedly cruel intent of terrorizing immigrants, including those here legally from Somalia and other disfavored ports.

In Minneapolis, to the horror of millions of Americans across party lines, Noem sank to new depths even for her.

After ICE agents killed Renee Good, a 37-year-old mother of three, in cold blood, Noem wasted no time in labeling her participation at a peaceful protest “domestic terrorism,” before an investigation began.

After the same fate befell Alex Pretti, a 37-year-old ICU nurse, she atrociously lied that Pretti had "arrived at the scene to inflict maximum damage on individuals and kill law enforcement."

The Minneapolis fallout was so severe that it triggered a public vote of no-confidence from Trump. He effectively fired Noem from her own operation, dispatching Border Czar Tom Homan to take personal charge of the Twin Cities crackdown.

No amount of national political advertising by Democrats could help them like this.

Noem was humiliated when she was sidelined in favor of Homan — a career official she reportedly despises and who favors targeted enforcement over her “insane” broad sweeps. By handing Homan the authority to de-escalate the "Metro Surge" and report directly to the White House, Trump didn't just bypass Noem; he signaled that even he finds her brand of chaos too toxic to manage.

Publicly, that is, not behind closed doors.

Understand that Noem is not freelancing. She’s carrying out the inhumane agenda of Trump and his Minister of Evil, Stephen Miller.

Trump is all about the optics. When the optics turn bad, buses have this annoying habit of running over loyal advisers.

It’s impossible from afar to assess motives in Trump’s snake pit of corruption. But there's at least some plausibility to the oft-rumored notion that one of Trump's rare loyalties rests, for the moment, with Lewandowski, the man who ran his first campaign.

Lewandowski is the “special government employee” who appears to specialize in proximity to Noem. Both she and Lewandowski are married to other people and deny all reports of infidelity. But even in our litigious age, this is one bit of gossip that a wide range of mainstream media feel comfortable reporting without hesitation.

According to recent reporting, Trump frequently entertains listeners with a story about seeing the two take sips from the same can of soda. “You can’t do that, it’s pretty obvious!” he reportedly mocks, channeling his own germaphobia into a critique of their political survival skills. “You can’t do that, everyone’s going to know!”

But the loving couple are still running DHS as their fiefdom. The Wall Street Journal has detailed their constant luxury travel together aboard a government-leased 737 MAX and both residing in proximate DHS-leased housing.

So, no one in the Beltway was shocked that Lewandowski reportedly berated Coast Guard flight staff mid-flight and threatened to fire a pilot over a forgotten heated blanket. It was chivalry.

Understand that if Noem was fired tomorrow — as many Democrats clamor for — not a thing would change at DHS. The cruelty and terror of Trump’s mass-deportation campaign wasn’t authored by Noem. It was executed by her.

Just like she famously executed a puppy she hated and bragged about it in a book.

If you’re a Democrat, don’t you want someone like that to run against?

Leave her be.

  • Click here to subscribe to Ray Hartmann's Soapbox

Trump's most lethal sidekick is hunting enemies. She can start with me

The New York Times reports that the Department of Homeland Security has sent Google (owner of YouTube), Meta (Facebook and Instagram), and other media corporations subpoenas for the names on accounts that criticize ICE enforcement. The department wants to identify Americans who oppose what it’s doing.

I’ll save them time.

***

Hello? Kristi Noem?

Robert Reich here. I hear you’re trying to find the names of people who are making negative comments on social media about ICE enforcement.

Look no further. I’ve done it frequently. I’m still doing it. This note to you, which I’m posting on Substack, is another example.

If you want more details, just type “Robert Reich” into an internet browser, followed by YouTube or Facebook or Instagram or X or TikTok or Reddit. Or Substack. Then type in your name, or ICE, or the Department of Homeland Security. That will give you plenty of evidence.

If you read what I’ve said, you’ll find it’s very critical. I’ve done some videos that are very critical of you and ICE, too.

Let me not mince words: I really truly believe you’re doing a sh---y job.

I’ve said and will continue to say that many of the things you and ICE are doing are unconstitutional.

For example: Pulling people out of their homes in the middle of the night without search warrants. Arresting people without giving them due process of law to defend themselves. Putting innocent people into detention camps. Not giving them adequate food or medical care. Not letting their families know where they are. Sending them out of the country to brutal prisons in other lands. Even jailing children. Arresting journalists reporting on protests against you. And murdering two innocent Americans and not allowing a full criminal investigation of those murders.

All this is forbidden by the Constitution of the United States, Madam Secretary. The federal courts keep telling you this, but you and your department keep defying the courts. This is unconstitutional, too.

You’re even violating the Constitution by sending administrative subpoenas to Google, Meta, and all the rest, seeking accounts like mine that criticize what you’re doing.

I have a right under the First Amendment to criticize you without fear of the consequences.

It’s my government, Madam Secretary. You see the possessive pronoun I’m using? My government. It’s your government because you’re a citizen of the United States, not because you’re a government official.

You and your boss are supposed to be working for me and every other American. You swore an oath. The people of the United States hired the two of you to do your jobs, which doesn’t including spying on us or jailing us or trying to intimidate us or murdering us.

I was once a Cabinet officer like you are, Madam Secretary. I had a big office like you do. I had a big staff, like you do. Taxpayers paid for all of it, as they do for everything you’re up to — except when Congress stops the funding, as they have now, because you’re doing so many despicable things.

When I was in the Cabinet, Madam Secretary, I was acutely aware of my responsibilities to the Constitution of the United States. I told myself every day that I had sworn an oath to uphold it. I worked very hard every day to fulfill that responsibility.

I’m not boasting or bragging. I merely did my duty.

I visited communities where my department’s inspectors were attempting to keep people safe, to make sure they were doing what they were supposed to be doing.

I did what federal judges told me to do.

I invited criticism of me and my department. That was an important way to get feedback on what we were doing, to learn if we were making mistakes, to improve the way we served the public. Feedback is very useful in a democracy. You might even say it’s essential to democracy.

What the hell are you doing, Madam Secretary?

Robert Reich

  • Robert Reich is an emeritus professor of public policy at Berkeley and former secretary of labor. His writings can be found at https://robertreich.substack.com/. His new memoir, Coming Up Short, can be found wherever you buy books. You can also support local bookstores nationally by ordering the book at bookshop.org

Hispanic Caucus warns Minneapolis: Trump aide Homan lied about ICE drawdowns before

WASHINGTON — Border czar Tom Homan’s goodwill tour continues, but members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus aren’t buying it.

In Minneapolis on Thursday, Homan — who as an aide to President Donald Trump has vowed to “run the biggest deportation force this country has ever seen” — announced the end of the immigration crackdown that has upended the city and roiled the nation.

On Capitol Hill, Homan’s claim that ICE is pulling out, after federal agents killed two protesters in three weeks, was met with suspicion from leading members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus.

“They're going to draw down in Minnesota and go somewhere else where they're not going to get as much [pushback],” Rep. Juan Vargas (D-CA) told Raw Story.

“They got particularly beat up [in Minneapolis] because the people that they shot and killed were very sympathetic. And I think they're going to go to some other place where people might not look so sympathetic.”

U.S. citizens Renee Good and Alex Pretti, both 37, were shot dead by federal agents in Minneapolis. Their deaths triggered outrage, repulsion and protest in ways that agents’ alleged abuse of migrants has not.

While the shooting deaths of two white protesters inspired a protest song written and released by Bruce Springsteen, Hispanic Caucus members point to comparatively muted protests over 32 deaths of migrants held in ICE custody last year as evidence of a double standard even for sympathetic voices on the left.


Homan took over supervision of the Minnesota immigration surge after the Trump administration removed Border Patrol chief Greg Bovino.

"I have proposed, and President Trump has concurred, that this surge operation conclude,” Homan told reporters on Thursday. “A significant drawdown has already been under way this week and will continue to the next week."

Homan also claimed to have "improve[d] coordination and achieve[d] mutual goals” with local authorities, and to be “leaving Minnesota safer."

But media coverage painting Homan as a sort of savior-like figure since swooping into Minneapolis made Latino politicians in Washington laugh until they cry.

Vargas for one wasn’t buying anything about the notion of Homan as a friendlier face of Trumpist immigration policy.

“You know, it's interesting because the other guy's face completely looked … like a fascist, there's no doubt about that,” he said.

Bovino courted controversy with gestures and costumes critics said evoked far-right precedents.

“And then it just was downgraded to a bully,” Vargas said of Homan. “But we're still at bully level. I mean, him being the nice face is incredible. You know, really, the bully is the nice guy?”

'Horrible stuff'

Other CHC members concurred.

“You know, [Homan] has a pretty brutal history, so for him to become like a lighter version, it'll be tough for him to do that,” Rep. Adriano Espaillat (D-NY) told Raw Story.

“His demeanor has been very in-your-face. And, you know, that's what they're trying to do. Today we heard from a Marine whose father was a gardener who was beaten down by ICE, the father of three U.S. Marines, [Narciso] Barranco.

“So this is horrible stuff that is happening in the nation. The fact that they are reacting shows that they admit what they got wrong.”

Others on the Hispanic Caucus said they’d heard Homan’s tune before.

“[The Minnesota surge ]has created so much backlash even within their own base, that they have to try to quell that, because it's just undermining their position,” Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D-CA) told Raw Story. “Even when they said that they were doing a surge in LA, they pulled back, they didn't.

“So I think it's probably hiding the ball a little bit, Homan being the ‘softer face’. I think it's a laughable approach.

“Remember a lot of the stuff he was saying early on? Maybe he didn't agree with it. Who knows, but he still believes in a kind of a hardcore anti-immigrant enforcement.”

Kristi Noem drowned out by loud protesters at press conference

Protesters surrounded Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem during a news conference in California on Thursday.

It appeared that Noem's voice was nearly drowned out at some points by people yelling and sirens blaring during a visit to Otay Mesa, San Diego, to discuss an update on border security and drug seizures along the U.S.-Mexico border.

Journalist Aaron Rupar pointed out how the press conference was physically set up, and how the view could have been obstructed as the volume of voices escalated around her. Video and images showed a large number of evidence bags and boxes surrounding her.

"Definitely sounds like protesters that are making the commotion behind Noem (also note that they've set up the news conference so you can't see anything behind her)," Rupar wrote on X.

Noem also appeared to have a hard time hearing questions through the commotion, Rupar added.

Noem has been criticized on multiple fronts, including her controversial handling of immigration enforcement, her role in overseeing the Trump administration's ICE operations that have been accused of excessive force — and even led to the death of two American citizens in Minneapolis — and her support for harsh border policies that critics argue are inhumane.

Revealed: Where ICE’s ‘secret campaign’ is heading next

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement has planned a "secret campaign" to expand its reach across a number of cities, according to a new report from WIRED this week.

The classified operation is part of a "monthslong expansion campaign" to add more ICE offices in the United States, including new locations in Irvine, California; Long Island, New York; and Houston, Texas.

"Federal records obtained by WIRED show that over the past several months, ICE and DHS have carried out a secret campaign to expand ICE’s physical presence across the US," according to the report. "Documents show that more than 150 leases and office expansions have or would place new facilities in nearly every state, many of them in or just outside of the country’s largest metropolitan areas. In many cases, these facilities, which are to be used by street-level agents and ICE attorneys, are located near elementary schools, medical offices, places of worship, and other sensitive locations."

The agency managing federal buildings and serving as the "government’s internal IT department," the General Services Administration (GSA), has been leading the expansion, WIRED reported.

"In numerous emails and memorandums viewed by WIRED, DHS asked GSA explicitly to disregard usual government lease procurement procedures and even hide lease listings due to 'national security concerns' in an effort to support ICE’s immigration enforcement activities across the US," according to the report.

WIRED reported that 19 projects were approved in early November for several cities, which include Nashville, Tennessee; Dallas, Texas; Sacramento, California; and Tampa, Florida.

"Multiple projects were days away from being awarded in Miami, Florida; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and New Orleans, Louisiana, among others, and emergency requests for short-term space had been made in eight cities, including Atlanta, Georgia; Baltimore, Maryland; Boston, Massachusetts; and Newark, New Jersey," the outlet reported.

I saw roving 'hunt clubs' kill street kids in Colombia. I'm sick that it's happening here

Donald Trump’s presidency now has a human body count.

“We really feel like we’re being hunted, we’re being hunted like animals,” an undocumented farm worker in Ventura county, California, told a reporter for The Guardian.

I’ve seen this movie before. Or at least where it leads.

Back in the late 1980s and early 1990s, I spent a fair amount of time in Colombia on behalf of the German-based international relief organization I’ve worked with for more than half my life. I shared the story in my book about those experiences, The Prophet’s Way, detailing one of the “hunt clubs” I ran across in Bogotá.

These were mostly middle-class European-ancestry (white) men, many of them off-duty cops, who go out at night in camo with high-powered rifles and night-vision gear to hunt dark-skinned “los gamines,” the million or so street children who commit much of the petty (and often serious) crime in the city.

Afterwards, they go drinking and partying, celebrating their kills. Some of the clubs even have names, like “the deer hunters” (cazadores de ciervos).

“Hunt clubs” is my term (and that of my host in Bogotá); during that era, what these men were doing was called “social cleansing” or “limpieza social” and in addition to killing kids, they also targeted for beatings or death homeless people, sex workers, LGBTQ people, drug users, and others they labeled “undesirable.”

As Amnesty International noted in a 1993 press release:

“There is concern for the safety of thousands of street children in Bogota following the appearance on 11 August 1993 of posters in the city centre inviting them to attend their own funerals.

“These posters, which announce the extermination of ‘delinquent street children’ are signed in the name of industrialists, shopkeepers and civic groups. There have been an increasing number of reports of killings of so-called ‘social undesirables’ (desechables sociales) in what are routinely called ‘social clean-up operations,’ generally attributed to shadowy ‘death-squads.’”

But the hunt clubs of Colombia in the 1980s and 1990s were pikers, compared to what Trump, Miller, Homan, Noem, et al are running today in America.

So far since Trump took over their operations, they’ve killed at least 40 people, both in their so-called “detention facilities” and on the streets of our cities, and imprisoned more than 70,000 men, women, and children in over 230 concentration camps. And Trump just cut off funding for medical services for those in the camps, so expect the death numbers to grow quickly.

Unlike the “volunteers” in Bogotá, Trump’s thugs are well-paid, making up to $200K when you include signing bonuses, bounties, and other benefits.

And they get to go hunting!

  • Supervisory Border Patrol agent Charles Exum, for example, reportedly bragged to his fellow ICE hunt club members that when he shot Miramar Martinez in Chicago suburb Brighton Park there were “5 shots, 7 holes.” The following day, he shared with his ICE buddies a text message saying, “Cool. I’m up for another round of ‘fuck around and find out.’”
  • After shooting Renee Good five times for daring to tell him to “have a nice day,” ICE hunt club member Jonathan Ross called her a “fucking bitch.”
  • And when two ICE thugs murdered Alex Pretti, they rolled his body over to count the bullet holes as nearby agents laughed and applauded.

Like the hunt club members in Bogotá, today’s ICE hunt club members — under color of law and with the approval of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh and the applause of Trump’s senior officials — pick out people based on how dark their skin is and routinely kick in brown-skinned people’s doors or drag them out of their cars before assaulting and even killing them.

And, while the hunt club members in Bogotá only occasionally wear masks or balaclavas to conceal their identity, ICE hunt club members can do it all the time.

America has — at least for the past few generations — always considered itself better than this.

These ICE hunt clubs don’t operate in secret. They wear (concealed) badges. They draw salaries from your and my tax dollars. They joke about murder and violence in their text messages. They pose for photos with their victims.

And they know — absolutely know — that powerful people will protect them. After all, the vice president of the United States claimed they have “absolute immunity” from prosecution.

But that protection only works if the rest of us stay quiet.

Colombia’s hunt clubs didn’t (largely) vanish because they had a moral awakening. They ended when the public finally said no and forced accountability. And the country today shudders every time that story is told. History tells us, unambiguously, how this sort of disgrace ends.

Every modern society that normalizes “hunts” of the poor, the dark-skinned, the undocumented, or the politically inconvenient eventually discovers that the culturally-acceptable definition of “undesirable” keeps expanding.

Today it’s brown-skinned migrants. Tomorrow it’s white protesters (they’ve already started that, building a database of “domestic terrorists” who film them and even revoking their access to TSA PreCheck). Then journalists (they just raided the home of Washington Post reporter Hannah Natanson). Then judges (they arrested Judge Hannah Dugan).

Then anyone who won’t clap loudly enough.

Colombia learned this lesson the hard way. As did Germany, Chile, and Argentina. So did the American South after Reconstruction, when “posses” and “night riders” were praised as patriots until, in the 1950s and 1960s, we finally admitted to ourselves what they really were and did something about it.

But here we are again.

The people running today’s ICE hunt clubs may feel untouchable now. After all, people like them always do. But history keeps receipts and is utterly merciless with those who choose to hunt human beings.

'Klanhood and slave patrol': DHS leaders silent as accused of 'great evil'

A lawmaker Tuesday warned Department of Homeland Security leaders that they would face justice following the deaths of American citizens and unlawful behavior by federal agents.

Rep. Delia Ramirez (D-IL) had a serious message for the heads of the agencies responsible for carrying out the Trump administration's harsh immigration tactics and mass deportation policy during a hearing where leaders were testifying ahead of a looming DHS funding deadline.

"My mother, a Guatemalan immigrant and an American, taught me that I have a responsibility to look evil in the eye and to fight it," Ramirez said.

She called out ICE Director Todd Lyons, Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Rodney Scott and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Director Joseph Edlow, speaking directly to the three men testifying before congressional leaders.

"You have used your power to perpetrate great evil. And it's about time you answer to this committee for the lawlessness that you've empowered and defended in your testimony," Ramirez said.

Ramirez described the methods ICE has used against immigrants and citizens, including extreme violence, detaining children, using children as bait, violating court orders, creating traps at immigration court, entering homes without warrants. She focused on CBP and its roving patrols, intimidation, plate-switching, using chemical agents against people — after a judge ordered for it to stop — shooting people, including the deaths of Alex Pretti and Renee Good.

"I have as much respect for you as I do for the last white men who put on masks to terrorize communities of color. I have no respect for the inheritors of the Klanhood and the slave patrol. Those activities were immoral then and criminal, and so are yours," Ramirez said.

Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Raw Story Investigates and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.