All posts tagged "jim clyburn"

Biden easily wins South Carolina’s ‘first-in-the-nation’ Democratic primary

COLUMBIA, South Carolina — President Joe Biden cruised to an expected victory Saturday in Democrats’ first recognized contest of 2024, following a month-long push by the president and his proxies to drive up turnout after the party put South Carolina first on the official voting calendar.

After The Associated Press called the race at 7:23 p.m., less than a half-hour after polls closed, the roughly 100 party faithful gathered at the South Carolina Fairgrounds chanted “four more years!”

With less than 30,000 votes counted, Biden was winning with 97% of them.

“I want to let you guys know, South Carolina, tonight is our night,” state Democratic Party Chairwoman Christale Spain told the crowd. “For the first time, Southern voters, Black voters and rural voters have had the chance to have their voices heard first.”

Biden called in to his victory party from Los Angeles.

U.S. Rep. Jim Clyburn, whose 2020 endorsement catapulted Biden to the White House, held his cellphone up to a microphone, but reporters stationed in the back couldn’t hear what the president said.

“In 2020, it was the voters of South Carolina who proved the pundits wrong, breathed new life into our campaign and set us on the path to winning the presidency,” Biden said in a statement. “Now, in 2024, the people of South Carolina have spoken again, and I have no doubt that you have set us on the path to winning the presidency again and making Donald Trump a loser again.”

The result of Democrats’ “first-in-the-nation” presidential primary was never in doubt, with Biden running against two extreme-long-shot candidates: U.S. Rep. Dean Phillips and author Marianne Williamson. Even when Phillips spoke to South Carolina Democrats, he said he fully expected 95% of the vote would go to Biden.

Still, Democratic officials and the Biden campaign went all out with get-out-the-vote efforts that focused on energizing Black voters, who make up a large part of South Carolina’s Democratic base. The party touted that a “six-figure” investment in radio, digital and outdoor advertising in South Carolina represented its earliest ever spending during a presidential contest on outreach to young, rural and Black voters.

That outreach effort continued after polls opened Saturday, as Biden called in to four Black radio stations across the state, his campaign announced.

Civic duty

Janae Epps, a 47-year-old University of South Carolina employee, said she was flooded with messages to vote.

“I got so many text messages that I’m kind of sick of them, and emails, that some of them I’ve opted out of,” she said, after voting at Irmo Elementary in suburban Columbia.

Biden visited twice himself, kicking off the campaign at the historic Black church in Charleston where a white supremacist gunned down nine worshipers in 2015. He returned last weekend to headline the Democrats’ “First-in-the-Nation Celebration” dinner. Other stops included a Black barber shop and, on Sunday, two Black churches.

Vice President Kamala Harris made three trips, the last on Friday at South Carolina State University, the state’s only public historically Black four-year college.

With Biden being the guaranteed winner, voters told the SC Daily Gazette a sense of civic duty is what brought them out to the polls.

A sign with the words "vote here" over an American flag

A “vote here” sign next to a series of Biden-Harris campaign signs outside of a polling location at Hopkins Park south of Columbia on Saturday, Feb. 3, 2024 (Abraham Kenmore/SC Daily Gazette)

“I try to vote every chance possible,” Robin Mays said after voting in rural Hopkins south of Columbia.

The 37-year-old nurse said she’s well aware that people who looked like her — being a “double whammy” of Black and female — were once kept from voting, so she regularly exercises her right.

Mays said she voted for Biden.

So did Sam Waters, a 79-year-old retiree who voted at Dreher High School in downtown Columbia.

“I’ve seen what he’s done for the nation in the last three years, and I can’t imagine jumping ship right now when he has a chance to continue the programs,” he said.

Perhaps surprisingly, Waters said he came out despite not seeing any of the get-out-the-vote messaging.

Besides Biden and Harris, others visiting the state as campaign surrogates included first lady Jill Biden; California Gov. Gavin Newsom; Harris’ husband, Doug Emhoff; former U.S. Sen. Doug Jones of Alabama, Housing and Urban Development Secretary Marcia Fudge and U.S. Rep Ro Khanna of California.

Keeping South Carolina first

Democrats pushed South Carolina to the front of the 2024 nominating contest because of its diversity, saying Palmetto State voters better represent the party than Iowa and New Hampshire, whose voters traditionally went first and second.

Democratic National Committee Chairman Jaime Harrison and state Democratic Party Chairwoman Christale Spain talks to reporters after President Joe Biden is declared the winner of South Carolina’s primary. (Abraham Kenmore/SC Daily Gazette)


National Chairman Jaime Harrison, who’s from Columbia, pitched it as an opportunity for Black voters, “the heart and the backbone of the Democratic Party,” to set the agenda for 2024 and beyond. Democrats needed a strong showing Saturday to keep South Carolina first in future presidential contests.

“I’m going to do everything in my power” to make that happen, Harrison told reporters at the fairgrounds.

“I am ecstatic at the turnout numbers I’ve seen so far,” he said.

This year’s calendar shift also was seen as Biden rewarding the state. It was South Carolina that catapulted Biden to a win in 2020 with a 30-point advantage here over second-place finisher Bernie Sanders, following fourth- and fifth-place finishes in Iowa and New Hampshire.

Voters in South Carolina do not register by party, allowing the state’s 3.2 million registered voters to vote in either the Democratic or Republican presidential primary. They just can’t vote in both.

More than 48,000 people cast ballots in the two-week early voting window that ended Friday, according to the state Election Commission.

Although the Democratic National Committee put South Carolina first on the voting calendar, New Hampshire leapfrogged South Carolina to go first anyway. Biden refused to register for that primary or campaign in the state but won as a write-in anyway with 64% of the vote.

Nearly 79,500 people wrote in Biden’s name in the Granite State.

Ahead of Biden being declared the South Carolina winner, Clyburn said he will ask Democrats’ rules committee to count New Hampshire’s delegates despite the state’s snub of the official calendar.

“That what Joe Biden has done for three years — making this country’s greatness accessible for everybody and affordable by everybody,” Clyburn said.

According to Biden’s schedule, he will spend Sunday and Monday in Nevada ahead of that state’s presidential primary Tuesday.

You blew it in New Hampshire, Joe Biden. Pray it doesn’t hurt you — and then some.

CONCORD, N.H. — You blew it Joe.

The decision by you and "your advisers" to reward Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-SC) by attempting to make South Carolina the first-in-the-nation Democratic primary in 2024 was one of the biggest political blunders in your decades-long time in public service.

You have said over and over that you might have skipped a 2024 re-election bid if it were not for Donald Trump, because you see Trump posing a unique threat to the United States and to democracy itself.

So while we know the 2024 general election may very well be a rematch of 2020, you are the incumbent this time and Trump is not. And despite his enormous lead in the Republican primary, coupled with the many pundits who are debating what color prison jumpsuit Trump will soon be wearing, all the GOP candidates running against him have been waging a war against you, not him.

By skipping January’s New Hampshire primary in protest of it leap-frogging your beloved South Carolina, you may have very well undercut your ability to fight the very anti-democratic force you say you’re in this race to slay.

ALSO READ: Mention ‘Liz Cheney 2024’ and things get very, very awkward on Capitol Hill

Let’s review: Because the GOP has kept the traditional, first-in-the-nation calendar for their New Hampshire presidential primary, all the Republican candidates — save for unabashed anti-Trumper Chris Christie — have made their time in Iowa and New Hampshire an opportunity to declare war on Biden and dance around Trump. And you, sir, are MIA. You are not on the primary ballot. You have not campaigned here in New Hampshire. You are entirely resting on the laurels of your 7-percentage-point victory over Trump in the 2020 general election — an advantage that’s hardly guaranteed in 2024 when every last electoral vote might count. (Thanks, but no thanks, South Carolina).

So, in January, New Hampshire will nevertheless conduct a presidential primary as is demanded by the statutes of my state. New Hampshire state law dictates that the presidential primary for both the Republican and Democratic parties must occur before any other in the nation — "7 days or more immediately preceding the date on which any other state shall hold a similar election."

Given that the presidential primary is run by the state of New Hampshire, and not by the Republican or Democratic parties, a primary for both parties will be held. Republican voters and undeclared voters that have chosen a Republican ballot on Primary Day will have a reason to vote – and their vote will matter. Dems will also have a primary, but it is little more than a rogue primary … not recognized by the Democratic National Committee. In fact, when the state of New Hampshire holds the legally required primary, it could actually lead to the national party penalizing New Hampshire Democrats and the Democratic presidential candidates who campaign here.

Yippee!

So the date has been set, a primary will be held, millions of dollars will be spent on ads attacking you, and we have to ask, “What value will this rogue presidential primary hold for New Hampshire Democrats?”

ALSO READ: Inside a nightmare: Donald Trump’s White House on April 4, 2025

To vote or not to vote, that is the question now before New Hampshire voters. But vote for what? There are currently 21 folks appearing on the New Hampshire Democratic Primary ticket (heck, cough up $1,000 and you, too, can be a presidential candidate in New Hampshire.).

But no Joe.

So write Biden in? What does that get you? If not enough people write you in, will the media spin it as a poor showing? (Traditionally, write-in campaigns are successful when there is a passion, either around the candidate or the issue at stake. Passion for Joe, if there ever was any, has faded like so many of the policy hopes and dreams we held four years ago.)

Voters could also show up to vote and leave the ballot blank as an expression of disgust.

They could vote for spiritual self-help guru Marianne Williamson or little-known, increasingly hated Rep. Dean Phillips (D-MN) who could use his multi-million-dollar personal wealth in a vain attempt to package himself as a younger, more energetic Biden.

All the choices suck, and the only thing you, Mr. President, have created by this misstep is a vehicle for competing, self-defeating messages that will be interpreted in self-serving ways by the media, the Republican opposition and even members of your own party you so desperately need in November. This is more danger than help, and you and the DNC invited a problem your campaign did not need and now cannot manage.

You may have better things to do these days: Attempting to manage the complex and tragic war between Israel and Hamas, eroding support for the continuing war in Ukraine, discontent with the economy — have you looked at the cost of groceries recently? — and the real-life consequences of climate change.

But when you finally roll your campaign into South Carolina after months of giving your opponents free shots at you and perhaps even bruising faith within the Democratic Party, folks won't give a crap ... the damage will be done.

Your mistake made, please figure out — and fast — how to reverse your blunder and stanch your losses.

No pressure: Only the very fate of our democracy may depend on it.

Arnie Arnesen is the host of syndicated radio program "The Attitude with Arnie Arnesen." A former fellow at the Harvard Institute of Politics, Arnesen was the 1992 Democratic nominee for governor of New Hampshire and served as a member of the New Hampshire House of Representatives from 1984 to 1992.

Top Dem's committee fined $3.5K for campaign finance mistake caused by staffer's death

A top House Democrat’s campaign committee was slapped with a $3,500 fine over a filing mistake made as the group grappled with a consultant’s death, according to Federal Election Commission records and a source close to the campaign.

The committee raising funds for U.S. Rep Jim Clyburn (D-SC) mistakenly filed a financial disclosure report in October 2022 that didn't include about $62,100 in disbursements, according to a letter from the FEC.

A source close to the campaign told Raw Story the committee, Friends of Jim Clyburn, didn't know the consultant who helped draft the filing was sick until after she had been hospitalized.

POLL: Should Trump be allowed to run for office?

The error was remedied in a Dec. 2022 report to the FEC and the fine has already been paid, the source said Wednesday.

Rosa Marshall, of the Alternative Dispute Resolution Office, confirms the issue's conclusion in her Oct. 19 letter.

"This agreement resolves this matter," wrote Marshall. "I appreciate your assistance in effectively resolving this matter and bringing the case to a mutually acceptable conclusion."

The letter also confirms that a tragedy was to blame.

“The committee states that their compliance consultant’s serious illness and death led to the failure to disclose all financial activity,” the letter reads.

“The consultant had extensive experience with the preparation and filing of commission reports and had performed this responsibility for several years.”

Editor-in-chief Dave Leventhal contributed to this report.

‘Protect them’: How S.C.’s honor-bound military college camouflaged its connection to Rudy Giuliani

The Honor Code of The Citadel, South Carolina’s 181-year-old military college, states that cadets “will not lie, cheat or steal, nor tolerate those who do.”

But The Citadel now finds itself quietly tolerating one of its most recognizable honorary degree recipients — Rudy Giuliani — who, in the estimation of the U.S. House’s January 6 select committee, lied and cheated while attempting to steal the 2020 presidential election away from its duly elected winner, Joe Biden.

“Mr. Giuliani’s effort to undermine the integrity of the 2020 presidential election has helped destabilize our democracy,” a DC Bar Association panel wrote last month in recommending Giuliani, who served as former President Donald Trump’s personal lawyer, be disbarred. “The misconduct here sadly transcends all his past accomplishments.”

Those accomplishments include “leadership and inspiration to all Americans in the aftermath of the September 11th terrorist attacks” — the reasons The Citadel’s Board of Visitors cited in 2007 when awarding Giuliani an honorary doctorate in public administration.

These days, however, The Citadel officials don’t want to talk about Giuliani, his myriad troubles — including newfound status as "co-conspirator 1" in Trump's latest federal indictment — or the honorary The Citadel degree he continues to enjoy.

And in a series of internal The Citadel emails, which Raw Story obtained through a South Carolina Freedom of Information Act request, school officials detail how they decided to close ranks, protect themselves and deflect Giuliani-related scrutiny.

‘Domestic terrorist behavior’

Giuliani’s honorary degrees first caught my attention in early 2022 while working as deputy editor at Insider.

Three schools — the University of Rhode Island, Drexel University, Middlebury College — had recently stripped “America’s mayor” of honorary degrees.

Such actions are uncommon in academia, the rationales notably severe.

Upon Rhode Island University relieving Giuliani of his honorary degree, President Marc Parlange concluded that Giuliani had “encouraged domestic terrorist behavior”.

Giuliani aided “an insurrection against democracy itself,” Middlebury President Laurie L. Patton declared.

Drexel admonished Giuliani for “undermining the public’s faith in our democratic institutions and in the integrity of our judicial system”.

Given this, I asked then-Insider reporter Hanna Kang to contact five schools that had also bestowed honorary degrees on Giuliani — Georgetown University, Syracuse University, St. John Fisher University, Loyola University Maryland and The Citadel. See whether they, too, planned to take those honors back, I asked.

ALSO READ: Giuliani’s ‘donkey show’: How fake electors and coercion allegations may doom ‘America’s mayor’

With the possible exception of Syracuse University (full disclosure: my alma mater), the schools had made no formal moves to deep-six or otherwise alter the status of Giuliani’s honorary degrees. Nor did they have much, if anything, to say about Giuliani.

But of these five schools, The Citadel alone is a public institution. As such, it’s subject to something the others are not — public records laws.

So in May, while recently working with Raw Story investigative reporter Mark Alesia to determine whether the five schools had reconsidered their stances in light of new Giuliani-related developments, Raw Story filed a South Carolina Freedom of Information Act request with The Citadel for school records pertaining to Giuliani.

In late July, The Citadel released to Raw Story several hundred responsive documents.

Within the document dump were a series of emails sent among school officials, administrators and members of the Board of Visitors — a government-appointed body responsible for the “direction and supervision” of The Citadel — detailing their plans to stay mum on Giuliani’s honorary degree.

‘Protect them’

The Citadel Board of Visitors’ consists of up to 14 voting members who are elected to six-year terms by South Carolina’s General Assembly and governor.

The members of The Citadel Board of Visitors are “dedicated to the principles of duty, honesty, loyalty, integrity, and accountability,” according to its “Commitment to Excellent and Ethics” document.

And conferring honorary degrees ranks among the specific duties of The Citadel’s Board of Visitors.

But when faced with questions from Raw Story about the status of Giuliani’s degree, Board of Visitors remained silent.

School officials, for their parts, angled to “protect” the Board of Visitors, according to emails obtained through Raw Story’s South Carolina Freedom of Information Act request.

“We could decline to reply, like we have with Business Insider recently, or provide a modified version of what we first sent BI when they asked, which is: Honorary degree recipients are determined by the Board of Visitors, the college’s governing body. Here is a link to the announcement when the Board presented Giuliani with an honorary degree in 2007: https://www.citadel.edu/root/honorary_degrees,” The Citadel spokesman Zachary Watson wrote to Col. William R. “Sonny” Leggett, The Citadel’s vice president for communications and marketing, on May 17.

No to the latter, Leggett replied.

“I would just not respond- I wouldn’t put it on the BoV- we still need to protect them,” Leggett wrote Watson. “The worse they run is we failed to respond.”

Source: The Citadel emails obtained through a South Carolina Freedom of Information Act request.

Watson concurred: “Yep, that’s my preference too. Just wanted to pull options in case.”

Raw Story’s article, published on May 22, would go on to report: “The Citadel spokesman Zachary Watson acknowledged — but did not answer — Raw Story’s questions about the status of the honorary degree Rudy Giuliani received from the South Carolina military school in 2007.”

This was just the latest example of The Citadel dodging questions about Giuliani.

When Board of Visitors member Allison Dean Love received a Giuliani-related email from Insider in June 2022, she did not reply, but instead forwarded the message to Leggett, according to records obtained by Raw Story.

Similarly, Board of Visitors member Dylan Goff demurred.

“We will not be responding,” Goff wrote to Love and Leggett.

Leggett briefed The Citadel’s president, Glenn M. Walters, a retired general in the U.S. Marine Corps and school alumnus. He carbon copied three other top school officials.

“Business Insider has asked whether the school has any additional statement regarding the degree, we are directing them back to the original release- which notes Giuliani was also recognized as Time's Person of the year in 2001 and granted honorary knighthood in 2002 by Queen Elizabeth II,” Leggett wrote Walters. “The reporter is now reaching out to BOV members seeking comment. We will send a message to the Board and encourage them to direct all queries to [the Office of Communication and Marketing].”

Leggett then issued marching orders.

“Business Insider is working on a piece regarding Rudy Giuliani's honorary degrees. The Citadel presented Giuliani with an honorary degree of Doctor of Public Administration in 2007 … Business Insider is seeking comment regarding the degree, we are directing them back to the original release. If contacted, please direct the reporter, Hanna Kang, back to [the Office of Communication and Marketing],” he wrote on June 17, 2022, in an email addressed to more than 30 recipients, including Board of Visitors members and top college officials.

After Insider published an article featuring The Citadel and Giuliani’s honorary degree, Leggett quarterbacked damage control.

“Thoughts? Should we tell the board,” Cardon B. Crawford, senior vice president of The Citadel and a retired Army colonel, wrote to Lori Hedstrom, executive assistant to the Board of Visitors.

“Yes I think COL Leggett should craft an email to the Board. I can send to them on his behalf. Please let me know how you would like to proceed. Thank you,” Hedstrom wrote back.

Leggett also wrote Crawford.

Source: The Citadel emails obtained through a South Carolina Freedom of Information Act request.

“Since we are updating the board on Irizarry, we may wish to flag this for them as well,” Leggett wrote, referring to a former The Citadel cadet who had recently been sentenced to jail time for his role in the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Leggett continued: “The Citadel is mentioned in the piece as having awarded Giuliani an honorary degree and the opening image of Giuliani at The Citadel receiving said honor (below)… but no one from the staff or alums provided comments to the article. It’s business insider so it isn’t getting much attention, though they did @citadel1842 in their twitter posting.”

Kang, a most diligent reporter, kept trying to get answers.

But throughout 2022, The Citadel kept stonewalling her.

“FYSA in case Ms. Kang did not reach out to you all. I did not intend to respond of course,” Citadel Alumni Association Executive Director Tom McAlister wrote Leggett later that year after receiving an email from Kang.

“Thanks, we are not engaging with her either,” Leggett wrote back.

Is Giuliani a role model for cadets?

In late July, Raw Story asked The Citadel about these internal emails, posing questions to each member of The Citadel’s Board of Visitors and several top college officials, including Walters, the school president.

Incoming freshman march at The Citadel, The Military College of South Carolina on August 19, 2013 in Charleston, South Carolina. The Citadel, which began in 1842, has about 2,300 undergraduate students. Richard Ellis/Getty Images

Among our questions:

  • Is The Citadel's Board of Visitors currently reviewing the status of the honorary degree The Citadel granted Mr. Giuliani in 2007? If so, what has prompted such a review, and where does this process stand? If not, why not?
  • To what degree is The Citadel concerned about Mr. Giuliani's role in the effort to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election?
  • The Citadel's honor code states that cadets “will not lie, cheat or steal, nor tolerate those who do.” Rudy Giuliani has been accused by various entities, including the U.S. House January 6 Select Committee and DC Bar Association, of lying and cheating in an attempt to illegally overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. Does The Citadel believe that Rudy Giuliani has lied or cheated?
  • Does The Citadel still consider Mr. Giuliani a role model for cadets?
  • Why — per the emails Raw Story reviewed — did several of The Citadel's Board of Visitors decline to answer reporter questions about Mr. Giuliani's 2007 honorary degree after receiving inquiries from Insider and Raw Story?
  • Why did The Citadel's communications staff in 2022 "encourage" Board of Visitors members to "direct all queries to OCM" regarding Mr. Giuliani?
  • In a May 17 email between [vice president for communications and marketing] Col. Sonny Leggett and [college spokesman] Zach Watson, which is discussing a request for comment from Raw Story, Col. Leggett states: "I would just not respond- I wouldn’t put it on the BoV- we still need to protect them. The worse they run is we failed to respond." What, specifically, is The Citadel staff protecting the Board of Visitors from?

Four days passed after Raw Story sent the questions. None of the 20 officials responded.

On July 25, Raw Story followed up by phone and email to again ask them for their answers.

More silence.

Instead, Watson, the school spokesman, emailed Raw Story a two-sentence statement:

“The Citadel has never revoked an honorary degree and does not have a process to do so. Designated members of The Citadel’s Office of Communications and Marketing serve as spokespersons for the college and, therefore, often act as designees for media inquiries directed to members of the Administration or Board of Visitors.”

Watson did not respond to a follow-up question asking whether this statement represents the views of The Citadel’s administration, The Citadel’s Board of Visitors, or both.

Nor did he respond to later questions about Giuliani’s newly established status as “co-conspirator 1” in Trump’s newest federal indictment.

Representatives for Giuliani did not respond to requests for comment. In May, Giuliani spokesman Ted Goodman blasted the schools that had taken honorary degrees away from Giuliani.

"It'll be interesting to see who is behind these efforts to attack Mayor Giuliani and if anyone at these schools will inform these students about the basic principles of ‘innocent until proven guilty,’ and if they'll educate these students on the mayor's past as the man who took down the mafia, cleaned up New York and comforted the nation following 9/11," Goodman told Raw Story. "Frankly, we weren't even aware of those decisions, and it's just disappointing, and it says more about the culture of these institutions than anything else."

‘When you know better, do better’

A 2019 The Citadel memorandum concerning honorary degrees states that there should be a “compelling reason why it would be particularly fitting for The Citadel to honor the nominee, in the form of a clear link between the nominee’s achievements and The Citadel’s mission and its core values.”

The memorandum doesn’t detail a formal process for revoking an honorary degree that’s already been awarded.

It also doesn’t expressly state the Board of Visitors cannot take an honorary degree back. Under the heading “compliance,” the memorandum states: “Failure to comply with this policy may prevent a deserving individual from receiving appropriate recognition from The Citadel.”


With this as backdrop, Raw Story asked three lawmakers with direct ties to The Citadel about what the school’s Board of Visitors should do with Giuliani’s honorary degree.

Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC), who in 1999 became the first female cadet to graduate from The Citadel, dismissed the notion of her alma mater rescinding Giuliani’s degree.

ALSO READ: Inside Trump’s six-person team of alleged co-conspirators and their effort to overturn Election 2020

“I’m not a big fan of cancel culture. Giuliani 20 years ago is different than the Giuliani today,” she told Raw Story correspondent Matt Laslo during an interview at the U.S. Capitol. “Everyone, including colleges, has a 1st Amendment right to do things like that. And I don’t think that any college should be discredited for that sort of thing.”

Mace noted that the “world changed” on Sept. 11, 2001, and Giuliani, as mayor of New York, provided rare and essential leadership in the midst of an unthinkable crisis.

“It was a very historic moment. And I actually think it’s kind of gross to take that away from someone,” Mace said. “This whole cancel thing — people got to grow the f— … just grow up. You know what, just grow up. Move on and look forward. Because it’s very divisive. It’s very divisive for our country.”


Even with Giuliani facing a host of legal and ethical problems?

“What’s he been convicted of? That’s the problem,” Mace said. “And if you believe in the Constitution and due process, and the law, then people are innocent until proven guilty. Even if you don’t like him personally, that’s the way it works.”

Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-SC), the U.S. House's assistant Democratic leader whose Charleston-area congressional district includes The Citadel, is more dubious.

“He’s embarrassed himself so much,” Clyburn said of Giuliani in a brief interview with Raw Story. “The school, I don’t think, would want to be embarrassed by him. So, it’s up to them.”

Rep. James Clyburn (D-SC) speaks during a dedication ceremony for a new statue of Pierre L'Enfant at the U.S. Capitol on February 28, 2022. Pierre L'Enfant was a French-American military engineer who designed the initial urban plan for Washington, DC. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

The Citadel’s elected representative in the South Carolina House of Representatives went further.

“When I think about the ongoing revelations of the behavior and statements of Rudy Giuliani, I am reminded of the old Southern adage that ‘the chickens always come home to roost’,” said state Rep. Wendell Gilliard (D-SC). “There is nothing that surprises me about him anymore and, frankly, the less said about him, the better.”

As it pertains to The Citadel, Gilliard said, “I am more apt to think of the wisdom in Maya Angelou’s words, ‘do the best that you can with what you know, and when you know better, do better’. So, I am more interested in what those that run The Citadel will do with all the things that have been revealed about Giuliani.”

The Citadel's Honor Code, for its part, advocates "doing the right thing when no one is watching," and also, to “do the right thing when everyone is watching".

Matt Laslo contributed to this report.

‘Monuments to me’: How politicians use donors’ leftover 'zombie' cash to buy themselves legacies

Like other such buildings dedicated to ex-presidents, the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, Calif., contains a replica of the Oval Office, complete with photos, mementos and flags placed carefully to depict what it looked like when the actor-turned-politician was the most powerful man in the world.

Five miles away, California Lutheran University had a replica office, too. But this replica was designed — “within an eighth of an inch” — to depict the Capitol Hill haunt of former Rep. Elton Gallegly.

If Gallegly’s name isn’t familiar, that’s understandable. The California Republican left Congress more than a decade ago, having decided against seeking re-election instead of running in what would’ve been a highly competitive race for a newly redistricted congressional seat.

But the ex-congressman’s campaign account, Gallegly for Congress, lived on for nine more years, still flush with surplus cash. Gallegly directed $110,215 of it to California Lutheran — to help fund the Elton and Janice Gallegly Center, according to the university.

Gallegly is hardly alone. During the past decade, federal-level politicians have given more than $14 million in surplus campaign funds to non-profit institutions of higher education, a Raw Story investigation of Federal Election Commission records shows.

The practice is generally legal. But campaign finance experts say such arrangements become ethically murky when the donations, directly or indirectly, create what amount to monuments to the lawmakers’ political legacies.

Donors may be surprised, even shocked to learn that money they gave to advance a political candidate or cause ended up funding nameplates or upholstered chairs on some college campus.

After all, the Federal Election Campaign Act says campaign funds can’t be “converted by any person to any personal use.”

But ex-lawmakers frequently keep their old campaigns open and active, even for years after they’ve left elected office. These “zombie committees” are allowed to direct leftover campaign money to 501(c)(3) nonprofit charitable organizations, the designation of most colleges and universities.

Yet there’s little prohibiting politicians from suggesting or directing a college to use some of the money to promote the politicians’ image. And even donations for what most would agree is a worthy cause — perhaps a scholarship for first-generation college students — can leave the impression that the funds came from a politician’s own money, out of pure generosity, not from surplus campaign funds from unwitting donors.

“It’s bipartisan and bicameral self-entitlement for everyone in Congress,” said Washington, D.C., attorney Brett Kappel, an election law attorney and expert on campaign finance laws and government ethics. “Most of this is legal, but nobody knows about it.”

Congress/college industrial complex

Creation of the Gallegly Center created an uproar on campus when it reached the school’s Board of Regents in 2017.

Sam Thomas, a professor in the Department of Religion, wrote in a letter to the student newspaper that the Gallegly Center “will in fact be legible primarily in terms of what it represents: the legacy of a particular, partisan politician with a record of immigration policy deeply at odds with the values of the University and the (Evangelical Lutheran Church in America).”

The Gallegly Center promoting itself as non-partisan made no difference, Thomas added.

Meanwhile, students at the school started a petition stating that Gallegly’s career “contradicts what Cal Lutheran stands for.”

“This Center serves as a monument to Mr. Gallegly’s service,” it said, “one in which he targeted the identities shared by many of our students — people of color, particularly Hispanics, the LGBTQ community, and immigrants to this country.”

Matters soon became messy. After a new university president removed the replica office in 2021, saying the school needed space for the former congressman’s papers, Gallegly sued.

The case continues in Ventura County Superior Court, where Gallegly contends that he and his wife spent years raising more than $1 million for the center. Cal Lutheran, he argues, failed to fulfill its contract for the donation, including a speaker series and digitization of papers.

ALSO READ: ‘Aren’t we a little more grown up than that?’: Ex-lawmaker rips Congress for ‘dog ate my homework’ excuses

Gallegly also spent another $56,807 of leftover campaign cash for legal bills related to Cal Lutheran, according to filings with the Federal Election Commission. He did not respond to a question about the specific legal work.

Earlier, Gallegly told Raw Story, “The replica office was not my brainstorm at all. The novelty of it, to my knowledge and to the university when they proposed it, was that there was no other such (replica office) that was as accurate.”

The media tour of the Elton and Janice Gallegly Center for Public Service and Civic Engagement inside the Pearson Library on the California Lutheran University's Thousand Oaks campus. © Juan Carlo / The Star / USA Today Network

A recent op-ed by R. Stephen Wheatly, Cal Lutheran’s former vice president for university advancement, said Gallegly “did not solicit, offer, or propose any aspect of the Gallegly Center.” The replica office, Wheatly wrote, “was intended to serve as an attraction for visitors and students and as a backdrop for film and television majors.”

A statement from Cal Lutheran to Raw Story said Gallegly’s papers and other archival material has been treated properly and made available to scholars. It said digitization is merely an option “based on historical import if funds are available.” The speaker series, which started with former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice in 2018, “wasn’t part of our gift agreement with Rep. Gallegly, and as a result requires additional funds to maintain.”

The statement said Gallegly was involved with negotiating the gift agreement and that a replica office “was and is a matter of university discretion.”

'Walking into my office'

There are generally five places that surplus political campaign money can go:

  • Back to donors
  • Toward the politician's future campaigns
  • To the campaigns of other political candidates
  • Into the U.S. Treasury’s general fund
  • To non-profit charitable organizations, including institutions of higher education.

In Kentucky, there’s another replica congressional office dedicated to a former Capitol Hill lawmaker.

Friends of Joe Pitts, the campaign fund for the former Rep. Joe Pitts (R-PA), gave $45,000 to his alma mater, Asbury University.

It’s unclear if the university would have a Joe Pitts Center for Public Policy were it not for the gift. But it does now, and the center includes the congressman’s papers and the replica office.

“If you walk in here, it’s almost as if you were walking into my office when I was a member,” Pitts said of the replica office in a video.

Asbury University did not respond to interview requests and Pitts could not be reached for comment.

People who gave money to Friends of Cliff Stearns, the fundraising committee of former Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-FL), probably didn’t know they were also going to become friends of Lake-Sumter State College and St. Johns River State College, too.

Stearns left office in 2013 and became a lobbyist. Both schools received a quarter-million from the campaign in 2021 and 2022, respectively, and named libraries for Stearns.

Stearns has his name displayed prominently on both buildings. A photo on the Lake-Sumter State College website shows a plaque saying the building was dedicated “in recognition of his distinguished service to the citizens of Florida.” A news release from St. Johns River State College praised the ex-congressman’s “passion for growth, thought, and purpose.”


The Lake-Sumter State College president, in recommending that the Board of Trustees vote to approve the naming of the Clifford B. Stearns Library & Learning Success Center, said the donation was “at the minimum level/amount to name a building.” Stearns’ gifts to both schools included scholarships.

Reached by email, Stearns said his campaign’s donation did not have strings attached. He said an attorney who specializes in federal election matters drafted the contract “and he specifically specified in the contract that the donations were given freely for them to use for whatever they determined best for the college.”

Stearns directed follow-up questions to the lawyer, Charles Spies, who said “no sort of naming was a requirement of the donation.” Asked about the large balance in the campaign account years after leaving office — he still had a $39,335 balance on March 31 — Spies said, “The Congressman still has money in his campaign account so he can support like-minded Republican candidates and officeholders.”

Stearns has had past campaign money issues. In 2019, after the FEC found Stearns had used campaign donations for personal use, including $4,118 for membership fees and club expenses at the National Republican Club of Capitol Hill. Stearns agreed to a fine of $6,900 and reimbursed his campaign committee $8,120.

The K. Michael Conaway Archive and Exhibit, located in a museum at Angelo State University, opened last year after Conaway for Congress, campaign committee for the former Republican congressman from Texas, gave $250,000 to the school.

Photos of the exhibit on social media show, in the center of the space, a large round photo of Conaway behind a desk. The U.S. Capitol stands in the background with words in all capital letters on top: “The journey of the public servant: Congressman Conaway.”

A page on the university website said the purpose of the exhibit is “to preserve the legacy of Congressman Mike Conaway and impart his guiding principles to the next generations of young Texans.” The money included an endowment for the study of agriculture and national security.

Angelo State University officials did not respond to Raw Story's interview requests, and Conaway could not be reached for comment.

Gifts from U.S. House leaders

The most prolific giver to higher education in the time period that Raw Story examined, 2013 to 2023, is the fundraising committee of a lawmaker who’s still in office — and a very powerful one, at that.

Friends of James Clyburn, the fundraising committee of House Assistant Democratic Leader James Clyburn (D-SC), made 55 donations across 10 South Carolina schools, according to federal records. Total value: more than $100,000 in campaign donor dollars.

Schools receiving Clyburn money include South Carolina State University, Allen University, Benedict College and Claflin University.

Sam Watson, South Carolina State’s Director of University Relations, said the money went to scholarships, athletics and the inauguration of a new president. He said it did not go to naming a program or facility, although the Clyburn Foundation and the Clyburn family have been major contributors to the university. The Honors College and an honors scholarship are named for the congressman’s late wife, Dr. Emily England Clyburn, and the James E. Clyburn University Transportation Center works for “recruitment and training of minorities and women for tomorrow’s transportation workforce.”

Tacara Carpenter, a spokesperson for Allen Univeresity, said the money went to scholarships for merit and financial need. Benedict College and Claflin University did not respond. Clyburn’s office acknowledged an inquiry from Raw Story but did not respond to questions.

Donors to Kevin McCarthy for Congress, the fundraising arm for the Republican speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, probably didn’t know that some of their money would go in part toward the athletic program at Bakersfield College, where the Renegades compete in the California Community College Athletic Association.

From 2019 to 2022, McCarthy’s campaign gave $26,250 to Bakersfield College, the speaker’s alma mater. The college spent the money on “student scholarships and to provide gear and academic tutoring for student athletes,” said Norma Rojas, spokesperson for Bakersfield College.

McCarthy’s office didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Lack of transparency

During the past decade, four gifts from political campaigns to colleges and universities reached into the seven-figure range.

The largest of these came from Shelby for U.S. Senate, the campaign committee for former Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL), which gave $4 million to Georgetown University in Washington, D.C.

Shelby, who left the senate in January after 36 years in office, honored his wife, an emerita professor at Georgetown University, with the money. It established the Annette N. Shelby Endowed Chair in Business & Leadership Communication and the Annette N. Shelby Endowed Fund for Leadership Communication.

Georgetown University officials declined to comment other than to provide a link to a story about Annette Shelby on the university’s website.

Annette Shelby was quoted in the student newspaper, The Hoya, as saying of her husband, “He had some money left, and he felt that Georgetown had been such a wonderful place for me and had given me many opportunities. He wanted to show that, and he also wanted to leave some kind of legacy for me as well.”

ALSO READ: Deepfake democracy: How AI is bamboozling Congress and threatening Election 2024

Citizens for Harkin gave the legacy of former Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA) a home at Drake University, an institution in Des Moines, Iowa, to which Harkin’s campaign gave $2.2 million.

A Drake spokesperson declined to say how the money was used, citing the institution’s status as a private university.

Drake University has a Harkin Institute for Public Policy & Citizen Engagement at The Tom and Ruth Harkin Center. Drake is also home to Harkin’s papers. The institute’s web page says the institute is for “non-partisan research, learning, and outreach to promote understanding of the policy issues to which Senator Tom Harkin devoted his career.”

Harkin unsuccessfully ran for president in 1992, winning the states of Minnesota, Iowa and Idaho during the Democratic primary. He served in the U.S. Senate until 2015.

Bill Nelson for U.S. Senate, campaign committee for the former Democratic senator from Florida, gave $1.25 million to the University of Florida after he lost a re-election bid in 2018.

Cynthia Roldan, a spokesperson for the school, wouldn’t say what the university is doing with the money, citing a public records exemption for organizations such as the University of Florida Foundation.

In 2019, Nelson gave 800 boxes of his papers and six terabytes of electronic communications from his 46 years in public office to the University of Florida.

Nelson now serves as the administrator of NASA.

The other seven-figure gift from the time examined was from Poe for Congress, committee for former Rep. Ted Poe (R-TX), which gave $1 million to Abilene Christian University.

Abilene Christian created the Judge Ted Poe Endowed Chair of Political Science and Criminal Justice to provide funding for a faculty position and guest lecturers, a school spokesperson said.

Tough to turn down money?

It’s a tough time for higher education. State funding has been slashed. Demographics in parts of the country portend sharp enrollment declines. And some state legislatures have moved aggressively against what professors can even teach.

So it might seem that schools would name a building after anyone if the price is right.

Not necessarily, said Kevin McClure, an associate professor of higher education finance and administration from the University of North Carolina-Wilmington.

“They may say, ‘We’re not in a good position to turn this down,’ but others can say, ‘This is not in line with our donor policies,’” McClure said. “I think the likelihood of saying no has increased as higher ed becomes central in the culture wars.”

John Pelissero, a government ethics expert from the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics at Santa Clara University, said the biggest ethical issue is if politicians are seen as using campaign funds not to win elected office or advance a political agenda, but “to burnish their legacy and reputation.”

He suggests a different way for candidates to dispense surplus campaign cash.

“A good practice would be for a retired politician to have a committee for residual funds and not leave it to the whims of the retiring politician,” he said.

“The donors didn’t intend, when they gave to the campaign, for it to be used for purposes outside the campaign. I don’t think any of these politicians spend much time thinking about whether donors would object to the mission of the recipient.”

Kappel said that during his career he senses that many congressmen forget about the purpose of campaign donations.

“The tendency is to think the money is yours,” he said, “and it’s very easy to get lulled into thinking it’s ‘my’ money.”

Ed Schultz to John Boehner: Will you take impeachment off the table?

Now that control of the House has changed parties, some liberals are worried about what Republicans will do with their new power.

Keep reading...Show less