All posts tagged "stephen miller"

Trump's henchmen revealed: mapping the powerful network that really rules America

A formal organization chart of the Trump regime would show Trump on top, his Cabinet officers arrayed underneath him, the White House staff below them, and an assortment of lower-level appointees at the bottom.

The reality is far different.

Today I want to give you what might be described as a power map of the regime — where power really lies and who really reports to whom.

At the top center of the map is the troika of Stephen Miller, Russell Vought, and JD Vance. Their joint goal appears to be to destroy American democracy.

Their power comes from their knowledge, tenacity, connections, and fanaticism — and from Trump’s apparent willingness to sign off on whatever they want to do.

  • Stephen Miller wants to return America to the 1950s, when it was dominated by white, straight, Christian men whose ancestors were born here. Miller is pushing for high tariffs, managing the ICE raids on Democrat-run cities, summoning National Guard and federal troops, and seeking to provoke enough violence to justify invocation of the Insurrection Act.
  • Russell Vought wants to create an all-powerful executive branch dictatorship, usurping the roles of the other branches. Vought has illegally impounded over $410 billion so far. During the shutdown, he has frozen nearly $28 billion for more than 200 projects mostly in Democrat-led cities and congressional districts, has fired thousands of federal employees, and is threatening not to provide back pay to furloughed federal employees.
  • JD Vance wants to prevent the Democrats from taking control of one or both chambers of Congress in the 2026 midterms and become president after Trump. He’s urging Republican states to engage in more gerrymandering to eke out more Republican House seats, managing the legal assault on the Voting Rights Act and mail-in voting, and pushing universities and the media to the right.

A fourth person also near the center of the regime’s power structure is Robert F. Kennedy Jr., whose tenacity and fanaticism are doing incomparable damage to America’s system of health care, health research, and public health. He’s got a lot of power but organizationally is out of the loop.

Second tier

Under Miller are Kristi Noem, secretary of homeland security; Howard Lutnick, secretary of commerce; and Pete Hegseth, secretary of defense (or war).

Under Vought are Scott Bessent, secretary of the treasury, and what remains of Musk’s DOGE.

Under Vance are Pam Bondi, attorney general; Kash Patel, director of the FBI; Linda McMahon, secretary of education; and Marco Rubio, secretary of state.

Under RFK Jr. is a vast (and increasingly dysfunctional) public health system including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institutes of Health.

Third tier

Beneath the second tier is a ragtag collection of ambitious bottom-feeders and misfits who are trying to rise through the muck.

For example: William Pulte, who, in his capacity as director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, has come up with flimsy evidence of mortgage fraud allegedly committed by people Trump wants to harm, such as New York State Attorney General Letitia James, California Senator Adam Schiff, and Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook. Pulte reports to Bondi and Miller.

There’s also Peter Navarro, the fanatical trade isolationist and anti-China hand who in the first Trump regime publicly advocated hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID-19 and condemned public health measures that aimed to stop the virus’s spread. After refusing to tell Congress what he knew about Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election, Navarro was convicted of contempt of Congress and spent four months in prison. Navarro reports to Lutnick and Miller.

Tom Homan, the so-called “border czar,” who accepted a bag of $50,000 in an FBI sting operation (the investigation has been dropped by Trump’s Justice Department and the FBI).

Heather Honey, a well-known election denier, now heading the Office of Election Integrity.

Where’s Trump?

Depending on the day and the issue, Trump wafts around the power map.

Because he is not a decision-maker and is pursuing little other than power, money, and praise, no one actually reports to him. They listen to him rave, laud him, tell him how wonderful he is and that he’s right about everything, and then report to the people with real power.

Trump will be out in front on an issue that’s likely to get a lot of positive attention, generate him a lot of money, or enlarge his power. Otherwise, he’s off the map, watching television and playing golf.

The fringe

Around the fringe of the power map is a Star Wars cantina of weirdos. Although not officially inside the regime, they exercise power by gaining fleeting access to Trump or to one of the troika.

They include Laura Loomer, Curtis Yarvin, Steve Bannon, Roger Stone, Michael Flynn, Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity, and various other Fox News personalities whose phone calls Trump will take and who may influence his thinking for a moment but have only indirect influence on what the regime actually does.

The oligarchy

At the top of the power map you’ll see billionaire oligarchs who have extraordinary clout in the Trump regime. In effect, the regime reports to them.

They include:

  • Peter Thiel, the Silicon Valley entrepreneur who got JD Vance his job. He has a direct pipeline to Vance.
  • Stephen Schwarzman, the private equity CEO. Schwarzman takes a variety of roles. For example, he’s behind the scenes in the regime’s fight with Harvard and other major institutions.
  • Bill Ackman, the investor. He, too, influences the troika. He’s the main intermediary between Trump and Elon Musk.
  • Musk himself still wields significant influence over Miller, Vought, and Vance.
  • Marc Andreessen, the unofficial godfather of Silicon Valley and co-founder of venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz. He’s heavily invested in artificial intelligence startups and financial technology firms and informally advises the regime.

Also: tech oligarchs Jeff Bezos, Larry Ellison, Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Page, and Tim Cook.

And Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump, and Jared Kushner. As members of the Trump family, they depend on, and are depended on by, the powers within the regime.

What’s in it for the oligarchs?

Money and power. Most basically, the oligarchs don’t trust democracy. Their definition of freedom is the ability to accumulate and retain as much wealth as they wish.

Their deepest fear is that the majority of Americans, if fully informed, would expropriate their fortunes. As Thiel wrote: “I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible.”

Marc Andreessen’s red line was a proposal that wafted around the Biden administration to tax unrealized capital gains. Others are freaked out by the possibility of a wealth tax on billionaires and multimillionaires.

The oligarchs are not entirely anti-government because they also want government funding for their giant projects, such as AI and the exploration (and exploitation) of space, which require vast amounts of capital and resources.

Hence, their enthusiasm for the defense industry, Middle Eastern sovereign wealth funds, and Chinese technology and the Chinese market.

***

No one in the Trump regime reports directly to these oligarchs. Instead, those with power inside the regime keep a keen eye on the oligarchs — courting them, seeking their approval, wanting their connections, using their power, pocketing their money, and channeling their influence.

The oligarchs know their decisions can make or break Trump. They likewise depend on the regime. Power in the Trump regime is a function of such mutual dependence.

  • Robert Reich is a professor of public policy at Berkeley and former secretary of labor. His writings can be found at https://robertreich.substack.com/.
  • Robert Reich's new memoir, Coming Up Short, can be found wherever you buy books. You can also support local bookstores nationally by ordering the book at bookshop.org.

America faces a 'Weekend at Bernie's' situation with declining Trump: ex-GOP lawmaker

A former House Republican warned Friday that President Donald Trump's cognitive decline reveals "the most dangerous reality" as the president expresses concerns about his own mortality while his "powerful advisers pursue their own agendas" — and that the United States could end up with a "Weekend at Bernie's president."

Former Republican lawmaker and Air National Guard member Adam Kinzinger questioned when this apparent cognitive decline could worsen and what those around him plan to do in a Substack essay.

"The question here is, is this an act, is he really losing his mind, is it both?" Kinzinger said in a Substack video.

"You don't know anymore what's an act, what's real, but I mean, it feels like he's even descended since the beginning of his term," Kinzinger said. "Three years left of this and that's the question so when he does, let's say he does hit a point where he's completely out of it, would there be anybody that had the courage to do the 25th Amendment, so you may ultimately end up with a 'Weekend at Bernie's' president... I just think it's something we need to look at, consider, and think about, having an insane president — I think we have an insane president — but having an insane president that actually can't think because he's lost it."

Kinzinger details the president's most recent comments about heaven.

"How do we know he’s worried? Recently, he’s started talking about his own mortality," Kinzinger writes. "'I want to try and get to heaven, if possible,' he said. 'I’m hearing I’m not doing well. I’m really at the bottom of the totem pole.' On another occasion: 'I don’t think there’s anything going to get me in heaven. I really don’t. I think I’m not maybe heaven-bound.' He’s also begun warning that one day he’ll fall down — the same kind of stumble he once mocked Biden for."

The president might say he's fine, but he actually isn't, said Kinzinger.

" Trump shows visible signs of age-related circulatory issues known as venous insufficiency, which causes swelling in the ankles and bruising on the hands. For a man who’s long claimed to be immune to aging, the visible evidence must be unsettling," Kinzinger wrote.

Trump might be signaling he's aware of what's happening, while he falls deeper into QAnon and conspiratorial territory, including his recent Truth Social post with a fake "med bed."

"These references to heaven and falling suggest an awareness of his own fragility," Kinzinger writes. "The physical decline may not be as worrying as the mental one. His father, Fred Trump Sr., displayed clear signs of dementia years before being diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease — and heredity is a known risk factor. Preventing or slowing such decline requires habits Trump has always resisted: a healthy diet, exercise, and humility."

It also raises questions about the people around him — and how vicious they could be, he adds.

"What does it mean to have a president in visible decline? It means we must watch carefully and hope those around him are competent. In the case of the Israeli–Hamas peace effort, skilled negotiators from the U.S. and abroad did the heavy lifting while Trump played a ceremonial role. A similar pattern is unfolding domestically, where powerful advisers pursue their own agendas." Kinzinger wrote. "Stephen Miller drives the crackdown on immigrants and the push to use the National Guard. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is leading the assault on public health. Russell Vought is overseeing the mass firing of thousands of federal workers."

It's unclear what those around him will ultimately do.

"The truth is, what Donald Trump says matters less than what those behind him do. And that may be the most dangerous reality of all," Kinzinger argues.

Stephen Miller selling home after fleeing amid peaceful chalk messages on sidewalk

White House deputy chief of staff Stephen and his podcaster wife, Katie Miller, have fled their Arlington home after peaceful chalk messages were left on the sidewalk.

According to ARLnow, the Millers recently listed the 6,000-square-foot house for $3.75 million. It sold in 2023 for $2.875 million.

In recent months, activists have left messages in chalk on the sidewalk, including "Stephen Miller is destroying democracy," "stop the kidnapping," "hate has no home in Arlington," and "no white nationalism."

Katie Miller responded to the messages on social media: "To the 'Tolerant Left' who spent their day trying to intimidate us in the house where we have three young children: We will not back down. We will not cower in fear. We will double down. Always, For Charlie."

Stephen Miller described the chalk protests as "terroristic threats" on The Sean Hannity Show.

Neighbors spotted the Millers moving out several weeks ago. The home was placed on the market on Oct. 7.

A listing for the home described it as "luxury living at its finest," featuring six bedrooms, 6.5 baths, and "comprehensive security."

'Absolute psycho': Trump's 'revealing' Stephen Miller comment buried in mockery

President Donald Trump's comment about Stephen Miller during a press conference on Wednesday had people mocking the president and his deputy chief of staff, saying "well, that's pretty revealing" and calling Miller "an absolute psycho."

"I want to thank Stephen Miller... I love watching him on television. I would love to have him come up and explain his true feelings. Maybe not his truest feelings. That might be going a little bit too far," Trump said, laughing, during a news conference with FBI Director Kash Patel and Attorney General Pam Bondi.

"But Stephen, thank you for doing an unbelievable job," Trump said. "The people of this country love you, I'll tell you, and they love what you say about crime and stopping crime," he added.

Users on social media immediately reacted to Trump's statement:

"Well, that's pretty revealing," Dan Pfeiffer, co-host of Pod Save America and former Obama advisor, wrote on X.

"They know hes a f----ing nazi man," online streamer Hasan Piker wrote on X.

"The world already knows his true feelings," Aaron Parnas, attorney and content creator, wrote on X.

"Surreal that he just knows little Himmler shouldn't be FULLY uncorked in front of a microphone because his senior advisor is simply too frightening and fascist to 100% be himself in public," podcast host Jordan Crucchiola wrote on X.

"Even *he* knows Miller is an absolute psycho..." radio host Mat Smith wrote on X.

"Yeah these motherf---ers are all Nazis," Democratic strategist Jack Cocchiarella wrote on X.

'Embarrassing cowards’: Analyst says AOC’s Trump aide takedown exposed how to attack MAGA

An analyst on Tuesday revealed the "trick" to Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's (D-NY) mockery of Stephen Miller after the congresswoman called the White House deputy chief of staff "insecure" and warned MAGA followers not to follow the "embarrassing cowards."

Ocasio-Cortez didn't mince words last week when she told her Instagram followers to “Laugh at them! Stephen Miller is a clown! I’ve never seen that guy in real life, but he looks like he’s, like, 4′10″.”

An analyst warned that the attack on Miller, who stands 5 feet, 10 inches, could backfire unless it's done "without making it feel as if elitist liberals and man-hating women are taking aim at all conservative men," journalist and lawyer Jill Filipovic writes for Slate.

Filipovic argues there is a straightforward way to poke at Miller and shame his followers into reconsidering their support.

“People talk about this toxic masculinity. Let’s put that to the side for just one second—this is about insecure masculinity, and one of the best ways that you can dismantle a movement of insecure men is by making fun of them,” the author writes.

She also emphasizes that Miller deserves ridicule.

"Few people in American politics are as deserving of condemnation and mockery as Miller. He was the impetus behind Donald Trump’s family-separation policy. He has been pushing the outrageous claim that left-leaning groups are 'domestic terrorist organizations,' a lie (domestic terrorist organization also is not a legitimate legal designation) that seems to be a pretext for bringing the full force of the federal government down on Trump’s political opponents. It is truly difficult to overstate how authoritarian, dark, and dangerous Miller’s politics are, and how much sway he maintains over the president."

Filipovic points to fear as a tactic to mobilize MAGA followers, something that opponents can use to their advantage.

"And it seems to stem mostly from the fact that despite actually being closer to 5’10”, he’s a big, scared baby: scared of immigrants, scared of liberals, and begging Big Daddy Trump to send in the troops to protect him. If there were ever a legitimate target for mockery, he’s it," she writes.

The best tactic to disrupt MAGA's stronghold on men would be to focus on a key element: manliness.

"And Ocasio-Cortez is right that MAGA is a movement premised on insecure masculinity—and in that, it is like many other authoritarian movements throughout history," she adds.

"The mockery is merited. And sometimes it works," she writes. "Revealing men like Miller for who he is—an anxious scaredy-cat dweeb—helps dispel some of the mythology that this administration is trying to create. It also sends a message to men that the leaders of MAGA are not impressive tough guys but embarrassing cowards: men not to emulate but to move away from."

However, specifically humiliating men — even ones targeting immigrants, children and women — could have repercussions. But there could be a way to approach it.

"That doesn’t mean that liberals have to embrace or court these guys. But it does mean drawing a line between mocking the MAGA men in power and MAGA men writ large. The trick is making MAGA less appealing to men by being honest about how unappealing MAGA male leaders are," Filipovic writes.

'Orwellian:' GOP congressman publicly hits back against Stephen Miller

U.S. Rep Thomas Massie (R-KY) recently celebrated Massachusetts Institute of Technology's decision to reject a deal from the Trump administration, leading to a public dispute with Stephen Miller.

Raw Story reported on the MIT's initial statement saying it cannot support the Trump admin's plan. That led Massie to reply with, "The surest way to screw up the world’s best technical school is to let feds tell them how to run it... Congrats to my alma mater for turning down a bribe to let the executive branch dictate what happens on its campus."

Democratic lawmaker Ro Khanna shared Massie's comment, calling his GOP counterpart "is brilliant."

"The guy programmed by himself a gadget with a running tally of our national debt," Khanna said. "Maybe it's because he went to MIT with meritocratic admissions and no donor or alumni legacy. Let's not have DC mess MIT up."

Trump adviser Stephen Miller chimed in on that post, writing, "MIT is a federally funded and financed institution. The US government asked MIT, as one of America’s largest recipients of taxpayer dollars, to certify that students and professors will be hired based on objective merit and not skin color."

"What precisely is your objection here?" Miller asked.

Massie himself then responded to Miller.

"Undergrad tuition is privately funded at MIT with a few exceptions like Pell grants which apply to all colleges," Massie wrote. "I trust MIT more than any party at the White House to know which 18 yr olds can solve differential equations. Also, Feds policing speech on campuses is Orwellian."

Admin insiders 'privately worrying' Stephen Miller is turning voters against Trump: report

Trump administration officials are worried that White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller is turning voters against the president, according to a new report.

CNN on Saturday published a report all about the role Miller is playing in the Trump administration's advancements into liberal cities. Miller is known for his hardline immigration policies.

The report notes that "the dark overtones have set Miller at odds with elected officials in those cities who accuse ICE and other federal agents of being the ones provoking confrontation, and with judges who have repeatedly determined that the situation on the ground bears little resemblance to the administration’s characterizations."

But that doesn't just apply to elected officials in target cities; insiders have a similar view, according to the report.

"Even within Trump’s orbit, Miller’s forcefulness has surprised advisers who had long grown accustomed to his strident views, according to three people familiar with the dynamics, with some privately worrying that his militant language risks turning Americans against Trump on the crime and immigration issues where he’s traditionally held an advantage," the article states. "Yet allies say Miller’s harsh offensive is also a strategic one, rooted in a broader effort to catapult the administration’s portrayals of out-of-control crime into the public consciousness — and build support for a maximalist Trump agenda that relies heavily on exercising his executive authorities."

Read the report here (subscription required).

This Nazi philosopher's playbook explains everything Donald Trump does

The endgame for Donald Trump, JD Vance, Kristi Noem, and Pam Bondi is coming into clearer focus, and it’s nearly a one-for-one, step-by-step implementation of Nazi jurist/philosopher Carl Schmitt’s ideas that created and sustained the early Third Reich. Vance has even gone so far as to directly quote Schmitt.

The concepts aren’t particularly complicated, and it’s easy to see how Trump and his enablers are implementing them:

  • First, Schmitt taught, “there is no law, there is just power”: democracy is a messy anachronism in which whomever controls the political majority inevitably imposes their will on everybody else, stifling individuality and freedom, both in thought and behavior. The cure for this messiness of democracy, he argued, is a strong leader who transcends politics, understands the people and reflects their true desires, defends their racial and religious identity, ignores inconvenient laws, and thus leads the superior/majority race of people to their true destiny. A fascist dictator, in other words.
  • Second, the way the noble dictator rises to “plenary” (ultimate, unchallengeable) power is by discarding participation in the political process; contemptuously ignoring norms; breaking previous promises; flaunting national laws while blowing up negotiations; and refusing to compromise with “inferior” political parties or political ideas. Instead, Schmitt says, a “true leader” puts every institution and person in the nation into one of two binary buckets: “friends” or “enemies.” Friends are lavishly and publicly rewarded with wealth and power; enemies are relentlessly pursued and conspicuously punished until they’re either neutralized, bankrupted, or dead.
  • Third, the way to get past the guardrails built into constitutional republics (like the German 1930s Weimar Republic or today’s American republic) is by invoking “emergency” powers, even if it’s necessary to create an emergency to justify the invocation.

When Vance sat down with New York Times columnist Russ Douthat in May of last year he complained that Democrats opposing Brett Kavanaugh’s appointment to the Supreme Court weren’t interested in Kavanaugh’s legal positions but, rather, whether he would serve or oppose Democratic Party political efforts. He said:

“The thing that I kept thinking about liberalism in 2019 and 2020 is that these guys have all read Carl Schmitt — ‘There’s no law, there’s just power.’”

Not only has Vance apparently read Schmitt, his mentor and benefactor, Peter Thiel, has — according to extensive reporting in Wired magazine — long been fascinated by the Nazi theorist’s ideas.

While it’s unlikely that Trump could tell Schmitt from Fred Flintstone, he instinctively understands the man’s theories — he’s systematically following them, starting with his flouting norms and laws like the Hatch Act (two years in prison for selling Teslas in front of the White House) and both US and international laws against selling pardons or killing civilians (in boats in the Caribbean) without trial and conviction.

And that’s just the beginning. Taking a jet plane in an alleged bribe; giving the UAE high-tech chips in violation of America’s national security in exchange for a $2 billion investment in a Trump family crypto business; and exempting companies that gave him gifts or money from antitrust regulation, tariffs, and Foreign Corrupt Practices Act enforcements continue the trend.

From there, Trump moved to Schmitt’s friend-enemy doctrine, maliciously punishing his perceived enemies even when — like James Comey, Miles Taylor, and James Clapper — they’re Republicans.

He’s characterized Democrats in terms never before used by an American president to describe members of his opposition party, using words typically reserved for traitors and criminals. This is incredibly wrong and destructive, which is why George Washington warned against it and no president has ever done it.

His friends, though — even if they took $50,000 in a paper bag in an FBI bribery sting (Tom Homan), or looked the other way from Jeffrey Epstein during her eight years as Florida’s top law enforcement officer (Bondi) — can do no wrong. Attack the Capitol and cause the death of three police officers? You get a pardon, and now it appears even compensation.

And now he’s preparing to use the sledgehammer that Hitler wielded to destroy the German constitution, taking it as a club to seize absolute, plenary power: he’s taking visible steps toward invoking a nationwide state of emergency.

Schmitt first advanced this idea in 1933 when a Dutch communist set fire to the German parliament (Reichstag) building, describing what we call a state of emergency as a “state of exception” (Ausnahmezustand).

During such an “exception” or (even phony) moment of “emergency,” Schmitt said, a leader could — indeed, should — use it as an excuse to ignore normal constitutional requirements and laws because the urgency of the exception supersedes the law in order to preserve the republic.

Using this process, Schmitt argued, would allow a “noble Führer” with his finger on the pulse of his people to end-run around the tedious, laborious normal legal and ethical processes by which a nation’s leader normally executed the law.

It would let him become, initially, above the law (as six Republicans on the Supreme Court have endorsed) and, ultimately, become the law himself and rule by decree or executive order.

Former Labor Secretary Robert Reich is calling out Trump’s four-step plan to achieve Schmitt’s goal of plenary power (summary in my words, not his):

1) Deploy ICE to Blue cities with brutal tactics that intentionally inflame local people to protest;
2) Exaggerate the “crisis” and try to provoke the protesters to violence;
3) Deploy troops to further polarize and inflame local sentiment, evoking physical resistance to their presence that justifies arrests and live ammunition, a Tiananmen square of sorts;
4) Citing that resistance, invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807 to suspend parts of federal law and the Constitution so you can use the troops to steal the 2026 an 2028 elections for the GOP.

Illinois Governor JB Pritzker has echoed that narrative, explicitly saying that the goal of Trump’s “invasion” is to control and corrupt the elections next year and in 2028, and California Governor Gavin Newsome has echoed the sentiment.

Trump’s behavior is a virtual mirror of the steps Schmitt recommended after the Reichstag Fire, and Hitler followed with both the Enabling Acts (they made it legal to prepare lists of your political enemies to use the state against), and his political assassinations during the later Night of the Long Knives (for which Schmitt wrote the legal justification).

Like so many of us across the nation, Reich is basically begging people not to take the bait Trump is dangling. So far here in Portland, for example, Trump’s and Noem’s attempts at provocation have been met with street theater, dancing furries, people bringing flowers to the ICE building, and a naked bike ride protest.

But the ICE guys, laughing, shot a praying priest in the head from the roof of the ICE building, hitting him with a Pepper ball round that knocked him to the ground.

Baffled, Noem told Trump and America at a cabinet meeting that Portland must have “cleared” the “war-torn” areas and hidden the parts of the city that are smoking ruins from the recent riots she imagines (and Fox “News” lyingly suggests by playing five-year-old B-roll of the BLM protests) have happened:

“[Mayor Keith Wilson] said that Portland was perfectly safe, a beautiful city, no problems. And I said, ‘well, why did you clear the streets for me today then, and build out a four-block radius to make sure I could get in and out of here?’”

Lacking any evidence whatsoever of organized violence against ICE officers or their building in Portland, the notorious puppy killer, her (also married) alleged boyfriend in tow, added:

“This is a sick situation. But those are anarchists, those are people that want to overthrow government. They’re really degenerates. And we’re finding out who is supplying all of those beautiful signs and everything else.”

So far, Portland, Los Angeles, and Chicago have succeeded in not giving in to Noem’s and Trump’s Schmittian provocations. Odds are, though, they’ll continue to ramp up the violence until finally a breaking point is reached, and Trump can then claim justification for the Insurrection Act, something he’s now openly discussing almost daily.

Stephen Miller appears to be salivating at the prospect, telling CNN that “under Title 10 … the president has plenary authority” and then suddenly realizing that he’d slipped and let the cat out of the bag; he froze for the next dozen or so seconds until CNN claimed technical difficulties and cut away. When they came back, Miller omitted that “plenary” word that Karl Schmitt so loved — which means “ultimate power that nobody can challenge” — from his final remarks.

As historian Heather Cox Richardson explained:

“It is this power under Title 10 that White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller yesterday claimed was ‘plenary,’ or absolute. The idea that exceptions to the rule of law reveal who is really in charge of the government was central to the political philosophy of German political theorist Carl Schmitt, who joined the Nazis and whose work is increasingly popular among the radical right in the U.S. these days.”

Forbes notes that Trump is already claiming that if courts try to stop him, he’ll neuter them by invoking the Insurrection Act, claiming it gives him plenary powers:

“Trump has suggested he could be inclined to invoke the law if courts rule against him. ‘If people were being killed and courts were holding us up or governors or mayors were holding us up, sure, I’d do that,’ Trump said Monday, referring to using the Insurrection Act.”

The next few days, weeks, or possibly months will be pivotal.

  • Will citizens in one of the Blue cities Trump’s thugs have invaded give him the riot he wants?
  • If they do and he invokes the Insurrection Act, will the six compliant, frightened Republicans on the Supreme Court back him up?
  • If they don’t, will he ignore them and order the military into our streets to establish martial law anyway?
  • Will the nation’s military commanders go along with such an order?
  • And if they do, can they stop or effectively disrupt the elections of 2026 and 2028 in Blue cities? (We even had elections during the Civil War and WWII.)

Most Americans, polls show, are aghast. Few of us ever thought we’d live to see the day an American president would be following the steps to cripple a republic laid out by Nazi Germany’s most famous political theorist.

But here we are. And the most important things we can do are to fearlessly keep speaking out (“courage is contagious”), demand action from our elected officials of both parties, and show up peacefully in the streets on October 18th for No Kings Day 2.

See you there!

Trump's very own Wormtongue is goading him to declare martial law

Today, I have a few things to say about that putz Stephen Miller. First, he’s been on TV a lot lately, because that’s how he pours more poison onto the president’s already-poisoned brain. He doesn’t whisper lies into the ear of the old and demented sovereign the way Wormtongue does in Tolkien's epic. King Théoden didn’t have a TV. King Donald can’t stop watching his. So Stephen Miller delivers poison that way.

Last weekend, the White House advisor wrote on Twitter there’s “a large and growing movement of leftwing terrorism in this country. It is well organized and funded. And it is shielded by far-left Democrat judges, prosecutors and attorneys general. The only remedy is to use legitimate state power to dismantle terrorism and terror networks.”

In the days following, Miller repeated a variation of that “insurrection” theme during numerous TV appearances. For instance, he told a CNN anchor that ICE protesters are “actually, as we speak, trying to overthrow the core law enforcement function of the federal government. … ICE officers have to street battle against antifa, hand-to-hand combat every night, to come and go from their building.”

Every word here, including “and” and “the,” is a lie.

But on Wednesday, we saw the fruit of Miller’s labor.

“Chicago Mayor should be in jail for failing to protect Ice Officers,” Trump wrote on his social media site. “Governor Pritzker, too.”

I have talked a lot before about how Trump has dementia and how growing public awareness of his disease could make him vulnerable to the allegation that he’s not really in charge – that malicious and unaccountable forces are pulling his strings. But I haven’t talked about how. Well, this is how. And Stephen Miller is doing it in plain sight.

The second thing I want to say about that putz is about his personality, specifically, about the character of a man who goes on TV to goad an old, demented president into invoking the Insurrection Act to impose martial law. (Miller seems to believe if he says “insurrection” on TV enough times, something in Trump’s head will finally click.)

Before they lie to anyone else, liars like Miller lie to themselves. They must, because they cannot face the truth. However, I don’t mean just any old truth. I mean capital-T truth, which is to say, the whole truth about themselves. If they had to face it, they would die. (They believe they would die, because they have no faith.)

So they lie, as if their lives depend on it.

What truth? In Miller’s case, I can’t say I know for sure, but it’s probably that he’s a mediocrity. He’s neither exceptionally intelligent nor exceptionally gifted. Let’s say he’s bland-looking. He’s short by Washington standards. (He says he’s 5 foot 10.) Of course, there are plenty of men who are born of average appearance, talent and smarts, but who accept who they are and lead decent, honorable, happy lives.

Not Stephen Miller. Why? Titanic ego. The truth shall never be true! So he lies to himself, about himself. I would surmise that from a very early age, he began living his life as if he were surviving an endless series of traumatizing events. Do this long enough and you end up not knowing who you are, what you want or what you stand for. And because the lies you tell yourself, about yourself, literally prevent you from feeling joy or satisfaction, always present in life is a desperate, junkie need.

I would suggest this junkie need is the root of hatred. Miller looks around at others who are living their best lives according to the truth about themselves. He sees you doing you better than he’s doing him — and it makes him mad. You cannot do that to him. It’s an injustice. You must be stopped. Indeed, the only way he’s going to feel better is if you are forced to accept the lies he tells himself, about himself. The Stephen Millers of the world, including the president of the United States, are not mediocrities. They are not even human. They are gods. You shall obey. And if you refuse, they will “use legitimate state power.”

I’m dwelling on this facet of Stephen Miller’s personality, as well as on the nature of the totalitarian mind, for a reason. What he’s doing — goading an old, demented president through TV appearances into imposing martial law — is scary. But manipulating the president only gets Miller and the rest of the regime so far. If they are going to take control of the republic, which is their objective (make no mistake), they must convince the American people there’s no use in fighting back, that resistance is futile. And they are going to do that by lying.

During TV appearances this week, Miller made Trump seem like a sovereign lord endowed by the law and the Constitution (and perhaps by God) with the divine right (“plenary authority,” Miller told CNN) to do whatever he wants in the name of his people, and that any opposition to his divine rule is not only pointless but punishable.

Greg Sargent put it this way. Miller “believes that if he supercharges the debate over Trump's abuses of power with enough propaganda, he can polarize it and force low-info voters to embrace authoritarianism.” (Greg’s latest in The New Republic is about how Democratic Governors JB Pritzker and Gavin Newsom are taking Miller’s “theory of fascist power politics” at face value and devising a strategy to combat it.)

In other words, Miller is lying in order to get you (and “low-info voters”) to give up. And he’s doing that, because surrender is strategically vital. That is, without surrender, Miller and the rest of the regime got nothing. They lie, believing that you will believe their lies, and you end up doing their work for them – by conquering yourself.

But they can’t conquer you if you don’t believe them.

The moment you stop believing them is probably their most vulnerable moment, as we saw when Miller was asked by a Fox host to respond to comments made about him by New York Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. In a stream for constituents, AOC discussed the critical role of ridicule in fighting fascism. For instance, she said:

“Laugh at them. Stephen Miller is a clown. I’ve never seen that guy in real life but he looks like he’s 4’ 10”. He looks like he’s angry about the fact that he’s 4’ 10”. He looks like he is so mad that he is 4’ 10” that he’s taking that anger out at any other population possible. Laugh at them.”

Fox’s Laura Ingraham played that clip, right there on live TV. The written word cannot do justice to the face Miller made while watching it. (You have to see it for yourself.) All I can say is he looked wounded, as if AOC had stabbed him, and that’s because the injury was very real.

She did the unforgivable: refused to accept the lies Miller tells himself, about himself, and she deepened that wound by daring to enjoy herself while doing it. She not only hurt him, emotionally and psychically, but she reminded him of his misery he endures daily.

I’ll close with this. You cannot debate a liar like Stephen Miller. You cannot persuade him with logic or facts. You cannot find common ground with him. There is no compromise. They are too weak to be worthy of trust, and therefore, they can only be opposed. Trump said JB Pritzker should be jailed. In reply, Pritzker said come and get me.

Low-info voters might not understand much.

But they can understand that.

Two governors get Stephen Miller's authoritarian scheme — and how to fight it: report

Two governors understand the authoritarian threat Stephen Miller poses to the nation, according to an analyst, who argued that's why they're some of the only elected officials who are meeting the moment.

President Donald Trump's influential deputy chief of staff is using the MAGA disinformation machine polarize and inflame the debate over his dictatorial crackdown on Democratic-led cities and states, which The New Republic's Greg Sargent wrote forces Americans to take sides in the standoff – driving many of them to accept authoritarian rule.

"Miller believes that if he supercharges the debate over Trump's abuses of power with enough propaganda, he can polarize it and nudge low-info voters into accepting authoritarianism," Sargent wrote.

"Do Democratic leaders broadly have their own theory about this moment? It’s unclear," Sargent added. "But here’s what we can divine right now: Governors J.B. Pritzker of Illinois and Gavin Newsom of California do have one. They grasp Miller’s theory of the case, and they are responding in kind, with their own war for attention, on the intuition that voters will side with the rule of law over authoritarian dictatorshipif they are presented with this as a clear choice."

Trump is threatening to invoked the Insurrection Act, which he's been itching to do since his first term, and judges who've blocked him from sending troops into Portland and other cities have noticed that he's making up facts to justify his invasion.

"The specter of Portland 'burning' is dimwitted MAGA propaganda," Sargent wrote. "But Trump is now nakedly threatening to invoke the notorious nineteenth-century act if Democratic governors or the courts lawfully exercise their roles in our constitutional schema, in a way that displeases him."

In an inverse of reality, Miller declared that judges were "insurrectionists" for blocking Trump from deploying troops in American cities based on outright fabrications or old video footage he saw on Fox News, and Sargent said the White House adviser seems to be pushing the president to declare war on the country's own citizens.

"Miller appears to want Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act," Sargent wrote. "It’s likely that Miller, a master manipulator lurking furtively behind the despot’s throne, frequently uses the word 'insurrection' about Trump’s opponents to lodge it deep in Trump’s brainstem and make invocation of the Act more likely."

Strong majorities of Americans oppose Trump using the military for immigration crackdowns and law enforcement, but Newsom and Pritzker understand that Miller believes that opposition isn't strong enough to survive constant onslaught on social media.

"In this understanding of politics," Sargent wrote, "what really matters is the political attention economy, and how conflict plays within it. Supercharging searing civil tensions over jarring high-profile events drives attention, jolts low-propensity voters out of their information ruts, and compels them to really take sides."

"Pritzker and Newsom see it as a defining challenge of this moment that Trump is consolidating authoritarian power daily, and using it to subjugate and dominate Blue America as if it’s akin to an enemy nation within," he added. "If Democrats sit this debate out, Miller has calculated, Trump’s deceptions can flood public information spaces, persuading low-info, low-attention voters that his autocratic encroachments constitute a proportional response to the civic unrest he keeps propagandizing about."