Busted: Convicted former Iowa cop found guilty of stalking — again

A Polk County jury has found former police officer Walter Pacheco guilty of stalking his ex-girlfriend, according to court records.

Pacheco, 29, of Pleasant Hill, had been convicted of the same crime before, but this criminal charge was enhanced to a felony by the existence of a protective order that barred the two from having contact. It carries a potential punishment of up to 10 years in prison.

A sentencing hearing has not yet been set. It’s possible that a judge will extend his existing nearly 21-year prison sentence with the latest conviction.

Pacheco — also known by the surname Pacheco Belen — is a former police officer of Carroll and Eagle Grove, which hired him despite a similar harassment allegation by another woman. He was forced to resign from Carroll and was fired by Eagle Grove before moving to the Des Moines metro area. He applied to be an officer with the Des Moines Police Department, court records show.

But his law-enforcement career was derailed by a pattern of violence and harassment that surfaced in 2022, much of which was tied to his most recent ex-girlfriend. Pacheco surrendered his peace officer certification in July 2022 after, over a period of months, he was arrested for multiple felonies and misdemeanors, including assault, burglary, criminal mischief, false imprisonment, harassment, robbery, stalking, theft, witness tampering and willful injury.

Pacheco pleaded guilty to four of the charges by early 2023 and received a 19-year suspended prison sentence and probation.

In August 2023, after Pacheco again violated a no-contact order, a judge sentenced him to 24 days in jail and warned him that further violations might result in prison time.

Ultimately, it was an incident two months later that led to the imposition of the 19-year sentence, an additional nearly 2-year sentence for protective order violations, and the looming potential 10-year sentence.

On Oct. 16, 2023, Pacheco was accused of approaching the woman at a fitness center on Des Moines’ south side.

“The staff at Planet Fitness noticed the victim was in fear and attempted to help her by having the victim step behind the counter,” according to a criminal complaint. “The staff helped the victim leave Planet Fitness so she could get to her car.”

Still, Pacheco persisted by approaching her vehicle and following the woman in his vehicle to her house and then when she left for work, court records show. The woman also noticed Pacheco’s mother near the woman’s residence.

Pacheco was wearing a tracking device at the time because of his probation, and its data confirmed the woman’s allegations, court records show. She also recorded cellphone video of Pacheco.

Prosecutors also accused Pacheco of sending 39 emails to the woman after the incident and, as the court case progressed, they learned Pacheco attempted to call the woman from jail, often by using other inmates’ accounts in an apparent attempt to disguise his identity.

He was sentenced in April to up to 19 years in prison after his repeated probation violations. In June, a judge decided Pacheco had violated the no-contact order four times with the jailhouse phone calls and added about two years to his prison term.

Last week, a jury found him guilty of felony stalking after a four-day trial, court records show. Pacheco did not testify.

He faces up to 10 more years in prison when he is sentenced. Those who are incarcerated often serve less than half of their total possible sentences because of credit for good behavior, and they can also be paroled even earlier.

Pacheco has been held in the Polk County Jail since his October 2023 arrest.

Iowa Capital Dispatch is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Iowa Capital Dispatch maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Kathie Obradovich for questions: info@iowacapitaldispatch.com. Follow Iowa Capital Dispatch on Facebook and X.

Ethanol is a key Iowa issue for GOP presidential contenders

Republican candidates for the presidency have fawned over farmers this caucus season as they’ve courted voters in Iowa — the nation’s top producer of corn, eggs and pork.

The candidates often talk in platitudes about their support for Iowa agriculture and paint themselves as farmers’ best friends.

“I’m proud to be the most pro-farmer president that you’ve ever had in your life,” former President Donald Trump told supporters during a campaign stop in Council Bluffs in July.

None of the candidates has suggested that farmers be forced to implement costly measures to help the environment. To the contrary, the candidates rail against federal regulations that pertain to agriculture, especially those that seek to protect the nation’s streams.

“I will prevent both federal and state overreach from obstructing our agricultural industry,” Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis wrote in the Des Moines Register.

The lone agriculture issue to cause serious contention among the candidates is ethanol, which Iowa also leads the nation in producing.

Ohio businessman Vivek Ramaswamy said he supports the ethanol industry, but when he was poised early this month to announce his forceful opposition to using eminent domain to build carbon dioxide pipelines — and to even question their purpose — the Iowa Renewable Fuels Association released a scathing critique of the candidate. The association called him a hypocrite for his support of an oil pipeline and lack of support for pipelines that might benefit ethanol producers and farmers.

Ethanol has, on the whole, been a rallying point for the candidates. More than half of the state’s corn is used to produce the fuel — bolstering demand for the crop and the price per bushel it fetches. And the candidates have supported its use in combustion engines as an alternative to electric vehicles, which are largely disdained by Republican voters.

A Gallup poll in March found that 71% of Republicans would not consider owning an electric vehicle.

But the unwavering support for ethanol among the candidates was not initially clear. DeSantis, when he was a congressman representing Florida in 2017, supported an end to the Renewable Fuel Standard, which mandates a certain amount of ethanol be blended with gasoline each year.

Trump has taken repeated shots at DeSantis because of it: “If he had his way the entire economy of Iowa would absolutely collapse,” Trump said in July.

DeSantis has reversed course on the issue and said recently he would not seek to end the biofuels mandate.

The candidates have expressed support for the year-round sales of E15, a gasoline blend that is 15% ethanol. In some states, including Iowa, the gasoline that is blended with ethanol is more volatile, and the E15 that is created with it does not meet federal fuel standards in the summer that are meant to limit air pollution caused by evaporation.

“Why is government telling you what months you can do it?” Nikki Haley, a former ambassador to the United Nations, said during a campaign stop in Altoona.

Trump scored points with the ethanol industry in 2019 when his administration decided to allow the widespread sale of E15 during summer months, but the rule change was struck down by an appeals court that said only Congress could authorize it. He also drew the ire of ethanol advocates when his administration granted waivers to fuel refiners that exempted them from Renewable Fuel Standard requirements.

Trump holds a commanding lead in Iowa, according to a recent Des Moines Register/NBC News/Mediacom Iowa Poll. He is the top choice of 51% of likely Republican caucusgoers. DeSantis and Haley are a distant second and third, with 19% and 16%. Ramaswamy has the fourth-most support at 5%.

GOP candidates on issues

This is one of an occasional series of stories comparing Republican presidential candidates’ positions on issues ahead of the Iowa Caucuses on Jan. 15, 2024.

Subscribe to Countdown ’24, a free weekly newsletter from States Newsroom, to keep up on all the news about the top 2024 races, candidates and issues from Iowa and around the country.

Iowa Capital Dispatch is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Iowa Capital Dispatch maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Kathie Obradovich for questions: info@iowacapitaldispatch.com. Follow Iowa Capital Dispatch on Facebook and Twitter.

Alleged Iowa tree thief claims protection by England’s Charter of the Forest

An 800-year-old English charter that was hugely consequential for establishing rights of people to use public lands also protects a rural Rolfe man accused of illegally cutting down and stealing dozens of trees from a wildlife management area in northwest Iowa, the man’s attorney argues.

That is among several reasons why Jason Levant Ferguson, 41, wants a judge to reverse a jury’s verdict last month that he is guilty of 51 charges for taking the trees without permission from public property in Pocahontas County.

His attorney, Kevin Fors, of Harcourt, argues that the provisions of the Charter of the Forest — issued in 1217 by King Henry III — were transferred by common law to the United States when it declared independence from England, according to documents Fors filed in state district court.

Fors points to a paragraph in the charter that says: “Every freeman may agest his own wood within our forest at his pleasure and shall take his pawnage.”

“When we have the need to depend upon these rights, they need to be there for our protection or our society will not endure and we will spiral into authoritarianism much the same as happened in the time before the Charter of the Forest,” Fors wrote.

Ferguson allegedly took more than 100 trees from the Stoddard Wildlife Management Area over the course of more than a year and planned to use the lumber to build a house, according to court records. One of the trees was a very old bur oak that was six feet in diameter at its base.

Claims news coverage tainted jury

The Iowa Capital Dispatch published a news article several days before Ferguson’s trial about timber thefts in the state that, in part, detailed the accusations against him. It was republished by several newspapers.

“This article was picked up by other sources and was so dominate that it became an issue at a political rally of presidential politicians in Pocahontas during the trial,” Fors wrote. He did not elaborate.

The article included information about Ferguson’s status as a felon and that a search of his property yielded evidence that someone was growing marijuana and manufacturing methamphetamine there. The article detailed how that evidence was suppressed because the search was improperly approved by a magistrate.

Fors said jurors would have likely seen the news coverage and that “the State” had colluded with Capital Dispatch to influence jurors.

“It is well known that in Russia the State uses the news to assert its position; this has been especially noticeable since the start of the war in Ukraine,” Fors wrote. “This is the first time I have been involved in a case where those tactics were used by the State so vehemently against my client.”

The Iowa Department of Natural Resources, which was the Capital Dispatch’s primary source of information about timber thefts, provided that information at a reporter’s request and had no influence over what the article contained or when it published.

Court records indicate potential jurors were asked whether they had seen news coverage of the allegations against Ferguson. The trial went for four days, and judges often admonish jurors to avoid news media during breaks in trials.

The Fort Dodge Messenger newspaper had published an article more than a year ago that detailed drug and weapons allegations against Ferguson.

Defense attorney claims he erred

Fors, who has been a licensed attorney in Iowa for nearly 40 years, also said he failed to object to a prosecution argument that Fors claims violated Ferguson’s right against self-incrimination.

“Defendant’s attorney has only been trying one jury trial a year since the beginning of the pandemic and as such was rusty and did not object to the testimony at trial,” Fors wrote. “This failure to object was a failure to provide the defendant with effective assistance of counsel.”

Fors said it was improper for the prosecutor to criticize the defense for not producing a witness to testify that Ferguson had previously had permission to take trees from the property, as he had claimed.

Fors argued that because Ferguson himself could have testified about the issue, the prosecutor’s argument insinuated Ferguson is guilty because he didn’t testify, which would violate the Fifth Amendment. He said his failure to object would most likely be the subject of a post-conviction appeal if a judge accepts the jury’s verdict.

Ferguson seeks an acquittal or a new trial. He is set to be sentenced next month and faces up to five years in prison for a felony theft charge and one year each for 50 timber buyer violation charges.

Pocahontas County Attorney Daniel Feistner, who is prosecuting the case, has not yet filed written responses to Fors’ motions. He told Iowa Capital Dispatch he anticipates the issues will be discussed at a hearing prior to sentencing.

Iowa Capital Dispatch is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Iowa Capital Dispatch maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Kathie Obradovich for questions: info@iowacapitaldispatch.com. Follow Iowa Capital Dispatch on Facebook and Twitter.

Trump says he was ‘great’ for Iowa — and asks for big caucus win

FORT DODGE — Former President Donald Trump rallied supporters on Saturday and asked them to repay his kindnesses to Iowa of keeping it the first state in the Republican presidential nomination process and of paying farmers billions of dollars during trade disputes with China in his first term.

He mentioned the payments to farmers several times during his roughly hourlong address to a capacity crowd in the gymnasium of Fort Dodge High School. The gym’s scoreboard time was set to 20:24, with the team scores set to 45 and 47, to signify the upcoming election year, his status as the 45th president and his hope to be the 47th.

“We gave $28 billion to the farmers,” Trump said. “And just so you know, my people have said, ‘Sir, please don’t talk about that so much. It makes you sound very arrogant.’ I said, ‘Wait a minute, I got $28 billion for the farmers!’”

Those payments in 2019 were bailouts to farmers affected by Trump’s attempts to overhaul the nation’s trade policies. He imposed new tariffs on Chinese products, and the country responded, in part, with tariffs on American soybeans.

Trump’s multiple mentions of the payments to farmers were part of a streak of transactional politicking during his speech. He also insinuated U.S. Sens. Chuck Grassley and Joni Ernst owe credit to his endorsements for their last election wins.

“I got ’em elected,” Trump said. “Remember that.”

He did not mention Gov. Kim Reynolds, who this month endorsed one of his rivals, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, and drew Trump’s ire.

But Trump took aim at DeSantis for being less friendly to Iowa agriculture and for trailing him distantly in recent polls.

“He’s going down the tubes,” Trump said of DeSantis. “He’s like a wounded bird going to the ground.”

A recent Iowa State University/Civiqs poll — the results of which were published on Thursday — found that 54% of likely Republican caucusgoers it surveyed support Trump. That’s comparable to Trump’s level of support in the poll in the past two months.

DeSantis had the second-most support at 18%, and former United Nations ambassador and South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley had 12%.

Support for DeSantis in the poll was only slightly higher from last month — a 1-percentage-point increase — despite his endorsement by Reynolds.

Trump’s campaign said in an email that the recent poll results show DeSantis is “dead in the water, and even Kim Reynolds’ endorsement hasn’t made a difference.”

But it wasn’t farm payments, endorsements or Trump’s attacks on his rivals that drew the loudest applause. That was reserved for his allegations that the last presidential election was rigged and for his critiques of transgender women competing in sports.

“We will not allow men to play in women’s sports,” he said to a standing ovation. Trump later added: “It’s very demeaning to women.”

Those who delivered short speeches before Trump took the stage also aggressively confronted the issue.

“Are you ready for a president that will tell transgender males they need to put their jock strap back on?” said Iowa Rep. Mike Sexton, a Rockwell City Republican.

Rep. Bobby Kaufmann, a Wilton Republican, added: “It’s ridiculous I even have to say this, but I will. There are two genders. Male and female.”

Jolene Messerly, a vocal music teacher in Storm Lake who attended Saturday’s rally, has twice voted for Trump and plans to again.

She said social policies — such as those that pertain to someone’s gender or sexuality — are not among what she considers important voting issues, but that illegal immigration and border security are. She said Trump’s policies are best for those issues.

“I like Trump’s policies, and I like him,” Messerly said. “He’s a businessman, and I think we just need to stick to the business of running the country. We don’t need to get into all this other crap.”

Messerly said she has not paid close attention to the criminal indictments Trump faces but dismissed them as “a wild goose chase to try to keep him out of office.”

“But I think that he’s gonna keep knocking it out of the park,” she said.

Trump is the subject of four criminal indictments related to the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol, his alleged efforts to overturn election results in Georgia, his handling of classified documents after his time in the White House, and alleged hush-money payments to an adult film actress.

Three of those cases are set for trial next year.

His civil fraud trial in New York is also underway, pertaining to whether Trump inflated the values of his properties to get more favorable loans.

Trump has said the prosecutions are politically motivated and meant to prevent him from returning to office.

“They know that in a free and fair fight, crooked Joe Biden doesn’t have a shot.”

Cindy Knutson, of Fort Dodge, voted for President Biden in the last general election but is seeking other options this year because Biden’s age is becoming problematic for her.

“He’s really gone downhill,” Knutson said.

She is a registered Democrat who sometimes votes for Republican candidates and attended the Trump event to see if he is a viable option. Knutson said she is not leaning toward supporting any particular candidate.

James Outlaw, of Dakota City, said he will vote for Trump in hopes that he can “reverse everything” that the Biden administration has done, “and then the country will be fine.”

Outlaw believes that Biden has mismanaged the nation’s military, and restricting abortion is one of his top issues. He said Trump deserves another term because his U.S. Supreme Court nominees overturned Roe v. Wade.

He said the country’s borders need to be locked down to prevent illegal immigration.

Trump pledged Saturday to launch the largest mass deportation in the country’s history of people who immigrated illegally and to impose “strong ideological screening” of immigrants to prevent potentially dangerous people from arriving in the United States.

Trump asked rally attendees to turn out in force in the January caucuses and “make sure we win by a lot.”

“Iowa’s been good to me, and I’ve been great to you,” he said.

Iowa Capital Dispatch is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Iowa Capital Dispatch maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Kathie Obradovich for questions: info@iowacapitaldispatch.com. Follow Iowa Capital Dispatch on Facebook and Twitter.

Tree theft: Why an uncommon crime is on the rise in Iowa

People stealing trees from public and private land in Iowa is an infrequent but growing occurrence, according to state conservation officers.

The crimes range considerably in their scope and sophistication, and the value of the heists can be lucrative. Some of the culprits might haul their looted timber with ramshackle trailers. Others might have full-on logging rigs.

Some of the thefts happen out in the open, such as when a company is contracted to harvest timber from a certain area but oversteps its bounds to cut down a valuable-looking tree on an adjacent property. A prime black walnut trunk can fetch upwards of $10,000.

Other thefts are conducted in the dead of night. In one recent instance, a thief was cutting trees in an area near a highway and would only operate his chainsaw when the sound of passing traffic would cover its noise.

“Timber theft was something we never used to see, and now it’s become a bigger thing,” said Craig Cutts, chief of the Iowa Department of Natural Resource’s Law Enforcement Bureau.

He said perhaps the most egregious recent offense happened in Pocahontas County last year, when someone allegedly cut more than 100 trees from a state wildlife management area. One of the trees was a bur oak with a trunk about six feet in diameter.

“That tree was a sapling when Iowa was made a state,” Cutts said. “It’s incredible somebody would cut that down.”

The DNR does not keep a reliable list of timber theft reports, but Capt. Brian Smith, who oversees the bureau’s region of southwest Iowa, estimates that the department has investigated about a dozen in the past two years.

“All across Iowa, timber theft has either been on the increase or at least it’s being recognized on a larger scale than it used to,” he said. “I believe it’s the former of the two — that it has increased — and it has been increasing for a number of years.”

The cause of that uptick is unclear. Smith speculates that a growing number of absentee landowners — those who own land but seldom step foot on it — gives potential thieves more opportunities and decreases the public surveillance of wider rural areas.

And while thieves have incentive to steal high-dollar trees worth thousands of dollars, they’re also taking low-dollar softwoods that can be made into pallets.

“They’re much, much less valuable,” Smith said, “but if you can steal it, and it’s free to begin with, a few bucks is better than nothing.”

In the case of the giant bur oak theft in northwest Iowa, the alleged culprit said he planned to build a house out of logs, according to court records.

Timber investigation leads to drug, gun charges

In October 2022, two DNR officers responded to a report that someone was illegally cutting trees from the Stoddard Wildlife Management Area near Rolfe.

While the officers were on-site, they noticed a vehicle pulling a trailer that turned off of the nearby roadway, onto a trail that led to the state property, according to court records.

The officers followed and found Jason Levant Ferguson, 41, who lives nearby. They noted the area was blanketed with vehicle trails, cut trees, branches, tree stumps and limbs. It’s illegal in Iowa to harvest trees from state land without DNR approval.

Ferguson allegedly admitted to the officers that he had been cutting down trees in the wildlife management area “that looked like they were dying.”

“Jason told (the officers) about a large tree that he had cut down, and it was so large that it took him weeks to get it out of the timber, having multiple issues including tires going flat under the extreme weight,” according to documents associated with a search warrant.

The officers asked if they could go to Ferguson’s acreage to see the large log, and he obliged, court records show. There they saw hundreds of logs piled on the property, and Ferguson allegedly admitted that most of them came from the state-owned area.

Ferguson could not be reached to comment for this article.

Another officer obtained a search warrant for the property to collect further evidence, and they seized a significant amount of logging equipment: two trailers, a chain hoist, numerous chainsaws, a winch and others.

But they also saw what they believed to be marijuana and a small-caliber rifle. Ferguson is a felon who cannot possess firearms, court records show.

That discovery led to another search warrant for drugs, and officers later found evidence that someone was manufacturing methamphetamine and growing marijuana on the property for sale. They found an unspecified “large amount” of both drugs, according to a criminal complaint, along with smaller amounts of LSD, cocaine and hallucinogenic mushrooms.

Ferguson was charged with numerous felonies for drugs and weapons, the most serious of which is punishable by up to 25 years in prison.

He was also charged with felony theft for taking trees from the wildlife management area, along with 50 counts each for timber buyer violations and prohibited destructive acts.

But the prosecution of many of those charges unraveled last month when a district court judge decided that the search warrants were improperly approved.

Magistrate Ben Meyer, who signed the warrants, was also certified by the Iowa Law Enforcement Academy to be a legal instructor for reserve officers of the Pocahontas Police Department and was identified by the academy as an employee of that department at the time he endorsed the warrants, according to court records.

That violated a constitutional separation of powers requirement because Meyer was a representative of both the judicial and executive branches of state government, District Court Judge Derek Johnson recently decided.

“It is this court’s finding that the search warrants in question are not valid because they were not endorsed and signed by a neutral and detached magistrate,” Johnson wrote in an Oct. 18 order.

The drug and gun charges have been dismissed, court records show, and prosecutors can’t use the evidence obtained for the tree thefts from the searches. Still, the DNR obtained evidence in its investigation that led to the search warrants — including Ferguson’s alleged admission he took the trees — and the tree-related charges are set for trial next week.

Pocahontas County Attorney Dan Feistner confirmed that his prosecution of the timber thefts will continue but declined to comment further about the case.

Difficult investigations

A review of court documents associated with timber violations shows at least one other prosecutorial misstep: a criminal charge against a Bloomfield man in 2018 was dismissed because of how it was filed in court.

The man was accused of buying timber without posting a bond with the state, which is a serious misdemeanor and punishable by up to a year in jail. But the charging officer filed it with a citation form that is most often used for traffic violations and didn’t include specific details of the alleged crime.

Citing that lack of detail, a judge dismissed the charge.

Timber buyers who agree to pay people to harvest their trees are required to set aside up to $15,000 to cover those sales if they don’t actually pay. Small-time loggers who aren’t stealing trees are occasionally cited for violating that law, DNR records show.

The state maintains a database of bonded timber buyers to help protect against improper sales and tree thefts, which can be difficult to uncover and investigate.

“In some circumstances, it’s tough,” said Smith, who oversees DNR law enforcement in southwest Iowa. “We’ve had completely legitimate bonded timber buyers logging one property, and they get across the property line not realizing it. Others might cross that line because they see that big $10,000 black walnut tree, and they think, ‘Well, what the heck? If I sneak over there and grab it, nobody will notice.’”

The DNR often relies on its staff to detect potential timber thefts from public property during routine walkthroughs. Thefts from private property are often aided by landowners and their neighbors.

https://www.rawstory.com/r/entryeditor/2666232305#

In 2020, two men stole seven walnut trees from an acreage near Central City in eastern Iowa, according to court records. They were identified with the help of surveillance video recordings from a neighboring property.

Last year, a man who had claimed he was cutting down walnut trees in rural Persia in western Iowa on behalf of the Iowa Department of Transportation was identified with the help of a suspicious neighbor who photographed the man’s truck. The man had stolen 17 trees worth about $1,000, court records show.

Iowa Capital Dispatch is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Iowa Capital Dispatch maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Kathie Obradovich for questions: info@iowacapitaldispatch.com. Follow Iowa Capital Dispatch on Facebook and Twitter.

Trump claims election investigations are themselves ‘election interference’

Former President Donald Trump — who might face criminal charges for attempting to interfere with the outcome of the 2020 presidential election — claimed Tuesday afternoon in Iowa that he is the victim of election interference by federal prosecutors.

Trump announced earlier Tuesday he has received a letter from Special Counsel Jack Smith saying he is a target of the federal investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol. Typically, such a notice precedes an indictment.

There is also pending investigation in Georgia into Trump’s alleged attempt to alter the results of the 2020 election. Trump asked Georgia’s secretary of state to “find” 11,780 votes — one more than his slim deficit to Democrat Joe Biden — according to a recording of a phone call between the two men.

But Trump said Tuesday those investigations — and two others that have already yielded criminal indictments against him — are the result of Democrats’ fears that he could be reelected.

“It’s election interference — never been done like this in the history of our country,” Trump told Fox News host Sean Hannity, who interviewed the candidate before a live audience in Cedar Rapids. “And it’s a disgrace what’s happening to our country, whether it’s the borders or the elections or kinds of things like this, where the (U.S. Department of Justice) has become a weapon for the Democrats, an absolute weapon.”

Reporters were barred from covering the event, which was billed as a town hall meeting but featured no questions from the audience during its Tuesday night broadcast on the cable channel.

About half of the one-hour program was devoted to the investigations into Trump that he and Hannity allege are politicized.

“If elected, he is also planning to completely reform America’s two-tiered system of justice,” Hannity said in his introduction.

Hannity alleged that there were insufficient investigations or prosecutions in recent years of Democrats: of former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton for her private email server and a dossier that linked Trump to Russian election interference; of President Joe Biden who was found to have improperly retained classified documents from his time as vice president; and of Biden’s son Hunter and his overseas business dealings.

Trump has been indicted twice this year, including for allegedly scheming to keep classified documents from his time as president and sharing some of the information with people who lacked necessary security clearances. His residence and resort in Florida was searched by federal investigators.

“Hillary Clinton’s home wasn’t raided; Joe Biden’s garage wasn’t raided,” Hannity said, and he later added: “Hunter Biden has always been protected.”

Trump is also accused of falsifying New York business records to conceal a hush-money payment to an adult film actress.

“Until I got indicted, I had such respect for the office of the president,” Trump said.

He claimed Biden’s family has received money from foreign countries and that Biden is a “compromised president.”

Little talk of Iowa

Trump’s Tuesday appearance in Cedar Rapids was four days after he skipped a gathering of evangelical Christians in Des Moines that featured interviews with six of his caucus opponents.

The event was hosted by The Family Leader, whose president recently called for three Iowa Supreme Court justices to resign or be impeached for failing to put a restrictive abortion law from 2018 into effect. State lawmakers last week adopted new, similar legislation, and Gov. Kim Reynolds signed it into law at the Family Leadership Summit.

Trump has been reluctant to express support for federal legislation to restrict abortion, and he didn’t broach the topic — or much else pertaining to Iowa other than his lead in the polls — on Hannity’s show. He claims credit for the overturning of Roe v. Wade because of his three appointments to the U.S. Supreme Court, but he says the issue should be decided by each state.

A Des Moines Register/Mediacom Iowa Poll in March found that about 61% of adults in the state support legal abortion in most or all cases. That’s up from 48% in 2008.

That level of support is likely to increase in the future: About 72% of Iowans younger than 35 support legal abortion in most or all cases, according to the poll.

Trump has said he supports exceptions to abortion restrictions for rape, incest and to protect the mother’s wellbeing.

Trump has been criticized recently by some supporters of Reynolds for bemoaning her public neutrality toward the Republican presidential field. It’s customary for governors of the first-in-the-nation caucus state to refrain from endorsements before party nominees are chosen.

Trump insinuated on Truth Social last week that Reynolds won election in 2018 because of his support and endorsement. Trump has said he expects some measure of loyalty from those he aids in elections.

“Now, she wants to remain ‘NEUTRAL,’” Trump wrote on the social media platform he founded. “I don’t invite her to events!”

Reynolds, speaking to reporters Tuesday at the Iowa Capitol, did not credit Trump for her 2018 win. “You know, I owe it to the Iowans who actually put their trust in me. They put their trust in me in 2018. It was a tough year for Republicans. I was one of the few that made it across the finish line and I overwhelmingly won in 2022,” she said.

Reynolds said she has invited all of the Republican candidates to the Iowa State Fair, including Trump, for one-on-one chats with her. “So hopefully, he’ll take that opportunity to show up,” she added Tuesday.

Iowa Capital Dispatch is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Iowa Capital Dispatch maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Kathie Obradovich for questions: info@iowacapitaldispatch.com. Follow Iowa Capital Dispatch on Facebook and Twitter.

Black Iowa students forced to sit in back of bus after dispute on band trip: lawsuit

Three Black Waukee high school students were told to ride home from a 2021 band trip in the back of a school bus after a white parent chaperone allegedly instigated an altercation with them that turned physical, according to a recently filed lawsuit and other documents.

The incident with the Northwest High School students followed a September 2021 marching band competition in Omaha, Nebraska, according to a letter penned by the attorney of one student who is suing the school district.

The letter — sent to the district’s superintendent in December 2021 — alleges the parent volunteer was perturbed that the students had gone to the bus before the competition’s awards ceremony had concluded because it was “disgraceful to their teammates.”

However, the students had gathered with two white students on the bus with the permission of the school’s band director and instrumental music teacher, the letter said. The students were members of the band’s color guard.

The parent volunteer told the students to get off the bus, dismissed the white students from the conversation, and, along with another white parent who joined a bit later, confronted the remaining Black students.

When one of the students attempted to leave the conversation to find the band director, one of the parents allegedly grabbed him by the arm to prevent his departure. That led to a heated exchange between the now-former student who filed the lawsuit — Bailey Hilson, then a high school senior — and the parent who had allegedly grabbed the other student.

The parent “responded by ‘getting in the face’ of Bailey, shouting at her, and thumping her in the forehead with her finger,” wrote Jerry Foxhoven, the Des Moines attorney who represents Hilson.

The parent could not be reached to comment for this article, but an investigative report produced by the school district said the woman denied touching the students.

The woman admitted to waving a finger in Hilson’s face, the report said. She alleged Hilson was using profanity and saying hateful things.

The band instructor and instrumental music teacher intervened a short time later, and the Black students asked to be moved from the bus for the ride back to Waukee because the parent volunteers would be on it.

“This mature and reasonable request was denied, and the three Black students were instructed to ‘sit in the back of the bus’ and not interact with the adults on the way home,” Foxhoven wrote. “This direction … created a pathetic scene reminiscent of our nation’s history of segregation in public transportation. The students, left with no other choice, followed instructions.”

A ‘sham’ investigation

The lawsuit alleges that a school district investigation into the incident was too focused on the students’ conduct and that the district’s actions thereafter did not adequately address — and perhaps exacerbated — the emotional distress of Hilson.

Assistant Principal Christie Pitts conducted the investigation and concluded that the parent volunteer had grabbed or touched two students, and someone at the district notified the Waukee Police Department of the alleged physical contact.

The woman was barred from volunteering at the high school and from attending at least one home football game, according to Foxhoven’s letter. The district further pledged to have a “restorative conversation” with the students and to reevaluate the requirements for its parent volunteers. It sent a message to band students and their families that said “the students involved were not at fault.”

“We regret the breakdown in the system that led to this event,” said the message, which was signed by the school’s two band directors. “You can be assured that we are taking proactive steps with administration to help ensure that such an incident does not happen again.”

Amy Varcoe, a spokesperson for the school district, declined to comment specifically on the allegations contained in the lawsuit but said the district “strongly denies” them.

“Waukee Community School District maintains a strong commitment to a safe and collaborative environment for all students,” she said.

It’s unclear whether the police department investigated the incident. The department did not immediately respond to a request for information about a potential investigation, nor does it have jurisdiction over an alleged assault that might have been committed in another state.

The school district investigation’s findings largely align with the timeline of events that are detailed in Foxhoven’s letter. A video surveillance recording from the bus showed that one of the white students who was allowed to leave at the start of the altercation had only been briefly on the bus. The other white student who was dismissed from the altercation had been with the Black students for the duration of their time on the bus, the investigative report said.

That white student called the parent volunteers “racist bigots” on the bus ride back to Waukee, the report said.

The lawsuit called the school district investigation a sham, in part, because it ignored the potential racial aspects of the incident. It further claimed that the district gave improper support to the parent volunteers by investigating a bullying complaint one of them subsequently made against Hilson.

A school investigation into that complaint found that there was an ongoing “substantial student conflict” between the volunteer’s child and Hilson as a result of the band trip, Foxhoven’s letter said.

The lawsuit was filed last month after Hilson lodged a complaint against the district with the Iowa Civil Rights Commission in July.

The commission issued Hilson a right-to-sue letter in September, which is required for lawsuits in state district court that allege violations of the Iowa Civil Rights Act.

The lawsuit names the school district, Superintendent Brad Buck and former Principal Fairouz Bishara-Rantisi as defendants, but not the parent volunteers. It seeks an unspecified amount of money to compensate Hilson for her suffering that resulted from the district’s alleged racial discrimination and a reimbursement for attorneys’ fees.

The lawsuit says Hilson “suffered severe emotional distress, causing her to miss school, struggle with depression and feel isolated and unsupported at school, causing her to miss the true joy normally experienced by a student in their senior year of high school.”

The school district has yet to file a response to the lawsuit in district court. There are no other pending lawsuits from the other students against the district, according to state and federal court records.

Iowa Capital Dispatch is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Iowa Capital Dispatch maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Kathie Obradovich for questions: info@iowacapitaldispatch.com. Follow Iowa Capital Dispatch on Facebook and Twitter.

Black, straight-A student was in ‘racially hostile environment’ at Iowa school


The repeated racial harassment of a Black, straight-A student at an Ottumwa middle school was not adequately addressed by the school district and might have led to the student’s diminished academic performance, according to the U.S. Department of Education.

The department on Monday outlined the findings of its investigation into the Ottumwa Community School District’s handling of multiple harassment complaints during the past two school years. The department’s Office for Civil Rights concluded that “district students subjected a Black middle school student to racial harassment so pervasive that it constituted a racially hostile environment and that the district failed to take necessary steps to protect the student,” the department said Monday.

The department determined that the district violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits racial discrimination at public schools.

A letter the department sent to the school district detailed numerous instances of harassment from five different students, at least four of whom were white. They included:

— The repeated use of racial slurs such as the N-word, slave, blackie and cotton picker.
— Taunting the Black student with monkey noises.
— Students mocking Black Power by raising their fists during class.
— A student referred to KKK — most often the acronym for the white supremacist Ku Klux Klan — as the “Kool Kids Klub.”
— A student knelt on a bottle that contained a dark-colored fluid and said, “It can’t breathe,” to mimic the murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis in 2020.
— One student allegedly said, “I can send you back to the cotton fields,” and thanked the Black student for his cotton shirt.

The department’s letter that was released publicly was heavily redacted to remove specific dates, names and other information. The investigation was spurred by the complaint of someone who is associated with the student. Their relationship was not disclosed in the letter.

An inadequate response

An Ottumwa teacher at Evans Middle School was among the first to address the harassment in 2020 and said she would speak to an unspecified number of students individually and further supply a list of the “alleged bullying students” to an assistant principal, according to the department.

As the harassment continued, the school’s principal — who was not identified by name in the department’s letter — suggested “restorative circle” discussions in which classes participated “to repair harm, educate, build community and reflect on the topic of race.”

The script that was developed to help guide those discussions did not specifically address racially offensive language — including the N-word — and didn’t say racial harassment was prohibited, the department reported.

Despite the discussions, the use of the N-word against the Black student became more frequent as the school year went on, but the student did not report it “because he did not want to be known as a ‘snitch’ or a ‘rat’ by other students and because he did not believe that the school would do anything in response to such a report,” the department’s letter said.

In 2021, the Iowa Department of Education received complaints regarding harassment of the student and contacted the school district. However, the state department “indicated that it would not investigate the incidents but would be available as a resource for the district.”

A spokesperson for the state education department did not immediately respond to a request for information about what might trigger an investigation into racial harassment complaints.

Among the new allegations was the mimicking of George Floyd’s murder by kneeling on a bottle that contained dark liquid. The principal investigated the incident but concluded it wasn’t racial harassment because it wasn’t part of a “current pattern of behavior,” the federal department said. The student received in-school lunch detention for an unspecified number of days.

Two students who were shown to have repeatedly harassed the Black student were punished with out-of-school suspensions.

After several in-school investigations in early 2021, the district told the students to stay at least 10 feet apart and altered the accused students’ classes and lunch to help prevent contact. The district allegedly denied a request for a no-contact order to fully prevent communication between the Black student and the others.

The use of racial pejoratives allegedly continued into 2022, when the Black student received his first B grades in classes. All of his previous grades had been As, according to the person associated with the student.

The fallout

The U.S. Department of Education reached an agreement with the school district to resolve the civil rights complaint against it. The district has agreed to pay for the Black student’s past and future therapy that is the result of the harassment.

The district also agreed to take steps to prevent future harassment by publishing an anti-harassment statement, revising policies, training employees and educating students.

There are no pending lawsuits in state or federal court against the school district for the harassment, according to publicly available court records.

The department’s Monday letter noted that the person who had spurred its investigation could file a lawsuit in federal court regardless of its findings.

There are rules that govern lawsuits in state court that are based on violations of the Iowa Civil Rights Act. Potential litigants must obtain a right-to-sue letter from the Iowa Civil Rights Commission after filing a complaint with the commission.

It’s possible for there to be concurrent investigations into the Ottumwa district by the commission and by the U.S. Department of Education, said Kaitlin Smith, a spokesperson for the commission. However, Smith could not say whether the commission is investigating a complaint against the district because they are generally confidential.

School and state records indicate Aaron Ruff started as principal at Evans Middle School in 2020 but is now the principal of one of the district’s elementary schools. Ruff did not respond to a request for comment.

A district spokesperson did not respond to a request for the dates of Ruff’s tenure as principal at the middle school. The district announced in February 2022 its choice for interim principal for this school year.

“We will continue to focus on equity for every student by expanding how we gather student voices, reviewing our policies and procedures, and ensuring stakeholders know how to report issues of harassment that could occur in our schools,” said Mike McGrory, the district’s superintendent, in a press release that addressed the agreement with the U.S. Department of Education. “In the weeks to come, we will continue to review and train our staff on how to better identify issues of harassment and how to build a safe, supportive and collaborative culture.”

Iowa Capital Dispatch is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Iowa Capital Dispatch maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Kathie Obradovich for questions: info@iowacapitaldispatch.com. Follow Iowa Capital Dispatch on Facebook and Twitter.

Federal government has given $800 million to keep indebted farmers afloat

More than 13,000 farmers have benefited from nearly $800 million in federal debt relief, U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack said Tuesday.

The assistance came from a new federal initiative to erase farmers’ loan delinquencies to the U.S. Department of Agriculture and private lenders or to resolve their remaining debts after foreclosure.

Going forward, the USDA is expected to give hundreds of millions of dollars of relief to farmers who are facing bankruptcy or foreclosure and to those who are at risk of missing payments on their loans.

“The star of the show here is the farmer,” Vilsack told reporters. “The person that really matters is the farmer, and keeping that farmer, him or her, on the land so that he or she can take care of their family and their community.”

The USDA’s Farm Service Agency gives direct loans to farmers and guarantees loans from banks, credit unions and others to farmers for up to 95% of their value.

The government’s farm loan obligations for the 2022 fiscal year, which ended Sept. 30, totaled about $5.8 billion, according to USDA records. States with the highest obligations included Iowa at about $484 million, Arkansas at $424 million, Oklahoma at $366 million and Nebraska at $341 million. Virginia’s overall obligations totaled over $67.5 million.

Of those with delinquent direct loans, the average farmer who has failed to make regular payments for at least two months received about $52,000 under a “distressed borrowers” initiative, which is funded with more than $3 billion by the Inflation Reduction Act. That eliminated their delinquencies.

For those with government-backed loans from private entities, the average benefit was about $172,000.

The total number of farmers in the two categories was about 11,000.

For those with direct loans who went bankrupt and still owed money — about 2,100 borrowers — the average benefit was about $101,000. Vilsack said those bankruptcies happened at least a year ago but did not say how long ago they might have occurred.

States with farmers who received the most relief included Oklahoma and Texas, Vilsack said, whereas farmers in the northeastern states of Connecticut, Delaware and Rhode Island were among those who received the least. Those northeastern states had a combined total of federal farm loan obligations of just $11 million during the 2022 fiscal year, USDA records show.

“Virtually every state in the country has a borrower or several borrowers or groups of borrowers that are impacted by this,” Vilsack said. “I think you’re probably talking about some very, very small operators, and you’re probably talking about a few that would be considered to be mid- or large-sized operators. So it’s across the board.”

The debt relief initiative is the subject of a new lawsuit by non-white farmers who claim that the government improperly reneged on its plans to forgive loan debts of “socially disadvantaged” farmers, which was part of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021. That initial version of the plan was challenged by lawsuits that claimed it was discriminatory.

The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 amended the debt relief program to eliminate its prescribed goal to help Asian, Black, Hispanic and Native American farmers. Vilsack described the farmers who have been aided by the amended initiative as those who “couldn’t get credit anywhere else.”

On Sept. 21, Virginia Rep. Bobby Scott, D-Newport News, sent a letter to Vilsack urging the federal government “to provide swift and equitable relief for borrowers with at-risk agricultural operations” and “take immediate action to ensure that producers with farm loans guaranteed by the USDA are protected from foreclosure.”

The letter was signed by 11 other members of Congress including Virginia Rep. Donald McEachin, D-Richmond.

The USDA suspended its foreclosures of direct loans in January 2021 because of the coronavirus pandemic, which was especially tough on livestock producers. Meatpacker closures because of the virus abruptly choked demand for the animals and led in some cases to mass euthanasia. The supply costs for farmers have also soared, notably for fertilizers.

This story originally appeared in the Iowa Capital Dispatch, a sister publication of The Virginia Mercury within the States Newsroom network.

Virginia Mercury is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Virginia Mercury maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Sarah Vogelsong for questions: info@virginiamercury.com. Follow Virginia Mercury on Facebook and Twitter.

'The radical left’s agenda': Mike Pence gives a glimpse at the Republican election strategy in Iowa

CARROLL, Ia. — Former Vice President Mike Pence lauded three of Iowa’s prominent Republican leaders in a visit to the state Saturday and lambasted Democrats and the Biden administration over a number of issues that could be key to election success later this year.

“It’s amazing to think how far our country has fallen in just 15 months,” Pence told delegates and others who gathered at the Republican 4th Congressional District convention in Carroll. “Joe Biden has done more damage to America in his first year and a half than any president in my lifetime. … The good news is, despite all the setbacks we’ve seen in the last year and a half, the Republican Party is fighting back all across America and all across Iowa.”

Pence, who ended his tenure with former President Donald Trump at odds over the validity of the 2020 election they lost, touted the former administration’s role in packing the federal court system — including the U.S. Supreme Court — with conservative judges, backing abortion foes and reinforcing the “strongest military in the history of mankind.”

Pence said he was invited to the Saturday event by U.S. Rep. Randy Feenstra, R-Iowa, the first-term congressman who represents the district, who Pence said has “won admirers around America” for his integrity, faith and conservative ideas.

READ: 'I don't like being called stupid': Trump worries about how his thinking is viewed

On U.S. Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, Pence said: “When I was president of the Senate, there was no more-courageous or principled conservative in the United States Senate than Sen. Chuck Grassley.”

And Pence said Gov. Kim Reynolds is “one of the most important conservative voices in our nation today.”

Pence, Feenstra and Grassley touched on several topics that are poised to factor heavily in Republicans’ bids to retake control of the House and Senate this fall.

Some were perennial issues such as immigration — “You can’t be a sovereign nation if you have open borders,” Grassley said — and gun rights.

READ: 'The frustration is deep': In Wyandotte County, Kansas, anger growing over political setbacks

Others were new. Pence and Feenstra cited conservative battles against “the radical left’s agenda” in regard to school curriculum about racism and conversations about gender identity and sexual orientation in classrooms. Pence credited the issue for recent Republican gains in Virginia.

“Parents are rising up and taking their schools back,” Pence said.

They also knocked Biden for recent inflation and high fuel prices. Feenstra said “we can be energy independent right here in Iowa with our biofuels,” and Pence rebuffed Biden’s efforts to blame fuel prices on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine: “It’s the war on energy that is driving up gasoline prices, and we gotta bring it to an end.”

Iowa Democratic Party Chair Ross Wilburn, in a call with reporters on Friday, criticized the Trump administration for tax cuts that were too favorable for wealthy people and for investing too little in infrastructure such as bridges, roads and broadband internet networks.

READ: 'God speaks to us': Trump rallygoer explains that Princess Diana is still alive

“Mike Pence can’t rewrite his role in the disastrous Trump-Pence administration,” Wilburn said.

Grassley did not shy away from his affiliation with Trump on Saturday and highlighted his role in blocking former President Barack Obama’s final Supreme Court nomination.

“Together, President Trump and I cemented a conservative 6-3 majority on the Supreme Court,” Grassley said.

Iowa Capital Dispatch is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Iowa Capital Dispatch maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Kathie Obradovich for questions: info@iowacapitaldispatch.com. Follow Iowa Capital Dispatch on Facebook and Twitter.

Iowa’s bird flu death toll tops 13 million

Two more poultry flocks in Iowa — including one with more than 5 million egg-laying chickens — were infected by a deadly and highly contagious avian influenza, the Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship reported Friday.

The new detections of the virus were in a massive commercial egg-laying flock in Osceola County, and in a flock of about 88,000 turkeys in Cherokee County.

The virus was confirmed in those flocks on Thursday, the end of the first month of such outbreaks in the state this year. There were a total of 12 detections in nine counties that affected at least 13.2 million birds.

Secretary of Agriculture Mike Naig has said the threat of infection could loom for another two months as wild birds migrate through the state. Those birds are the likely carriers of the virus and can be asymptomatic if they are infected. The virus is often deadly for domestic birds.

Infected flocks are culled as quickly as possible to limit the risk of transmitting the virus to other nearby facilities.

The vast majority of the affected birds in Iowa have been egg-laying chickens due to the size of their flocks. The virus was previously found in a Buena Vista egg-laying flock of more than 5.3 million.

The state is the country’s top egg producer and has about 60 million laying hens, Naig has said. The infected flocks account for about 21% of that total. Naig expects food prices to increase because of the virus.

“If we continue to see the spread of (highly pathogenic avian influenza) and affecting more and more sites … I think you could very well see a change in price and even availability,” he said in an appearance on Iowa Press on Friday. “Now, the good news about the poultry industry is they can restock quickly — they can rebuild populations.”

The virus is unlikely to infect humans, and eggs and meat from infected flocks are discarded.

In 2015, a deadly bird flu outbreak led to the culling of more than 32 million birds in Iowa, which accounted for about two-thirds of the affected birds in the United States that year.

Iowa’s affected birds this year account for 59% of the country’s current 22.4 million total, according to U.S. Department of Agriculture data. The virus has been detected in commercial and backyard flocks in about two dozen states.

The rate of the detections in Iowa has been accelerating. The first was March 1 in a backyard flock in Pottawattamie County. Half of the state’s detections so far occurred in the past week, and all of them were at commercial facilities.

“Maybe we’re approaching the end — maybe we’re just getting started,” Naig said of the virus detections. “Time will tell.”

.indent2Container { margin-left: 1em; border-left: solid 1px var(--brand_one); padding-left: 2em; }

Here are the flocks that were infected in Iowa in March:

March 1: A backyard flock of 42 chickens and ducks in Pottawattamie County.
March 6: A commercial flock of about 50,000 turkeys in Buena Vista County.
March 10: A commercial flock of about 916,000 egg-laying chickens in Taylor County.
March 17: A commercial flock of more than 5.3 million egg-laying chickens in Buena Vista County.
March 20: A backyard flock of 11 chickens and ducks in Warren County.
March 23: A commercial flock of about 54,000 turkeys in Buena Vista County.
March 25: A commercial flock of about 250,000 young hens in Franklin County.
March 28: A commercial flock of about 28,000 turkeys in Hamilton County.
March 28: A commercial flock of about 1.5 million egg-laying chickens in Guthrie County.
March 29: A commercial flock of about 35,500 turkeys in Buena Vista County.
March 31: A commercial flock of more than 5 million egg-laying chickens in Osceola County.
March 31: A commercial flock of about 88,000 turkeys in Cherokee County.

Iowa Capital Dispatch is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Iowa Capital Dispatch maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Kathie Obradovich for questions: info@iowacapitaldispatch.com. Follow Iowa Capital Dispatch on Facebook and Twitter.

Kansas lawmaker tries to sidestep Covid bill -- and ends up casting deciding vote for passage

TOPEKA — Rep. Linda Featherston resisted until forced to cast a vote Friday on a bill expanding hospital and nursing home immunity from lawsuits tied to the COVID-19 pandemic that was merged with provisions difficult for the Democrat to support.

In an unusual procedural move, House Republicans struggling to find the minimum 63 votes among 125 representatives for the bundle known as Senate Bill 286 voted to reject Featherston’s request to be allowed to abstain. House Speaker Ron Ryckman asked her repeatedly to press a “yes” or “no” button at her desk. She tried to avoid eye contact with Ryckman.

Featherston had taken the lead in assembling a House bill to increase criminal penalties for people convicted of interfering with activities of a hospital and of assaulting a hospital employee. Those policy pieces were, to her regret, blended with broadened and extending until January 2023 pandemic-related policies associated with civil immunity of hospitals and nursing homes treating COVID-19 patients.

She tried, but failed, to have the bill sent back to a House-Senate committee for revision. She also asked permission of House colleagues to allow her to vote “present” on the bill containing provisions she admired and provisions she loathed. In a vote requiring members to stand in support of her plea or remain seated if opposed, she was ordered to cast a vote for or against the bill.

If Featherston refused to vote as a form of protest, she risked being reprimanded, censured or expelled by the House.

“As I talk to friends on both sides of the aisle in this chamber,” said Featherston, an Overland Park Democrat, “I hear the phrase a lot: ‘Can’t we just do one good thing without messing it up?’ Can we not just stand for the people and for what is right once, without linking it to something that causes so many of us distress?”

She said her priority was to stand with 70% of emergency room nurses and 50% of emergency room physicians who reported being assaulted at work.

As it turned out, Featherston ended up casting a “yes” vote that was the 63rd in favor of the bundled legislation — the fewest required for passage in the House. The final tally in the House was 64-51, with Republicans and Democrats opposed. It cleared the Senate on a vote of 24-16. That sent the bill to Gov. Laura Kelly’s desk.

“This took quite a bit of effort to get to a spot where both the Senate and House cold come to an agreement,” said Rep. Brad Ralph, R-Dodge City.

Rep. John Carmichael, D-Wichita, said the bill had been “held hostage” to create a path to insert expanded immunity from COVID-19 lawsuits requested by the Kansas Hospital Association. He said the organization was anxious that hospitals would be targeted with lawsuits over decisions on use of ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine or on vaccination status.

“Many lawyers much brighter than I am actually believe that those tweaks may have expanded the immunity given to hospitals and other health care providers to the extent that it goes far beyond even COVID-related matters, and could result in essence in a prohibition against most medical malpractice litigation for injured patients over the next 10 months,” said Carmichael, who voted against the bill.

Across the rotunda, Sen. Mark Steffen, a Republican from Hutchinson and an anesthesiologist, urged his colleagues to oppose the bill. He said the immunity provisions would allow hospitals to “lower their quality of care” under guise of a pandemic that should be declared over.

“The faith in our hospitals in the area has dramatically diminished when people get COVID,” Steffen said. “The last place they want to go is the hospital. Things are upside down. By voting no on this bill, we have the opportunity to start to right the ship.”

Several House Republicans also opposed the package after expressing concerns about access to ivermectin — which studies repeatedly show provides no benefit to preventing or treating COVID-19, the disease that has killed 8,397 Kansans and sickened one-fourth of the state’s population in the past two years.

Rep. Michael Houser, R-Columbus, described his personal battle with the virus. He falsely claimed ivermectin has been proven to lessen disease “from taking you down” and said he couldn’t find a doctor in all of Cherokee County who would give him the drug. Houser said he was told “we can’t give that to you” because it was against hospital protocol.

“I firmly believe that if I had not fallen through that gap, and I’d had somebody that would prescribe that for me early on in the stage, I wouldn’t have missed three weeks of session, and I still wouldn’t be huffing and puffing when I walk from my truck to the elevator,” Houser said.

Rep. Pat Proctor, a Leavenworth Republican, said he voted against the bill because he wasn’t going to participate in “perpetuating the lie that we are still in a ‘COVID-19 emergency.’ ”

“This lie has been used to destroy lives,” he said. “It has been used to destroy livelihoods. It needs to end. And it won’t end until we sunset all of the emergency measures, including this legal immunity.”

Eighteen House Democrats signed a statement in opposition of the bill because they believed it went too far beyond the reform crafted by Featherston.

Kansas Reflector is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Kansas Reflector maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Sherman Smith for questions: info@kansasreflector.com. Follow Kansas Reflector on Facebook and Twitter.