Download Our App
Seth D. Norrholm avatar

Seth D. Norrholm

Stories By Seth D. Norrholm

GOP 'sociopaths' live among us — and it's 'contagious': neuroscientist
Raw Exclusives

GOP 'sociopaths' live among us — and it's 'contagious': neuroscientist

Sociopaths, a term often used to describe those living with antisocial personality disorder, who operate within their daily lives without a “conscience,” can be characterized as acting without feelings of guilt, remorse, or shame coupled with a tendency to reject the concept of responsibility.

Antisocial people will intentionally make others angry or upset and use harsh and cruel indifference as they manipulate or attack others.

Clinically speaking, there is no defined difference between a sociopath and a psychopath although some have drawn this line at acting with low moral conscience (sociopath) and no moral conscience (psychopath) or having no regard for someone else’s rights or feelings (sociopath) and taking pleasure in robbing another of their rights, freedom, or well-being (psychopath)....

GOP 'sociopaths' live among us — and it's 'contagious': neuroscientist
Raw Exclusives

GOP 'sociopaths' live among us — and it's 'contagious': neuroscientist

Sociopaths, a term often used to describe those living with antisocial personality disorder, who operate within their daily lives without a “conscience,” can be characterized as acting without feelings of guilt, remorse, or shame coupled with a tendency to reject the concept of responsibility.

Antisocial people will intentionally make others angry or upset and use harsh and cruel indifference as they manipulate or attack others.

Clinically speaking, there is no defined difference between a sociopath and a psychopath although some have drawn this line at acting with low moral conscience (sociopath) and no moral conscience (psychopath) or having no regard for someone else’s rights or feelings (sociopath) and taking pleasure in robbing another of their rights, freedom, or well-being (psychopath)....

We're witnessing a large and concerning movement in American history
Raw Exclusives

We're witnessing a large and concerning movement in American history

I was dying…It was just a matter of time. Lying behind the wheel of the airplane, bleeding out of the right side of my devastated body, I waited for the rapid shooting to stop.

—Former Representative Jackie Speier (D-CA) in her memoir Undaunted: Surviving Jonestown, Summoning Courage, and Fighting Back recounting her experience after being shot five times during an ambush during her fact-finding visit to Jonestown, Guyana where Jim Jones and his cult, Peoples Temple, had built a compound.

It, combined with everything else that was going on, made it difficult to breathe…Being crushed by the shield and the people behind it … leaving me defenseless, injured.

—Metropolitan police officer, Daniel Hodges, describing being crushed in a doorway during the January 6, 2021, attack by Trump supporters on the U.S. Capitol...

A neuroscientist asks what Jason Aldean, Ron DeSantis and Josh Hawley are so afraid of
Raw Exclusives

A neuroscientist asks what Jason Aldean, Ron DeSantis and Josh Hawley are so afraid of

Inside the white male fear that’s dominating much of America

In 2022, Ron DeSantis and the Republican Florida legislature passed the legislation, FL HB 7 (22R), or the Individual Freedom Act which expanded anti-discrimination laws to prohibit schools and companies from leveling guilt or blame to students and employees based on race or sex. Casually speaking, the “anti-woke” law aimed at helping white Floridians avoid any white guilt associated with slavery.
In the past few weeks, DeSantis went a step further, this time as a Presidential hopeful, and set a new education “standard” declaring that enslaved people “developed skills which, in some instances, could be applied for their personal benefit.” Despite the pushback that he received from many angles for this revisionist history, DeSantis has doubled down on his widely askew, ignorant, and offensive notion. Many have defined the anti-woke movement by Republicans as a form of fighting reverse discrimination against whites.

Policies such as these beg the question, “What are white males afraid of?” What are you afraid of by admitting slavery was a colossal, historical mistake not to be repeated? A mistake made by our forefathers and those that came before us. This raises the horribly concerning notion that downplaying slavery may serve as some sort of precursor for reintroducing similar inhumane public policies.

White male members of Congress, what are you afraid of? Many congressmen like Ted Cruz, Lindsay Graham, Josh Hawley, Mitch McConnell, Kevin McCarthy, Jim Jordan, Mo Brooks, as examples, have shown that they will do almost anything to keep their seats – even defend the indefensible. Most recently by defending efforts to overthrow the people’s will in a national election and to attempt to explain away why stealing and sharing classified documents is not a serious crime. The fear by many of these white men (and some white women) is that they will lose the votes of die-hard Trump supporters (his “base") if they step out of line against the ex-President. What does keeping those voters do for these whites (and admittedly at least one Black congressman)? They get to keep their job.

On paper, a job that pays relatively well at a level of at least $174,000 per year. Of the members of Congress, approximately 60 percent have an occupational background in business, about 43 percent have law degrees and a whopping 96 percent have a college education. In other words, these individuals would be considered marketable and employable. So, conceivably, if they were not re-elected to their seats, they could do as they often advise those of lower socioeconomic status to do – get a job. Of course, losing their seats also means losing power, influence, and the ability to seek high-paying jobs in the private sector or as lobbyists based on their time and service record in Congress....

Look in the mirror. How do you define yourself?

Look in the mirror. How do you define yourself?

Since the publishing of my last column, I have had the opportunity to interact online and in person with many readers (both Democratic and Republican).
What I found was that there are many areas in which there is commonality: we have many of the same occupations, loyalties to sports teams, religious affiliations and, yes, a desire to not have our children murdered at school.
But it doesn’t take long (or that many drinks) for the differences to emerge and the name calling to begin. When I’m called a “libtard” to my face my first question is why? How is that defined? I have spent the last 20 years working with servicemembers, Veterans, and their families to overcome the invisible wounds of war including posttraumatic stress disorder and traumatic brain injury.
Based on this work and my own experience, I have a strong sense of what it means to be patriotic, to pursue American ideals, and to seek to defend our nation and Constitution “against enemies foreign and domestic.”
As a former U.S. government employee, I had to go through an extensive background check that included a series of questions regarding my past and current activities and how they related to the best interests of the United States of America…this included no less than four questions specifically asking me if I planned to incite an insurrection or rebellion against my government. Shouldn’t elected officials at the highest levels of our government be held to the same standard at a minimum as us rank and file?

I had the privilege of attending a conference recently with servicemembers and one session featured Eddie Glaude, Jr, Professor of African American studies at Princeton University. I posed this to Dr. Glaude (paraphrasing): We sit in this room with servicemembers who are ultimately led by civilians in the White House and Congress. The men and women here are trained to uphold the values of integrity, service before self, excellence in all we do, and zero tolerance of cheaters and those who allow such behavior. What advice would you give these men and women when they see the elected officials who direct their duties and activities not upholding these same values?

Dr. Glaude’s response was this (paraphrasing): Character is repeatedly tested in these moments when there is a conflict between training and values and your orders. Knowing that there is no middle ground on slavery, there is no middle ground on January 6th (full video of exchange here).

That begs the questions: What are your values? How do you define yourselves? What labels, signs, and symbols do you adhere to? Do you, like Dr. Glaude have a “vexing relationship with the flag?” ...