'Throw it in the trash': MAGA turns against conservative magazine over Gabbard attack
A corner of the MAGA online world has found a new enemy, and it is not a liberal news organization. It is Reason, the libertarian magazine, which set off a wave of right-wing fury by criticizing outgoing Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, a former Democrat.
The flashpoint was a Reason piece arguing that Gabbard, on her way out the door, "revives a Russian disinformation campaign" with her recent biolab disclosures. To a slice of Trump's base that views Gabbard's release as vindication, the framing was an act of betrayal from a publication they had assumed was on their side.
Journalist Paul Thacker led the charge, casting the dispute as a battle against willful blindness. He argued that critics once accused people of pushing "a 'Russian disinformation campaign' about US funding for foreign biolabs," and that now, with Gabbard having released internal documents, those same critics accuse her of "reviving Russian disinformation." His verdict on Reason and its defenders was unsparing: "No amount of proof can alter the thinking of those with broken brains."
Former Trump official Michael Caputo was even blunter, taking aim at Reason science writer Ronald Bailey by name. He accused the "TDS-infected Trump hater" and the magazine of "lying to defend the indefensible," insisting the US was "quietly researching deadly pathogens like bird flu in overseas research labs." Mocking the idea that the work was merely "veterinary," he compared it to the Wuhan lab, "only more dangerous," and signed off with a directive to readers: "Throw your Reason Mag in the trash."
The pile-on extended to anonymous accounts, with one calling Reason's reporting "the corrupt deep state criminal cartel disinformation" and branding the outlet "traitorous scum," while another suggested the magazine "should rebrand to 'Emotion'." The common thread was a sense that a publication nominally aligned with limited-government conservatives had sided with the establishment against one of the movement's own.
What is actually in dispute is murkier than either side allows. Gabbard, in one of her final acts as DNI, declassified material she says documents longstanding US funding for more than 120 biolabs across over 30 countries, including more than 40 in Ukraine, and she accused Biden-era officials and Anthony Fauci of lying about their existence. Her supporters treat that as proof that years of "conspiracy theory" warnings were correct.
But the records confirm a narrower set of facts than the celebration implies. As outlets across the spectrum have noted, the existence of US-funded laboratories abroad was never secret. Much of the funding flows through the decades-old Cooperative Threat Reduction program, created to secure dangerous pathogens left over from Soviet-era weapons research. Critics quoted in coverage from Fox News and elsewhere maintain the facilities were public-health and threat-reduction efforts designed to safeguard pathogens, not bioweapons programs. Reason's argument, and the reason it drew MAGA's wrath, is that conflating that established funding with a sinister coverup echoes a narrative Russia aggressively promoted to justify its invasion of Ukraine.
The fight, in other words, is less about whether the labs exist than about what their existence means, and whether Gabbard's framing illuminates a real scandal or repackages a propaganda talking point. For the activists turning on Reason, that distinction is beside the point. The magazine declined to treat Gabbard's release as the vindication they wanted, and in the current environment, that alone was enough to get it branded an enemy.