China to vote on controversial criminal law changes
BEIJING — Chinese lawmakers are due to vote Wednesday on changes to the criminal law that would give police powers to detain some suspects for up to six months in unofficial locations known as “black jails”.
Secret detentions in China are well-documented. Many people — from renowned artist Ai Weiwei to rights lawyers and petitioners — have been illegally held in locations away from formal detention areas, sometimes for months.
But critics say the amendments to China’s Criminal Procedure Law would legalise the practice for people considered a threat to the Communist Party such as political dissidents, dozens of whom were detained last year.
“The legislation would provide dangerous exemptions from due process for entire categories of criminal suspects, including those who simply wish to peacefully express their opinion,” Amnesty International said in a statement.
The proposed amendments caused a storm of protest from rights groups and judicial reformers when details first emerged in 2011, and have since been watered down.
A new clause in the latest draft would oblige police to inform relatives of those held outside formal detention centres within 24 hours of their detention, although it is not clear whether the location would be disclosed.
Liu Xiaoyuan, a lawyer and friend of Ai Weiwei, said in his blog that the modification from the original draft was “obvious progress.”
“But when all is said and done, the law is only written on paper, and the crux is whether law enforcement agencies strictly respect it,” he said.
There are three ways of locking up suspects in China — formal arrest, formal detention and “residential surveillance”, which can be at home or in other locations, usually hotels or guesthouses.
In the first two cases, suspects are held in formal areas of detention such as police stations or prisons, which people know about.
The controversy focuses mainly on the latter, where there is little accountability and where police may feel freer to use torture.
If, as is likely, the amendments are voted through, the law would for the first time include a clause to allow police to hold some people under “residential surveillance” away from home for up to six months.
This form of detention is limited to people suspected of terrorism, endangering national security or serious bribery, where holding them under surveillance at their homes would impede investigations.
But activists point out that the charge of endangering national security is not clearly defined, and is regularly used to silence government critics.
Rights groups and legal scholars however say other areas of the criminal law have seen positive changes.
Human Rights Watch said in a statement it welcomed provisions that could “strengthen procedural protections and due process for ordinary criminal suspects.”
The group said this included “stricter time limits for detentions, better guarantees for access to a lawyer, and greater protection for juvenile and mentally ill defendants.”