Quantcast
Connect with us

Supreme Court hears oral arguments in breast cancer gene patent case

Published

on

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Monday in a challenge by a contingent of breast cancer patients and women’s health organizations against a Utah company’s claim to being able to patent human genes.

Bloomberg News reported that the high court used analogies like chocolate-chip recipes in discussing the case, stemming from a 2009 suit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) against Myriad Genetics for filing patents on two genes connected with increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer.

ADVERTISEMENT

According to NBC News, mutations in the genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, can lead to an 85 percent risk of breast cancer and a possible 50 percent risk of ovarian cancer.

Justice Antonin Scalia expressed concern during the discussion for the potential impact of the lawsuit on companies’ ability to conduct research.

“Why would a company incur massive investment if it can’t patent?” Scalia asked at one point.

Attorneys for the ACLU and the Public Patent Foundation said in a statement that Myriad’s patent on the genes is unlawful because it removes them from being examined by the scientific community at large.

“Myriad did not invent the human genes at issue in this case, and they should not be allowed to patent them,” ACLU attorney Chris Hansen said. “The patent system was designed to encourage innovation, not stifle scientific research and the free exchange of ideas, which is what these patents do.”

ADVERTISEMENT

A federal appeals court ruled in favor of Myriad in 2011, saying DNA isolated from the body could be patented because its chemical structure was “markedly different” from biological material located inside a person’s chromosomes. However, the court also ruled that the company could not patent the analysis process used to determine whether mutations were present.

President Barack Obama’s administration urged the court to consider whether Myriad could have a patent on complimentary DNA (cDNA), a synthesized version of the material. Justice Anthony Kennedy asked whether that provision would “give the industry sufficient protection for innovation and research”

A decision is expected by the end of June 2013.

ADVERTISEMENT

[Image via Shutterstock.com]


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

2020 Election

Trump supporters expect the election to be over before bedtime Nov. 3 — and are bracing for violence

Published

on

President Donald Trump is behind in the polls nationally and in most battleground states, but many of his supporters are sure only fraud can sink him.

The president himself has been stoking conspiracies about fraudulent ballots, and his supporters believe he would be justified in challenging a losing result and are already blaming Trump's opponents for any violence that might break out, reported the New York Times.

Continue Reading

2020 Election

Biden campaign mocks Trump teams’s earpiece conspiracy: They asked Chris Wallace to ‘never mention’ COVID deaths

Published

on

Biden campaign deputy campaign manager Kate Bedingfield on Tuesday claimed that President Donald Trump's team asked debate moderator Chris Wallace not to mention the number of people who have died from COVID-19 during his presidency.

Bedingfield revealed the detail of debate negotiations after the Trump campaign reportedly demanded that Democratic candidate Joe Biden's ears be inspected for listening devices, a conspiracy theory that was quickly repeated on Fox News.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Mike Flynn’s lawyer just admitted to a federal judge she’s been talking to Trump about his case

Published

on

The attorney for disgraced former Trump national security adviser and convicted felon Mike Flynn has just admitted to a federal judge she has been talking with President Donald Trump about her client's case – and that she personally asked the president to not pardon Flynn.

Sydney Powell, a former federal prosecutor turned conspiracy theorist, QAnon-signaler, and pro-MAGA anti-"deep state" personality, was asked by U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan, if she's been in contact with Trump.

Continue Reading
 
 
Democracy is in peril. Invest in progressive news. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free. LEARN MORE