By Lawrence Hurley
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The Supreme Court on Monday declined to review an executive order issued by Florida Governor Rick Scott that had required all state employees take random drug tests.
The high court’s decision not to hear the case means a May 2013 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that found the governor’s order to be too broad remains intact.
The appeals court said Scott, a Republican, could not require all employees to take tests, although it was justified for some workers, including those involved in law enforcement.
Scott defended his policy in a statement issued on Monday.
“State employees should have the right to work in a safe and drug free environment, just like in any other business,” he said.
Litigation over which employees can be subject to testing will now continue in lower courts.
The 2011 executive order was aimed at all 85,000 state workers. It was challenged in court by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, which represents almost 40,000 of the workers potentially affected.
The union said the order violated the U.S. Constitution’s Fourth Amendment, which prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures.
Shalini Goel Agarwal, an American Civil Liberties Union lawyer who represents the employees’ union, said in a statement that the question of whether a state can require all workers to submit to a drug test without a reason has long been settled.
“Without a threat to public safety or a suspicion of drug use, people can’t be required to sacrifice their constitutional rights in order to serve the people of Florida,” she said.
The union did not challenge whether Scott could require drug testing of employees in safety-sensitive jobs.
The case is Scott v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, U.S. Supreme Court, 13-841.
(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Editing by Tom Brown)
[Image via CNN]
Armed security forces in DC are refusing to identify their agencies — sparking condemnation
On Tuesday, Mother Jones national security reporter Dan Friedman posted an image of heavily-armed federal officials overseeing protests in D.C. — and noted that they refused to identify their agency when asked.
Asked who they’re with, these guys say only that they’re with “The Department of Justice.” pic.twitter.com/ciVDtP8ndk
— Dan Friedman (@dfriedman33) June 2, 2020
Internet scorns Trump for saying D.C. was the ‘safest place on earth last night’: ‘Bunker Boy says what?’
On Tuesday, President Donald Trump took to Twitter to proudly proclaim he had succeeded in restoring order to Washington, D.C. last night.
Washington, D.C., was the safest place on earth last night!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 2, 2020
Commenters on social media did not see it the same way.
Did your hear that George W. Bush’s former alum have launched a Super PAC to elect Joe Biden?
Trump campaign provokes outrage with demand that media stop saying protesters were tear gassed
On Tuesday, the Trump campaign issued a statement demanding that the media "correct or retract" the reports that peaceful protesters were tear gassed in front of the White House — citing claims from the U.S. Park Police that the substance used to forcibly disperse the crowd was not tear gas.
This demand did not go over well on social media, with commenters siding with journalists over the official reports — and others asking what the point is for the White House to dispute the type of substance they sprayed at peaceful protesters.