Rep. Steve Chabot (R-OH) suggested to FBI Director James Comey that Hillary Clinton had broken her college’s honor code by using a private email server.
Although Clinton graduated from Wellesley College 40 years before she became secretary of state, Chabot brought up the school’s honor code at a House oversight hearing on Wednesday.
Chabot began his questioning of Comey by noting that both men had attended William & Mary.
“Our alma mater is very proud of something called the honor code,” he explained. “It says, ‘As a member of the William and Mary community, I pledge on my honor not to lie cheat or steal either in my academic or in my personal life.'”
Chabot said that he “wondered” if Wellesley College also had an honor code.
“And I looked it up and they did!” he continued, pointing out that Wellesley students were required to “act with honesty.”
“I’m sure the young women attending Wellesley today and those that have attended it in the past are proud that one of their own could be the next president of the United States,” Chabot opined. “But a majority of the American people have come to the conclusion that Hillary Clinton is not honest and cannot be trusted.”
Chabot went on to ask Comey a series of questions which he said proved the Clinton was “not honest.”
In conclusion, the congressman accused the FBI director of having a “double standard” when it came to prosecuting Clinton.
“I disagree with that characterization,” Comey replied. “I actually think if we were to recommend she be prosecuted, that would be a double standard because Mary and Joe at the FBI or some other place if they did this would not be prosecuted.”
Watch the video below from C-SPAN, broadcast Sept. 28, 2016.
If Trump really believed he was falsely accused ‘that is not a corrupt motive’ for removing the special counsel: Bill Barr
Attorney General William Barr told Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) that if President Donald Trump really and truly thought he was being falsely accused of collaborating with Russia to steal the 2016 presidential election, that it was "not a corrupt motive" for firing Robert Mueller, a stunning statement from the nation's highest law enforcement officer.
"As a matter of law, I think the department's position would be that the president can direct the termination or the replacement of a special counsel," said Barr. "And as a matter of law, the obstruction statute does not reach that conduct."
Trump ‘shirking his duty to protect the country’ by ignoring Russia election threat: Ex-CIA agent
Ex-CIA agent Evan McMullin told CNN on Wednesday that President Donald Trump was "shirking his duty to protect the country" by ignoring the fact that Russia plans to attack the 2020 election.
"He's shirking his responsibility to protect the country," McMullin said. "We are in a new era of information warfare."
"Countries can be defeated without a shot being fired," he went on. "We just learned from the Mueller report that the president was aware that we were undergoing, as a country, an information warfare attack during 2016. He sought to benefit from it."
"A lot of times we say 'look, the president's ego is wounded' when we talk about how the Russians attacked us, and may have helped him get elected," McMullin continued. "But I actually think that we are a little naive to buy into that narrative. I think that is a fig leaf for the president. How can we ignore that this president barely won the electoral college?"
White House made it clear they were ‘trying to hide’ evidence from Mueller: Omarosa
Omarosa Manigault, former political aide to President Donald Trump, told MSNBC Wednesday that the while the White House never "directly" ordered her to destroy documents related to the Mueller report, they made it quite clear they were "trying to hide" evidence.
"He wants to run out the clock," Manigault said. "He thinks he can run down the clock and that people will stop being concerned about it. We should really not just focus about what he is telling people to do or say, but how he's asked people to destroy documents, to destroy e-mails, in my case two boxes of campaign-related materials that the White House still has in their possession, that they claim they don't have or don't know what happened to it."