Quantcast
Connect with us

Right-wing media’s hero worship of Flynn goes down in flames — but what lies ahead is still a mystery

Published

on

- Commentary
On Tuesday morning the former national security adviser and retired four-star general, Michael Flynn, woke up believing that his nightmare was almost over. After having pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI and cooperating for many months with the special counsel in the Russia investigation, he had every reason to believe that he would be allowed to walk free. The government had requested that he serve no time for his crime, praising his early decision to cooperate and noting his long service as a high-ranking military officer.

ADVERTISEMENT

This article was originally was published at Salon

It’s also possible that Flynn thought the judge would do something even more drastic by vacating the guilty plea and taking the government to task for ever charging him in the first place. In an unexpected last-minute move, his lawyers had implied in their sentencing memorandum that FBI agents had failed to properly conduct their interview, suggesting that the whole case was built on tainted evidence. Judge Emmet Sullivan, who was hearing the case, is known to be hostile to government abuses of power. His response was to ask for the underlying documents in the case in order to assess whether that had happened in the case.

Trump supporters immediately jumped to the conclusion that their crusade against the FBI and the Department of Justice had found a sympathetic ear in the judiciary, and that meant that the case against President Trump would come tumbling down at last. Flynn is known to be an avid consumer of right-wing media so he undoubtedly felt buoyed by the possibility. If Flynn walked out under those circumstances it would mean he could have his cake and eat it too — be a government cooperator while maintaining his conservative street cred with an eye toward future money making possibilities.

Kimberley Strassel of the Wall Street Journal held up Sullivan as “a judge who is wise to the tricks of prosecutors and investigators … His reputation is for being no-nonsense, a straight shooter, an advocate of government transparency.” Fox News’ Judge Jeanine Pirro spoke for all the hopes and dreams of the Trumpian right on her broadcast over the weekend:

ADVERTISEMENT

 

Pirro was right about one thing. Judge Sullivan is “a man who does not tolerate injustice or abuse of power.” The problem is that she and all the others refuse to see who it is that’s doing that. Michael Flynn is the powerful man who abused his position, not the federal authorities who caught him at it.

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s true that prosecutors and law enforcement can abuse their power. And far too often they are aided and abetted by the judiciary, many members of whom are former prosecutors themselves. Sullivan isn’t one of them. He often pushes back on the government when it fails to follow proper procedure and is unusually willing to challenge the Department of Justice when it goes easy on wealthy white-collar criminals. And as it happens, Flynn is the epitome of the kind of defendant Sullivan thinks the government routinely lets off too easy. It was obvious yesterday that after looking at all the documents and having access to the redacted and classified material the public cannot see, he thought the Mueller team’s sentencing request was far too lenient.

Sullivan was offended by the abuse of government power — by Michael Flynn. He seems to have concluded, perhaps by the somewhat sappy sentencing memorandums from both sides, that Mueller was being taken in by a man who wore the uniform. Sullivan even mentioned another powerful government figure, Gen. David Petraeus, as a similar defendant he thought was dealt with too kindly.

ADVERTISEMENT

When the judge took the bench yesterday it was immediately obvious that Flynn’s lawyers’ gambit, in implying that he’d been duped by the feds, had backfired. Sullivan asked Flynn if he wished to withdraw his guilty plea and he said no. He demanded to know if Flynn sincerely believed he had committed the crime and Flynn said yes. He offered to delay the sentencing so that Flynn could think it over. As he spoke, Sullivan reportedly became more and more animated by what he saw as an act of betrayal that was going unpunished. He was completely unsympathetic to the notion that Flynn had been treated unfairly and was instead outraged by his behavior and was clearly considering a prison sentence if Flynn didn’t take the offer to delay..

In the end Flynn wisely took him up on it. He will turn over his passport and face strict travel restrictions, and will be back in court for sentencing in March, apparently after working a little bit more with prosecutors to earn his “get out of jail free” card. It is unclear what else Flynn has to offer but one can’t help but wonder if there is something else hanging out there. The reason for asking that questions is that this man who has spoken with prosecutors 19 times and spilled many secrets still maintains the full support of the president of the United States.

On Tuesday morning, Trump tweeted:

ADVERTISEMENT

 

That’s quite a contrast to Trump’s comments about another of his former associates who is cooperating with prosecutors:

ADVERTISEMENT

There’s a lot of head-scratching about why Flynn continues to be such a favorite with the president and his supporters. He’s Mueller’s favorite witness! White House press secretary Sarah Sanders gave a little clue yesterday. She held a short press briefing after the hearing and continued to attack the FBI for allegedly “ambushing” Flynn even after he had contritely admitted to the judge just hours earlier that no such thing had happened. But Sanders also said outright that the president favors Flynn over Cohen because Flynn’s admitted crime and other conduct “are not related to Trump,” which clears up why he remains on the president’s good side.

It’s still unclear why Flynn lied about his conversations with the Russian ambassador. The interview notes show that the FBI agents let him know they were aware of those conversations and Flynn made false statements anyway. Perhaps the reason is hidden under all those blacked-out lines in the sentencing documents but at this point it remains a mystery.  This does raise the question of why the president can possibly be sure that Flynn hasn’t implicated him. It makes you wonder whether the president’s little mole in the Department of Justice, Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker,  hasn’t been whispering in his ear.

If that’s so, Trump and his fans should not rest easy. Michael Flynn walked out of the courtroom yesterday with an order from the judge that if he expects to get that lenient sentence he’s going to have to earn it. If there’s something he’s been holding back, he knows what he has to do. Using right-wing fever swamp narratives in a court of law has proved to be a very bad strategy.

ADVERTISEMENT

Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Fox News legal analyst makes stunning prediction: Trump will testify under oath in impeachment trial

Published

on

Fox News legal analyst Andrew Napolitano predicted that President Donald Trump would testify during his impeachment trial.

Napolitano told "America's Newsroom" anchor Bill Hemmer on Thursday that he believed the president would testify on his own behalf once the House votes to impeach him and the Senate holds a trial, reported The Hill.

“If you go to a Senate trial, who testifies on behalf of the president?” Hemmer asked.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Mitch McConnell may let Republicans write Senate impeachment rules without Democratic votes

Published

on

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is plotting to shut out Democrats on impeachment if a bipartisan compromise on rules for the trial can't be reached.

The Kentucky Republican said this week that he hopes to reach an agreement on rules for the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump, but he's also readying a "backup plan" in case he can't reach an agreement with Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, reported Vanity Fair.

“The first thing Sen. Schumer and I will do is see if there’s a possibility of agreement on a procedure,” McConnell said. “That failing, I would probably come back to my own members and say, ‘Okay, can 51 of us agree how we’re going to handle this?’”

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Fresno Bee burns Nunes to the ground in scathing editorial

Published

on

The editorial board of the Fresno Bee has written a scathing takedown of Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) for his extraordinary fealty to President Donald Trump, which the editors say is harming the country.

Specifically, the editorial accuses Nunes of forsaking his oath of office as a congressman to serve as Trump's most loyal toady on the House Intelligence Committee.

"As has been true for nearly all of Trump’s first term, Nunes has relinquished his proper role as an independent representative of Congress and has instead acted like a member of the Trump 2020 re-election team," the editorial states.

Continue Reading