Quantcast
Connect with us

Trump Supreme Court front-runner Amy Coney Barrett criticized Roe v. Wade and Obamacare decision

Published

on

Filming of The Handmaid's Tale at the Lincoln Memorial (Victoria Pickering via Flickr and a CC )

Democrats sounded the alarm about the potential Supreme Court nomination of federal appeals court Judge Amy Coney Barrett over her ties to the Federalist Society and criticism of Roe v. Wade.

Despite opposing former President Barack Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland 11 months ahead of the 2016 election, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., has already announced that the upper chamber will vote on President Donald Trump’s nominee to replace late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg despite her “fervent wish” to “not be replaced until a new president is installed.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Trump vowed to choose a woman to replace Ginsburg, and Barrett has emerged as the apparent front-runner.

“I’m saving her for Ginsburg,” Trump said of Barrett when he tapped Brett Kavanaugh to replace former Justice Anthony Kennedy in 2018, according to Axios.

Barrett, 48, has been a cause of concern for Democrats since she her confirmation to the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in 2017. The former clerk for the late Justice Antonin Scalia is considered to be a strict constructionist. Barrett criticized Roe v. Wade, though she acknowledged that the court would “probably” let the precedent stand.

“The fundamental element — that the woman has a right to choose abortion — will probably stand,” she said during a speech at Notre Dame, according to the student newspaper. “The controversy right now is about funding. It’s a question of whether abortions will be publicly or privately funded.”

But Barrett later said that the court was likely to chip away at some abortion protections in 2016.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I think the question of whether people can get very late-term abortions — you know, how many restrictions can be put on clinics — I think that would change,” she said in 2016, according to The New York Times.

Democrats also raised concerns about Barrett’s strict Catholicism. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., angered some conservatives when she pressed Barrett on her religious beliefs during her 2017 confirmation.

“You have a long history of believing that your religious beliefs should prevail,” Feinstein said at the time. “The dogma lives loudly within you.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s never appropriate for a judge to impose that judge’s personal convictions — whether they arise from faith or anywhere else — on the law.” Barrett responded.

The New York Times reported that Barrett and her husband, who are parents to seven children, are members of an obscure group called People of Praise.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Members of the group swear a lifelong oath of loyalty, called a covenant, to one another, and are assigned and are accountable to a personal adviser, called a ‘head’ for men and a ‘handmaid’ for women,” the report read. “The group teaches that husbands are the heads of their wives and should take authority over the family.”

According to The Times, the group describes itself as a “charismatic Christian community.” The “heads and handmaids give direction on important decisions, including whom to date or marry, where to live, whether to take a job or buy a home and how to raise children.”

Craig Lent, one of the group’s leaders, told The Times that the group was neither “nefarious or controversial.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“We don’t try to control people,” he said. “And there’s never any guarantee that the leader is always right. You have to discern and act in the Lord.”

Barrett is also a former member of the Federalist Society, the group which bankrolled Kavanaugh’s nomination and has been largely responsible for vetting conservative judges for Trump to appoint to federal courts.

If confirmed by the Senate, Barrett may possibly weigh in on the future of Obamacare after previously criticizing the Supreme Court’s decision which upheld the law.

“Chief Justice Roberts pushed the Affordable Care Act beyond its plausible meaning to save the statute,” she wrote in 2017.

ADVERTISEMENT

The court is scheduled to hear arguments in a lawsuit challenging Obamacare one week following the election.

“Amy Coney Barrett meets Donald Trump’s two main litmus tests,” Nan Aron, the president of progressive advocacy group Alliance for Justice, told The New York Times. “She has made clear she would invalidate the A.C.A. and take health care away from millions of people and undermine a woman’s reproductive freedom.”

Though some associates and former classmates argued that Barrett was not ideological in her legal opinions, Politico described her frontrunner status as a potential “coup for Catholic culture warriors 25 years in the making and a high point in the right’s decades-long project of reshaping the judiciary.”

“She was kind of the Manchurian candidate,” one former colleague at Notre Dame Law School told the outlet. “She’s been groomed for this moment all the way along.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Despite Barrett’s claim during her confirmation hearing that she would “never impose my own personal convictions upon the law,” Democrats have raised alarm over comments she made in 2012 about being a “different kind of lawyer.”

Barrett reportedly told students at Notre Dame that a “legal career is but a means to an end . . . and that end is building the Kingdom of God.”

(Correction: This article previously cited a report indicating that People of Praise was the inspiration for “The Handmaid’s Tale.” It was actually a different group — People of Hope.)


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Senior DHS official slams Twitter after being locked out of account for ‘hate speech’

Published

on

On Thursday, Politico reported that Customs and Border Protection chief Mark Morgan lashed out at Twitter during a news conference on border wall construction, complaining that they had briefly locked his account under "hate speech" policies for tweeting his support of the wall.

The original tweet in question had stated that "every mile helps us stop gang members, murderers, sexual predators and drugs from entering our country."

Continue Reading

2020 Election

Here’s why counting 2020 votes could hinge on 13,500 misprinted ballots in Wisconsin

Published

on

Officials in Wisconsin are warning of delays in counting votes after 13,500 ballots were misprinted.

"The state Supreme Court declined to take a case Thursday that would tell officials in northeastern Wisconsin how to deal with misprinted ballots, raising the prospect of lengthy counting delays as clerks fill out thousands of replacement ballots on Election Day," Patrick Marley reported for the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel on Thursday.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

‘Signs of a coming conflict are everywhere’: Why a 2nd Civil War would be quite different from the 1st

Published

on

In 2020, the United States has been rocked by everything from a deadly pandemic and a brutal recession to civil unrest in a long list of cities to fears that violent conflicts will occur either on Election Day or after the election. Journalist Matthew Gault, in an article published by Vice this week, wonders if the political divisions in the United States run so deep that the country is headed for another civil war.

Describing the unrest that has occurred this year, Gault writes, "People are marching in the streets, aligned with two ideologically distinct factions. Many of them, overwhelmingly from one side, are armed, and violence and death has resulted when these two sides have clashed. The signs of a coming conflict are everywhere."

Continue Reading
 
 
Democracy is in peril. Invest in progressive news. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free. LEARN MORE