'Complete and total fraud': Alex Jones turns on Elon Musk after he's 'massively censored'

Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones lashed out at Elon Musk, the owner of X, and claimed he had been "massively censored" by the billionaire's social media platform.

On his Monday InfoWars program, Jones said that he had important news.

"But we're not sure if Elon Musk is behind this or if it's ghost of the machine, employees and people that, after he goes by and see something happening and freeze it up," he explained. "They come back and incrementally put the shadow-banning systems in place."

"[Infowars] put out one article that just a hundred percent proves in this one area, InfoWars is being massively censored on X, formerly Twitter," he asserted. "This is being blocked because now, when Elon Musk took back over or took it over, what was it a year plus ago? He said he would bring freedom, you know, back."

ALSO READ: Parents of ‘2119’ Nazi teens haunted by fear and regret

Despite recently forging an "alliance" with Musk, Jones complained about being unable to access all of X's features.

"I'm calling this... algorithmic shadow-banning or algorithmic throttled shadow-banning where it's done a lot of different ways, but it's definitely going on," he opined. "And so I think we're at the stage here of finding how bad the manipulation is on X, which, you know, it's total on the other platforms."

"We need to have a discussion about that and find out why that is and what changes have been made, or is he doing what Google did 25 years ago where they're open and free at first could get everybody on the platform, and it works so great, and it's so wonderful," he added. "Then over time, they start bringing in controls until now it's a complete and total fraud."

"I mean, is that all he was doing, was buying it?"

Watch the video below from InfoWars.

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

It seemed so trivial. Trump ordered the Interior Department to post signs along the walkways leading up to several of the museums that make up the Smithsonian system in Washington, D.C., warning people that they’d find “inaccurate information” therein. It was based on a bizarre “report” written by the White House’s Domestic Policy Council and released without fanfare on the 4th of July.

The council itself was packed by Trump with leftovers from right-wing think tanks and activist groups like American Compass, Heritage, the Manhattan Institute, and Stephen Miller’s America First Policy Institute.

It claims that the American Museum of American History has displays that cover the fights for women’s and civil rights and to end slavery, along with the positive role immigrants, women, and queer people have played in our country, which it finds deplorable and un-American. It wrote that Smithsonian leadership and museum curators:

"Have directed the museum’s mission away from historical education and scholarship of a shared national inheritance to be celebrated, and toward extreme political activism, rooted in Marxism, to divide, dispirit and discourage Americans. … [And have] denigrated and displaced whites, males, Christians and Americans” while focusing on “race in areas where it has little to no historical relevance.”

Wild, over-the-top nonsense complaints that our museums are accurately portraying American history notwithstanding, this is far more sinister and dire than it seems.

Pretty much every dictator in history, both ancient and modern, has rewritten his nation’s history because, as Orwell noted, those who control the past can use it to reprogram the future.

Dictators and wannabe dictators rewrite the past to legitimize their rule, typically portraying themselves as representing the inevitable culmination of history, as the nation’s savior (“I, alone, can fix it!”), and as the rightful heir to a mythical glorious tradition like Trump is doing by trying to reinvent America as an exclusively white Christian nation.

In the process, they typically erase their rivals (Trump has replaced Biden’s picture in the White House with a photo of an autopen), reframe negatively their political opponents (ditto), and use the threat of erasure from history as a weapon against their own allies to keep them bowing and scraping (ditto).

Dictatorial regimes frequently use rewritten history to justify wars of aggression, suppress minorities, and gut civil liberties. Modern American examples include how Sam Alito cited a 17th-century witch-hanging British judge to justify ripping the right to abortion away from women, or how Trump has reinvented (with extensive lies) Obama’s peace deal with Iran to justify his and Netanyahu’s illegal war.

They rewrite history to bind themselves to the country’s majority group with simplified stories of the nation’s “glorious” past, claiming members of that group must rally around them to maintain national unity, strength, and a shared destiny. Diversity, in this context, is seen as a weakness as it doesn’t support this kind of dictatorial framing, which is why Trump called Kamala Harris “a DEI hire” on the campaign trail and has essentially criminalized the phrase.

Rewriting history is also a powerful way to shift the Overton Window to the right, causing the previously unthinkable to become “common sense.” When the history of protest, democratic movements, and civil rights efforts are reframed as chaos or crises in the nation’s history, young people are less likely to engage in them. When citizens fail to learn about successful alternatives to authoritarian rule, it can make democracy or pluralism seem unnatural or even impossible, particularly to young people.

— When Alexander the Great conquered Egypt in 332 BCE, he rewrote Egyptian history to make himself the son of the god Amun, the seniormost of the gods and arguably the one we acknowledge to this day when we end a prayer by invoking his name.
Joseph Stalin removed purged officials from photographs, rewrote textbooks, and reshaped official government accounts of the Russian Revolution and WWI to magnify his own role.
— Adolf Hitler and his Nazi regime taught a racialized version of German history that portrayed Jews, Slavs, Gypsies, and other racial and political minority groups as enemies and Germany as the victim of a “stabbed in the back” betrayal after World War I.
Mao Zedong oversaw repeated revisions of Chinese history, especially after the Cultural Revolution, with history textbooks and official records regularly being edited or radically changed to meet his political needs. To this day, for example, they’ve elided the Tiananmen Square Massacre.
— Even small-timers like Saddam Hussein do this; he linked himself to ancient Mesopotamian rulers and promoted a personality cult through museums, monuments, giant banners with his face on them hanging from federal buildings, and school curricula.

The simple reality is that in democracies it’s historians, journalists, courts, archives, universities, and scholars who write history and can challenge official narratives. Debate is expected, and interpretations can change as new evidence comes to light.

In dictatorships, on the other hand, the state typically monopolizes education, media, and archives, suppresses competing interpretations of history, and punishes those who publicly contradict the official version.

All of which is why it’s so important that we don’t treat the efforts by Trump and his neofascist lickspittles to rewrite America’s history into a sanitized white male supremacist mold as if it’s just some sort of aberration or sick joke.

This is serious stuff, and serious people within this administration are dedicated to destroying our and — particularly — our children’s understanding of the truly revolutionary and progressive history of this nation.

They’re trying to induce a national amnesia, stretching back through the history of the Klan, the Civil War, and even the American Revolution.

We must push back against them boldly and loudly, and when they’re gone we’re going to have a huge job cleaning up the fascist mess they’re making.

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

A former GOP strategist was spooked by who he saw calling out Elon Musk's midterm spending, saying it's a telling sign.

During an episode of The Bulwark Daily, Tim Miller and The Atlantic's Charlie Warzel talked about the political influence of wealthy tech figures, and at one point, focused in on Musk's reportedly dumping more than $100 million across midterm states like Maine to benefit Republicans. However, Miller was especially worried after seeing that former GOP Sen. Mitt Romney sounded the alarm on Musk.

Miller mentioned that he saw a clip where Romney called out Musk during an interview with McKay Coppins, a staff writer with The Atlantic who wrote a 2023 Romney biography.

"He's looking at McKay Coppins. He's like, 'The Elon thing's a little too far,'" Miller explained. "He's like, 'This guy who has all these government contracts, and he has this unimaginable wealth, and it's like no sweat off his back at all to spend a couple billion to influence these races, and then he gets better deals.'"

Although Miller shared Romney's concerns about Musk's spending, he said, "If Mitt is concerned about this, like, I feel like that should be a five-alarm fire to everybody about the scale of what we're talking about here." Miller explained that Romney's warning was especially revealing because of the former GOP presidential nominee's reputation.

"Mitt Romney is the guy that was on the Iowa soapbox, being like, 'Corporations are people, my friends,'" Miller said. "After Citizens United, that is Mitt Romney, rich private equity guy that wanted unlimited spending."

Warzel agreed with Miller, saying, "It's crazy! When you've lost Mitt Romney," and similarly cautioned that Musk has "always kind of operated as if he's above the law, but it is a type of power and influence that we actually don't have a historical parallel to, so we don't know how to constrain it, deal with it, what is even possible."

A former GOP strategist is calling a bluff by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and said he's playing Vice President JD Vance.

During an episode of the Against All Enemies podcast, Rick Wilson said that Rubio was lying when he reportedly told Vance and other insiders that he won't be running for president in 2028.

"It's bull—," Wilson said. "I've known Marco a very long time. He's completely full of sh—. They are planning his run."

Wilson said he knows "the guys that worked for Marco at that level," and they're already talking to the people who can help organize his presidential campaign.

"They are all talking to the money people. They are all talking to the press. They are all talking to political power brokers in the various early states," Wilson said. "They are planning a run. Do not be fooled for a single minute."

Wilson's co-host, progressive podcaster David Pakman, said, "Rubio supposedly told Vance, 'I won't run against you,'" but Wilson said it's a bluff that shouldn't be believed.

"He will come out and go, 'While I did not want to run against my friend JD Vance, I believe it is time for new leadership,'" Wilson said, predicting Rubio's announcement. "I can see the speech in my head because I've written it a thousand times."

On top of that, Wilson said that former MAGA congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene hinted that she could be planning "a movement" with far-right podcaster Tucker Carlson and outgoing Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY).

"It smells and looks like a political party that is going to be for those of you for whom MAGA is not crazy enough. 'Let's have something more crazy!'" Wilson said, adding that he predicted "there will be a lot of people" in the 2028 presidential race.

"This will be a very big field," Wilson said. "You are going to get Rubio and Vance and Ted Cruz and Ron DeSantis and Nikki Haley. They're going to have a cast of thousands in this fight."

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}