Opinion

Rumors of Donald Trump's decline have been greatly exaggerated

The year-end holidays are a horrible time for politics and for writing about it. Most people are thinking about other things, even if they don’t celebrate Christmas. So the press and pundit corps scrape together what’s already known and make it seem dramatic and new.

The AP ran a round-up of Donald Trump’s travails. In the beginning of 2022, he was at the peak of his powers, the AP said. “Primary candidates were flocking to Florida to court the former president for a coveted endorsement. His rallies were drawing thousands. A bevy of investigations remained largely under the radar.”

Keep reading... Show less

The Jan. 6 committee closes the books on Trump’s treachery

Hours before its dissolution at noon Tuesday with the ending of the Congress of the last two years and the commencement of the new session, the House Select Committee to Investigate the Jan. 6 Attack on the United States Capitol released the last remaining documents from its crucial probe. Using the website of the U.S. Government Publishing Office — which was called the U.S. Government Printing Office from its founding on the same day that Lincoln was first inaugurated in 1861 until the internet era in 2014 — the bipartisan panel put on the permanent record the sordid details of Donald Trump’s...

The GOP is about to go wild with phony Biden investigations. The media must not take the bait

Dark Brandon strikes again! Republicans have been drooling openly for weeks now over the small House majority they will have in the new year, and not because they have plans for legislation that will improve the lives of Americans. Nah, the blueprint for 2023 is all revenge on Democrats, all the time. Republicans are still salty over House Democrats investigating Donald Trump for minor transgressions like attempting to overthrow democracy and sending a murderous mob after Congress and his own vice president. The main form this revenge will take will be endless, stupid "investigations" into the various conspiracy theories about President Joe Biden that have been dredged up from the bowels of right wing media.

But Biden is not interested in making it easy for them. On Thursday, White House lawyer Richard Sauber metaphorically crumpled up Republican requests for materials on various fake scandals, telling them they don't have the authority yet and will have to redo all the paperwork in the new year.

"Should the Committee issue similar or other requests in the 118th Congress, we will review and respond to them in good faith, consistent with the needs and obligations of both branches," he wrote. "We expect the new Congress will undertake its oversight responsibilities in the same spirit of good faith."

Keep reading... Show less

Why was the Buffalo blizzard death toll so high?

When, in February 2021, the temperatures in parts of Texas dropped to the low teens, crashing the power infrastructure, officials were at a loss dealing with a problem that they simply hadn’t had before and people died as a result. The same was true later that year in the Pacific Northwest as temperatures hit 115 degrees, baking Oregon and Washington to the point that cables literally melted and roads buckled in a region where most homes don’t have A/C and people died as a result. The same cannot be said for officials responsible for the safety of typically snowbound western New York, which wa...

Antonin Scalia and the uncertain future of legal conservatism

During her 2010 Senate confirmation hearings, centrist-liberal Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan famously allowed that “we are all originalists.” In a 2015 interview at Harvard Law School honoring her then-colleague Justice Antonin Scalia, Kagan proclaimed that “we are all textualists now.” However, in a dissent opinion to the West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency decision, which gutted the Clean Air Act, Kagan wrote: “Some years ago, I remarked that we’re all textualists now. ... It seems I was wrong. The current Court is textualist only when being so suits it.” What are we to make...

Does the real George Santos even exist?

I don’t know how Long Island prosecutors can investigate a man who does not exist, but apparently they’re going to try. Nassau County District Attorney Anne Donnelly said Wednesday that her office is looking into the case of New York Congressman-elect George Santos.

Since winning a seat in the US House of Representatives, Santos has admitted to lying about his Jewish heritage, college education and employment history, among other things. Though having confessed to deceiving his voters, he has indicated nary a plan to resign. “I'm not a fraud,” Santos told Fox host Tucker Carlson. “I'm not a fake.”

Keep reading... Show less

Year of opportunity: Can America escape from political depression in 2023?

We know a great deal about how human beings respond to extreme danger. Most people exhibit a range of stress responses as a function of "fight or flight" instincts, which may include some or all of the following: dilation of the pupils, changes in heart rate and the circulatory system, rapid breathing, tunnel vision, time dilation, unreliable or overly acute memories, distorted hearing and loss of fine motor skills.

Some people stricken by fear may literally feel stuck in place, the phenomenon known as "cement feet," where they are rendered helpless and unable to move. Others faced with extreme danger and peril will remain calm, take command of the situation and lead themselves and others to safety.

Many things in that litany may seem uncomfortably familiar, given what Americans have lived through since 2015 or so. These examples of the "fight or flight" response can apply to societies and groups as well as individuals. American society as a whole has suffered great physical, emotional, psychological, spiritual, intellectual and financial trauma from the Age of Trump and the rise of neofascism. That trauma has been most acutely felt by members of marginalized and other vulnerable communities.

Keep reading... Show less

Can a politician's mental fitness for office be diagnosed from afar?

It was a presidential election year. A magazine called "Fact" had reached out to all 12,356 members of the American Psychiatric Association (APA) about the Republican presidential candidate, who hailed from the party's extreme right-wing and was intensely disliked by liberals. Of the 2,417 psychiatrists who responded, nearly half said the Republican nominee was psychologically unfit to be president (1,189), with the rest split almost evenly between saying that he was fit (657) and demurring altogether (571). Even though this means that fewer than 10 percent of the APA members actually denounced the Republican candidate as mentally unfit for office, the ones who did so used such colorful and memorable language that it made headlines. To understand way, simply look at one one of the quotes from the anti-Goldwater psychiatrists:

"He is a mass-murderer at heart and ... a dangerous lunatic. ... Any psychiatrist who does not agree with the above is himself psychologically unfit to be a psychiatrist."

While one might imagine those words being written about former President Donald Trump, their actual target was Sen. Barry Goldwater of Arizona, who ran in the 1964 election against President Lyndon Johnson. Even though the Johnson-Goldwater contest happened nearly six decades ago, Americans are still living with the ramifications of these psychiatrists' public statements. For one thing, it will never be clear if they contributed to his landslide defeat; that said, Goldwater eventually sued Fact magazine for defamation and won, achieving an important symbolic victory over the liberal media outlets that had attacked him. Even before Goldwater's legal victory, however, the APA released a new rule — later dubbed "the Goldwater Rule" — which prohibits psychiatrists from publicly commenting on an individual unless they have previously performed a "thorough clinical examination" on them as a patient.

Keep reading... Show less

Trump posts 'Gee I wonder why' no one is buying his baseless Jan. 6 conspiracy theories

Donald Trump used his Truth Social platform again today to spread widely debunked conspiracy theories blaming others for allegedly orchestrating the January 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol.

In a purported response to transcripts released by the House January 6 Committee, Trump shared an out-of-context post by right-wing Dinesh D’Souza. That post sought to lay blame for the riot with ex-Oath Keeper Ray Epps and alleged “Antifa” member Jason Sullivan.

Keep reading... Show less

Why do guys like George Santos lie?

David Brooks isn't entirely wrong in his assessment of "The Sad Tales of George Santos," his latest column for the New York Times: "If you don't have a real story, you don't have a real self," is spot-on. But when he muses that Santos — the Republican congressman-elect from New York, whose many and convoluted fabrications about his life and career require the sort of murder-board treatment one usually needs to follow a years-long "Real Housewives" feud — feels different from earlier all-American identity scammers like (fictional) Jay Gatsby, he's wrong about why that is:

I wonder if the era of the short-attention spans and the online avatars is creating a new character type: the person who doesn't experience life as an accumulation over decades, but just as a series of disjointed performances in the here and now, with an echo of hollowness inside.

Santos isn't some new character in the drama. Sure, it's tempting to believe that every scammer (sorry, "embellisher") who manages to up the ante has reinvented the game — to do otherwise would be to suggest we don't learn from our gullibilities, and I'm sorry, but how rude — that the liars and grifters and opportunists making headlines today are somehow more special because we can live-tweet our outrage, then experience it again almost immediately in scripted form, starring our Hollywood faves. The details evolve with the times, sure. Sam Bankman-Fried's FTX scandal does sound shiny and new. But his knack for gaining people's financial trust also looks a lot like old-fashioned Bernie Madoff technique. It's the cryptocurrency trappings that are novel. Lies are as old as talking itself.

Keep reading... Show less

Neil Gorsuch knows 'three co-equal branches' is a myth

Apparently trying to prove the old cliché about broken clocks and twice a day, Supreme Court Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch defied his 5 Republican colleagues on the bench and authored an honest and factual dissent in this week’s Title 42 case.

He came right out and said the Supreme Court shouldn’t be making policy.

It all started when Section 71.40 of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations was written into US policy by Trump’s HHS Secretary Alex Azar on September 4, 2020.

Keep reading... Show less

Donald Trump Jr. doesn't look so smart in latest trove of Jan. 6 testimony

Yesterday's release of January 6 testimony didn’t go well for Donald Trump Jr. To the surprise of no one, the former president’s son did not come across as the most astute of advisors.

For one thing, Trump Jr said that he did not know what happened to some $240 million raised to fight his father’s 2020 presidential election loss, the Independent reported. To hear him tell it, Trump Jr. was out of the loop.

Keep reading... Show less

A pastor comes to terms with the church’s idols of Trump, money and power

(Editor’s note: This is an excerpt from “Red State Christians: A Journey into White Christian Nationalism and the Wreckage it leaves behind,” available everywhere books are sold.)

On Sunday, January 10, 2021, I woke up early, stepped out my back door into frigid, biting air, and drove from one America into another.

I drove from leafy, liberal southwest Minneapolis, west from metro Highway 62 onto US Route 212, which runs from Minnesota into South Dakota, dead-ending in Yellowstone National Park in wild, ultra-conservative Wyoming.

Keep reading... Show less