The slam dunk that sidelined a MAGA senator's career
Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-MO) was being hoisted as a potential 2028 vice president pick â until this slam-dunk disaster.
Nick Anderson is a Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial cartoonist.
Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-MO) was being hoisted as a potential 2028 vice president pick â until this slam-dunk disaster.
Nick Anderson is a Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial cartoonist.
In 1998, Rep. Dan Burton of Indiana, a truly loathsome character at the time but now almost angelic in comparison to today's characters, told the Indianapolis Star that Bill Clinton was "a scumbag" and that's why he was "after him."
It was a really big deal. It sent shock waves through Washington. I recall being gobsmacked at the language. It triggered intense political backlash, with Democrats attempting to remove him from his committee chairmanship. He was never formally investigated, as the Dems demanded. The House Republican leadership ultimately blocked all disciplinary resolutions, allowing him to retain his position despite his potty mouth.
My oh my oh my, have we come a long way in terms of GOP potty-mouthing.
Yesterday, Sen. Eric Schmitt of Missouri sat in a Senate Judiciary hearing and told former Special Counsel Jack Smith he would "go down as a total dirtbag." He called Smith a "villain" and said he had "already perjured" himself.
To prove it, he rolled out a poster board of text messages allegedly showing Smith traveling to Atlanta to collude with local prosecutors. In basketball parlance, it proved to be a game-ejecting flagrant foul.
The stupid Schmitt â dare we call him a dirtbag? â had confused the Atlanta Hawks with the Iowa Hawkeyes. Smith had been at a college game in Maryland. The great dirtbag exposĂŠ rested on a mascot mix-up.
Sen. Amy Klobuchar said an apology was in order. Schmitt went on The Charlie Kirk Show and refused to give one.
This isnât Schmittâs first time at the raunchy rodeo. In September 2025, in a hearing with FBI Director Kash Patel, Schmitt snapped at Democrats, "Check yourself! Don't give me this both sides b------t." He then claimed the left and George Soros were "dropping off bricks at riots."
Iâm sorry, but can anyone see the 96-year-old Soros carrying bricks?
Schmittâs blood and mouth are riddled with contempt. At the National Conservatism Conference, he declared that "America doesn't belong to them â it belongs to us."
Everyone who heard "them" knew who it meant: immigrants, minorities, LGBTQ+ Americans. In 2022, the Missouri NAACP called his campaign ads "Jim Crow-style racist political ads."
So, beside being a dirtbag and a BS artist, Schmitt is also apparently a racist.
Schmitt is also following a naughtiness that started with Burtonâs scumbag. Even John McCain â who privately, I was once told, had a mouth like a sailor â called anti-war protesters "low-life scum." Sen. Markwayne Mullin called Teamsters president Sean O'Brien a "thug." I know, I know, thug is childâs play, but still.
Sen. John Kennedy used the Senate floor in 2024 to say President Biden was "letting a dirtbag run the FDIC." So, let me get this straight, Kennedy not only helped Schmitt with his Hawk hi-jinx by holding up a BS poster-board (was this for Donald Trump?), but he also helped Schmitt with his dirtbag term.
But, folks, weâve been down the dirtbag road before, and surprise, surprise, a Republican used it appropriately. Then Connecticut governor and former GOP Sen. Lowell Weicker called Trump a dirtbag and a bigot. Oh, I miss moderate, sensible Republicans like Weicker.
Now, hereâs something that won't surprise you. Schmitt's "dirtbag" actually sounds tame. That's because the bar has dropped through the metaphorical House floor. An April New York Times review found that GOP Rep. Derrick Van Orden had used the F-word at least 35 times in his public communications.
To be fair, because vulgarity now seems so commonplace, Van Ordenâs Democratic colleague, Rep. Mark Pocan (D-WI) used the same word on X 30 times over the six-year tracking period, according to the Times analysis.
Consider Rep. Lauren Boebert. In June 2026, a reporter asked her about allegations involving her and Rep. Thomas Massie. Her answer: "F--- you, first of all." As a journalist, I would have probably thanked her for being so kind. No, seriously, I would have got in the game and gave it right back to her.
Rep. Nancy Mace, you might say, takes her cues straight to the people. In 2025, she posted video of her own confrontation with a constituent in a South Carolina store, in which she snapped, "F--- you. You are absolutely f---ing insane." She didn't hide the footage. She published it.
And prior to Schmittâs, the Senateâs most infamous trash mouth belonged to the ribald Ohio GOP Senator Bernie Moreno. During the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee hearing with Dr. Anthony Fauci in July, Moreno crudely asked, "Do you feel like you're in deep s--t?" He followed up with, "Who the f--k do you think you were for doing that?" That was a U.S. senator, in a formal hearing, addressing a witness.
Dan Burton's "scumbag" once made the headlines of Beltway newspapers. Now a Republican can curse out a reporter, a constituent, and a witness and it enjoys a slight blip on social media âtrendingâ pages. Letâs see how long Schmitt stays at the top of the ever-evolving and changing GOP sewer-mouth list.
Burton's "scumbag" was shocking because it was rare. Schmitt's "dirtbag" is unremarkable because it's now so routine that you almost expect GOP MAGA motormouths to spew salty language.
As Louisianaâs crazy-crackpot (see how I refrained from using an expletive?) Senator John Kennedy might say, âIt makes me want to throw up in my mouth.â
You can hear it in their voices, the words they use, the issues brought up, the frustration evolving into tinged anger, and the conviction â no more, you're pushing it, really pushing it.
Republican senators have been talking about Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth a lot more lately, and that's bad news at a particularly bad time for him, as he already faces eight articles of impeachment once the House returns (assuming it ever returns).
But it is even worse news for Donald Trump.
Because for all the talk about Hegseth's recklessness in firing officers, bumbling the war, running through money, self-aggrandizement, and self-satisfaction, it's all but impossible for these Republicans to keep Hegseth's name straight in these sentences. It is amazing they don't realize that it's not obvious that everything they say applies equally to Trump, if not more to Trump, and that this is a coded message: "If we come after your guy, the one you still strongly support, and we are coming, there's only one last hill to climb between him and you."
The cynics will laugh this away, and to a degree they are right. We cycle through this. But as has been said here too many times, we've never cycled like this when the American people are hurting and watching a new war unfold in front of us. And it really, really matters when the cycling includes Hegseth stumbles that hurt Congressional candidates in the midterms. That's a sick mix.
An unnamed Senate source was quoted as saying: "There are a lot of people that are really upset with the war in Iran and how it's being played out. We feel it's hurting our chances in the elections in the fall, and it seems rather haphazard."
Seems?
It "seems" to the American people like we had a one-week plan for a two-year war. Of course, the war might have gone better had Hegseth not emptied the cupboard of "strong, experienced senior officers," who just happen to be women, Black, or insufficiently nimble in their Trump support.
Said another Senator: "We don't like what we're seeing when it comes to the pulling of officers off of the promotion lists. We don't like what we see with ⌠indiscriminate firings of admirals and generals across the force."
It would be easier to feel some sort of compassion for the angry Republicans, or at least shared concern in this matter, were it not for the fact that Hegseth was laughably unqualified. He also told us exactly what he was going to do during his confirmation hearings: rid the department of DEI, meaning everyone who isn't a white-hetero-Christian MAGA man. He wanted big guns, bigger bombs, and the biggest dudes, not once thinking maybe there was a use for the mousy 45-year-old woman about to be brigadier general â the type who might step up and say, "What do we have to prevent them from closing the strait?"
Door slam.
They certainly don't want to give Hegseth's "War Department" any more money; they don't trust him to use what they've given already, and they really don't trust the voters' forgiveness for giving much more to an adolescent with the matches to burn down the Middle East. Now Hegseth is asking for a $1.5 trillion Pentagon budget, more than 40% above the prior year, plus another $88 billion associated with the Iran war and additional weapons.
For poor Pete, this couldn't possibly come at a worse time. Word on the street is that Trump plans on re-upping bombing and aggressiveness after the midterms, as if it might have escaped Americans' notice that we're in a quagmire, lifting all prices. But guess what else is coming after the midterms? That's right, Pete's eight articles of impeachment, and all Massie needs is a handful of GOP votes to move it forward. He may well have that now, never mind then, and that's just the beginning of issues, because ramping up war means putting more of our sons and daughters in harm's way.
Lose 20 soldiers to a horrifically "perfect" drone placement â data provided by Russia, parts by China â and suddenly those Senate voices may well be joining Massie and the Democrats. Hegseth could realistically be in actual danger of being convicted and dumped.
And, look, this isn't dumping Kristi Noem for imitating her boss. This is Hegseth, a Trump guy to the bone, a guy Trump still strongly supports.
It is that strong Trump support that links the two, as Hegseth acts as a political proxy for things that Republicans wish they could say and do to Trump. Because again, you can hear it in the tone, the specificity of the complaints, the bewilderment; everything said about Hegseth could actually be directed at Trump.
No doubt, it is not easy being president, nor Secretary of Defense, but it is also nowhere near as hard as these two are making it, either. That sentence alone is doing a lot of work; think about it: two men who, through a combo of incompetence and misplaced priorities, make hard jobs infinitely harder than they would otherwise be, and like a man drowning, the more they panic and slap, scream, and shake, the further under they go.
So now the real danger. What if Trump starts pushing the war again right as an entire Congress is freed during a lame duck session with a truly lame duck president, one who â be reminded â is already polling at his lowest levels ever, at a career-low 32% approval, and God forbid, what if it doesn't go well at all? It doesn't go well at all while Trump keeps talking about his ballroom, gas prices go up further, Epstein still hasn't been opened, a blue wave just crashed, investigations are coming, threatening a lot more GOPers than just Trump and Hegseth? What if Trump's name starts getting substituted for Hegseth's outwardly, rather than under the breath as now?
A real squeeze could be coming as we join three formerly disparate matters: Blue wave coming to Congress, including investigations, Trump renewing a war so unpopular it is stunning, Hegseth impeachment, drifting, drifting, drifting, to either firing Hegseth â a major Trump concession, along with Republicans stretching their vision a bit, stretching their Trump-opposition voices. That is a lot coming together at a point in time when Trump would desperately love to avoid investigations, avoid a lame duck two years, desperately enjoy his full pardon, and then desperately enjoy his money.
It is cool to say that nothing can bring this administration down, that MAGAs will parrot whatever Trump says. But Sen. Foghorn-Leghorn Kennedy, one of the smartest 'Aw Shucks' guys in Congress, did not support Trump's ad over the weekend; the stretching is getting worked out.
Mostly true during pretty good times when Trump had his hands around the necks of every candidate in any race and the American people were doing "alright" and no new war. Reverse all of it, all of the above, and trouble is brewing.
Hegseth is a placeholder. A workout. Stretching exercises. It is more likely he's gone before Christmas than still in office unless that war is somehow won.
They say one should live in interesting times. Well, this has been interesting, but only because we're seeing the destruction of a once great nation, in part because hard jobs are made infinitely harder by guys who simply can't help themselves.
Soon, neither will Congress.
Jason Miciak is a Raw Story Columnist, former editor of Occupy Democrats, author, consultant, attorney, and single parent girldad. Please follow on Bluesky, and he can be reached at jasonmiciak@gmail.com
If only Trump's devoted MAGA could use this to fuel their trucks.
Nick Anderson is a Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial cartoonist.
Two very different demos have recently risen to social media prominence: GenX women and our polar opposites, the MAGA Trad Wives. The starkly opposed messaging is making a real case for the ânurtureâ part of the ânature vs. nurtureâ argument during a time when womenâs rights are constantly in flux.
GenX Women â aka the âForgotten Generationââ have emerged as a hugely influential group thanks to being the (better) half of the last fully analog generation on the planet. Too many GenX men are MAGA, which is why liberal GenX women have found our collectively loud social media voice amid our current AI garbage fire of MAGA fakery. We are rightfully raging as we refuse to remain silent during our menopause, from the peri- to the post-menopausal years. Black women in particular are leading the female GenX trends, and rightly so.
It took us forever to get here, and weâre going to make sure everybody knows it.
Call it Middle Rage instead of Middle Age. Our mothers and grandmothers may have suffered through the âchange of lifeâ in silence, but weâre absolutely not going gently into our golden years. Several celebs in their 50s now have menopause wellness lines and are very vocal about how itâs changed literally everything. The Portland-based Menopunks podcast/documentary project has grown exponentially over the last year.
We have plenty of wisdom to impart on the younger generations, because weâre made of the toughest stuff. Raised on hose water, Twinkies, and frozen pizza we made in the toaster oven in our empty house after walking home from school by ourselves, the latchkey GenX kids are better prepared to take over this country than you might think. We stood on kitchen chairs to cook our own breakfasts on the stove by the age of 5 or 6. None of used a bike helmet or a seat belt until the government mandated them. Our parents had no idea where we were most of the time during the summers, and we all had jobs by the time we were 15.
Plus, with all of our tattoos and other body modifications, weâre also poised to be the coolest old people ever! Weâve already made going naturally gray both hot and cool, and weâre also using fewer facial fillers than our moms.
But itâs our collective political voice thatâs emerged as our strongest asset, because weâve lived through decades of sexism and misogynist microaggressions, and we arenât having any of what the MAGA Mean Girls and the Trumpy Trad Wives are putting out there.
If youâre not familiar (and oh, how I envy you!), the Trad Wife is young, Christian, white, and obedient to her husband, whoâs often much older. Not at all Epstein-y. Anyway, they embrace a âLittle House on the Prairieâ lifestyle of doing all of the housework and child-rearing while the menfolk make â and therefore, control â the money. They call it âspousal submission.â I call it domestic abuse.
Iâm oddly fascinated by women who vote for Republicans. There are multiple memes for it, but the best one is probably any that shows someone punching themselves in the face. Or just pointing out that it will never make sense.
There really isnât enough internet space to delve into the subjugation of women since the dawn of time, so weâll just fast-forward to the last few decades of watching Republican women hand over their bodily autonomy to men for *checks notes* reasons I donât get.
But theyâve been immersed in a groupthink cult experiment for their whole lives, mostly due to the patriarchy of Christianity. Religion is a choice, and once youâre an adult, you have a duty to yourself to question everything youâve been told when youâve never been given any proof.
Thinking for yourself isnât hard and should always be encouraged. However, the cult-like atmosphere in which most conservatives are raised clearly doesnât lend itself to individuality. No one is born hating anyone or believing anything; our parents are our first teachers, and whether or not theyâre aware of it, theyâre imprinting us with their belief systems instead of letting us create our own.
But MAGA women are still women, and Iâm not letting them distract me with that stupid âwhat is a womanâ question they use as a distraction from the cult stuff theyâre doing.
I want to know why theyâre okay with giving up their bodies, brains, and basic human rights to men. Theyâll say theyâd be fine with the abolishment of the 19th Amendment. They believe that getting married young and having a huge family is all theyâre meant for. They donât question any of the GOPâs tactics or the evils of Project 2025/2026, they just repeat whatever theyâve been told.
A recent viral example of this is the helium-voiced, non-blinking Julia Kate, who doesnât use her last name and speaks in the overly cheerful cadence of a cult member, even when sheâs defending Donald Trumpâs horrific track record. She just got a whole bunch of negative attention thanks to a debate on Jubliee Media, which seems to exist solely to create ragebait videos. Julia Kate claims that all women need to marry young and get into their Birthing Vessel Era by having no less than 10 children as fast as possible.
GenX women would like a few moments with Julia Kate and her ilk to set them straight. MAGA women will also go through childbirth, menopause, and other things that their men wonât like. We can see how ill-equipped they are to handle real life and wonder how they manage to even dress themselves (which is mostly like a human version of a Holly Hobbie doll, yet another GenX reference).
But itâs so much more than just making viral videos. Itâs making sure women achieve full equality. Itâs electing more Democratic women to be louder than the weak Republican men who fear our power. And itâs setting the example for those coming up behind us.
Is it just me, or has anyone else also noticed that our president has been melting down even more than usual lately?
That whole âno guardrailsâ thing, combined with being surrounded by sycophants who are only too eager to do all of his bidding without questioning it and Congressional Republicans who almost without exception remain scared to death of him â plus immunity â has produced a monster who believes no court order applies to him and no law can stop him from doing whatever the hell he wants.
Given the above, I donât think it qualifies as catastrophizing to conclude that all bets are off when it comes to this guyâs wholly unpredictable behavior and what heâs prone to do when faced with whatâs looking like an increasingly likely blue wave washing over the midterms to deliver a Democratic majority in both the House and Senate.
The question becomes less how Trump is likely to act and more what the rest of us will do to stop him if a worst-case scenario comes to pass. Because unlike what some believe, stopping him is not only possible but essential to ultimately restoring the health of the republic.
But letâs try to look at this logically, if anything resembling reason can even matter when it comes to the least stable leader this country has ever been forced to endure by a very wide margin.
Trump has done nothing to indicate heâll play by any rules other than his own; ergo, I have precisely zero confidence that he will, for instance, heed the original injunction put in place by Federal District Judge Indira Talwani that the U.S. Postal Service cannot refuse to send-out mail-in ballots because a state hasnât complied with Trumpâs onerous new requirements that were essentially rubber-stamped by the Supreme Court.
You know that sense of relief you got on September 14 when the Supremes uncharacteristically declined to overturn Judge Talwaniâs order? Well, forget about that.
It would be entirely on brand at this stage for Trump to disregard what the courts said and order the USPS to, for instance, withhold the sending out of mail-in ballots to blue states â in other words, go utterly rogue. He could just say, âI overrule the order because I believe itâs unfair, and as president I have the power to correct this grave error.â
He doesnât, of course. But who is going to tell Trump he doesnât? You? Me? Certainly not the lily-livered House and Senate.
Letâs remember that he still has a loyalist presiding in USPS Postmaster General David Steiner. Steiner already announced that heâd abide by the courtsâ determination of the post officeâs legal authority, but a lot of people have said a lot of things lately that wind up not being worth squat.
So letâs say USPS decides to do the presidentâs bidding, anyway. Trump would laugh at threats of additional injunctions and civil contempt sanctions. The only thing he seems to understand and heed is brute force, and the courts ainât got it. However, he personally has it in the form of his very own ICE militia/goon squad.
The Supreme Court doesnât command an army or police force of its own. Federal courts in general have limited independent means of physically ensuring compliance with their decisions. Before Trump, this was simply not an issue, since we were not an authoritarian state ruled by a would-be dictator. (Actually, I think we should erase the words âwould-beâ at this point.)
The constitutional system has historically depended entirely on executive officials accepting judicial judgments as binding. I wouldnât be so sure thatâs going to continue.
Imagine this: the president orders defiance on mail-in ballots. USPS leadership complies. Subordinate officials comply. The Justice Department refuses to assist the court (thanks Todd Blanche). Executive officials refuse to implement contempt orders, and even if they do, thereâs no one to enforce them.
Even if Congressional Republicans were suddenly to locate their long-lost spines, the whole process of conducting investigations and hearings, subpoenaing officials and even invoking the impeachment process would likely take far too long to save the midterms.
Bottom line: there is no automatic mechanism in place to stop such illegality should Trump and his group of enablers choose to go that route.
Should a rogue Trump fly completely off the rails of legal and ethical comportment surrounding the midterms, the mail-in ballot system would be only one of the alarming concerns (and perhaps not even the primary one).
He could direct federal agents to seize ballots or voting equipment at polling locations, throwing the whole process into chaos.
He could deploy federal law-enforcement troops around polling places, as has already been regularly threatened, to intimidate voters and potentially transform numerous locations into immigration roundup zones.
He could call up the National Guard or other armed military to crack down and toss the election into further turmoil by invoking a sham emergency.
He could use federal investigations to obtain voter registration databases, demanding voter files from states and invoking voting-rights or election-integrity laws.
He could attempt to dictate which voting machines states may use.
He could attempt to impose new nationwide voting requirements and ID laws by executive order, essentially instituting elements of the SAVE Act unilaterally in the purported interest of preventing fraud and keeping election integrity intact.
He could try to disrupt the counting of ballots after Election Day, claiming that suspected federal crimes justify obtaining ballots, records or equipment while tallying or canvassing are underway.
He could attempt to use the DOJ (thanks again, Mr. Blanche) to stop or alter counts, filing lawsuits and requesting emergency injunctions.
Mind you, all of this could be accomplished no matter how any federal court rules if Trump simply decides the judiciary doesnât matter. Thatâs more than a mere constitutional crisis, boys and girls. Thatâs democracy in its death throes.
I would be shocked if at least some of this isnât on the White House drawing board and/or being prepped for implementation, and so would you. If the rulings of judges are ignored, this thing stands to get very ugly very quickly.
I pray that it doesnât come to that.
(Ray Richmond is a longtime journalist/author and an adjunct professor at Chapman University in Orange, CA.)
I was reading a story about how Donald Trump had so thoroughly destroyed the Kennedy Center, a once-great arts institution reduced to a pathetic shell by one manâs seemingly deep-seated enmity at John F. Kennedyâs ongoing, and entirely justified, veneration. It was clear that Trumpâs goal all along has been to raze the venue and rebuild it as the Trump Center, so egomaniacal is he.
The thing is, this sort of pitiful move is entirely on brand for this president. He is at war with Americaâs history, the goal being to erase it and install himself as at once the demolisher and self-appointed savior of everything that has been and will be. He is all about marking his territory with toxic urine. If it doesnât bear his name and/or likeness, he believes it carries no value and must be wiped from the face of the earth.
Indeed, to catalog the institutions, ideals, norms and shared assumptions of American life that Trump has sought to destroy during both his first and (especially) second administrations is to perceive an impossibly voluminous obliteration of things and standards that once seemed permanent and invulnerable.
What follows here, in no particular order, is a list of what Trump has ruined through either his hideous taste, inept decision-making or purposeful hostility. It is by no means a complete list, as that would require a multi-book encyclopedia.
The deeper argument here is not simply that Trump is singlehandedly destroying American democracy, science, education, journalism and the rule of law. They remain essentially intact despite the enormous and continuing pressures placed on them to completely implode.
What seems the larger point is how his two presidencies have exposed how much of our lives depends on voluntary restraint, institutional independence, public trust and a willingness to accept limits on power, the kind of limits that Trump will never believe apply to him.
As we sit less than six weeks from the midterms, itâs instructive to remember that a constitution cannot enforce itself and a democracy canât survive indefinitely without a vigorous defense. We must start to reverse his purposeful destruction of everything we hold dear.
November canât come soon enough.
(Ray Richmond is a longtime journalist/author and an adjunct professor at Chapman University in Orange, CA.)
I feel optimistic about the midterm elections, just over five weeks away. But my stomach aches when I think of whatâs at stake.
Call me nauseously optimistic.
I suspect youâre in a similar place.
If it were only the polls, Iâd feel reasonably good. Hereâs one that stuck out for me: The share of Republicans who say the economy is better than a year ago has collapsed from over 70 percent in January to 29 percent in September, according to last weekâs New York Times/Siena poll.
Hereâs another: According to a Wall Street Journal poll, just 37 percent of Americans approve of the job that Trump is doing â the lowest approval rating of any president heading into a midterm election in Journal polls dating to 1990.
Another good sign: Because of Trumpâs unpopular war, his dreaded tariffs, and their effect on prices, Republicans in tight races are starting to tiptoe away from Trump. In recent days, Maine Senator Susan Collins and Kansas Senator Roger Marshall have distanced themselves from Trump on tariff policies that they say hurt small businesses and rural communities in Maine and aircraft production in Kansas. Nebraska Senator Pete Ricketts has questioned whether consumers would see lower prices from Trumpâs decision to temporarily allow more foreign beef imports into the U.S., a move thatâs opposed by ranchers. All three senators are seeking reelection this year.
In the House, seven Republicans, including a group facing tough reelection races, joined Democrats this past week in passing a measure directing Trump to remove U.S. forces from hostilities against Iran unless Congress authorizes the war.
Republicans are also uneasy with Trumpâs refusal to regulate AI, data centers, or even Flock Safety cameras â which most Americans now oppose.
And I think this is fascinating: Mentions of Trumpâs name per hour on conservative podcasts have fallen nearly 70 percent from their peak in the run-up to the 2024 election. Monthly mentions of his name have fallen 30 percent since the U.S. launched the war in late February.
All encouraging.
But what makes my stomach churn is the vast amounts of money from some of the worst right-wing billionaires in America (cue Elon Musk) now being poured into key races to finance a barrage of ads favoring Republican candidates and making stuff up about Democrats and progressives.
My stomach also aches when I think about what Trump and his regime may try (and have already tried) to do to interfere with our elections and further erode public trust in them. On Friday, for example, the Supreme Court lifted restrictions on a federal voter database pushed by Trump. Even worse, his regime refuses to rule out sending ICE agents to polling places.
So our work over the next five weeks is essential â phoning, writing, canvassing, getting out the vote, and, to the extent we can, funding candidates who will help average working Americans.
Yes, money talks, and Trump is a vicious dictator. But there are far more of us than there are Trumpâs billionaires â more of us to do the talking and the organizing and the mobilizing. And far more of us to guard our electoral system than there are Trump lapdogs and agents.
And always remember this: Weâre on the right side â the side of the people seeking the common good rather than the corporate and techno-billionaires seeking additional wealth and power for themselves.
Which is why Iâm nauseously optimistic that we will prevail in just over five weeks. And you? How do you feel?
Donald Trump made history this week when he achieved something none of his predecessors ever could: the lowest approval ratings since approval ratings began. Heâs languishing at -26, according to YouGov polling. Nowhere near the winning MAGA was promised.
Itâs almost as if heâs deliberately trying to look as bad as possible so he can keep embarrassing our country on the global stage. Witness his welcome for Chinese President Dictator Xi Jinping, which was an exercise in full cringe. Oddly bundled into a winter coat with black leather gloves covering his badly bruised hands, Trump tried to show off for Xi during a military flyover, but ended up wincing in fear while saluting absolutely no one.
US President Donald Trump reacts to the roar of B-1 bomber flyover during the U.S. national anthem as Trump salutes next to Chinese President Xi Jinping during an arrival ceremony ahead of a state visit at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, US, September 23, 2026. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst
Then Trump led Xi on a tour of what used to be our White House, but has now been decorated with leftover stock from a Hobby Lobby in Moscow. Trumpâs Wall of Hate is especially infuriating to see hanging in the Peopleâs House, serving only to boost King Babyâs weak ego. Imagine thinking itâs a flex of any kind to bully Joe Biden and Barack Obama in front of the Chinese dictator, who openly laughed at the âAutopenâ display. Trump is so feckless, he thought Xi was laughing with him, instead of at him.
I miss dignity from the White House. Also, I just miss our White House, which isnât his house, and he never shouldâve been allowed to change any part of the structure. It was the first step in his intentional vandalization of DC to make America look as weak as possible on the global stage, a display for his Daddy Vladdy, Xi, and other dictators that the U.S. is that easily bought.
Also on display for Xi: the least effective First Lady ever, Melania âI don't careâ Trump, who couldnât have made it clearer that she hates her husband.
While sheâs always enjoyed the material spoils of being the third Mrs. Trump, sheâs also looked the other way at his philandering, probably because she doesnât want him touching her. Itâs no secret that Melania never had any interest in being the First Lady in the first place, which was painfully obvious when Trump ran in 2016. She took no joy in the scrutiny of public attention, and any speeches she made on behalf of her husband came across as joyless chores. If he lost, it was rumored Melania would finally divorce him.
That rumor took hold even tighter after Melania famously remained behind in Manhattan with Barron instead of moving to the White House, claiming he needed to finish school in New York. Once she finally made the move, she made it clear she was doing it under protest.
Melania allegedly demanded a new toilet in her en suite bathroom because Michelle Obama had used it before her, according to a book written by her former aide, Stephanie Winston Wolkoff. âMelania took one look at her bedroom off the West Sitting Hall and said, âIâm not moving to D.C. until the Residence has been renovated and redecorated, starting with a new shower and toilet,ââ the book says.
âMelania did not conduct business on a previously-used john."
Published in 2020, Melania and Me: The Rise and Fall of My Friendship with the First Lady details the strained relationship between Melania and her elder stepdaughter, Ivanka. Before Trumpâs first inauguration, Melania and Winston Wolkoff plotted to keep Ivanka from drawing attention during the 2017 swearing-in ceremony in what they called âOperation Block Ivanka.â
Imagine if Jill Biden had tried the same thing with Hunter.
Like her husband, Melania has a habit of taking out her personal misery on everyone else, which is why she paved over Jackie Kennedyâs Rose Garden and turned the White House into a Handmaidâs Tale Christmas Horror Show.
Melania has never taken to the role of First Lady. She doesnât visit sick kids in hospitals or read to them in libraries. She doesnât go on âGoodwill Ambassadorâ tours or promote initiatives to make anything better. Instead, she promoted the biased documentary about her that aired on Amazon Prime and has made her full lack of interest in other people her entire aesthetic.
The former model knows how to turn on a smile for the cameras, but the Unhappy First Coupleâs unhappiness was on full display during Xiâs visit this week when they thought no one was looking, probably because Trump still wonât lift the press ban a federal judge ordered him to lift. Check the unguarded body language in this image. Whoâs the most miserable? They donât even try to hide it. Could this be any less presidential?
US President Donald Trump, first lady Melania Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping after watching a military demonstration from a balcony of the White House in Washington, D.C., US, September 24, 2026. REUTERS/Evan Vucci
Like, they have no desire to interact with each other at all. Thatâs some extreme body language on display.
I share two important things with Melania: a birthday (April 26th; Iâm one year older than she is) and a white-hot hatred for her husband. But sheâs not a prisoner of her own making â sheâs a willing co-conspirator, happy to live off his grifted billions until she can finally get away from him.
So when you see Melania looking miserable, never feel bad for her.
Sabrina Haake is a political analyst and 25+ year federal trial attorney specializing in 1st and 14th A defense. Subscribe to her free Substack, The Haake Take.
Thursdayâs ruling from U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly putting an end to Trumpâs White House media ban was lamentable for the speed with which it was issued. An exhausted nation was enjoying a break from Trumpâs vitriol dominating every channel but, alas, the reprieve was short-lived.
On September 24, only three days after banned outlets CNN, MSN, and Politico sued, Kelly ordered the White House to âimmediately return, reinstate, and restoreâ their access to the White House. The judge said the banned media outlets had met the legal thresholds for a temporary restraining order, which he put into effect for 14 days. âThis is a high bar,â Kelly wrote, âbut Plaintiffs have met it.â
At argument, Trumpâs DOJ made a laughable attempt to call his press ban a âmatter of national security.â The DOJ argued that the three banned news organizations engaged in a ânon-exhaustive list of reporting incidentsâ that âthreatened national security and spread falsehoods.â Those incidents included publishing construction details about the East Wing bunker, reporting on who is really funding the White House ballroom, and reports detailing how U.S. munitions stockpiles were affected by the administrationâs mistakes in Iran.
Kelly rejected the DOJâs ânational securityâ explanation as an after-the-fact justification. The judge noted that Trump had not used a national security argument when he announced the ban, but instead focused solely on what Trump called negative coverage of his administration.
Trump TV: when a man gasps for attention like a fish out of water
On the day of the hearing Wednesday, after Kelly had failed to immediately rule, even though the ban was a textbook example of government censorship, I was hopeful the judge would drag his decision out, because other major news networks had suspended their shared pooled television coverage of Trump in solidarity with the banned networks. The media boycott left Trump with comically reduced media exposure as even The New York Times and The Washington Post stopped publishing new Trump images.
The media blackout was so effective, it seemed perhaps Kelly, a Trump appointee, might have a partisan motive in prolonging it: to help Republican candidates in competitive races by reducing Trumpâs face time. A delayed ruling meant continued diminished Trump coverage, also a welcome balm for our collective mental health.
But taking airtime from a creature formed by Reality TV and media attention was like taking a fish out of water. Deprived of 24/7 media attention, Trumpâs pitiful wet flopping on the deck prompted his staff to create a quick and embarrassing replacement: Trump TV, a 24-hour YouTube livestream of White House coverage â curated, of course, by the White House.
Trump calls himself the âKing of Ratings,â but Trump TV debuted to hilariously small numbers, peaking at around 8,000 viewers and frequently dropping down to a few thousand. As of Thursday morning, under 500 live viewers were watching. The internet blew up over the fact that a YouTube stream of a black screen and box fan had more viewers than Trump. One of the funniest sentences ever written, thank you Roxanne Cooper of Alternet, said it all: âTrump TV was similarly crushed by random ambient streams of people getting pedicures.â
And now, a blatantly illegal campaign ad
Trumpâs lesson in humility would be funny, but Trump has taken State TV to the next illegal level. Fox News is now airing a new partisan ad promoting Trump, âpaid for by the U.S. government.â The 30-second video combines rapid cuts of Trump, American flags, and military aircraft, alongside claims about tax cuts, manufacturing, and policing. Images of Trump are accompanied by a choir singing, âLove me,â repeatedly. It ends with Dana White saying, âHe is the toughest, most resilient person Iâve ever met, and nothing was going to stop him from fighting so hard for the country he loves.â
Spending tax dollars on political campaign ads has long been illegal under federal law. The Hatch Act prohibits federal employees, as well as local government employees under federally funded programs, from engaging in political activities of any kind while they are on the clock. The General Government Appropriations Act also prohibits the expenditure of any tax dollars to produce partisan content. Ads that glorify an official or an administration, like singing âLove meâ against a backdrop of militaristic Trump images and brags, blatantly violate both laws.
Internet reaction was swift and correct. Occupy Democrats' Grant Stern tweeted, âDear Leader is using YOUR tax dollars to make this insane propaganda with a musical track that says 'Love Me' on repeat.â Author Brendan Noble asked, âWhy is the U.S. Government paying for cult-level media like this? 'Love me' over images of Trump feels like some weird psychological play. Regardless, it's propaganda with our tax dollars.â
The cost of the absence of truth
The ad is an obviously illegal use of taxpayer dollars, and a legal reckoning will come at some point, IF the 90 million voters who stayed home in 2024 care more about the price of gas than they cared about Trumpâs J6 coup attempt. But more dangerous than Trumpâs continued abuse of power is the fact that Trump appears to believe his own falsehoods.
Much noise has been made about Trumpâs assistant Natalie Harp, who follows him around with a portable printer. Itâs widely reported that Harp shows Trump only favorable news stories, positive polling, and praise. Trump inhales that disinformation and regurgitates it back to a press pool allergic to hard questions because they are owned by Trumpâs corporate backers.
Steady flattery may make the job more palatable to a man getting tired of politics, but itâs dangerous. Trump canât make informed decisions if he only hears information he wants to hear; advisors with nefarious intentions can also shape information to manipulate him. But thatâs what seems to be happening: Trump believes we are winning the war in Iran because Hegseth tells him we are; he believes the economy is strong; he thinks world leaders respect him, even as they mock him and move toward alliances excluding the U.S.
Unfavored media outletsâ crucial role is correcting Trumpâs misinformation on everything â the war in Iran, the economy, even foreign trade. They may have returned to the White House, but the extreme danger of a president so insulated from the truth that he believes his own propaganda remains.
As President Xi heads back to China, one imagines him, like any other tourist returning home after a long trip, meeting with old friends who are sure to ask how his trip went â and to have him recount the highlights.
This is what I imagine Xi would say, translated into English, of course:
When we landed, they made me stand in the doorway of the plane for like forever while they unfurled a little red carpet. You know, here in China we can lay down a mile-long red carpet at lightning speed and watch a million soldiers walk on it in perfect formation in under a minute, but the Americans took forever smoothing it out. I think they spent so much time on it because Donald has trouble walking in a straight line on carpets.
Then Donald was waiting at the bottom of the stairs for me, and I was like, âWhat?â It apparently was the first time in decades an American president had greeted a visiting leader planeside. I mean, I didnât go to the airport to meet Donald when he came to China because, as a dictator, Iâm too busy with crushing freedom. I just donât have time for such trivial matters.
When I reached the bottom of the stairs, I said to Donald that he didnât need to come all this way since Iâve been to D.C. before, and I knew the way to the White House.
The weather was pleasant enough, but Donald was bundled in a heavy coat and gloves, like there was a blizzard coming, but I think he was wearing those things to hide the bruises on his hands and the contraption he seems to carry around on his backside.
Within the first five minutes, he started with his incessant attempts to impress me, starting with a flyover of Americaâs bombers roaring overhead. Again, it looked puny. You know the way we do things in China, we have 200 planes roaring overhead during our National Day Military Parades in Tiananmen Square.
Now, let me show you a picture. As the planes were flying over, look at the expression on Donaldâs face. I said to Peng Liyuan that Donald clearly has a very low threshold for pain or discomfort, and she reminded me that he didnât serve in the military because he had a little bone spur in his foot. So the expression made sense.
While we were there, there was a big controversy going on because Donald banned three news outlets from the White House. And yes, Peng Liyuan and I had a good laugh about that too. I canât remember the exact number, but I have imprisoned between 50 and 113 media professionals. I donât just ban them. Donald is such a wimp.
When we pulled into the White House, the media was standing outside the gate like groupies at a TFBOYS concert.
Oh, and the altruistic rest of the media allowed on the premises decided not to send cameras to my White House welcome ceremony in solidarity with the three outlets that were banned. Boy oh boy, you should have seen how angry Donald was that there were no American news cameras there.
Of course, China was well represented. I mean, if they didnât show up, or decided to support free press, you know very well what would have happened to them once we crossed into Chinese airspace on the way home.
Donald showed me this little helipad he put in the backyard of the White House. He kept bragging about how he liked granite and kept fussing over this silly little circle. I wanted to say that I have got 109 acres of granite at Tiananmen Square to land a plane on if I wanted, so you want me to be impressed with your little granite sandbox?
It was just another example of how this friendship is so one-sided. He has all these things that he boasts about, but does he realize who heâs talking to? Who I am? And all the infinite material possessions I possess as a result of my dictatorship?
For example, he took me for a walk along whatâs called the West Wing colonnade, showing me how he put up all of his predecessorsâ âportraits,â which are just little 8-by-10s in fake gold frames. I kept biting my tongue, trying not to laugh, because again, does he realize who heâs talking to?
I have an enormous hand-painted oil portrait of Chairman Mao over the Tiananmen Gate that measures 20 feet by 15 feet and weighs 1.5 metric tons.
But then, I just couldnât hold my mirth anymore when he paused at Joe Bidenâs photo and jokingly said, âThis is the autopen â itâs Biden.â I broke out laughing, which is something I donât normally do, and not because what he said was funny. It was because it all seemed so immature and childish. This man is the most powerful person in the world, and this is how he spends his time?
We are going to kick Americaâs a-- once we declare war on them, economic or otherwise, because their leader has the mentality of an incorrigible six-year-old.
Then we had whatâs called a State Dinner in the quaint dining room of the White House. Itâs about the size of Peng Liyuanâs bathroom. Donald gave us this sculpture of a bird, an eagle, I think, although it looked like a prehistoric bird, and Iâm not sure why he gave me something that represents freedom, since thatâs the last thing in the world I care about.
Then thereâs his silly ballroom. He talked about it all day, and then wanted us to go behind some magic curtain to see what he said was a ânice and clean and sparklingâ construction site. What a disappointment.
Again, Donald is not my friend, because if he were, heâd know that our State Banquet Hall alone spans 75,000 square feet and easily seats 5,000 guests for dinner simultaneously, which makes his 22,000-square-foot ballroom look pathetic.
I mean, I could keep going, if you want, but Iâd rather talk about my plans to have AI supremacy for China so that we can destroy humanity, or at the very least, do more to destroy Chinaâs freedoms.
Sabrina Haake is a political analyst and 25+ year federal trial attorney specializing in 1st and 14th A defense. You can subscribe to her free Substack, The Haake Take.
Veterans are standing in the middle of D.C.âs Memorial Circle at rush hour with banners denouncing plans for Trumpâs arch. Their continuing protest, which started on Memorial Day, features a replica arch and an urgent plea to âprotect and defend the solemnity and honor of this hallowed ground.â
The veterans have a point the rest of us need to hear, including 'unitary executiveâ nonsense-spouting Supreme Court justices who think the madman at the helm is free to take a wrecking ball to our nationâs historical monuments. At 25 stories tall, Trumpâs arch would deliberately diminish the stature of monuments around it, and would forever obscure historical sightlines, laid after the Civil War to symbolize national healing.
At the protests, Retired Army Colonel Ann Wright, a 29-year Special Operations officer, carries an âover our dead bodiesâ banner for âMr. Bonespurs, with five deferments from the military.â The veteransâ spokesperson explained that, âTo place a memorial that would obstruct the unbroken viewshed from the Lincoln Memorial to Arlington Cemetery would totally destroy all that this space represents.â
Trumpâs sacrilege
The targeted sightline, unbroken across the Potomac River via the Arlington Memorial Bridge, was rendered two generations after the Civil War as a symbol of national reconciliation. The memorial to Abraham Lincoln, preserver of the Union, deliberately overlooks Arlington, the estate of Confederate Robert E. Lee and the hallowed burial grounds for both sides, to symbolize the enduring triumph of national unity over the tragedy of division.
Alignment of those monuments was key. Lincolnâs memorial (âA house divided against itself cannot standâ) solemnly overlooks the shared blood and soil of Arlingtonâs dead. Veterans are concerned that a giant arch dominating Arlington, now the final resting place of more than 400,000 war veterans, many of whom died in battle, would overpower the significance of their sacrifice.
Retired Army Major General Paul Eaton called the arch âentirely inappropriate, (bordering) on sacrilege to the men and women buriedâ there. A Gold Star mother whose son is buried at Arlington lamented grievously that the archâs planned observation deck means tourists will be able to take selfies while burials are happening.
âWe donât need tourists overlooking funerals. Iâm just appalled,â she said. âWe need everybody to speak out about this.â
The legal battle
In May, a federal panel packed with Trump appointees approved plans for the arch, then in August, the National Park Service found the monument would have âadverse effectsâ on several historic sites. Although aviation experts noted the hazards of a 250-foot arch near the runway of one of the nationâs busiest airports, last week Trumpâs FAA approved the plans.
Meanwhile, Vietnam War veterans have sued to stop the project, challenging the arch for both lacking congressional authority and blocking historically significant monument sightlines. Earlier this month, a federal judge ordered the administration to provide at least 48 hoursâ notice before conducting any activities on the planned arch while the case is pending.
After that order, over a year after revealing plans for the arch, and after the Supreme Court let Trump get away with his ballroom on manufactured national security grounds, Trump then raised a national security rationale for the arch. Last Sunday, Trump claimed that heâd âagreedâ to convert the proposed arch, at the âstrong requestâ of the military, âinto a top grade Military Complex/ Triumphal Arch,â alleging that:
"(F)or National Security purposes, I have agreed to convert the magnificent Triumphal Arch, planned since the Civil War Era many years ago, (laughably false)⌠into a top grade Military Complex/Triumphal ArchâŚâ
Trump said his arch would âhouse, store, and have the rapid ability to use large numbers of drones, plus Snipers, on both the roof and plaza areas, and additionally have and hold large quantities of sniper ammunition in storage.â Arlingtonâs historic message of national healing â and the devastation of its opposite â is sadly lost on the most divisive president in our nationâs history. He also seems to miss how a Hitler-inspired monument would discourage tourists who may not want snipers aimed at their heads.
Ye old national security ruse
Courts have long given deference to the executive on matters of national security. In 1936, the Supreme Court said presidents must have âwide latitude in security affairs,â reiterating the same in 1988, and again in 2018. Small wonder Trump is now claiming that his decorative arch is ânecessary to protect US national security.â
Never mind that it took Trump over a year to manufacture a ânational securityâ rationale for his obviously ornamental arch.
Trumpâs security claim is just another well-worn litigation ruse. He also cited national security to defend both unconstitutional immigration tactics and his ban of several media outlets from the White House. He even claimed that trade relations posed an âunusual and extraordinary threat to national securityâ to defend his tariffs, an argument the Supreme Court rejected.
The ballroom decision illustrates the flaw of the âunitary executiveâ theory
After the Supreme Court cleared the way for Trumpâs sprawling ballroom, however, the same flawed analysis could protect Trumpâs arch. Even after Chief Justice Roberts wrote that Trumpâs ballroom was âlikely unlawful,â the other conservative justices determined that the National Trust for Historic Preservation couldnât block it, because âmere offense, disagreement, or distasteâ wasnât enough to constitute an injury for purposes of standing, trashing decades of legal precedent whereby historic preservationists successfully sued to protect historic landmarks.
The question now dangling before a nation dreading a Hitlerian arch in D.C. is this: If a National Trust created by Congress to act as guardians of historic monuments doesnât have standing to sue to protect those monuments, who the hell does?
If SCOTUS approves this arch, under its misguided âunitary executiveâ theory that contradicts the foundersâ intentions of never having a king again, wait for Trump to sandblast his name into all four sides of the Washington Monument, install a statue of himself sitting in the Lincoln Memorial, and carve his own face on Mount Rushmore.
The only silver lining of such a ruling would be that the next president would then possess the legal authority to build another monument on the basis of national security: a permanent prison cell around Trump, open for public viewing at feeding times. Only then, the security justification will be real.
Nick Anderson is a Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial cartoonist.
Copyright © 2026 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 |
Masthead
|
Privacy Policy
|
Manage Preferences
|
Debug Logs
For corrections contact
corrections@rawstory.com
, for support contact
support@rawstory.com
.