The real cage fight MAGA's going crazy for
Nick Anderson is a Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial cartoonist.
Nick Anderson is a Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial cartoonist.
Friends,
No, he’s not over. I wish he were. But something important has changed.
Yesterday, the U.S. House of Representatives voted to direct Donald Trump to withdraw U.S. forces from Iran or win approval from Congress to continue the war. It was a remarkable rebuke. Four Republicans sided with Democrats.
His “short-term excursion” into Iran, which he promised in late February would last no more than “four to five weeks,” has now entered its fourth month, with no end in sight. His claim to have “destroyed” Iran’s missiles and drones is belied by Iran’s massive attack on Kuwait on Tuesday. Iran still controls the Strait of Hormuz. Its highly enriched uranium remains hidden. Even MAGAs have had enough of his forever war.
Meanwhile, Senate Republicans are rebelling. They’ve forced Trump to abandon the $1 billion request for his gilded ballroom, which was becoming ever more grotesque as Americans struggle to make ends meet.
His $1.8 billion Thug Fund is also dead, largely because a significant number of previously gutless Republicans (including — gasp! — Lindsey Graham) pushed back.
Trump’s name is coming off the Kennedy Center because a federal judge ordered it off, and no Republicans came to his defense.
Even Trump’s endorsement is losing its magic. On Tuesday, Iowa voters rejected Trump’s choice for governor, Randy Feenstra, whom Trump called “MAGA all the way.” It was Trump’s first major endorsement loss.
And even with Stephen Colbert off the air, Trump has become a bigger late-night joke than ever. All the entertainers — even the B- and C-list also-rans desperate for exposure — dropped out of his 250th anniversary ego trip. So he’s going to be the headliner in a four-hour Fidel Castro speech. Good luck with that.
His Ultimate Fighting Championship event on the White House’s South Lawn has become a one-liner. To attend, military members have to pay their way to Washington and cannot have a waist size more than 55 percent of their height. (“No Fatties at UFC White House Event,” declared a Facebook page.) We’ll see how many show up.
As if all this weren’t enough, he’s nominated an unqualified sycophantic MAGA mortgage clown to be the director of national intelligence — an action so absurd that even Mitch McConnell had to object: “Anyone performing this role of such immense public trust must have the extensive national security experience required by statute, and no nominee who falls short of this requirement will earn my vote.” Get ready for a circus of a Senate confirmation fight.
No, Trump’s not done. He’ll continue to torment us with his cruelty, corruption, and criminality for some time, so we have to keep fighting.
But his power is disappearing. He’s become a lame duck whose quack no longer causes anyone to quake.
He has no one to blame but himself. His hubris finally reached its own breaking point.
Robert Reich is an emeritus professor of public policy at Berkeley and former secretary of labor. His writings can be found at https://robertreich.substack.com/. His new memoir, Coming Up Short, can be found wherever you buy books. You can also support local bookstores nationally by ordering the book at bookshop.org
America seems to be failing, both at home and around the world. But why?
David French published a thoughtful op-ed in Monday’s New York Times titled The Fire of Stupidity Can’t Be Contained, identifying many of the symptoms of our national decline and wondering out loud why this is happening now.
His best guess is that we’re not remembering the horrors of both fascism and communism from the last century, which is why people — particularly young people — are embracing both. He notes:
“A disturbing number of young people on the right are fascinated with fascism. An extraordinary 34 percent of young people overall express a favorable view of communism, and young Americans are far more likely than their parents or grandparents to say that political violence is ‘sometimes OK.’”
Katy Tur opened an hour of her MSNOW show with French’s article; she similarly was wondering what happened that has so torn our country apart. Could it be that we’re just not as well educated about our history as we once were? Is it the economy? Demagogues like Trump in politics?
Millions of words have been rightly devoted to this sort of inquiry, but most miss the most obvious answer: it’s the billionaires, stupid. Follow along and I think you’ll get it.
When FDR took over America in March of 1933, we’d been a largely laissez-faire nation since our founding. There wasn’t much government help for anybody other than the rich and powerful.
Three preceding Republican presidents (Harding, Coolidge, Hoover) had dismantled what little regulation was left from the progressive Republicans (Teddy Roosevelt and William Howard Taft) and dropped Wilson’s 91% top income tax rate down to 25%, kicking off the Republican Great Depression.
In 1933 a third of America was unemployed, hunger and homelessness were rampant, and only about 20 percent of us were in the middle class; the country had never gone above a third of us in that class. So, FDR, his wife Eleanor, and Labor Secretary Francis Perkins set out to reinvent America. They legalized unions, restored the 90% income tax rate on the morbidly rich, made government the employer of last resort, and instituted the minimum wage, unemployment insurance, Social Security, built schools and infrastructure nationwide, etc.
The result was dramatic. By 1981, when Ronald Reagan took office, fully a third of us had good union jobs and they set the wage floor for another third of us; as a result, two-thirds of us were in the middle class, and could do it with a single paycheck. A single-family home, a car, an annual vacation, send the kids to college, and retire on a good pension.
But from 1933 forward, FDR’s New Deal had been under continuous attack from a handful of extremely wealthy oligarchs who resented capping their paychecks to avoid that top 91% tax rate and hated the regulations that made both consumer products and the workplace safer but cut into their profits.
That backlash movement found its voice with Lewis Powell’s infamous Memo in 1971, and Nixon put Powell on the Supreme Court the following year.
The Memo called for the creation of rightwing think tanks that could influence public opinion, taking over schools and colleges, buying and running media operations, seizing control of the courts (particularly the Supreme Court), aggressive pushback against the Civil Rights movement, and the promotion of “free market” ideology. It was essential, Powell wrote, to “save” America from an incipient communist takeover.
The Memo electrified what we today call the Epstein/Billionaire Class of morbidly rich men. They endowed and built all of that infrastructure, spending literally billions in today’s dollars, putting a right-wing radio station in every city and town, right-wing TV networks, well-paid pundits, “alternative” colleges like Hillsdale, a billion-dollar effort to pack the courts, challenges to textbooks, and an embrace of hard-right Christianity.
Their main message was that the government had grown “too big,” a result of the New Deal that must be reversed, and the GOP they own has run with it ever since.
Although the federal government of the US was smaller as a percentage of either population or GDP compared to virtually every other developed country in the world, it was a meme that resonated with average people who were horrified that we’d been lied into the bloody Vietnam War, resented paying taxes, and felt they were being left behind as a result of the severe oil-shock inflation of the Nixon/Ford '70s.
Their plan worked. Trust in the American government went from nearly 80 percent in the early 1960s to a mere 17% last year. And, just like a marriage doesn’t work when the partners don’t trust each other, neither does a society or a government.
![]() |
Reagan cemented this by declaring in his first inaugural speech that “Government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem.” It was the perfect encapsulation of the billionaire hatred of taxation and regulation, but was sold so well that a majority of Americans bought it hook, line, and sinker.
Reagan and the billionaire-owned Republicans in Congress broke the back of the union movement, slashed taxes on the morbidly rich and corporations, stopped enforcing our anti-monopoly laws, sold off federal lands, increased subsidies to the fossil fuel industry, slashed federal spending on education and college, enabled stock manipulation through stock buy-backs, etc., etc.
Five corrupt Republicans who the Powell movement billionaires had helped install on the Supreme Court helped amplify the damage with their 5-4 Bellotti (written by Powell) and 5-4 Citizens United decisions, freeing both billionaires and corporations to buy elections by claiming that “corporations are persons” and “money is free speech.”
As a result, our elections now typically go to the highest bidder and billionaires are the biggest players in our political system. Just 100 billionaires put $2.6 billion into the 2024 election, about a fifth of all spending, and will probably beat that number this fall; in recent elections, roughly nine times out of 10 the better‑funded candidate wins, especially in House races.
Meanwhile, 45 years of Powell Memo-style Reaganomics have gutted the middle class. Only around 43 percent of us can now claim that status, and it takes two full-time paychecks today to live like one could in 1981.
Nobody has halted this slide from a highly functioning government and a vibrant, healthy middle class into the mess we have today, all as the result of nearly a half-century of Reaganomics.
The income tax rates are still stupidly low, incentivizing yachts for billionaires and massive bonuses for corporate executives. Bill Clinton declared “the era of big government is over” as was “welfare as we know it.” Obama turned our healthcare funding system over to a handful of massive insurance companies who are now turning the screws to extract as much wealth from us as they can.
So, people are — quite reasonably — pissed off. Our legislators are bought-and-sold, sometimes even by foreign-loyal entities like AIPAC, our judges are hand-picked by billionaires, and Trump has gutted our “big” government even further.
By the end of 2025, the federal civilian workforce had shrunk by roughly 300,000+ employees compared with its size at Trump’s inauguration, a drop of around 10% in a single year.
Education Department staff fell by 43% in 2025 alone, the U.S. Agency for International Development was effectively dissolved, the agency housing the National Endowments for the Arts and Humanities lost more than half its staff; AmeriCorps shrank by 44%; the Small Business Administration by 33%; the agency overseeing Voice of America and other international broadcasters by roughly 33%; and the National Science Foundation by about 30%.
During the 2025 shutdown, the Trump administration used that crisis it created to carry out at least 4,200 immediate layoffs across seven agencies in a single day, rather than furloughing workers. Cuts hit Treasury (1,446 workers), Health and Human Services (around 1,100–1,200), Education (466 on that day, after earlier large cuts), Housing and Urban Development (442), Commerce (315), Energy (187) and Homeland Security (176), with additional reductions at EPA and the Patent Office.
Laying off over 7,000 people at Social Security has left seniors with frustrating day-long hold times and a lack of in-person appointments, while the feds under Dr. Oz are experimenting with partially privatizing and starting pre-clearances done by big insurance companies and inflicted on traditional Medicare recipients in six states, Arizona, New Jersey, Ohio, Oklahoma, Texas and Washington.
As our government is gutted, our social services are crushed, our unions are enfeebled, wages are flattened, and our politicians and judges are wholly-owned properties of a handful of billionaire families and industries, Americans are justified in looking for alternatives.
Ironically — and perhaps alarmingly — billionaires are now looking for alternatives, too.
Peter Thiel, the guy who funded JD Vance’s political career who, through Palantir, has access to mind-boggling amounts of data on us and our future, just moved his entire family to Argentina. Mark Zuckerberg has a 5,000 square-foot doomsday bunker in Hawaii, and Elon Musk, Bill Gates, and Larry Ellison are reported to have similar “bolt-holes” in case the public gets too restive or Trump starts a nuclear war.
The bunkers-for-billionaires business is among the fastest-growing in America, with Survival Condo, Oppidum Bunkers and Vivos advertising architect-designed what Oppidium calls “ultra-luxury fortified underground residences.”
Meanwhile, because of Reagan’s cuts to education and civics, two generations have grown up without a good understanding of how government works in a democracy; only 1 in 20 Americans can name the five freedoms protected by the First Amendment, and a third of Americans can’t name the three branches of government. No wonder they’re curious about fascism and communism.
So, the next time somebody asks you why America is in such a mess, why people no longer care or even despair about the future, let them know the simple and real answer: “It’s the billionaires, stupid.”
When I was growing up in the pre-cable, pre-streaming '70s and '80s, there was this thing called “appointment television.” It meant a lot of people were watching the same show at the same time, because it was only on once. If you missed it, you’d have to wait for this thing called a “rerun” in the summer, when there was almost no original programming. Instead, the three networks, which were all we had besides a local channel here and there, just recycled all of the shows from their seasons, while everyone took the summer off, as if Hollywood were a school.
“Appointment television” in my house meant watching 60 Minutes every Sunday night on CBS. My mother would order Chinese food (Jewish, New Jersey, ‘nuff said), and my father would go pick it up, returning with a giant box stuffed with all of our Americanized favorites. It was the only meal of the week eaten in front of the TV as a family. We sat on the couch and ate off of small square side tables, each of which had a border of fake jewels, one of my earliest tactile memories.
My younger brother and I weren’t allowed to talk very much during 60 Minutes because we were LEARNING. “Sha!” my mother would hiss if we talked over Morley Safer or Harry Reasoner. “Quiet!” my father would yell if we dared say anything during Andy Rooney’s closing segment, his favorite part of the show. I’m now old enough to understand that my father wasn’t smart enough to absorb a lot of what we were LEARNING, which is why he preferred Andy’s pointed humor. Rooney smartly mocked dumb people, which included my father. Imagine if Donald Trump drove a delivery truck in Jersey; that’s who we’re talking about here.
The lineup of correspondents may have changed and expanded over the years, but one thing about 60 Minutes has always remained consistent:
Telling the truth.
60 Minutes has a venerable track record of exposing lies, cover-ups, and scandals, as well as interviews and human interest stories that made Americans aware of the world at large. No matter the subject, there was never a time when the audience questioned the veracity of what they were being told and shown.
But oh, how the mighty “Tiffany Network” has fallen.
Remember the heavily edited 60 Minutes interview Trump finally did just before the 2024 election, after whining about the interview Kamala Harris did? You might recall CBS News paid Trump $16 MILLION after he whined that her interview, which had been full of facts, was “deceptively edited,” causing him “mental anguish” and “confusion among voters.” When Trump finally sat for the interview, 60 Minutes ran one heavily edited version, while Trump released a heavily edited 73-minute version that was “more favorable.”
That was a glaring sign that we were headed down a very bad path, one paved with Putin propaganda.
CBS/Paramount is now under the control of a bunch of Trumptraitors, which is an astonishing thing to witness. The Ellison family has pledged loyalty to a convicted felon adjudicated rapist whose name appears in the Epstein Files nearly as much as Jeffrey Epstein's. They pushed Stephen Colbert out and pressured CBS News journalists to placate Trump instead of pushing for the truth.
But now the control of CBS News, the former home of Edward R. Murrow, was somehow handed to an inexperienced book editor whose biggest gigs were writing op-eds and reviews for The Wall Street Journal and The Forward, where she took a proud Zionist stance.
Bari Weiss is about as qualified to be the Editor-In-Chief of CBS News as I am to fly a rocket. Interestingly, she’s been following me on Twitter forever, but she’s never once responded to any of my tweets that challenge her loyalty to Trump over the United States of America.
Weiss has just hired equally inexperienced tech blogger Nick Bilton to help her commit treason and lie to the American people via CBS. Bilton tweeted that it’s “the honor of my career" to become the executive producer of 60 Minutes and then shared this tech bro-y introduction to his colleagues that set my skin on fire.
Poorly written propaganda isn’t supposed to be anywhere near legitimate news networks. Nothing about this is normal, yet it’s being normalized.
Bilton is the one who officially fired longtime 60 Minutes correspondent Scott Pelley on Tuesday, all because Pelley has this annoying habit of maintaining his journalistic integrity.
You can almost hear that in Trump’s voice, can’t you? Minus the bigger words, that is.
Scott Pelley was fired because he refused to comply with orders from Weiss and Bilton to lie to protect Donald Trump.
Read that again, because it’s true.
It’s 2026 in the United States of America, but Weiss and Bilton are deploying Nazi tactics from the 1930s to silence the truth.
Pelley responded to the firing by exposing the real reasons behind it. "New management has instructed me to inject falsehoods and bias into a politically sensitive story,” Pelley said in a statement. “I’ve been told to include assertions that are unverified. To date, in every case, I have managed to ignore these instructions or refuse them.
"Finally, incompetence and unprofessionalism in the new management have wreaked havoc. In a case involving one of my stories, the entire program came within 19 minutes of not getting on the air at all.”
Pelley has received tons of support online from his fellow journalists and other longtime admirers who respect him for standing up to the Trumpocrites. Meidas Touch has already offered him his own show on their network. Perhaps he can reunite there with Anderson Cooper and Cecilia Vega.
What will 60 Minutes be covering going forward? Segments about how we could all learn a lot from re-reading Hitler’s Reichstag speech?
Bye, Bari.
Friends,
Trump is trying to rig the midterms because he’s scared. And because Trump’s scared, he’s trying to scare Americans with an imaginary boogeyman: so-called “voter fraud.”
Here’s the truth: Every study shows voter fraud, including noncitizen voting, is so rare that a person is more likely to get struck by lightning than to cast a fraudulent ballot.
But Trump’s using this boogeyman to sabotage our elections. Here are three things I’m worried about — then I’ll tell you how we fight back.
#1 New voting restrictions
Trump is pushing for strict voter registration laws (the so-called “Save America Act”) that would require eligible voters to prove their citizenship. But a state ID or driver’s license won’t do. Voters would need to show either a current passport or a certified birth certificate from the state they were born in to register.
Yet, more than 21 million Americans cannot easily provide those documents, either because they simply don’t have them or they can’t afford to get them. (Do you know where your birth certificate is?)
And even if you do have it, about 80% of married women and 30% of trans people have legal names that don’t match the name on their birth certificates — which makes it even harder to register.
Trump isn’t stopping there; he also wants to restrict mail-in voting, despite frequently voting by mail himself.
Trump’s hypocrisy would be laughable if it weren’t so dangerous. Some 45 million votes were cast by mail in the 2024 general election (which he won, and doesn’t say was rigged, by the way). Restricting mail-in voting, along with instituting harsh voter ID laws, is blatant voter suppression.
#2 Voter intimidation
Trump insiders say he might deploy armed ICE or Border Patrol agents to polling sites.
Trump’s violent ICE agents have run rampant in our streets, abusing both noncitizens and citizens alike. The presence of armed agents of the state at polling places would almost certainly have a chilling effect on voter turnout — which is exactly what Trump wants.
#3 Denying election results
Trump’s latest big lie is that any Democratic victory is illegitimate.
What if Republicans lose the midterms but follow Trump’s 2020 example and try to hold onto power? A few years ago, this would have been unthinkable. But after what Trump tried doing in 2020, it’s frighteningly plausible.
The bottom line is Trump is deeply unpopular, which is why he is trying to suppress the vote.
But here is how we can fight back.
1. Press your state and local leaders to protect our elections right now. Your state attorney general and local election officials still have authority over our voting system. Urge them to develop a plan to protect our elections. Call on them to sue the Trump administration if it tries to seize ballots. Tell your state legislature to ban armed federal agents from polling places, like New Mexico just did.
2. Second, VOTE — and help turn out the vote! We need to show up in such large numbers that no amount of voter suppression can change the result. Go to vote.org right now and check your registration. Then reach out to three friends and make sure they are registered to show up.
3. Lastly, SOUND THE ALARM. Share the video I’ve posted above, which I made with the talented team at Inequality Media Civic Action. Help spread the word that the boogeyman of voter fraud is just a cover for Trump’s election sabotage.
Trump’s strategy to sabotage the election depends on fear, confusion, and division.
We must respond by being brave, focused, and united.
Robert Reich is an emeritus professor of public policy at Berkeley and former secretary of labor. His writings can be found at https://robertreich.substack.com/. His new memoir, Coming Up Short, can be found wherever you buy books. You can also support local bookstores nationally by ordering the book at bookshop.org
I was a news junkie long before it was cool — was it ever cool? — or even common.
Growing up in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, I was probably the only kid on my block, maybe in the entire city and state, who planted himself in front of the television every night to watch Walter Cronkite on CBS News.
When I was about eight years old, I could even do an impression of him, articulating his famous sign-off, “And that’s the way it is.” I can still do it today, though you have to be someone of a certain age to appreciate it.
I had a fixation with presidents, with war, with history, and nobody delivered the news with more authority, more gravitas, or more sheer trustworthiness than Cronkite. It wasn’t just my opinion. Year after year, he was named the most trusted man in America.
When he retired in 1981, I was in high school, and it felt like a seismic event. A seminal moment. Who in God’s name could ever replace the God of the evening news, Walter Cronkite? Dan Rather stepped in and did a terrific job.
Now it’s anchored by the woefully incompetent Tony Dokoupil. Who? Exactly. This neophyte wouldn’t have been qualified to be Cronkite’s junior intern.
But my devotion to Cronkite was only the beginning. There was also 60 Minutes. I watched that too, for as long as I can remember. Mike Wallace and Ed Bradley were my guys. And I loved Andy Rooney. I can do his impression too, but again, no one knows who he is anymore.
The fearlessness and tenacity of the show’s correspondents, and their refusal to let the powerful off the hook, were legendary. It was what journalism looked like at its absolute finest.
It was perhaps the love for Cronkite and 60 Minutes that drove me into media and public relations, where I spent 30 years working with hundreds of reporters and media outlets.
For a long time in PR, we had two holy grails — a front-page story in the New York Times and a segment on 60 Minutes, positive ones, of course. I was fortunate enough to land five front-page Times stories over my career and one 60 Minutes segment in 1999, tied to Y2K preparedness.
Which makes what is happening right now to that network all the more gut-wrenching.
Since the loathsome Bari Weiss took over CBS News and Donald Trump began his assault on Black Rock, the nickname for the former CBS headquarters, the network has been in a death spiral of its own making.
Weiss has no business running a major network news division. Under her watch, CBS News has become a shadow of itself, and its anchor has devolved into little more than Trump state television. The news division is collapsing at breathtaking speed.
And then there’s the tragedy occurring at the beloved 60 Minutes.
60 Minutes debuted in 1968 and became, arguably, the most important television program in American history, and remains that today. And, not just in news, but in the entirety of television. Year after year, it ranks among the most-watched programs on the air.
It broke stories that changed the country. It featured the most iconic correspondents in broadcast history. It was appointment television, 7 PM on Sunday night, or whenever the late NFL game ended in the fall, you made sure you were parked in front of your set. You were spellbound.
It’s now in a freefall.
Weiss shockingly dumped the show’s long-time veteran and executive producer, Tanya Simon, and appointed Nick Bilton, a technologist with no traditional broadcast experience, to lead 60 Minutes. He subsequently fired veteran producers and correspondents Sharyn Alfonsi and Cecilia Vega.
The decision caused intense internal backlash, and that’s putting it mildly. It's being murdered, and I’m not the one using such draconian terms. And those firings were only the beginning.
Scott Pelley, the former CBS News anchor and 60 Minutes correspondent, blew up — and rightly so — this week, tearing into the new leadership of 60 Minutes, calling out the way staff have been treated, the firings, the gutting of the show’s editorial independence. He said Weiss was “murdering” the show.
After sticking up for his show, and his colleagues, Pelley was fired, and simultaneously proven wrong. The Trump/CBS paramilitary isn’t murdering the show. They are executing it.
Steve Kroft, another legendary 60 Minutes correspondent and my “friend” from the Y2K days, was more blunt, more direct, and more correct. He said, “I never expected it would be executed by the President of the United States.”
Trump is doing to 60 Minutes what he did to Stephen Colbert and the CBS Evening News.
This trifecta represents the cowardice at CBS toward Trump. It is a direct testament to how thoroughly Paramount and CBS have prostrated themselves before Donald Trump.
Here’s the business reality that CBS executives apparently cannot grasp: everyone who has ever bowed down to Donald Trump eventually gets kicked in the teeth. Trump never rewards loyalty. Ever. And CBS is going to pay a big, and perhaps fatal, price.
Having worked in the media for so long, I know that the advertising exodus is coming. Without credible news programming and without marquee late-night talent, what exactly is CBS selling? The NFL? Sure, football delivers ratings, but a network cannot survive on four months of ad revenue.
Once the big advertisers bolt, and they will bolt, CBS will be left hawking gold coins, commemorative silver plates, and 1-800 numbers, the same bottom-of-the-barrel inventory that clutters Fox News and late-night infomercial block. That is the road CBS is now on.
What is being done to CBS is a demolition. And when the last advertiser walks and the last credible journalist quits, Donald Trump will have claimed his most significant media scalp yet.
His accomplices, a cowardly corporation and one inept executive, are helping him tear it down.
And, that’s the way it is. And it’s a damn shame.
Can you feel it?
There’s something weird in the air, and I think I’m perfectly justified in tossing out this piece of unfounded conjecture based on sheer gut instinct:
Donald Trump is suddenly acting like a man who is about to quit his job.
Wishful thinking? Quite possibly. But he doesn’t seem like he’s having any fun lately, and that’s the whole ball of wax for a guy like Trump who carries no actual ideology and no sense of duty or mission when it comes to the country whose interests he has been tasked with protecting as its president.
For Trump, it’s all about Trump, as we know. Full stop. He no longer seems inclined to pretend he gives a single crap about…well, anything. He just claimed he didn’t give a good goddamn if the peace talks with Iran were over or not. He was no longer trying to save the Kennedy Center and didn’t care about what it was called after a judge’s ruling. He gave up without putting up even a tiny fuss about his $1.8 billion slush fund.
He also famously noted that he didn’t care about the financial struggles of the American consumer due to exploding gasoline and grocery prices. And far from trying to rescue his Great American Country Fair on the National Mall in D.C. on June 24, he labeled all the artists who pulled out “losers” and said screw it, I’ll just entertain everyone myself.
He has rapidly transformed his presidency into a vendetta on American citizens, like a high school kid who’s been shunted aside by his clique. “You don’t like me? Well, I don’t like you more!"
Trump is behaving like an utterly broken man who is done even trying. He’s tired. He’s infirm. He’s losing cognition. The walls are moving in on him. He has to know on some level that the country, and the world, have lined up against him. And so, coward that he is, I’m speculating that he sees cutting and running to be his best move.
This is, in general, all very Un-Trumplike behavior. The man will fight tooth and nail to defend his purported “honor” over the pettiest thing. But now he’s just tossing his hands in the air and metaphorically saying, “To hell with it – and all of you!”
But here is why I’m thinking he may be about to pack it in, and soon: It’s all about the spectacle for this guy. He could get the biggest bang for his purloined buck, as it were – not to mention the greatest hit of martyrdom – by going out in a blaze of ignominious glory by saying sayonara on his 80th birthday: June 14.
He could pretend that the extra-long celebration of the nation’s 250th birthday on July 4 is designed to honor him, and he alone.
And meanwhile, Trump could satisfy everyone, both himself and all others, by walking away and leaving the country to clean up the considerable mess he created – like a toddler flinging his or her soiled diaper following a lengthy meltdown.
Yep, Trump is bored with the war he launched. He said so directly that the discussions to end it “started to get very boring” during his already legendary CNBC phone interview on Monday. He tends to lose interest very quickly, like every man-baby whose attention is regularly diverted by the newest shiny object.
He doesn’t even seem to have his heart in the immigration crackdown anymore. It was never something he actually cared about in the first place, naturally. It was just a means to an end to endear him to his MAGA hordes. DHS is reportedly starting to sell off some of the massive detention warehouses it had purchased. Alligator Alcatraz has already been closed.
And. Trump. Couldn’t. Care. Less.
Oh yeah, he also doesn’t care about the midterms. How do we know? He said so himself. I have no doubt his Republican colleagues would love for him to step down before he does the November elections any more damage.
But even besides all of that, one could make the argument that Trump has already plundered the Oval Office for everything he can. He’s made billions for himself and his immediate and extended family, enriching them with all variety of schemes – most of them transparently corrupt.
And keep your eye on the Internal Revenue Service immunity debacle. Even with the dumping of the “Anti-Weaponization Fund,” the concurrent agreement that permanently shields Trump, his family members, and his businesses from any IRS audits or actions, past, present or future, in perpetuity, continues forth.
In many ways, it’s an even greater unethical debasement of the presidency than the slush fund. One could make the case that it’s one of the key reasons why Trump ran for the office again in 2024, to stop the government from going after him for the likely innumerable tax sins he and his clan have committed over the years and plan to commit again.
So if you’re Trump, you’ve already used the office for what you want. And if you know that the final 2 ½ or so years of your administration are going to be packed with inquiries and lawsuits and losing decisions, why would you want to stick around to face that inevitable music?
This is to say nothing of his ongoing accountability dodge of the Epstein Files. Judgment Day is bound to come, sooner or later, and at this point, Trump just may want to hide out and dictate his directives from the safe distance of Mar-a-Lago rather than the White House fishbowl.
What’s that you’re saying? Trump’s ego would never allow him to step down? He’s too fearful of prosecution to ever willingly expose himself to life as a regular citizen before he has to? Don’t be so sure. For one, I don’t think Trump genuinely fears incarceration at this point. I think he believes his money and repute will protect him through the final chapter of his miserable life.
So I’m betting that Trump may well be preparing to leave it all behind, play golf and spit into the wind without having to face any of the negative blowback anymore.
To this I say, please merciful God, let it be so.
Ray Richmond is a longtime journalist/author and an adjunct professor at Chapman University in Orange, CA.
In 1971, Don McLean wrote an eight-and-a-half-minute elegy for the American soul. “American Pie” begins with a plane crash in an Iowa cornfield in 1959 that killed rock and rollers Buddy Holly, Ritchie Valens, and the Big Bopper.
But the song was never really about the crash. It was about what happened after: the loss of innocence, the corruption of joy, the day a culture stops believing in its own music. McLean called it the day the music died.
Almost 55 years later, Donald Trump is living his own bye-bye Miss American Pie moment. And it’s unfolding, with exquisite irony, on the National Mall.
If the music died in a cornfield in February of 1959, it’s going to die again on the Mall — albeit ever so briefly — in June, 2026.
This week, the White House-affiliated “Freedom 250” organization unveiled the lineup for the Great American State Fair, a 16-day patriotic extravaganza on the Mall running June 25 through July 10, billed as America’s grand 250th birthday party.
This is the same organization responsible for the blood-and-guts UFC match on the White House lawn on June 14.
The roster included Martina McBride, Young MC, Morris Day and the Time, the Commodores, C+C Music Factory, Bret Michaels, Milli Vanilli, Flo Rida, and Vanilla Ice.
The lineup was announced Wednesday. By Friday, it was, as Tom Petty might sing, free fallin’ with half of those slated pulling out. And panic set-in.
Morris Day and the Time dropped out within hours, posting simply: “It’s a no for me.” Young MC followed, writing that “the artists were never told about any political involvement with the event.”
Milli Vanilli’s surviving original vocalist said he was “shocked” to see the group’s name on the bill. Then the headliner, Martina McBride, walked, saying she’d been misled about the event’s nature.
Of the performers featured on the original promotional poster, only two are now understood to still be taking part. They’re not worth mentioning.
But never fear! Trump took to Truth Social on Saturday and announced a replacement act.
“DONALD J. TRUMP, to take the place of these highly paid, Third Rate ‘Artists,’ and give a major speech, rallying the Country forward like I have done ever since being President!” He wrote.
Third-rate? Well, he’s right, but if they are, why were they invited in the first place?
None of these withdrawals should be surprising. This is the defining pattern of the entire Trump era. Musicians don’t want to be associated with him. They never have.
The list of artists who have sent Trump cease-and-desist letters, demanded he pull their music from rallies, or publicly recoiled at the association reads like a Hall of Fame roll call: Neil Young. The Rolling Stones. Aerosmith — twice. R.E.M., whose Michael Stipe called the unauthorized use of his music “a moronic charade.”
There were others, ABBA. Celine Dion. Beyoncé. Foo Fighters. The estate of Sinéad O’Connor. Creedence Clearwater Revival’s John Fogerty.
And then there was the “day the music died” at the Kennedy Center: February 9, 2025, when Trump appointed himself as chairman, and then went on to add his name to the monument for President John F. Kennedy.
Thank the Lord that a whip-smart federal judge on Friday had the good sense and decency to tell Trump to end another of his moronic charades and take his name off the building asap.
But once Trump effectively took over the Kennedy Center like a mad dictator, what followed was a massive cultural exodus.
One of the first to cancel was a touring production of Hamilton. Then, Folk singer Rhiannon Giddens announced she could not “in good conscience” play there.
Jazz pianist Chuck Redd, who had led the center’s annual Christmas Eve “Jazz Jams” since 2006, canceled the moment he saw Trump’s name on the building.
The Cookers called off their New Year’s Eve gig. Doug Varone and Dancers said their cancellation was “financially devastating but morally exhilarating.” Renowned composer Philip Glass followed, withdrawing the world premiere of his Symphony No. 15 (“Lincoln”) from the National Symphony Orchestra.
Hamilton. Folk. Jazz. Dance. Opera. Country. Symphony. Every genre, every discipline, walking away from a stage that once represented the summit of American artistic life.
Last week, while performers were also furiously dropping out of the Great American State Fair, someone else was furiously going after the Trump administration.
Bruce Springsteen’s “Land of Hope and Dreams” American tour, a sold-out, three-hour-a-night referendum on Trump’s America, with Tom Morello of Rage Against the Machine as guest guitarist, wrapped its American leg Wednesday night in Washington, D.C.
At Nationals Park, Springsteen used the capital stop to directly confront Trump.
He opened with a declaration: “Our democracy, our constitution, our rule of law are being challenged right now as never before by a reckless, racist, incompetent, treasonous president.”
He led the crowd in “ICE out!” chants, then bellowed: “Let them hear you at the ... White House!”
Trump responded on Truth Social by calling Springsteen a “dried out prune” of a rocker.
But Trump, the real dried prune, is desperately trying to control the musical soul of the country while the music community refuses to sing along. Not at the Kennedy Center, not at his rallies and not at the Great American State Fair.
The month-long event this summer was supposed to celebrate 250 years of American freedom. Instead, it’s being abandoned by B-list talent in favor of a wannabe authoritarian dictator. The irony is as rich as it is offensive.
Don McLean drove his Chevy to the levee, but the levee was dry. When Trump drives to the National Mall this month, he’s going to see that it will be dry too.
Nick Anderson is a Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial cartoonist.
It’s so weird how Donald Trump just can’t stop defaming the one woman who’s ever held him legally accountable for his sexual violence.
Trump just can’t be told “no,” so he keeps appealing the case that writer E. Jean Carroll famously won against him after enduring years of his well-documented defamation, both online and off, after she accused him of sexually abusing her — which a jury later found him civilly liable for.
Even though he keeps losing the appeals, he’s never stopped defaming her for daring to tell the truth about him.
I keep a screenshot on my phone of a Washington Post headline: "Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll," because far too many of the MAGA trolls who gleefully continue to blame and shame all of Trump’s victims don’t understand what a court ruling means
Yeah, they don’t like this one because Trump said he didn’t do it. It’s that simple for them. The truth messes with their cult ideal of Dear Leader, as well as their self-identities; they just couldn’t have been wrong about him all along.
They hate it when you remind them about this L from last year — his bid to overturn the $83 million damages awarded to Carroll was lost in September, then an appeals court refused to rehear the case in April this year.
So, here we go again.
The pesky thing about the truth is that it’s always true, whether a cult wants to believe it or not. If they were capable of reading anything longer than a Truth Social post full of the lies they feed on, they could actually (GASP) learn truthful things. I know the truth actually doesn’t matter to them, and there are a lot of things they don’t know about Trump because no one’s ever told them.
For example, Carroll shares previously unreleased details about the trial in her excellent memoir, Not My Type, the title of which co-opts Trump’s most infamous claims of his innocence, as if a woman’s physical attractiveness is the deciding factor when it comes to committing physical violence against them.
Aside from cataloguing the amazing outfits she wore to court, Carroll takes the reader through the entire process, from voir dire to the jury’s unanimous decision to award her $83.3 million in damages.
One of my favorite details from the book that MAGA doesn’t know is that one of the jurors had revealed during voir dire that he got his news exclusively from MAGA podcaster Tim Pool. Carroll's lawyer, the unbreakable Robbie Kaplan, tried to have him dismissed, but Trump’s lawyers argued for his inclusion to keep the jury “fair and balanced.” When questioned by Judge Lewis Kaplan (no relation to Robbie), the juror testified under oath that he’d only listened to Pool's podcast “three or four times” in the preceding six months. He testified that he considered the show "balanced," had never heard of Carroll before the trial, and was confident he could remain fair and impartial.
And then he voted with the other jurors to award Carroll her big money, which she’s still waiting for as Trump’s legal team repeatedly keep appealing the ruling at his behest.
MAGA still can’t cope with the decision and continues to parrot Trump’s disparaging remarks about her credibility, from bagging on her looks to pointing out that she named one of her cats after female anatomy. I guess because they think that word is worse than what Trump did to her in a Bergdorf dressing room.
They love to blame all of Trump’s victims of sexual violence, from Carroll to any potential connections in the Epstein Files, because they just can’t allow themselves to consider that they might have been wrong about Trump. They still believe Bill and Hillary did the unspeakable things with Epstein, and yet they have no answers when I ask them why Trump hasn’t testified like the Clintons did. Innocent people have no problem showing up to testify about their innocence.
Trump is now weaponizing his Department of Justice against Carroll, forcing it to launch a manufactured criminal investigation into the trial. He’s never once even threatened to sue anyone who’s accused him of being in the Epstein Files, or demanding the arrest of anyone named in them. He’s not using his DOJ to get a do-over for his 34 felony fraud convictions.
Nope, he’s fully fixated on this one blemish on his spotty record, thanks to this one woman.
And right before this new investigation was announced, Trump rewarded his disgraced former Attorney General, Pam Bondi, with a new job in the White House, right before she was called to testify about the Epstein Files again.
Weird timing, huh?
This is the kind of “witch hunt” Trump whines about the Democrats launching against him any time anyone dares to call him out. This goes deeper than “Trump can’t be wrong” about anything; it’s yet another confession that he covers up with accusations. Trump is also siccing his DOJ on anyone who supported Carroll, like LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman.
MAGA has been more than happy to resume this narrative to move the goalposts away from the unpopular war in Iran, the Epstein Files, and the clear implosion of the GOP as Trump’s health is rapidly declining. He’s also facing the embarrassment from the failing “America 250” concert that all but two of the artists have dropped out of because they don’t want to perform for Epstein’s Bestie and his cult.
Trump will fail at this new attack on Carroll like he’s failed at all of his previous attempts. His scapegoating never works for very long because both he and MAGA have short attention spans. They’ll always be able to gin up a new outrage distraction when Trump lets them down, because just like him, they can’t stand to be seen as the losers they know they are.
Meanwhile, Team Carroll is already reassembled and ready to go another round against the biggest loser this country has ever produced.
Commenters to this website often lament that too many opinion columns predict Trump's imminent downfall over his latest scandal, yet it has yet to come. But, while some of us do believe there are still things that might tear him down, we know there are people who certainly can. You.
By the very act of coming to Raw Story, you've proven both a need and the ability to absorb the latest political news. That makes you an asset, and your country has never needed assets like you more, at least not in our lifetimes. We need you to volunteer to help with whatever effort it takes to get the current regime out of office, and direct your efforts at all levels of government, any age, profession, and from any political bent but dead red.
I take pride in never referencing myself in columns, but on this, it might be worth noting that I just took my own advice. Instead of merely writing to a national audience, hoping to strengthen a winning message, I also just offered to help my local Dem running for Congress, hoping to unseat a Republican in a "pink-purple" district. There has never been a better time and never one with fewer excuses.
Amidst all the bad news we've endured lately, there is some real good news on this front.
For one, it's literally never been easier. You can do invaluable work from your phone, laptop, whatever, in your home, or walk miles canvassing, donating money yourself, soliciting donations of money from others, writing letters to the editor, and attending local events. Time to do more than vote, more than just send money; it's time to pick a challenger and expend the effort to upend MAGA, or spend the next two generations living with the consequences. It is that bad, and you who regularly read and comment know it better than anyone.
In brutal honesty, this is a unique time, in a unique country, born of unique promise, a dynamic in which winning is the only line of defense, losers not only lose but have never lost more, and in ways we're only beginning to feel.
And thus, though this might hurt some of the stronger progressives here — including this guy — it's time to set aside all qualms we have with anything approaching purity. The only "pure" position of any use this cycle is unfiltered opposition to MAGA. When and if — because it's now an "if" — Dems regain a measure of power, we can fight hard as to the proper progressive priorities, from affordability and pro-business moderates, healthcare advocates, to climate change heroes, to defending all things DEI, regaining all lost ground on women's rights, on racial justice, and our LGBTQ community, to reaffirming leading the world in science, attacking monopolies, the list is endless. But holding fast to progressive purity hurts when up again MAGA impunity.
Now it may get rough; some might not like this. But I strongly suggest that if you find yourself still amidst primary season, as I do, pick the leader with the most money, name recognition, power — the one most likely to defeat a MAGA opponent. Hold your nose if they don't match your priorities in anything other than beating the MAGA on the ballot. It is that bad. We no longer have the luxury of picking anyone but the "best," and the only definition of "best" right now is the one most likely to win.
What good is prioritizing climate change or racial justice if your candidate never gets into office because your purple district doesn't align with your wonderful values? We will never get justice in any form, from bullets in protesters to billionaires billeting in the White House, not until MAGA is stopped. So, if you're sick of hearing about the next scandal taking Trump down, the one that never comes around, you're up. If you are not in a purple district or state, if you're in a district that is hopelessly lost (or even very safely won), find a competitive race and adopt it. Our tech makes it as if you're across the street from the campaign office, and believe me, they'll appreciate you.
"Winning" can only come about by balancing two means of attack. First, we must maximize the Democratic vote. We need Democrats voting in percentages unseen in generations. Second, we must reach the last 20 percent of this country that is moderate enough to vote either way, and relentlessly reach out with the only message they want to hear. They have been left behind economically.
For the first group, true blue, note that without them showing up to possibly vote for a moderate, uninterested in their enlightened progressive priorities, beating a MAGA with anyone at least ensures those priorities remain viable and not vitiated. For the second group, and it pains me to say this as much as it does for you to read it, set aside the deep progressive values for one race. Instead, merely mention that Trump left that moderate behind long ago.
These are the independents who elected Trump on the promise that he'd decrease prices on day one — yet polls make clear that no issue infuriates Americans more with Trump than inflation. It's their number one issue. Note to them, 1) It's getting worse, 2) He has no plan, and 3) Even if he had a plan, he lacks all competence to get it done.
He promised to stay out of foreign wars — America First — then started one, and we're not winning. At a billion a day, he immediately made your life more expensive, yes, gas prices, groceries, but don't forget the billions that could've gone to healthcare.
He promised to "drain the swamp," and yet he just released more alligators and snakes amidst a muddy mangrove moat than we thought could fit. He is literally paying himself to be president in stock trades, foreign deals, crypto. He promised to lower taxes, but instead we're all paying higher prices as a tax; only these tax dollars go to Elon, Ellison, Epsteiners, and the eponymous one himself, Trump.
For all of us making less than $100,000 a year, which is most of us, by far, our Trump tax has made living much, much more difficult. This is the Dems' winning message because, yes, Trump has MAGAs that will commit seppuku in his name, but we're not talking to them, don't need to. We're talking to those who thought Trump meant a better economy, and it certainly is for the Epstein class. The stock market is up. (For now, and due for a major fall), which does no good for the lives of your average young teacher, a nurse, a construction worker. They pay, he plays. Message that.
That is the formula. Go to the tried and true blue, and say, "If not you, who?" Right now, if you place pronoun priority ahead of healthcare, you'll do little more than clear up the pronoun for the obituary. (And yes, as a long-time LGBTQ advocate, a daughter with transitioning friends, it hurts to say it — but it's no less true.) If the strongest candidate doesn't prioritize your progressive ideals enough, consider the total wrecking crew awaiting a loss. To tepid Trump voters? Speak the only language they know. Their economy, their healthcare, their job opportunities. They don't care about trans rights; you're not going to convince them to care. Don't waste your time.
Good news. There's no better time. Trump is reeling. GOP Congress feels the heat in all directions, looking at losses because they cannot cross Trump. He has never grabbed for or held more raw governmental power, but that weakens him politically amidst all but his true believers (And there are fewer of them by the day). Yes, redistricting will likely hurt, but it's possible — with work, we'll have caught them off guard, diluting red districts a bit too much in the wrong election, infrared to ultra-violet. We won't know until we try.
It is worthless to say the current Democratic leadership has been basically useless. True as it is, for now, they're at least better than the alternative. In some situations, the most progressive may be the most marketable — by all means, dive in, primary out the useless. But in those situations where only baby blue dogs have a chance, use every minute of midnight blue in you to fight anything red. It's literally all we have.
Sick of reading columns about the latest Trump move sure to bring him down? Fine. Understandable. Wait no more and do it yourself, ourselves. There is no guarantee we'll win, but we know what's guaranteed with a loss: more corruption, more fascism, fewer rights, a nation so divided it's hard to argue we're one nation anymore.
I have read the comments and sympathize. And I've long said no scandal alone can bring him down, but an imploding economy might, especially if we push. I used to think that writing national pieces with inarguable arguments sufficed. No more. I just got involved in an out-of-the-way pink/purple district with the most powerful Dem in the primary — I know nothing about her priorities except she aims to defeat the MAGA opponent and has the greatest support.
Good enough.
Normally, that would be a civic sin. But this isn't normal. It's the only defensible thing. Instead of just keeping up to date on how Trump might be brought down (And don't stop), let's get to work doing it ourselves. Nothing is too small, and damn sure no effort too big.
It really is now or never. Let's try now. Because "never" is already too close, perhaps too late. We won't know without trying. We only know what happens if we don't. But please, please, please, don't let pride in purity supremacy make things worse. I've spent ten years as a Dem columnist and see it daily, people fighting over "I can out liberal you."
Actually, the only measure of such right now is the one who wins against MAGA - the one who moved the needle. If done right, we will have time to fight progressive priorities down the line. Done wrong, we'll never again see a line.
Commit to one degree more than what you've done before. No kings, true in '76, and just as true 250 years later in the spirit of '26. History is made by those who show up. So do. The world will be proud, and so will you.
Jason Miciak is a Rawstory Columnist at Large, Past Associate Editor at Occupy Democrats, an author, attorney, single parent, girldad. Newly associated with a Dem campaign. Please follow on Bluesky, and he can be reached at jasonmiciak@gmail.com
Friends,
It’s impossible to understand American politics without also understanding the American economy (and vice versa). Politics and economics may be different disciplines but they’re two sides of the same coin.
This came home to me again when I saw Thursday’s report on the U.S. gross domestic product.
Numbers can be pretty boring but bear with me. Worker compensation—wages and benefits — grew 0.8 percent from the fourth quarter of 2025 to the first quarter of 2026. Corporate profits grew 2.7 percent.
When you adjust for inflation, hourly wages have risen 3 percent since the end of 2019. Corporate profits have risen 50 percent.
Worker’s share of the nation’s income has now dropped to the lowest it’s been since records began in 1947. Profits’ share is the highest since 1950.
Most people who depend on wages for a living are struggling, while a small minority at the top who own most shares of stock and private equity — that is, people who rely on capital gains — have never had it as good.
The trend toward lower wages and higher profits began in the 1980s, increased in the 2000s, picked up speed after the pandemic, and is about to explode as Artificial Intelligence takes over.
In coming months three companies centered on AI will go public — Space X, OpenAI, and Anthropic — with expected valuations of around $1 trillion each (reflecting the gargantuan profits investors expect). But what about workers?
This is not just morally wrong. “Income from capital risks replacing income from labor,” Pope Leo wrote in Magnifica Humanitas, his encyclical letter devoted to the effects of AI, released this week.
It also threatens the future stability of our economic and political system.
What accounts for the increasing shift of the American economy from wages to profits, even before AI?
One big reason is monopolization. The economy has become concentrated in a few giant corporations with the power both to raise prices and keep wages down.
Sure, there are still lots of small businesses and mom-and-pop operations. But the gravitational center of the U.S. economy is now Amazon, Alphabet (Google), Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Meta, Walmart, Costco, Home Depot, Kroger, United Health, Cigna, CVS, AT&T, Verizon, ExxonMobil, Chevron, JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Vanguard, Fidelity, Blackstone, Apollo, and KKR.
These giants control large swathes of the economy. They also exert significant political power. They’re like black holes in space, sucking in vast sums of money.
Their political power makes it impossible to know whether government policy is based on the public interest or private gain.
Consider Trump’s war in Iran and its resulting surge in energy prices. The energy-price rise has caused after-tax disposable income to drop and the profits of energy companies to soar. Did Trump decide to go to war because he thought it necessary, or because Big Oil nudged him into it?
Workers, meanwhile, no longer have any countervailing power. In the 1950s, over a third of workers in the private sector were unionized. That gave them enough bargaining power to claim a significant share of the total economy. Now, only 6 percent of workers are unionized. Their bargaining power has been further eroded by their easy replacement by lower-wage workers in Asia and by software. AI will further erode it.
This trend is not sustainable. It feeds growing anger at the system, which demagogues like Trump exploit for their own ends.
What should be done? Let me list five steps (I’ll go into each in greater detail in coming months).
1. For one thing, we’re going to need a new era of antitrust. Giant corporations will have to be busted up.
2. We’ll also need to tax those at the top, especially on the value of their ownership of capital. (California voters will likely be asked to vote on a billionaire tax in November.)
3. We’ll need regulate AI and simultaneously provide a universal basic income to cushion those who lose their jobs because of it.
4. Universal health care will be a necessity (perhaps via Medicare for all) along with subsidized childcare and eldercare.
5. Finally, we’ll need to distribute capital far more widely, so that the broad American public has a palpable stake in the rip-roaring stock market and the AI tsunami.
None of these fixes will be easy. Even if all are implemented, they may still be insufficient.
But, my friends, we have no choice but to try. We’ve already witnessed what mass anger can do to America, in the form of Trump. Unless we act soon, we’re likely to have Trumps, or worse, as far as the eye can see.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Corporations can now vote in Delaware. And they’re doing it.
Seriously. Not dystopian science fiction or a new novel by an AI version of George Orwell. Actual corporations — what America’s first Supreme Court Justice, John Marshall, in 1819 called “an artificial being, invisible, intangible, and existing only in contemplation of law” — are today voting in elections for everything from the mayor and town council to referendums on corporate taxes and limits on corporate behavior.
What could possibly go wrong?
There are, after all, more corporations than people in Delaware. They can now decide who’s going to run the government, what the laws are, and — through their votes to elect humans who’ll take corporate money to do what corporations want (something else that corrupt Republicans on the Supreme Court legalized) — even what regulations companies must follow and what limits there are on their behavior.
In a few weeks, my next book will be coming out, “Who Killed the American Dream: The Greatest Political Crime Ever Told,” and the timing couldn’t be more synchronous.
The book, written like a murder mystery but 100% true, tells the story of how a corrupt Supreme Court clerk conspired with a corrupt Supreme Court justice to hand “corporate personhood” to the railroad corporations that were then among the richest and most powerful in the world.
The decision was handed down in 1886; in it, the Court itself didn’t say a single word about corporate personhood. Back then corporations had the rights of “artificial persons” so they could pay taxes, own land, and execute contracts and lawsuits, but nobody seriously claimed they could assert human rights like free speech, privacy, or the right to vote.
But the clerk of the Court, a wealthy plutocrat named John Chandler Bancroft Davis, slipped into the headnote of the case — a commentary for law students and others wanting a summary of a decision, which carries absolutely no legal weight whatsoever — that the Chief Justice, Morrison Remick Waite, had claimed corporations were “persons,” implying they had rights under the 14th Amendment.
The railroads then hired a few retired members of Congress who were on the committees that wrote the Amendment as frontmen and for the next five years they traveled the country claiming that the “actual intent” of the authors of the 14th Amendment was to grant human rights to corporations, not former slaves.
Their efforts worked; just 10 years later, in the Covington & Lexington Turnpike v. Sandford case, the Court cited the Santa Clara decision and ruled:
“[C]orporations are persons within the meaning of the constitutional provisions forbidding the deprivation of property without due process of law as well as a denial of the equal protection of the laws.”
That badly abused Amendment, ratified on July 9, 1868, was written to liberate formerly enslaved people, and its language is pretty clear about that:
“No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” (emphasis added)
The railroad corporations claimed that because they were taxed at different rates on property they owned in Santa Clara and Santa Ana counties in California, they were “persons” being denied the “equal protection of the law.” The Court determined that the California constitution already dealt with tax issues like that, giving the railroad the relief they wanted, but there was no federal action at all.
However, the lie about corporate personhood buried in the headnote took root and lives on to this day. For example, yesterday afternoon I asked DuckDuckGo’s AI the question:
“Who won the 1886 Santa Clara Supreme Court decision?”
And the answer I got back was:
“The Southern Pacific Railroad Company won the 1886 Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad decision. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the railroad, affirming that corporations are considered ‘persons’ under the Fourteenth Amendment.”
None of that is true, but it was nonetheless the basis of the 1978 First National Bank v Bellotti decision written by Lewis Powell himself (of “Powell Memo” fame), claiming that because corporations are “persons” with rights under the Bill of Rights — including the First Amendment right to free speech — they could spend big bucks to swing elections. In that decision, the Court majority footnoted:
“It has been settled for almost a century that corporations are persons within the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific R. Co., 118 U. S. 394 (1886); see Covington & Lexington Turnpike R. Co. v. Sandford, 164 U. S. 578 (1896).”
Because corporations don’t have mouths to speak with, Powell reasoned, their money served the same purpose. So they could “speak” freely with millions thrown into elections, corrupting our democracy to their benefit and our detriment.
Two years earlier, in Buckley v Valejo, the Court had struck down the 1970s campaign contribution limits Congress put into law after the Nixon bribery scandals. They ruled that wealthy Senator James Buckley (brother of William F. Buckley) could use his own money to finance his election campaign because his money was functionally the same thing as his First Amendment-protected free speech.
Which led straight to Clarence Thomas — the most corrupt Supreme Court justice in history, then on the take from a Nazi-memorabilia-collecting rightwing billionaire — to cast the deciding vote in Citizens United.
That bizarre decision blew up hundreds of campaign finance and other good-government laws, claiming that there should be virtually no limits on the money morbidly rich individuals, corporations, and even foreign entities could pour into US elections.
Clarence Thomas even cited the Bellotti case and, thus, its reference to Santa Clara to justify handing our democratic processes over to the richest people and biggest companies in the nation.
And now we’ve arrived at terminal insanity. As Reuters reported on Tuesday:
“A judge in Delaware, where many big U.S. companies are incorporated, ruled on Tuesday that a small town that allows corporations to vote in municipal elections was not violating the state’s constitution.
“Delaware Superior Court Judge Craig Karsnitz said the beach town of Fenwick Island was not diluting human votes by allowing companies and other legal entities that own property to cast votes in municipal elections.”
More corporations are incorporated in Delaware than any other state in the nation because of that state’s lax corporate laws and low corporate taxes: there are more corporations in the state than people.
And now they can vote.
I wrote Who Stole the American Dream? to wake people up to the corruption of our democracy by the rich and powerful, particularly the corporate “artificial beings” that keep buying off judges and politicians because of corrupt Supreme Court cases citing that corrupt headnote, starting with Santa Clara and then going to Covington and then straight-lined to Bellotti and Citizens United.
The entire thing is a fraud, a 140-year-long scam, as knowledgeable legislators like Sheldon Whitehouse, Bernie Sanders, Ro Khanna, Mark Pocan, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Pramila Jayapal, and Elizabeth Warren will tell you in a New York minute.
And it needs to be overturned.
There are a few ways to do that, the most effective being a constitutional amendment, but reorganizing the Supreme Court and even strong legislation can take a bite out of it. I detail them all in the book, and good government groups like Move to Amend and Public Citizen have been on this case for years.
The situation, after all, has become so bad that I suggested in my book Rebooting the American Dream (which Bernie read from on the floor of the Senate in his famous filibuster) that members of Congress should be required to wear NASCAR-style patches to let folks know which corporations are “sponsoring” them.
If we don’t get active and take back our democracy for humans, corporations may one day vote one of themselves into office and the Republican majority on the Supreme Court will probably simply nod along.
Copyright © 2026 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 |
Masthead
|
Privacy Policy
|
Manage Preferences
|
Debug Logs
For corrections contact
corrections@rawstory.com
, for support contact
support@rawstory.com
.