Bombshell whistleblower letter reveals 'lawlessness' inside Trump's DOJ

Bombshell whistleblower letter reveals 'lawlessness' inside Trump's DOJ
FILE PHOTO: Attorney Emil Bove, centre, listens as Republican presidential candidate, former U.S. President Donald Trump, flanked by defense attorney Todd Blanche, talks to journalists as he arrives for the day?s proceedings in his criminal trial at Manhattan Criminal Court in New York, New York, on May 10, 2024. Todd Heisler/Pool via REUTERS/File Photo

Senior Justice Department official Emile Bove told lawyers under him that he was willing to ignore court orders to ensure President Donald Trump got what he wanted, a whistleblower letter to the Senate said.

Bove, Trump's former personal lawyer, has been nominated to a federal judgeship, requiring Senate confirmation. Among those in opposition is a former DOJ prosecutor on the case for Kilmar Ábrego García, an asylum seeker living in Maryland who was captured and sent to an El Salvador prison without due process.

In March, prosecutor Erez Reuveni appeared in court to argue the DOJ's case against Ábrego García — but he revealed to the judge that the deportation was due to a clerical error.

“Our only arguments are jurisdictional. … He should not have been sent to El Salvador," Reuveni told the judge.

He was asked why the U.S. couldn’t simply ask El Salvador to return the man.

Reuveni responded, “The first thing I did when I got this case on my desk is ask my clients the same question." He noted he never got an answer.

A few days later, he was placed on administrative leave and, by April, he was fired.

In a Bluesky post, Immigration Council senior fellow Aaron Reichlin-Melnick shared excerpts of the letter from Reuveni, where he walks through "lawlessness at the DOJ around the CECOT deportations."

"Bove stated that DOJ would need to consider telling the courts 'f--k you' and ignore any such court order," the whistleblower letter said. "Mr. Reuveni perceived that others in the room looked stunned, and he observed awkward, nervous glances among people in the room. Silence overtook the room. Mr. Reuveni and others were quickly ushered out of the room. Notwithstanding Bove's directive, Mr. Reuveni left the meeting understanding that the DOJ would tell DHS to follow all court orders."

Reuveni said that to his knowledge, "no one in DOJ leadership — in any administration — had ever suggested the Department of Justice could blatantly ignore court orders."

"Reuveni accuses Drew Ensign, the DOJ lawyer appearing for the Trump admin in the CECOT cases and other immigration cases, of lying to Judge [James] Boasberg on March 15 when he said he didn't know planes were taking off. He says Ensign was at a meeting the day before when the flights were planned!" Reichlin-Melnick summarized.

"Ensign had been present in the previous day's meeting when Emil Bove stated clearly that one or more planes containing individuals subject to the AEA would be taking off over the weekend no matter what," the letter continued.

Reuveni goes on to write that on March 15, he emailed the Department of Homeland Security to inform them that the judge was thinking of issuing a court order to block the flights. He said he was concerned Ensign wouldn't act.

Reuveni "supervisor, August Flentje, noted Bove's 'f--k you' line and joked Reuveni might be fired for raising alarm. He was," Reichlin-Melnick noted. "Ensign agreed Judge Boasberg's order required them to turn the planes around."

It was Bove who stepped in, telling DHS to ignore the judge. Senior DOJ leadership also went so far as to directly order DHS to ignore the judge's demand to give information on the deportation flights.

It has a bearing on the Supreme Court ruling issued on Monday that allows DHS to continue deporting migrants to war-torn countries where they have no ties or connections.

After the ruling, NBC News Supreme Court reporter said that the Trump admin is now asking the court to clarify the "third country" immigration order because the lower court noted that the ruling didn't apply to the case involving six individuals DHS wants to send to South Sudan.

The DOJ called it "unprecedented defiance" of the Supreme Court, however, as one legal analyst explained, there were no specifics on the Supreme Court's ruling other than a blanket approval in another case.

Read the full thread with excerpts of the letter here.

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

Vice President JD Vance caught heat on Monday night after defending the Trump administration's "objectives" in Iran following the strikes over the weekend.

Vance joined "Jesse Watters Primetime" on Fox News to discuss the administration's decision to strike Iran on Saturday morning. Watters asked how Americans can be sure that the operation won't turn into another War on Terror, which dragged on for decades without a clear end in sight.

Vance's comments raised eyebrows among some political analysts and observers.

"What's so different about this is that the president has clearly defined what he wants to see in Iran," Vance said. "There is just no way Donald Trump is going to allow this country to get into a multi-year conflict with no end in sight and no clear objective."

Analysts and observers reacted on social media.

"We’ve already gone to war and Trump hasn’t defined a damn thing," political writer Polly Sigh posted on X.

"Even Mollie Hemingway isn’t buying this," writer Shannon Last posted on X, referring to a far-right writer for The Federalist.

"Oh JD, we are all going to remember this when you run for President," political commentator DJ Omega posted on X.


THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

President Donald Trump was seen with an alarming skin rash on his neck Monday, with many initially suspecting he may be having a flare-up of shingles — but the cagey response from the White House has led some medical experts to fear a cover-up of something potentially worse.

“President Trump is using a very common cream on the right side of his neck, which is a preventative skin treatment, prescribed by the White House Doctor," White House physician Sean Patrick Barbabella wrote in a statement flagged by The Daily Beast. "The President is using this treatment for one week, and the redness is expected to last for a few weeks.”

However, the Beast continued, doctors are pointing to another potential thing the rash could be.

“The White House medical team didn’t know [Trump] got a CT scan. They claimed it was a MRI for weeks,” wrote Dr. Vin Gupta, a frequent commentator on MS NOW, in a post to X. “Now instead of acknowledging he might have a pre-cancerous skin condition, they dance around the issue. “Trying to fool the public just makes it worse.”

CNN medical analyst Dr. Jonathan Reiner agreed, writing, “Preventative skin treatments (such as topical 5 flurouracil) are commonly used to prevent overt skin cancer in people with precancerous skin lesions. We don’t know what specific treatment the president is receiving, but why all the secrecy for something that is potentially easy to treat and very common in older people?”

This comes after a number of other medical oddities surrounding the 79-year-old president, including unexplained bruising on his hand and ankle swelling that can be associated with heart problems.

Pop star Kesha has joined a growing roster of musicians calling out the Trump administration for unauthorized use of their songs on social media.

The controversy erupted after the White House posted a TikTok video on Feb. 10 featuring her hit track "Blow" alongside military jets, including a fighter jet launching a missile at a naval ship, with the caption "Lethality." The clip has racked up more than 14 million views and 1.8 million likes.

Weeks after the post went live, Kesha took to social media on Monday to express her fury.

“It’s come to my attention that The White House has used one of my songs on TikTok to incite violence and threaten war,” wrote Kesha. “Trying to make light of war is disgusting and inhumane. I absolutely do NOT approve of my music being used to promote violence of any kind. Love always trumps hate. please love yourself and each other in times like this. This show of blatant disregard for human life and quite frankly this attack on all of our nervous systems is the opposite of what I stand for.”

She didn't stop there, adding: "Also, don't let this distract us from the fact that criminal predator Donald Trump appears in the Files over a million times."

She tagged the White House in another post, writing: "Stop using my music, perverts @WhiteHouse."

Kesha's public rebuke follows similar blowback from Radiohead, who told the Department of Homeland Security to "go f---yourselves" over a pro-ICE video using their song "Let Down." Olivia Rodrigo, Sabrina Carpenter, and SZA have also condemned the government's unauthorized use of their music for what they view as promoting violence and harmful policies, Variety reported.

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}