Bombshell whistleblower letter reveals 'lawlessness' inside Trump's DOJ

Bombshell whistleblower letter reveals 'lawlessness' inside Trump's DOJ
FILE PHOTO: Attorney Emil Bove, centre, listens as Republican presidential candidate, former U.S. President Donald Trump, flanked by defense attorney Todd Blanche, talks to journalists as he arrives for the day?s proceedings in his criminal trial at Manhattan Criminal Court in New York, New York, on May 10, 2024. Todd Heisler/Pool via REUTERS/File Photo

Senior Justice Department official Emile Bove told lawyers under him that he was willing to ignore court orders to ensure President Donald Trump got what he wanted, a whistleblower letter to the Senate said.

Bove, Trump's former personal lawyer, has been nominated to a federal judgeship, requiring Senate confirmation. Among those in opposition is a former DOJ prosecutor on the case for Kilmar Ábrego García, an asylum seeker living in Maryland who was captured and sent to an El Salvador prison without due process.

In March, prosecutor Erez Reuveni appeared in court to argue the DOJ's case against Ábrego García — but he revealed to the judge that the deportation was due to a clerical error.

“Our only arguments are jurisdictional. … He should not have been sent to El Salvador," Reuveni told the judge.

He was asked why the U.S. couldn’t simply ask El Salvador to return the man.

Reuveni responded, “The first thing I did when I got this case on my desk is ask my clients the same question." He noted he never got an answer.

A few days later, he was placed on administrative leave and, by April, he was fired.

In a Bluesky post, Immigration Council senior fellow Aaron Reichlin-Melnick shared excerpts of the letter from Reuveni, where he walks through "lawlessness at the DOJ around the CECOT deportations."

"Bove stated that DOJ would need to consider telling the courts 'f--k you' and ignore any such court order," the whistleblower letter said. "Mr. Reuveni perceived that others in the room looked stunned, and he observed awkward, nervous glances among people in the room. Silence overtook the room. Mr. Reuveni and others were quickly ushered out of the room. Notwithstanding Bove's directive, Mr. Reuveni left the meeting understanding that the DOJ would tell DHS to follow all court orders."

Reuveni said that to his knowledge, "no one in DOJ leadership — in any administration — had ever suggested the Department of Justice could blatantly ignore court orders."

"Reuveni accuses Drew Ensign, the DOJ lawyer appearing for the Trump admin in the CECOT cases and other immigration cases, of lying to Judge [James] Boasberg on March 15 when he said he didn't know planes were taking off. He says Ensign was at a meeting the day before when the flights were planned!" Reichlin-Melnick summarized.

"Ensign had been present in the previous day's meeting when Emil Bove stated clearly that one or more planes containing individuals subject to the AEA would be taking off over the weekend no matter what," the letter continued.

Reuveni goes on to write that on March 15, he emailed the Department of Homeland Security to inform them that the judge was thinking of issuing a court order to block the flights. He said he was concerned Ensign wouldn't act.

Reuveni "supervisor, August Flentje, noted Bove's 'f--k you' line and joked Reuveni might be fired for raising alarm. He was," Reichlin-Melnick noted. "Ensign agreed Judge Boasberg's order required them to turn the planes around."

It was Bove who stepped in, telling DHS to ignore the judge. Senior DOJ leadership also went so far as to directly order DHS to ignore the judge's demand to give information on the deportation flights.

It has a bearing on the Supreme Court ruling issued on Monday that allows DHS to continue deporting migrants to war-torn countries where they have no ties or connections.

After the ruling, NBC News Supreme Court reporter said that the Trump admin is now asking the court to clarify the "third country" immigration order because the lower court noted that the ruling didn't apply to the case involving six individuals DHS wants to send to South Sudan.

The DOJ called it "unprecedented defiance" of the Supreme Court, however, as one legal analyst explained, there were no specifics on the Supreme Court's ruling other than a blanket approval in another case.

Read the full thread with excerpts of the letter here.

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

A billionaire running for governor with President Donald Trump's backing is facing a damaging accusation from Trump's own federal government.

The Internal Revenue Service has accused Rick Jackson, the Republican nominee for Georgia governor, of manipulating his company's taxes, The Daily Beast reported Thursday. According to a July court document, the agency alleges that the Jackson Investment Group, which serves as the parent company of his businesses, attempted to deduct bad debt on loans it had already written off in prior years.

"Petitioner is playing a shell game with the alleged Family Christian debt," the IRS wrote, alleging the company mixed up separate entities and loans in an effort to make its deduction hold up on paper.

The case centers on roughly $1.4 million in debt, but it is only one piece of a much larger fight between Jackson and federal tax authorities. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported last week that the IRS is contesting close to $54 million in business deductions tied to losses from ventures Jackson's companies invested in, and has assessed $16 million in penalties.

Jackson is challenging the IRS claims and is scheduled to appear in court in March 2027, roughly three months after the winner of next week's election would be sworn in as governor.

The accusations cut against the image Jackson has cultivated as a business mogul and Christian philanthropist who claims his health care fortune belongs to God. "This is God's money," Jackson said recently, according to The Daily Beast. "I'm using that money to make a difference in other people's lives."

Trump endorsed Jackson in July after the president's original pick, Georgia Lt. Gov. Burt Jones, lost to the billionaire in the GOP primary. Jackson joined Trump at a Georgia rally on Saturday alongside Rep. Mike Collins, the GOP Senate nominee trailing Democratic Sen. Jon Ossoff.

The Daily Beast has previously reported that one of Jackson's companies spent years trying to seize a couple's home in court, and that other subsidiaries paid $5 million to resolve allegations they exploited workers and violated labor laws.

Jackson faces former Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms, the Democratic nominee, on Nov. 3. Jackson did not immediately respond to The Daily Beast's request for comment.

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

CNN’s Jack Tapper delivered a sarcastic response Thursday after President Donald Trump lashed out at a reporter who questioned his decision to cancel a campaign appearance in Kansas.

“Classy as always,” Tapper said after airing footage of Trump’s angry exchange with the reporter.

The outburst happened after Trump was asked why he abandoned plans to rally with Republican Sen. Roger Marshall, who is facing a tough reelection fight.

“I don’t feel like I have to go to Kansas,” Trump said, before snapping at the reporter when pressed about his health.

“You are disgusting,” the president said. “Put yourself in shape. You look like hell.”

Back in the CNN studio, Tapper couldn’t resist another jab.

“There should be a reverse-angle camera so I know who he’s talking about,” he said.

The White House told CNN that Trump would instead participate in more than 20 telephone rallies before Election Day, arguing they would help him reach more voters.

“I’m not sure I buy it,” Tapper remarked Thursday.

The CNN anchor then questioned whether Trump was deliberately distancing himself from Marshall.

“Roger Marshall’s not acting like a guy who thinks he's going to get reelected,” Tapper told his guest. “Do you think President Trump is trying to get away from the stink?”

The Trump administration's push to back up its unproven voter fraud claims in California has now followed one election worker home.

The Justice Department has opened a criminal investigation into alleged noncitizen voting in the state and issued federal grand jury subpoenas to local election officials, The New York Times reported Thursday, citing people familiar with the matter and subpoena copies the paper obtained. Federal marshals served one Los Angeles County election employee at home even though that employee had already been served at the registrar's office, according to officials familiar with the incident.

At least two workers in the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder's office received subpoenas last week summoning them to a grand jury proceeding set for Nov. 4, the morning after Election Day, according to records The Times obtained through California's public records law.

The subpoenas seek all internal communications about the Justice Department's demands on county officials and California's secretary of state. They also call for records on the agency's "methods for screening for unlawful voting by aliens" and its "efforts to prevent noncitizen votes from being counted in any election." Those followed earlier subpoenas seeking records on specific voters prosecutors appeared to suspect were not citizens.

Los Angeles County Registrar Dean Logan blasted the subpoenas as "intimidation."

"At every step, the U.S. Department of Justice has taken a confrontational, adversarial approach," Logan said in a statement. "Election officials are acting in accordance with state and federal law."

The subpoenas mark an escalation in the Trump administration's bid to paint elections in Democratic-run states as rigged against Republicans, coming after Justice Department officials repeatedly hinted they would investigate and prosecute local election officials who refused federal demands. A letter sent to election officials across the state last week warned they would "risk significant federal scrutiny" by not complying. Bill Essayli, the top federal prosecutor in Los Angeles, went further.

"Any election official who knowingly processes the ballot of a noncitizen is opening themselves to legal jeopardy," he said.

The Times noted that receiving a grand jury subpoena does not mean a person is under investigation, and the DOJ rarely subpoenas people it plans to charge.

A Justice Department spokeswoman declined to comment on the subpoenas. California Secretary of State Shirley Weber also declined to comment for The Times.

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}