Bombshell whistleblower letter reveals 'lawlessness' inside Trump's DOJ

Bombshell whistleblower letter reveals 'lawlessness' inside Trump's DOJ
FILE PHOTO: Attorney Emil Bove, centre, listens as Republican presidential candidate, former U.S. President Donald Trump, flanked by defense attorney Todd Blanche, talks to journalists as he arrives for the day?s proceedings in his criminal trial at Manhattan Criminal Court in New York, New York, on May 10, 2024. Todd Heisler/Pool via REUTERS/File Photo

Senior Justice Department official Emile Bove told lawyers under him that he was willing to ignore court orders to ensure President Donald Trump got what he wanted, a whistleblower letter to the Senate said.

Bove, Trump's former personal lawyer, has been nominated to a federal judgeship, requiring Senate confirmation. Among those in opposition is a former DOJ prosecutor on the case for Kilmar Ábrego García, an asylum seeker living in Maryland who was captured and sent to an El Salvador prison without due process.

In March, prosecutor Erez Reuveni appeared in court to argue the DOJ's case against Ábrego García — but he revealed to the judge that the deportation was due to a clerical error.

“Our only arguments are jurisdictional. … He should not have been sent to El Salvador," Reuveni told the judge.

He was asked why the U.S. couldn’t simply ask El Salvador to return the man.

Reuveni responded, “The first thing I did when I got this case on my desk is ask my clients the same question." He noted he never got an answer.

A few days later, he was placed on administrative leave and, by April, he was fired.

In a Bluesky post, Immigration Council senior fellow Aaron Reichlin-Melnick shared excerpts of the letter from Reuveni, where he walks through "lawlessness at the DOJ around the CECOT deportations."

"Bove stated that DOJ would need to consider telling the courts 'f--k you' and ignore any such court order," the whistleblower letter said. "Mr. Reuveni perceived that others in the room looked stunned, and he observed awkward, nervous glances among people in the room. Silence overtook the room. Mr. Reuveni and others were quickly ushered out of the room. Notwithstanding Bove's directive, Mr. Reuveni left the meeting understanding that the DOJ would tell DHS to follow all court orders."

Reuveni said that to his knowledge, "no one in DOJ leadership — in any administration — had ever suggested the Department of Justice could blatantly ignore court orders."

"Reuveni accuses Drew Ensign, the DOJ lawyer appearing for the Trump admin in the CECOT cases and other immigration cases, of lying to Judge [James] Boasberg on March 15 when he said he didn't know planes were taking off. He says Ensign was at a meeting the day before when the flights were planned!" Reichlin-Melnick summarized.

"Ensign had been present in the previous day's meeting when Emil Bove stated clearly that one or more planes containing individuals subject to the AEA would be taking off over the weekend no matter what," the letter continued.

Reuveni goes on to write that on March 15, he emailed the Department of Homeland Security to inform them that the judge was thinking of issuing a court order to block the flights. He said he was concerned Ensign wouldn't act.

Reuveni "supervisor, August Flentje, noted Bove's 'f--k you' line and joked Reuveni might be fired for raising alarm. He was," Reichlin-Melnick noted. "Ensign agreed Judge Boasberg's order required them to turn the planes around."

It was Bove who stepped in, telling DHS to ignore the judge. Senior DOJ leadership also went so far as to directly order DHS to ignore the judge's demand to give information on the deportation flights.

It has a bearing on the Supreme Court ruling issued on Monday that allows DHS to continue deporting migrants to war-torn countries where they have no ties or connections.

After the ruling, NBC News Supreme Court reporter said that the Trump admin is now asking the court to clarify the "third country" immigration order because the lower court noted that the ruling didn't apply to the case involving six individuals DHS wants to send to South Sudan.

The DOJ called it "unprecedented defiance" of the Supreme Court, however, as one legal analyst explained, there were no specifics on the Supreme Court's ruling other than a blanket approval in another case.

Read the full thread with excerpts of the letter here.

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

New reporting gives additional insight into the abrupt resignation of Joe diGenova, the Washington lawyer leading the South Florida-based investigation into President Donald Trump's political enemies.

DiGenova resigned Thursday, one day after a tense phone call with Attorney General Todd Blanche, according to two people familiar with the matter, CNN reported.

The immediate trigger was diGenova's effort to block lawyers sent by Justice Department headquarters from assisting the probe, following broader friction with top DOJ officials over the investigation's pace.

Two people familiar with the matter told CNN the tensions had been building for weeks, fueled partly by diGenova's request that a high-security SCIF be built at the team's Fort Pierce office to store the most highly classified materials.

The team currently works out of an office with a room for handling sensitive — but not top-secret — evidence, and DOJ officials instead directed diGenova to use a SCIF at an FBI office miles away. DiGenova had also pushed for additional lawyers, though two Justice Department officials disputed any suggestion he'd been denied resources.

DiGenova's departure came on a busy day for the probe, with investigators presenting a witness to a grand jury, a person familiar with the matter said.

His exit could further slow an investigation that has already missed internal deadlines. DOJ officials had recently hoped for the first charges as soon as this month. Despite the disruption, a U.S. law enforcement official said Justice Department officials feel confident in the remaining team and expect momentum to pick up.

DiGenova declined to comment beyond remarks he made to CNN last week, saying he builds cases "the old fashioned way: witnesses, evidence, etc. That takes time."

Even amid the internal discord, investigative activity had intensified in recent weeks.

A grand jury subpoena went out last week seeking testimony from former FBI lawyer Lisa Page, and another summoned lawyer Dan Richman, a close contact of former FBI Director James Comey during the 2016 Russia investigation.

A former supervisor on that investigation sat for a multi-hour interview after being granted immunity, according to four people with knowledge of the matter. Investigators have also questioned lower-level former CIA and intelligence officials about the intelligence community's 2016 election assessment and former CIA director John Brennan's leadership.

In a sign the inquiry's timeline may be creeping forward, at least one witness recently received outreach from the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida specifically about the 2023 Mar-a-Lago search — bringing the probe's questions closer to the present day, sources told CNN.

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

CBS News’ “60 Minutes” aired an explosive exposé Sunday night revealing new details about the emerging pardon industry under the second Trump administration, and several critics were shocked that the segment managed to air under the leadership of CBS News Editor-in-Chief Bari Weiss.

Using a fake pardon-seeker with hidden cameras, CBS News’ investigation found that Trump-connected brokers were charging clemency applicants fees reaching as high as $3 million to lobby for presidential pardons outside the traditional Justice Department (DOJ) review process, with “about 70%” of President Donald Trump's second-term clemency actions bypassing DOJ vetting entirely.

“If this is the version that made it past Bari Weiss, how bad is the real story?” asked Joe Flood, a D.C.-based writer and photographer, in a social media post on X.

Weiss, who’s cozied up to billionaires in her ascent to CBS’ top leadership role, has faced scrutiny for her leadership at CBS News, including for the controversial firing of veteran broadcast journalist Scott Pelley. Weiss scrapped a “60 Minutes” report on the Trump administration incarcerating deportees in the infamous El Salvador prison known as CECOT, and was accused of pushing a false report targeting a progressive Democratic Senate candidate.

Given Weiss' “MAGA-coded” reputation, the segment's unflinching look at Trump's pardon economy left a number of viewers surprised, many of whom called for action.

“Every single [pardon] needs to be revoked,” wrote prominent tech vlogger Zack Nelson in a social media post on X to his nearly 1 million followers.

Democratic strategist Ameshia Cross struck a more resigned tone in response to CBS News’ findings.

“With Trump everything is for sale...damn this administration continues to prove its corruption in plain sight,” Cross wrote in a social media post on X.

Senate Democrats are demanding a full accounting of President Donald Trump's Freedom 250 organization, accusing the group of running a "pay-to-play" operation that showered corporate donors with lucrative federal contracts.

In a letter sent Sunday night to Freedom 250 CEO Keith Krach, a group of senators led by Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Adam Schiff of California demanded the group disclose how much money it has collected from businesses and individuals, and whether donations bought special treatment from the federal government, reported MS NOW.

"The lack of transparency in these donations makes it difficult for the public to determine whether donors may have received any favors or special treatment in exchange for their donations," the senators wrote, asking directly whether the administration was "concealing potential pay-to-play politics or even outright bribery."

Freedom 250, billed by the White House as a "public-private partnership" organizing the nation's semiquincentennial celebrations, has effectively replaced the bipartisan, congressionally created America250 commission — but unlike its predecessor, it discloses neither its donors nor its spending.

The senators, including Alex Padilla of California and Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, pointed to reporting that the group has raised more than $50 million from at least 21 corporate sponsors, several with business pending before the federal government.

United Airlines gave $2.5 million in March, four months before Trump announced a $22 billion Dulles Airport overhaul benefiting the carrier. RTX Corporation donated $1.5 million in May, months after Trump threatened to slash Pentagon contracts with its Raytheon subsidiary — which went on to win $2.9 billion in Navy contracts that summer. Chevron gave $5 million in May as the administration pressed the company over gas prices and its Venezuela operations. TikTok, not a listed sponsor, reportedly donated $2 million.

The senators called Freedom 250 "yet another slush fund for wealthy corporations and insiders to buy influence with the White House," noting its parent organization includes Trump campaign veterans such as fundraiser Meredith O'Rourke, reportedly nicknamed the "princess of darkness."

White House spokesperson Davis Ingle did not address the bribery allegations directly, saying only that Trump is "ensuring America gets the spectacular 250th birthday it deserves." TikTok and Freedom 250 did not respond to requests for comment, and a Chevron spokesperson said the company was "pleased to have supported" the celebrations.

The senators gave Krach until Sept. 27 to respond — a preview, they suggested, of subpoena-backed investigations that could follow if Democrats retake the Senate in November.

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}