'Every time you go behind closed doors you lie': The View unleashes on impeachment GOPers

Whoopi Goldberg The View
"The View's" Whoopi Goldberg (Photo: Screen capture/ABC Video)

Republicans passed an impeachment inquiry vote against President Joe Biden in the House on Wednesday, but they've still been unable to cite evidence for crimes they say he committed — and that's something that is infuriating the hosts of "The View."

On Thursday, the ladies called out Republicans for refusing to have public hearings, with even Republican and former Trump aide Alyssa Farah Griffin saying that the Justice Department should handle Biden's son Hunter's problems, not Congress. Republicans have fixated on business dealings between the president and his son as a potential smoking gun for impeachment.

"Let them deal with it and keep it," Whoopi Goldberg said. "Since you want us to know about this so badly, keep it out so we can hear it. I don't want — every time y'all go behind closed doors, you lie. You leak stuff and then the person who you've leaked it to is — then they have to prove that you lied about what was said because then somebody plays it and it's not at all what was said."

Read More: House Republicans split on whether Joe Biden impeachment is 'a real impeachment' or not

Sara Haines pointed out that the House members tend to lie in the open too.

"I have not seen one shred of evidence that it's tied to Joe Biden," Griffin said. "That's what it comes down to, to me. I'm no Joe Biden fan. Steve Doocy on Fox News has been hammering James Comer. Give me one thing. One piece of evidence. Otherwise, it's a waste of taxpayer dollars."

Sunny Hostin pointed out the fatal flaw in the GOP's claims — that they are searching for the crime, not investigating one.

"When you are prosecuting a case and investigating a case, you're not investigating a person," she said. "You're investigating a crime. And I think Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD), who I love, was a former prosecutor, and he said the Biden impeachment investigation isn't a whodunit. Like an Agatha Christie novel is the mystery — what's the crime? It's not how you investigate cases and it's political retribution. They're playing politics."

See the full discussion below or at the link here.


For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

A fiery back and forth erupted between Sen. Bernie Sanders (D-VT) and Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-OK) Wednesday during the Senate hearing for President Donald Trump's nominee for surgeon general, Casey Means.

Means, a favorite of Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is an entrepreneur and author, who gave up her medical license in 2018 and did not complete her residency at Stanford University, according to The Daily Beast. The "alternative medicine" blogger has been a controversial pick to lead the nation's public health agency. Her initial confirmation hearing was postponed because she went into labor and rescheduled to Wednesday after she gave birth to her son, Phoenix.

During the hearing, Sanders snapped at Mullin after the MAGA lawmaker criticized the Affordable Care Act and suggested getting rid of it altogether.

"I support a national health care program... You're going to attack me, I'm going to respond," Sanders said.

Mullin continued talking during the committee hearing.

"I ranted too long," Mullin said.

"Yes you did!" Sanders shouted back.

"I'm sorry. I didn't ask your opinion. I don't care about your opinion. You're part of the system. You're part of the problem. You've been sitting here longer than I've even been alive," Mullin said.

Sanders had a sarcastic response to Mullin's remarks.

"I've decided not to run for surgeon general," Sanders said.

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

Following the State of the Union Address, Democrats are striking President Donald Trump over the declining state of the economy, and over his own allies' and family's blatant excess of self-enrichment while working Americans struggle to afford basics — but MS NOW analyst Philip Bump argued on Wednesday that there is a better message they could be using.

"Philip, your thoughts on the effectiveness of what you might call a two-prong approach from Democrats?" asked anchor Ana Cabrera.

"Yeah, I mean, I understand that the Democratic Party feels as though they are going to be well-positioned for the midterms, and they don't want to step on their own toes. I get that," said Bump. "But I do think that both the response in the room, save for, you know, some of the incidents that you you suggested and also [Virginia Gov. Abigail] Spanberger response really failed to get at the real threat to democracy, which Americans feel."

That threat to democracy, Bump argued, is heavily apparent in public surveys.

"People understand that Donald Trump wants to do something with his power that is atypical for a president, to put it mildly," said Bump. "We have that new poll from Marist conducted for PBS Newshour and NPR, which shows that 90 percent of Democrats, I think 80 percent of independents, feels American democracy is at risk. And I think there's a very potent message there, which the Democrats have been shying away from in favor of the economy."

"I think it's a missed opportunity, particularly after that speech last night," he added.

- YouTube youtu.be

The Trump administration has employed a “rarely used” tactic to block the release of a bombshell whistleblower complaint regarding Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and President Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner – a complaint so sensitive that it’s currently “locked in a safe” – The Washington Post reported Wednesday.

The existence of the complaint first became known to lawmakers last November when the whistleblower’s attorney sent a letter to Gabbard to accuse her office of blocking lawmakers’ access to it. That letter was reviewed by the Journal and first reported on earlier this month.

The contents of the complaint remain unknown to both the public and top lawmakers, including the so-called “Gang of Eight,” a group of lawmakers who are typically briefed on matters of intelligence. One Trump administration official told the Journal earlier this month that the disclosure of the complaint could cause “grave damage to national security,” speaking with the outlet on the condition of anonymity.

It was later reported that the complaint involved Kushner, and that it includes supposed details on an intercepted conversation between two foreign nationals about the president’s son-in-law.

Top lawmakers have continued to push for access to the complaint, but on Tuesday, Gabbard’s office shut those requests down, and using what Glenn Gerstell, former general counsel at the National Security Agency, described as a “rarely used” tactic.

“In an email to Democratic congressional staffers sent on Feb. 13 and reviewed by The Wall Street Journal, Gabbard’s office said it was unable to provide the unredacted intelligence that underpinned the complaint ‘due to the assertion of executive privilege to portions’ of the intelligence itself,” the Journal’s report reads.

The citing of “executive privilege” as cause to keep the whistleblower complaint under lockdown, Gerstell said, was unusual, especially as justification to restrict access to intelligence information from the Gang of Eight.

“Executive privilege is rarely used as a reason to not give information to the Gang of Eight,” Gerstell told the Journal.

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}