Trump projected winner of the Iowa Caucus in the first contest of the presidential cycle

Trump projected winner of the Iowa Caucus in the first contest of the presidential cycle
MSNBC

Former President Donald Trump won the Iowa caucuses on Monday evening, CNN and MSNBC are reporting.

This comes as a long string of polling predicted the former president would carry the first in the nation contest with a considerable lead. The second place finisher is still too close to call as caucuses unfold throughout the evening.

The Iowa caucuses unfolded in one of the most brutal cold snaps on record during such a contest, with the wind chill plunging effective temperatures to sub-zero conditions, creating an obstacle for caucusgoers to get out and make their voices heard.

Trump spent the home stretch of the caucus urging his supporters to get out and take nothing for granted, even if it means their death. Eager to cement an early win, scoring over 50 percent would establish Trump as the inevitable nominee in 2024.

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R), who has seen his position in the primary polling gradually slip over the last few months, campaigned relentlessly in Iowa and tried to improve his standing by rolling out endorsements from prominent evangelical leaders, which Trump asserted, with no evidence, he obtained by paying them off.

The next contest in the cycle is the New Hampshire primary, where polls show Trump's rivals are considerably more competitive against him.

CNN political analyst and long-time Democratic strategist Paul Begala explained on Sunday that at its absolute best, about 25 percent of Iowa voters attend the caucuses.

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

Ivanka Trump's story about how she and Jared Kushner seemed to stumble upon the Albanian island where they want to build their $1.4 billion resort has a glaring hole, according to an ex-GOP operative.

Steve Schmidt couldn't help but laugh during his podcast and sing "Albania! Albania!" while he broke apart Ivanka's story about discovering the island while swimming in the Mediterranean Sea and then walking ashore to explore it.

"She got five words in," before she started lying, as he notes that "She would have stepped on her first landmine."

Schmidt explained with the help of his guest, Canadian podcaster Dean Blundell, that the Albanian island of Sazan is littered with landmines and ordnance.

On top of that, even though Ivanka says the island is in the Mediterranean, Blundell points out that it sits squarely "in the Adriatic" Sea.

Dead Air: Ivanka and Jared's special "discovery" by Steve Schmidt

Read on Substack

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

Pollsters are finding that swing voters are increasingly worried about a trending issue that's being overlooked.

Sarah Longwell, a Republican pollster and the publisher of The Bulwark, revealed in a podcast that swing voters are sharing a long list of concerns about AI data centers with pollsters.

The issue is "flying under the radar as a big picture issue for folks in D.C., but I hear it coming up all the time in focus groups," Longwell said. "I know some people are paying attention to this, but I mean, the voters talk about it all the time."

She played audio from a focus group interview with a Georgia small-town voter who described the impact of AI data centers as "devastating" and explained why she's bothered.

"I'm in the middle of a huge countywide fight against data centers," one voter said. "People are showing up about their water already, and about 40 people are being pushed out of their homes. It's just very personal."

The voter added that the fight against AI data centers "took the cake for me on whether or not I might vote. The only reason I'm going to is because maybe when I go to heaven, it'll count for something."

Another voter from Pittsburgh said that data centers are replacing "old mill sites," and "people are saying, 'We don't want them! We don't want them! We don't want them!'" Pittsburgh residents are opposed to the water consumption and pollution created by data centers, "but they just keep coming," he went on.

"It doesn't matter who the governor is, who the mayor is," he said. "They're all on board because it's job creation."

Longwell predicted, "Does this become a 2028 issue?" referring to the next presidential election. "I suspect it does."

The release of heavily redacted FBI records showing that a sheriff's deputy exchanged emails with would-be Trump assassin Thomas Crooks before the July 13, 2024 shooting — as Raw Story reported — sent MAGA world into overdrive this weekend, with commentators across the political spectrum demanding answers about what those emails said and why the documents remain concealed.

MeidasTouch, the liberal political media outlet, reached nearly 500,000 views with a post summarizing the Judicial Watch release, noting that "the records remain heavily redacted, concealing the nature of the communications."

Kaelan Deese, a political reporter, called it "a bombshell in their Thomas Crooks FOIA fight," and flagged the recovery of the gray remote device with an antenna from Crooks' pocket as a detail warranting further scrutiny.

Sara Gonzales, a conservative commentator at The Blaze, kept her focus on the emails: "The public deserves to know why and when Crooks contacted law enforcement."

Not everyone agreed the word "exchange" was warranted. Heather Champion, a conservative social media personality, urged precision: "I don't know if 'exchange' is correct but they did receive emails from Thomas Crooks before the July 13 Trump rally."

Left-wing podcaster Jimmy Dore, who has previously raised questions about the official account of the shooting, used the records to revisit a string of unresolved details. "So you're telling me there's some nefarious stuff surrounding the supposed assassination attempt of Trump?" he wrote. "You mean the one where the cops admitted to seeing him THREE TIMES in a restricted area with a scope and a backpack and yet never did anything? The one where a bunch of people in the crowd saw the shooter on the roof but no cops or secret service officers or sheriff's deputies or State troopers saw him?"

Shane Cashman, a journalist, offered the most pointed response, cataloging the same unanswered questions in a sardonic thread while warning against the leap to conspiracy. "There's literally nothing weird about Thomas Matthew Crooks emailing a deputy from Butler, PA before the assassination attempt," he wrote, before listing item after item: that Crooks practiced at the same range Homeland Security used, that local police and Secret Service spotted him with a rangefinder and texted about him for over an hour before he climbed the roof, that no Secret Service drones were flying that day while Crooks allegedly had one, that his house had no trash or silverware and his body was cremated ten days later before Congress could view it. "This is like when people say the CIA was shadowing Oswald before he, and he alone, shot JFK."

What nobody knows, still, is what those two emails said.

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}