Pandagon

Smile

I've just been reading this page over and over again today. It's like a YouTube video, but with words.

Atheists in the house, throw your hands in the air, 'cause you count now

Agnostics, non-religious and openly anti-religious people, too. Hey, I can't be the only person who had a "holy shit" moment when Obama recognized non-believers in his inaugural speech. Nor can I be the only one bracing myself for the wingnut outrage, since there's so much effort dedicated to vilifying atheists as the ultimate cancer eating away at our supposedly secular nation. Or maybe not. Perhaps even the most hardened wingnuts will realize that Obama included non-believers in the spirit of inclusiveness he's been trying to foster in his speeches for awhile now. I've really appreciated the way he pointedly includes "gay or straight" and "disabled or not" amongst other phrases that really draw attention not just to the diversity of this country, but to the diversity of oppression that must be overcome. Until he singled out non-believers in his growing list of People Who Count, though, I hadn't thought a whole lot about how much it sucks to be pointedly ignored by our politicians. Maybe in my brain I had thought that the ChristianMuslimJew list wasn't so much exclusionary as merely listing. After all, why include atheists and other non-believers, when the point is to not have an affiliation that requires a label? But by listing non-believers, Obama tacitly argued that the non-inclusion of non-believers in the past was a deliberate exclusion he clearly means to reject.

Keep reading... Show less

The Meaning

My high school did an awards ceremony every year, and there was a section that focused on graduating seniors. Part of the tradition was that the scholarships each senior received were listed in order, with the top scholarship-getter having theirs listed and then the total value of the scholarships announced. My junior year, there was a graduating senior, a black girl, who was the top scholarship recipient by far. The auditorium, predominantly white, filled with near-deafening applause for her. Afterwards, my mother and I were grabbing dinner, and she remarked that she wanted me to be in that spot the next year.

Keep reading... Show less

Yes we can

Keep reading... Show less

Sympathy for the Devil

It was almost a post title in search of a subject, wasn't it?

Keep reading... Show less

Dr. King's Dream - poll tested by CNN

A new CNN poll found that two-thirds of blacks believe Martin Luther King Jr.'s vision for race relations has been fulfilled.

Keep reading... Show less

The invisible, inaudible Bishop Gene Robinson

If you were channel surfing to catch HBO's inaugural concert coverage at the Lincoln Memorial where openly gay Episcopal Bishop Gene Robinson delivered the invocation, you didn't see him. Remember, this was the supposed salve on the wound to the LGBT community for the upcoming high-profile appearance of Rick Warren at the actual inauguration on Tuesday, which will be seen by millions and will float out there on YouTube in perpetuity. I had no illusions that Robinson's appearance would reach the same level of exposure as Warren's, but damn -- no broadcast of it at all? That's just freaking rich.

Keep reading... Show less

Diamond orgasms are a girl's best friend

Sometimes when I'm reading stories people send me about the pseudo-scientific claims of evolutionary psychologists,* I'm compelled to ponder the power of a media that can create a "science" almost strictly by its lonesome. Most sciences evolve from get-your-hands-dirty research-discovery-more-research cycles, but evo psych evolved to meet the need of the media to have a constant influx of stories justifying sexism through "science". Because it's a whole lot easier to get media attention to your work if your conclusions are that women are (fill in misogynist stereotype) and/or men are slaves to certain sexual signals that make it biologically impossible to treat women as they would someone they considered a full human being.** If you actually did some solid research with physical evidence of bona fide evolved traits in this species or that---which happens all the time, actually---there's very little chance of you getting an article celebrating your hard work in the mainstream media. If you do some half-assed research and draw some shaky conclusions that make a number of unlikely assumptions, but you confirm someone's misogynist beliefs, prepare for your phone to ring off the hook.

Keep reading... Show less

The End Of An Era

Piggybacking off of Amanda's post below, I'm just trying to think of how vicious and vituperative the commentary would have been if Clinton had left Bush with two wars, a tanked economy and a looming budget deficit in his first year that was bigger than any two combined years of deficits in our nation's history. It would have been saucy. And it also wouldn't have been couched in terms of Bush's challenges and his need to reconcile with his opposition.

Yes we can

Keep reading... Show less