Behold: Donald Trump the chosen son — and religious con

Last week, Donald Trump and company shared a messianic video about God sending the former president to save the world. Upon seeing this latest egocentric and propagandistic video about Donald Trump and his “true” believers, there have been at least three kinds of reactions.

As the Peabody Award-winning television producer and founding editor of Mediaite, Colby Hall, has written, his “creepy and messianic bit of messaging” has caused “many to cringe but others to fall to their knees in supplication.”

Many people, however, have also found the video to be comical if not satirical.

Perhaps many more persons have found it to be crazy, irrational or senseless.

ALSO READ: Pat Sajak wants you to help solve the puzzle of 'far-left propaganda'

So why would Trump and company post a “satirical” version of Paul Harvey’s famous “So God Made a Farmer” video in which Trump, whose religious bona fides are dubious at best, is playing the role of God’s son?

It all goes back to 2015 when political pundits, social commentators and just about everybody else, for that matter, were all surprised to learn that the lifelong amoral, pro-abortion, pro-homosexual Democratic campaign contributor had become the beloved favorite of the evangelical community.

This inversion of Trump’s personal biography involved a lot of hard effort and energy on the former president’s part, not to mention his promise to appoint conservative judges to low and high courts alike, and to do his best to fight against abortion, gender, civil and human rights for all.

But, ultimately, it also came down to arguably one of Trump’s greatest con jobs.

It all occurred on the 25th floor of Trump Tower in a meeting arranged by Michael Cohen, Trump’s former personal attorney and fixer and presently one of Trump’s leading antagonists. Cohen had called in an IOU from Jerry and Becki Falwell. At this meeting, Trump was able to play to the desires and vanities of some of the nation’s celebrity evangelicals, including Jerry Falwell Jr., Pastor Darrell Scott, and the Rev. Robert Jeffress. Trump convinced them that he had experienced a moment of conversion.

As some of those in attendance such as Johnnie Moore — the unofficial leader of Trump’s evangelical advisory board — had been quoted, “I absolutely believe he’s a born-again Christian.” Or, as the Rev. Franklin Graham, faith adviser to Trump’s White House and son of the late Billy Graham, stated, “I think there’s no question that he believes.”

As Cohen writes in his first book on Trump, Disloyal: A Memoir, a few minutes after all of the evangelical leaders had ritualistically laid their hands on Trump’s germophobic body and were descending from Trump Tower, Donald popped into Cohen’s office and had this to say, “Can you believe people believe that bulls—?”

In other words, Trump had learned that even though he never made a pretense to being a religious person before running for office beginning in 2015 that he was still able to establish an ardent support from evangelical voters both in 2016 and 2020. He even enjoyed more support than traditional conservative Republican candidates and presidents such as Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush had, vis-à-vis what we can only refer to as the “conversion” con.

Religious scholars tell us that this has less to do with the qualities of the candidates/presidents themselves and more to do with the changing identities of evangelical voters, per the New York Times.

In the past, being evangelical “suggested regular church attendance, a focus on salvation…Today, it is often used to describe a cultural and political identity” in which “Christians are considered a persecuted minority” and “traditional institutions are viewed skeptically,” including church.

ALSO READ: Birtherism is back. But these top GOPers are tired of Trump’s citizenship conspiracies.

Enter Donald Trump, “the savior” for those new white American voters who had become evangelical Christians during his presidency, according to a 2021 Pew Research Center analysis.

Relatedly: Trump, who understands the polls perhaps as well as most pollsters do, also understands the social construction of “alternative realities.” He’s also a master of the “art of the con,” or the interplay of three characteristics — gullibility, absurdity and believability — that he uses to captivate his cultish followers.

For instance, Trump knows that according to polls from November 2023 that more Republicans believe Trump is a person of faith compared to Joe Biden — a church-going Irish Catholic who has worn religion on his sleeve for most of his 81 years.

Trump also understands that throughout U.S. history the most successful con men have all relied on these three characteristics of their victims They range from Jefferson Randolph “Soapy” Smith II in the mid-19th century to Charles Ponzi in the 1920s to Bernie Madoff and Donald Trump himself more recently.

Ironically, even when the “jig is up” with 91 felony counts pending against the former president across four criminal cases, most of his “marks” (or victims), who have been deceived with the exception of those who may have been financially or emotionally ruined or imprisoned because of their fraudulent experience, will tend to excuse this fraudster-in-chief rationalizing or excusing his behavior one way or the other. Trump will fashion himself a victim of persecution by Biden and the imaginary Deep State, and most of his most ardent supporters will agree.

Meanwhile, there is the sardonic underside of Trump’s messianic messaging playing out in real time. I am referring specifically to the ongoing threats and violent crimes against agents of law enforcement, including the doxxing and swatting of those “enemies” of the savior Donald Trump, such as special counsel Jack Smith and Judge Tanya Chutkan.

All of which underscores that the upcoming criminal trials — whenever they finally occur — will not only be about various “crime scenes” surrounding Trump and his associates’ attempts to steal an election or engage in fraud from the past. They will also be about various “crimes in progress” such as obstructing justice or intimidating witnesses.

The only thing that will break this spell, as Trump fully knows as well from the polls, will be his inevitable criminal convictions by juries of his peers.

Ergo, the Trump legal team’s one and only procedural strategy or legal defense has been to delay, delay and delay these trials from occurring until after the November 2024 presidential election.

But with prosecutors pushing for swift justice and courts seemingly receptive to relatively speedy trials, Trump will need a serious prayer to get his wish.

Gregg Barak is an emeritus professor of criminology and criminal justice at Eastern Michigan University, co-founder of the Journal of White Collar and Corporate Crime, and the author of Criminology on Trump (2022) whose sequel, Indicting the 45th President: Boss Trump, the GOP, and What We can Do About the Threat to American Democracy will be published April 1.

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

President Donald Trump celebrated his record this week in endorsing winning candidates – endorsements typically made to oust his perceived GOP enemies – but in doing so, he has “essentially” turned himself into a “lame-duck” president devoid of any real power for the remainder of his term, one GOP Senate adviser has warned.

The adviser, who spoke with The Atlantic in its analysis published on Friday under the condition of anonymity, named the president’s “pursuit of retribution” as the key driver in what The Atlantic described as his “political decline,” a dynamic exacerbated by the shrinking number of people within Trump’s orbit willing to push back on his “personal priorities.”

“The problem is he has nobody around him who is willing to tell him, ‘Sir, the stuff you are talking about is not possible, and you are shooting yourself in the foot every time,’” the adviser said. “He essentially has lame-ducked himself in pursuit of retribution, and either the staff has failed to make a reasonable argument against these actions, or they have told him this and he is no longer listening.”

Trump’s endorsement record in the 2026 primary season has been 100%, as reported by Fox News, with all 101 U.S. House candidates backed by Trump winning their respective elections. Trump also has a 100% rate of success in endorsing Senate and gubernatorial candidates during the 2026 primary season.

In doing so, however, Trump has booted out Republicans that may have been willing to push back on Trump’s priorities that critics say appear out-of-step with the economic challenges facing most Americans – priorities such as the White House ballroom or his taxpayer-funded $1.7 billion “anti-weaponization” fund.

“For months now, Republicans have fervently hoped that Trump’s focus would shift to issues that could help the party in November,” The Atlantic’s analysis reads.

“Instead, he has been consumed with an Iran peace agreement and with his projects: new paint for the Reflecting Pool, a triumphal arch near Arlington National Cemetery, the conversion of a Washington, D.C., public golf course into championship links, and, of course, the ballroom. The economy? Not so much.”

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

A growing coalition of Republican senators is breaking ranks with President Donald Trump, threatening his legislative agenda in a narrowly divided chamber where he can ill afford to lose votes on critical issues.

Sens. Bill Cassidy (R-LA), Susan Collins (R-ME), Rand Paul (R-KY), Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), John Cornyn (R-TX), and Thom Tillis (R-NC) comprise what observers are calling the new "Gang of Six" — Republican dissenters who feel no obligation to the president and are willing to oppose him on key votes, wrote Wall Street Journal columnist Matthew Contenetti.

"This Gang of Six is unlike its predecessors," Contenetti wrote. "Earlier Senate gangs, from the Gang of 14 to the Gang of Eight, had quasi-official status. They were bipartisan. They capped membership. They tackled specific issues: judicial nominations in 2005, the budget in 2011 and immigration in 2013. They were proactive. Their goal was to resolve differences and advance legislation."

This informal group of dissident Republicans has no official structure, designated leader or fixed membership, and their goal will be to constrain their own party from overreach, he argued.

"Still, the trendline is clear," Contenetti wrote. "The gang is growing."

Trump's own actions helped create this bloc by threatening primary challenges against GOP incumbents and actively supporting challengers, and now the president has alienated senators who no longer fear electoral consequences. Lame-duck senators Cornyn and Tillis, having announced retirement plans, are freed from re-election concerns. When Trump endorsed challengers against Cassidy and Cornyn earlier this year, both incumbents defeated the primary threats and emerged emboldened.

The consequences are already visible, Contenetti wrote. On April 15, only Paul voted with Democrats on a resolution removing U.S. forces from hostilities against Iran. One month later, the same resolution passed 50-47, with Cassidy, Collins, Murkowski and Paul voting alongside Democrats – and the shift demonstrated the gang's growing influence.

"Republican anger at Trumpian excess delayed passage of an unrelated domestic priority," Contenetti wrote. "It was a reminder that when a president loses prestige in Congress, the effects aren’t isolated. They spill over."

GOP leaders delayed a vote on ICE and Border Patrol funding after some Republicans objected to a $1.776 billion Justice Department "weaponization fund" to compensate Biden-era lawfare victims, and Tillis called the fund a "payout pot for punks," exemplifying the party's internal divisions.

The timing of this rebellion poses significant challenges. Republicans face a crowded legislative calendar, including a $1.5 trillion defense budget and potential reconciliation legislation before midterm elections. More critically, should a Supreme Court vacancy occur, Trump can afford to lose only four Republican votes on any nominee — a margin the Gang of Six can easily breach.

In a 53-member Republican caucus, Trump has mathematically alienated more senators than he can afford to lose. His growing influence over the national party apparatus has paradoxically weakened his Senate control, creating the conditions for sustained opposition on nominations, spending bills and foreign policy decisions.

"This GOP Congress increasingly looks like the Republican congresses of recent second-term presidencies," Contenetti wrote.

"Will history repeat? Come January, Mr. Trump may find he no longer controls the agenda," he added. "But if the new Gang of Six continues to grow, he may lose control sooner than expected."

Tech billionaire Peter Thiel has relocated to Argentina as a potential Plan B, fueling concerns given his past remarks about a nuclear apocalypse.

The New York Times reports the PayPal and Palantir co-founder maintains a home in Buenos Aires, Argentina and has quietly purchased land in Uruguay near Argentina's eastern border, with observers speculating the property could include a nuclear bunker. He has reportedly also enrolled his children in local schools.

Author Joyce Carol Oates noted, if a nuclear war devastates North America, Argentina would hardly be affected. She speculated this could be a reason behind Thiel's move.

As a longtime supporter of President Donald Trump, Thiel contributed $1.25 million to his 2016 campaign and secured lucrative government contracts for Palantir during Trump's second administration, according to Mother Jones.

Journalist Pedro González wrote on X, “Peter Thiel is cooking up a plan B for fleeing the United States and hunkering down in Argentina, which I hope is an indicator of how bad he thinks it’s going to get for the new right and how dramatically JD Vance has failed as a viable political vehicle for Thiel’s agenda."

Watch the video below.


{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}