Busted: Dem lawmaker with military oversight is playing the market with a military supplier

Rep. Bill Keating (D-MA) is the latest member of a congressional armed services committee to personally invest in one of the nation’s top defense contractors while also overseeing the nation’s military affairs.

Keating disclosed purchasing between $15,001 and $50,000 worth of Boeing Co. corporate notes, according to a U.S. House financial document filed Sept. 28 and reviewed by Raw Story.

Keating is a member of the House Armed Services Committee which, in the U.S. House, “retains exclusive jurisdiction for defense policy generally, ongoing military operations, the organization and reform of the Department of Defense” and other military-focused responsibilities.

The Boeing purchase is “part of an IRA retirement account that is third-party managed, and investment decisions are made by that third party,” Keating spokesperson Chris Matthews told Raw Story in an email. “The positions of the investment firm do not influence the congressman's policy positions.”

Keating’s office declined to name who makes trades on the congressman’s behalf.

“Unfortunately, we've been advised not to disclose non-public information about the Congressman's personal accounts due to concerns surrounding cyber-security targeting,” Matthews said.

Matthews noted that Keating “does support a ban on member trading” and is a co-sponsor of the TRUST in Congress Act, a bipartisan bill — languishing in the House Committee on House Administration since January — that would notably prohibit members of Congress and their immediate family members from buying and selling stock.

That doesn’t cut it for Jessica Tillipman, associate dean for government procurement law studies at The George Washington University in Washington, D.C., who described Keating’s investment as a “raging conflict of interest.”

RELATED ARTICLE: ‘Undermining the integrity of Congress:’ Four more GOP lawmakers just violated a federal law

Tillipman noted that regardless of whether Keating personally made the trade, he’s attested to being aware that he owns a financial interest in a defense contractor. And as a member of the House Armed Services Committee, he has the power to influence legislation, conduct oversight and set spending priorities that affect Boeing — and therefore, his personal investments, she said.

“It’s crazy,” Tillipman told Raw Story. “You have a body that doesn’t want to self-regulate. They need to do better.”

Keating is hardly the only member of Congress to invest in defense contractors.

RELATED ARTICLE: GOP lawmaker breaks financial law after ripping opponent for breaking financial law

Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL), for one, recently purchased up to $250,000 worth of stock in telecommunications technology company Qualcomm Inc., a federal defense contractor, while serving on the U.S. Senate Committee on Armed Services and actively blocking hundreds of military nominations and promotions, congressional financial disclosures reviewed by Raw Story indicate.

Republican presidential candidate Tim Scott (R-SC) failed to properly disclose nearly a dozen stocks on his 2022 financial disclosure, Roll Call reported. That included up to $50,000 in Boeing Co. stock, according to a review of federal financial disclosures by Raw Story.

Raw Story also broke the news that Rep. Rick Allen (R-GA) was as much as six-and-a-half years late in reporting 136 stock and other financial transactions on an Aug. 10 disclosure — totaling between $3.05 million and $8.56 million. Up to $15,000 of that was invested in defense contractor CAE Inc.

While Keating publicly disclosed his Boeing investment within a 45-day window mandated by law, numerous members of Congress have violated the existing Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act of 2012 by failing to properly disclose otherwise legal stock and financial trades.

Keating himself violated the STOCK Act in 2022 with late trades, according to Insider.


For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

Political analysts were blown away on Thursday after Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem sat down for what seemed like a softball interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity.

Noem joined Hannity at a time when President Donald Trump's immigration forces were receiving significant criticism for the way they had conducted their operations in Minneapolis. Last weekend, a swarm of immigration agents killed 37-year-old ICU nurse Alex Pretti during a protest, an event that sparked bipartisan outrage toward the Trump administration. It was the second high-profile killing in Minneapolis in January. The other one involved Renee Good, 37, a mother who was killed by ICE agent Jonathan Ross just a few blocks from her home.

Then administration officials like Noem and White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller smeared Pretti by calling him a "domestic terrorist" and claiming he brandished a weapon at immigration officers, two claims that the administration has since distanced itself from.

Noem attempted to clean up her part of the mess on Hannity's show on Thursday, but it appears she may have made it worse.

Hannity asked Noem about why she thought it was appropriate to use the term "domestic terrorist."

"We're continuing to gather information, and the FBI leading this investigation is important to make sure that we talk about both of these situations appropriately," Noem said.

Analysts were blown away by Noem's comments and shared their reactions on social media.

"She is just an unbelievable piece of crap," political commentary account Spiro's Ghost posted on X.

"So @Sec_Noem, you publicly call the dead protester a “domestic terrorist” right away, and THEN you investigate to see if the person really was a domestic terrorist? That’s how you do things? That’s really ass-backwards," former Republican congressman Joe Walsh posted on X.

"Her answer is literally that she uses the term 'domestic terrorism' until they collect information that might indicate otherwise," Jonah Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Dispatch, posted on X.

"Noem believes it because she's a strung-out paranoid," political commentator Keith Olbermann posted on X.

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

There is one important difference between President Donald Trump's first and second administrations, and one former Trump insider believes it could bring down the White House.

Olivia Troye, who worked on national security issues during the first Trump administration, joined Sydney Blumenthal and Sean Wilentz on their "The Court of History" podcast to discuss what she sees as the main difference between the two Trump administrations. Troye argued that the absence of Trump's daughter, Ivanka Trump, and her husband, Jared Kushner, is the key difference, and one that threatens to upend the second administration.

Troye said Kushner was able to restrain Trump's now Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller because of the gravitas he had across the White House. There were other times when Kushner would be brought in to argue against more extreme policy proposals, she added.

"At times, Jared Kushner came off as reasonable in certain negotiations, especially when it came to foreign policy or international relations," Troye said.

Now that Ivanka and Jared are no longer around, Miller appears to be completely unbridled, Troye argued. She said Miller appears to have learned how to manipulate Trump to achieve his personal goals, like building the immigration regime that has put the Trump administration in legal jeopardy.

"The thing about this entire inner circle is there's so much blatant corruption that we can see now ... and everything that's happening here that I think that this is a circle of complete loyalty," Troye said. "And I think what they've seen with Steven Miller is that he is unwavering. He has a specific agenda that is aligned with Trump's."

Last weekend, Trump's immigration forces killed a 37-year-old ICU nurse named Alex Pretti during a protest in Minneapolis. Pretti had been subdued by officers before the first shots rang out. It was the second high-profile killing in Minneapolis in January.

The killings have sparked protests and calls for DHS Secretary Kristi Noem and Miller to resign or be fired.

President Donald Trump's administration has made up its mind regarding who will replace the outgoing Federal Reserve chairman, according to a new report.

Bloomberg reported on Thursday that the Trump administration is preparing to elevate Kevin Warsh to the Federal Reserve Chairman role once Jerome Powell's tenure ends in May. Warsh was a finalist for the role in 2017 when Trump initially picked Powell for the job. However, Trump and Powell have clashed on a number of issues since then, including the Federal Reserve's insistence on keeping interest rates high to combat inflation.

Trump is expected to officially announce Warsh as Powell's replacement on Friday.

CNN previously noted that Warsh "may be too independent" for Trump's liking.

Read the full report by clicking here.

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}