Raw Story files lawsuit against the Pentagon and Navy

WASHINGTON — Raw Story today filed a federal lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Defense and U.S. Department of the Navy following the agencies’ refusal to release records related to a former U.S. Marine and avowed neo-Nazi.

In May, Raw Story investigative reporter Jordan Green filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the U.S. Navy for “memoranda, emails, correspondence or other documents” related to the former Marine, Jordan Duncan, who the government has accused of participating in a white supremacist terror plot and possessing classified government documents.

The U.S. Navy denied Raw Story’s request and subsequent appeal of that denial, citing Duncan’s privacy interests. Duncan, who has been detained since his arrest in 2020, is charged with conspiracy to illegally manufacture and transport firearms and conspiracy to damage an energy facility.

RELATED ARTICLE: Neo-Nazi Marine Corps vet accused of plotting terror attack possessed classified military materials: sources

In its lawsuit, Raw Story accuses the Navy of failing to “conduct a reasonable search for records responsive to the request,” “issue a complete determination within the statutory deadline” and “produce all non-exempt records responsive to the request.”

Raw Story asks the United States District Court for the District of Columbia to declare that the departments of Defense and Navy violated the Freedom of Information Act and order them to “conduct a reasonable search for records and to produce the requested records promptly.”

The “basic function” of the Freedom of Information Act, according to the federal government, “is to ensure informed citizens,” which is “vital to the functioning of a democratic society.”

In a memorandum to government agencies last year, Attorney General Merrick Garland declared the Freedom of Information Act a “vital tool for ensuring transparency, accessibility, and accountability in government.” He directed government agencies to exercise a “presumption of openness.”

“In case of doubt, openness should prevail,” Garland wrote. “Moreover, agencies are strongly encouraged to make discretionary disclosures of information where appropriate.”

Raw Story argues that the government has fallen short of its own standard.

“The Biden administration is on notice that Raw Story will aggressively pursue the public’s right to know how its government is working or not working — up to and including legal action,” Raw Story Editor-in-Chief Dave Levinthal said. “Attorney General Garland has stated that agencies should ‘remove barriers to requesting and accessing government records.’ We encourage the government to take its own advice.”

Raw Story has retained the Chicago-based law firm Loevy & Loevy to assist with the lawsuit.

Matthew V. Topic, a nationally recognized Freedom of Information Act expert who has litigated hundreds of open government cases, is Raw Story’s lead attorney.

Founded in 2004, Raw Story is America’s largest independently-owned political news site.

This year, Raw Story significantly expanded its investigative and original reporting team and redoubled its commitment to government accountability journalism.

New hires include Levinthal, Executive Editor Adam Nichols and investigative reporters Alexandria Jacobson and Mark Alesia. Green, who joined Raw Story in 2021, recently won a Folio Award from the Fair Media Council for his investigative reporting on extremism in America.

Contact: editor@rawstory.com

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

President Donald Trump's fish joke stinks, according to a new political analysis.

Trump — during a Rose Garden dinner Thursday for hunting, fishing and outdoorsmen industry leaders — took aim at Bass Pro Shops owner Johnny Morris, a billionaire Trump frequently competes with on Forbes' annual list of the world's richest people.

"I could have banned fishing," Trump said. "Driven Johnny right the hell out of business. I think I'm gonna do that."

This line caught the ear of political commentator David Pakman, who on Saturday delved into his serious concern that the fish joke was fishy.

"Trump admitted he is drunk on power in a disgusting, swollen, orange rant," Pakman said. "This is an authoritarian classic."

Pakman explained his frustration stemmed from the not-too-subtle threat underlining Trump's joke, and argued the president wanted to be praised for not abusing his power.

"Saying you deserve praise for things you could have done," Pakman argued. "Authoritarians love that."

Trump's real message to his billionaire rival, and all those who tuned in to hear the speech, wasn't very funny, Pakman argued.

"Look at all the power I have," Trump was saying, according to Pakman. "I could destroy your business... Then you would come begging."

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

An Independent Senate candidate in Nebraska is gaining momentum by attacking Republicans with pun-loaded insults as President Donald Trump's cheap foreign beef sours rural voters on the GOP.

The campaign and fallout around it were detailed in a Saturday article by Politico, which found that Trump's plan to lower beef prices has enraged ranchers who usually vote Republican.

Senate candidate Dan Osborn is challenging Sen. Pete Ricketts (R-NE) with an ad this week that his campaign will spend at least six figures airing, according to Politico.

"This Congress, it's too chicken to stand up to the corporations who bought them off," Osborn says in the ad.

He also pledges to "cut the pork" and "take on the coastal shrimps in both parties," casting himself as an outsider unwilling to answer to Washington. Osborn told Politico that he is "pretty p---ed off" about how farmers keep getting treated.

Trump's plan would strip tariffs from a large volume of imported beef sold well below market price, according to Politico. Republicans across farm states have condemned the move, warning it will hollow out a domestic industry already under strain, Politico noted.

Ricketts fired back at his challenger in a statement and dismissed the ad as scripted messaging.

"Ranchers know the difference between a senator who delivers and a candidate reading a script," Ricketts said, per Politico.

Other Republicans have broken with the president as well. Rep. Ashley Hinson (R-IA) called Trump's beef plan a "bad idea," while Sen. Roger Marshall (R-KS) said the focus should be on growing the domestic cattle herd, Politico reported.

Sen. John Boozman (R-AR), who chairs the Senate Agriculture Committee, admitted producers in his home state are deeply frustrated.

"I think they understand what's going on," Boozman said, per Politico. "They're just not pleased with it."

Ranchers themselves argue the plan misses the real problem. Ben Menges, an Arizona cattle rancher, told Politico that Trump should target fuel costs instead.

"The best way that President Trump can do that is by lowering the cost of fuel, not by importing a bunch of beef," Menges said.

Many of President Donald Trump's senior aides were caught off guard by his abrupt move to ban several news outlets, Politico reported Saturday.

Politico, which was included in the ban, revealed that the directive landed while Chief of Staff Susie Wiles was out of town, and several senior staffers didn't know Trump would kick members of the press out of the White House until he announced it on Truth Social. Politico's reporting was based on three anonymous sources with knowledge of West Wing conversations.

Trump used Truth Social to bar CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the White House. He accused them of reporting "LIES when they're covering the President of the United States" and warned that there were "Other Fake News Media Outlets to follow."

The press shop was reportedly blindsided and unsure how to respond, with one aide simply pointing back to the president's post.

One person told Politico that Trump had tried to restrict certain outlets before, at one point even attempting to move the press into the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, but was talked out of it.

However, Trump's aides are treating the order as final. "It's real and permanent as far as POTUS is concerned," one person told Politico.

More than a dozen current and former Trump White House officials contacted by Politico were also puzzled by the development. Some reached out to the publication unsolicited to call the move a head-scratcher, according to Politico.

The outlets hit with the ban have all said that, as of Saturday, their staff were turned away from the White House. In a statement, MS NOW said its people "were denied access to the White House grounds" and vowed to "take any and all steps necessary to defend our First Amendment rights."

CNN said its "mission to report on the U.S. government will continue regardless of any attempts to restrict physical access to the White House."

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}