Raw Story files lawsuit against the Pentagon and Navy

WASHINGTON — Raw Story today filed a federal lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Defense and U.S. Department of the Navy following the agencies’ refusal to release records related to a former U.S. Marine and avowed neo-Nazi.

In May, Raw Story investigative reporter Jordan Green filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the U.S. Navy for “memoranda, emails, correspondence or other documents” related to the former Marine, Jordan Duncan, who the government has accused of participating in a white supremacist terror plot and possessing classified government documents.

The U.S. Navy denied Raw Story’s request and subsequent appeal of that denial, citing Duncan’s privacy interests. Duncan, who has been detained since his arrest in 2020, is charged with conspiracy to illegally manufacture and transport firearms and conspiracy to damage an energy facility.

RELATED ARTICLE: Neo-Nazi Marine Corps vet accused of plotting terror attack possessed classified military materials: sources

In its lawsuit, Raw Story accuses the Navy of failing to “conduct a reasonable search for records responsive to the request,” “issue a complete determination within the statutory deadline” and “produce all non-exempt records responsive to the request.”

Raw Story asks the United States District Court for the District of Columbia to declare that the departments of Defense and Navy violated the Freedom of Information Act and order them to “conduct a reasonable search for records and to produce the requested records promptly.”

The “basic function” of the Freedom of Information Act, according to the federal government, “is to ensure informed citizens,” which is “vital to the functioning of a democratic society.”

In a memorandum to government agencies last year, Attorney General Merrick Garland declared the Freedom of Information Act a “vital tool for ensuring transparency, accessibility, and accountability in government.” He directed government agencies to exercise a “presumption of openness.”

“In case of doubt, openness should prevail,” Garland wrote. “Moreover, agencies are strongly encouraged to make discretionary disclosures of information where appropriate.”

Raw Story argues that the government has fallen short of its own standard.

“The Biden administration is on notice that Raw Story will aggressively pursue the public’s right to know how its government is working or not working — up to and including legal action,” Raw Story Editor-in-Chief Dave Levinthal said. “Attorney General Garland has stated that agencies should ‘remove barriers to requesting and accessing government records.’ We encourage the government to take its own advice.”

Raw Story has retained the Chicago-based law firm Loevy & Loevy to assist with the lawsuit.

Matthew V. Topic, a nationally recognized Freedom of Information Act expert who has litigated hundreds of open government cases, is Raw Story’s lead attorney.

Founded in 2004, Raw Story is America’s largest independently-owned political news site.

This year, Raw Story significantly expanded its investigative and original reporting team and redoubled its commitment to government accountability journalism.

New hires include Levinthal, Executive Editor Adam Nichols and investigative reporters Alexandria Jacobson and Mark Alesia. Green, who joined Raw Story in 2021, recently won a Folio Award from the Fair Media Council for his investigative reporting on extremism in America.

Contact: editor@rawstory.com

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

Rep. Max Miller was facing public backlash on Tuesday after a heated interview with CNN anchor Jake Tapper.

Tapper pressed Miller, who has been facing allegations of abusing his ex-wife and 2-year-old daughter, to respond to serious questions about the accusations as calls for him to resign were mounting.

Political and media experts weighed in on Miller's reactions during the conversation.

"Wildly desperate defense from Miller to tie his own allegations to Trump’s and claim staying in the race despite them is 'a quality the American people cherish,'" Vanity Fair Washington correspondent Aidan McLaughlin wrote on X.

"Absolutely crazy interview. Check it out," writer Parker Molloy posted on Bluesky.

"Honestly can't stress enough, as a former family law attorney, how depressingly common Max Miller's behavior and words are, right down to the petty fixation on custody procedure and rules when faced with allegations of shocking violence," Lisa Needham, contributor at Daily Kos, wrote on Bluesky.

"Rep. Max Miller's interview with Jake Tapper was one of the most self-destructive things I've ever witnessed on cable news," journalist Aaron Rupar wrote on Bluesky.

"Rep. Max Miller floundering to keep his assertions straight while defending himself to Jake Tapper," Rolling Stone politics reporter Nikki McCann Ramírez wrote on Bluesky.

Rep. Max Miller floundering to keep his assertions straight while defending himself to Jake Tapper

[image or embed]
— Nikki McCann Ramírez (@nikkimcr.bsky.social) August 4, 2026 at 2:15 PM


THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) has changed his mind on the Senate filibuster — once again.

Earlier this year, the longtime senator broke from his past commitment to protecting the controvrsial Senate rule, saying he would support changing the filibuster to pass the SAVE America Act, President Donald Trump's package of voting restrictions. He did this hoping to assuage angry MAGA followers who were flocking to his rival, state Attorney General Ken Paxton, and perhaps get Trump's endorsement — neither of which happened.

Now, with Cornyn denied re-nomination and on his way out of Congress, he told the conservative National Review he once again opposes alteration to the filibuster rules.

“I said I was open to changes in the filibuster, but I was intentionally not very specific,” said Cornyn. “I’m happy to have that conversation, but I’m not prepared to vote to overturn the filibuster at this time.”

Trump, for his part, has repeatedly demanded that Republicans scrap the filibuster to make passing his agenda easier.

A critical mass of Republicans have stood firm against this, because historically, the filibuster obstructs far more pieces of the Democratic Party's agenda than the Republican Party's.

Paxton defeated Cornyn in large part by pressing him on the SAVE America Act, and even went so far as to say he would drop out of the race if the legislation passed before the primary happened — a subtle way of pinning the blame for its failure on Cornyn, who was already serving in the Senate.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche's chance of securing his role permanently is hanging on by a thread after a GOP senator came out against him.

On Tuesday, the Senate Judiciary Committee voted to advance Blanche's nomination as Attorney General to the full Senate, but not before deals with two GOP senators had to be cut to secure the vote. Now, Blanche has to secure enough Senate votes to secure the AG role, but Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) announced she would not be voting in his favor, according to reports.

"While I believe Mr. Blanche is a capable lawyer, the Department of Justice has become increasingly political," Collins said in a statement. "Mr. Blanche has taken several actions that have further eroded the Department's independence, and that is the basis for my vote to oppose his confirmation."

Blanche can only afford to lose two votes in the Senate if he wants to become President Donald Trump's AG, according to reporting by CNN and Axios, which noted that Sen. Mitch McConnell's lingering absence is also narrowing his margin for error.

During the past few months, Blanche had to battle to secure the support of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) over the weekend said that he won't confirm Blanche after Trump posted on Truth Social that he'll resurrect the $1.776 billion anti-weaponization fund, which critics worry will pay Trump allies and Jan. 6ers. Tillis called it a "payout for punks."

However, Tillis ended up voting to advance Blanche. Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) also made it unclear whether he would vote for Blanche, and after the vote on Blanche was delayed last week, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) said he would work to shore up the votes to advance Blanche. Ultimately, Cornyn and Tillis voted to advance Blanche.

Now, Blanche can only afford to lose one more vote. Axios noted that Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) and Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) haven't said how they will vote on Blanche's confirmation, though Murkowski's state has seen a recent windfall in settlements with Blanche's Department of Justice.

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}