Unemployment wasn't keeping people from work as Republicans claimed — data shows something else could be happening

Unemployment wasn't keeping people from work as Republicans claimed — data shows something else could be happening
Caregiver (Shutterstock)

Republicans promoted the conspiracy theory that Americans weren't going back to work amid the COVID-19 pandemic because they were too busy living the comfortable life on the U.S. dime. Data now shows that they were wrong.

The New York Times reported Sunday that in Missouri when federal pay for the unemployed was scrapped, workers still were being choosy. Gov. Mike Parson (R) proudly proclaimed that his state would be among the first to kill unemployment benefits. It still hasn't worked, however.

"Work-force development officials said they had seen virtually no uptick in applicants since the governor's announcement, which ended a $300 weekly supplement to other benefits," said the report. "And the online job site Indeed found that in states that have abandoned the federal benefits, clicks on job postings were below the national average."

It's early on in the post-pandemic era, but thus far, the GOP claims appear to be false.

"One way you might define normal is when employers and workers have the same idea of what an appropriate package looks like, and then the issue is matching up the people with the jobs," said University of Maryland economist Katharine G. Abraham. "Clearly part of the problem now is that what employers and what workers think is out of whack."

With 9.3 million out of work, surely there would be crowds to beat down the door. But some think it isn't about the jobs but the high cost of other things that make work seem impossible. With fewer child care options, already high costs are soaring. If someone makes less money working and paying for child care, then it makes more sense to stay at home.

For some, the high cost of health and safety is the factor. Work might be great, but if there's no health insurance in the position and they contract COVID from unvaccinated co-workers or customers, they could hurt family members or their children and be bankrupt from health expenses.

Angelic Hobart, a client service manager at American Staffing told the Times that people now know how in-demand they are and are better able to negotiate for higher pay, better benefits and things most good companies provide.

"And I think that is being taken advantage of," said Hobart. But public benefits have made people "very complacent."

It's an ironic statement, given the cost of living demanded of American families.

"In St. Louis, a single person needs to earn $14 an hour to cover basic expenses at a minimum standard," reported the Times citing M.I.T.'s living-wage calculator. "Add a child, and the needed wage rises just above $30. Two adults working with two children would each have to earn roughly $21 an hour."

So, many workers have felt that they were the ones being taken advantage of by companies, now it appears they're refusing to be part of that system.

Of the 34 employers and agencies at a Maryland job fair, many were willing to increase pay by $1 an hour. But as one woman saw it, the wages were still too low.

"They're offering $10, $12, $13," said Elodie Nohone who earns $15 an hour as a visiting caregiver. "There's no point in being here."

Her boyfriend, Damond Green was in a similar boat. He works two jobs, but even his job at McDonald's pays $15 an hour.

"I want to do something where my work is appreciated," he said, "and pay me decent."

While things might change, it appears, at least for now, the free market is delivering a harsh blow to low-paying employers.

Read the full report from the New York Times.

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

Musician Nicki Minaj urged Americans to “vote red” Saturday during an interview on Fox News with Lara Trump, prompting critics to point out that the Caribbean-born star can’t cast a ballot herself.

“I want you guys to do your research, see what candidates are in your area, and just give it a few minutes or an hour, research them, and then make a decision,” Minaj said. “You guys are so blessed to be able to vote, and you have to, more than ever now, take advantage of that ability. Please — and vote red!”

Minaj quickly cracked up and tossed out a joking “nah,” but Trump wasn't letting her walk it back.

“Amen!” Trump said. “I feel like we can end it there. Great sales pitch to the voters of America! I love it.”

As noted by countless critics, Minaj is not a U.S. citizen, having immigrated to the United States — admittedly as “an illegal immigrant” — from Trinidad and Tobago, a twin-island nation in the Caribbean. Minaj has claimed to have been gifted a Trump Gold Card — the Trump administration initiative that offers pathways to U.S. citizenship for $1 million — but said earlier this year that she is still “finalizing” her “citizenship paperwork.”

Other critics pointed to her husband and brother, Kenneth Petty and Jelani Maraj, respectively. Petty is a registered sex offender, having been convicted of attempted rape in 1995, and also spent “seven years in prison after pleading guilty to manslaughter in 2006,” People reported. Maraj is also a registered sex offender, having been convicted of sexual assault against an 11-year-old girl.

“Nicki Minaj’s husband is a convicted sex offender, and her brother is a pedophile. That’s why she fits in so well with the MAGA crowd,” wrote Jamie Bonkiewicz, a Nebraska-based political activist who received a visit from the U.S. Secret Service over an online post about former White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt.

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

Elected Democrats—and even the Senate’s top Republican appropriator—blasted President Donald Trump late Friday for rescinding nearly $1 billion in congressionally approved spending that the White House deemed “wasteful and harmful” through a legally contested process.

In a statement announcing what was targeted, the administration celebrated funding cuts for what it called “pro-illegal immigration programs,” a “nefarious” Department of Justice subagency, a program that “propagates America Last climate alarmism,” an office that promotes diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI)—or “discrimination, and radical woke ideologies”—and more.

House Budget Committee Ranking Member Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.) responded in a statement that “Donald Trump knows he can’t get these cuts through Congress, so he is illegally making them through the back door.”

“Trump’s actions are a blatant attack on Congress’ constitutional power of the purse,” he added. “It is exactly why we need to pass my Congressional Power of the Purse Act and stop any president from illegally overriding Congress.”

The Associated Press reported that “under federal law, Congress has 45 days to review the president’s proposed spending cuts before they take effect. But Trump made that all but impossible by announcing them with just five days left in the federal fiscal year and the House out of session through the November election.”

Senate Budget Committee Ranking Member Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) stressed on social media that “a pocket rescission is an illegal line-item veto. It is the president saying that he and he alone will convert a bipartisan spending bill (that has been signed into law) into a partisan spending bill. He is canceling the lines of spending he doesn’t like.”

“This violates the core separation of powers embedded in our Constitution in which it is the Congress, not the president, who decides what programs are designed and at what level they are funded,” he continued. “Republican colleagues said they would never let this happen. Well, here it is. They should ask themselves: ‘How would I like to have a Democratic president canceling out the Republican flavored programs he or she doesn’t like in a bipartisan spending bill that has been signed into law?’ If they have any integrity or any spine, they will join us in ending this practice.”

Noting that the cuts will impact everything from critical health research, to combating the international illicit narcotics trade, Senate Appropriations Committee Vice Chair Patty Murray (D-Wash.) declared: “This is theft from the American people, plain and simple. These are funds Congress has delivered on a bipartisan basis and should be helping people—not cut off by a president more focused on building a ballroom than investing in families.”

She specifically called out Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director Russell Vought—a co-author of Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation-led blueprint for a right-wing overhaul of the federal government, who was recently condemned as an “unelected shadow president” by the House Democrat who introduced impeachment articles against him. According to Murray, “Every Republican who voted for these bills should be furious because Vought is saying their votes don’t count.”

Murray also pointed out that during negotiations for the recently enacted stopgap spending legislation, “Democrats fought to include language to prevent the Trump administration from once again usurping Congress’ power—but for the second time in a year, Republicans refused to take common sense action and prevent this from happening.”

“While Trump spends tax dollars on ads promoting himself, Congress needs to reassert its powers to help people, and it’s past time Republicans join us in that fight,” she argued. “Russ Vought’s message to Congress is that your votes don’t count, and your laws are optional. It is now time for my Republican colleagues who said they would never let this happen to stand up and join us to stop this, and remind this administration this is not how this works.”

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) emphasized the impact of the administration’s move, saying that “Trump is gleefully eviscerating programs and protections that help hardworking American families live a safe and healthy life, all while he continues to punish them with skyrocketing gas and grocery prices.”

“With this rescissions package, the Trump administration is illegally stripping nearly $1 billion in critical funding that supports kids, K-12 students, small businesses, and health and clean air research,” he highlighted. “Americans are crying out for relief.”

“Instead of ending his Iran War and tariff chaos that are driving up costs, Trump is rolling out the red carpet for our adversaries while stealing funds meant to help American families,” he added. “Senate Democrats will challenge Trump’s illegal cuts at every turn and continue the fight to help American families, lower healthcare costs and secure our communities.”

The administration’s rescission announcement came less than six weeks away from the midterm elections. Democrats aim to win majorities, while Trump’s Republican Party is fighting to keep control of both chambers of Congress. One of the nationally watched races is that of Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine).

As some congressional Republicans cheered the Friday action, Collins put out a statement denouncing it. She said that “without warning or consultation, Congress just received an $810 million package of pocket rescissions from the administration,” which she called OMB's most recent attempt “to undermine Congress’ constitutional power of the purse.”

“This move shows that OMB intentionally withheld these funds for months to execute this unlawful cancellation of appropriations that were approved on a bipartisan basis and signed into law,” Collins continued. “Not only is the delay itself an impoundment that was not reported to Congress, but also it is a usurpation of Congress’ appropriations powers. OMB is an agency of the executive branch. It does not get to decide which programs are worth funding.”

“The independent Government Accountability Office has concluded that pocket rescissions are unlawful and not permitted by the Impoundment Control Act,” she added. “Any effort to rescind appropriated funds without congressional approval is a clear violation of the law. I will work with my colleagues to address these illegal actions.”

While some Democrats had called for their Republican colleagues to make such promises, Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) fired back at Collins on social media, writing that “Senate Republicans had chance after chance to stop Trump’s illegal seizure of taxpayer money. Time after time, they pledged allegiance to Trump instead of to citizens. And he’ll keep rolling them if the Senate doesn’t change hands.”

So did Troy Jackson, the former Democratic Maine Senate president running to unseat Collins. He said that “Susan Collins voted for Trump’s pick to lead the OMB. Now she’s surprised he’s doing exactly what he promised to do? She’s the appropriations chair who voted with Trump 96% of the time. Expressing concern isn’t enough. Mainers see through the bull----.”

While speaking at the Texas Tribune Festival in Austin on Saturday, Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA) sparked laughter and jeers from the audience after mistakenly calling himself a “lifelong Republican.”

“Freudian slip by Fetterman?” asked Preston Hill, a conservative commentator and writer, in a social media post on X.

Fetterman was featured at the event as its closing keynote speaker and was asked by a member of the audience why he didn’t “become an independent” given the mounting accusations that he’s shifted toward the right and embraced President Donald Trump.

“Because I’m a lifelong Republican,” Fetterman said.

The moderator of the event, CBS News’ Major Garrett, corrected Fetterman by saying, “Democrat.”

Fetterman briefly stuttered before throwing his head back and laughing, sparking both laughter and jeers from the crowd.

“That’s a moment right there, that’s clippable, ladies and gentlemen!” Garrett said. “Circulate! Internet, spin wildly!”

Fetterman agreed that the moment would likely spread wildly online.

“I guarantee you that’s gonna break through, that’ll get clipped,” Fetterman said. “Yeah, I’m a lifelong Democrat though.”

Author Don Winslow argued that Fetterman “finally spoke the truth” with his slip-up, and Russell Foster, a former Democratic congressional nominee from Texas, argued Fetterman’s comment was telling.

“I don't think in all my years I have ever slipped up and said that I was a lifelong Republican. That's not something someone misspeaks,” Foster wrote in a social media post on X.

Fetterman’s standing among Pennsylvania Democrats has cratered since he took office in 2023, with the Pennsylvania Democrat having clashed with his own party on a number of issues, including Israel, the Iran war and border security. This month, Fetterman even made a video cameo at the GOP's midterm convention, pledging to work with Trump to protect Pennsylvania's steel industry.

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}