'Romeo and Juliet' child actors sue over 1968 nude scene

'Romeo and Juliet' child actors sue over 1968 nude scene
Leonard Whiting and Olivia Hussey, seen here in 2018, claim in their suit that the nude scene in 'Romeo and Juliet' was exploitative(AFP)

The actors who played star-crossed lovers Romeo and Juliet in Franco Zeffirelli's 1968 film are suing Paramount Pictures for child abuse over their brief nude scene, their lawyer said Tuesday.

Olivia Hussey was 15 and Leonard Whiting 16 when they starred in the Oscar-winning version of William Shakespeare's tragedy.

The actors, now both in their 70s, claim in a suit filed in Santa Monica last week that a bedroom scene in which buttocks and bare breasts are visible amounts to sexual exploitation by movie studio Paramount, and that the company was guilty of distributing nude pictures of adolescents.

The suit says Zeffirelli -- who died in 2019 -- cajoled them into performing the scene, telling them without it "the picture would fail", having originally insisted there would be no actual nudity, with both actors covered by flesh-colored underwear.

"Defendants were dishonest and secretly filmed the nude or partially nude minor children without their knowledge, in violation of the state and federal laws regulating indecency and exploitation of minors for profit," the suit says.

The complaint, which claims damages of hundreds of millions of dollars, says the two performers have suffered mental anguish and emotional distress in the five-and-a-half decades since the film came out, and that both had only limited professional success in its wake.

Both won Golden Globes for their performances.

Solomon Gresen, representing the actors, told AFP the years that have elapsed since the film was made did not lessen the damage done, especially as it has been re-released since.

"(Paramount) have images that they know are images of underage nudity that should be removed from the film. That would be the beginning for sure," he said.

"Sexually explicit images of children are bad and they shouldn't be tolerated.

"If they were under 16, then they're under 16. It's a sexually explicit image of an underage person, it should be forbidden."

December 31 was the final date for historical child sex abuse lawsuits to be filed in California under a temporary waiver of the statutes of limitation.

A raft of claims were lodged during the waiver, including one last week by a woman who says she was the teenage lover of Aerosmith frontman Steven Tyler in the 1970s.

There was no immediate response from Paramount to AFP's request for comment.

Variety reported that during its 2018 interview with Hussey, she had defended the nude scene, which she insisted Zeffirelli had done tastefully.

"It was needed for the film," she told the outlet at the time.

© 2023 AFP

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

Political observers bashed Paul Ingrassia, a right-wing podcaster whom President Donald Trump nominated to lead the Office of the Special Counsel, after he withdrew his nomination on Tuesday.

Ingrassia has a long history of making incendiary statements, some of which recently came to light when Politico reported on a series of text messages he sent. In one message, Ingrassia called for the federal Martin Luther King Jr. holiday to be "tossed to the 7th circle of hell." In another, he claimed to have a"Nazi streak" in him.

Ingrassia's lawyer has denied the authenticity of the texts. Even so, Ingrassia withdrew his nomination.

"I will be withdrawing myself from Thursday’s HSGAC hearing to lead the Office of Special Counsel because, unfortunately, I do not have enough Republican votes at this time," Ingrassia posted in a statement on X. "I appreciate the overwhelming support that I have received throughout this process and will continue to serve President Trump and this administration to Make America Great Again!"

Observers bashed Ingrassia's statement on social media.

"This isn’t anywhere near enough. Trump has to fire him immediately," Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) posted on X.

"We're sure your mom is devastated :/," The Democrats wrote on X.

"Tough day for sons of boy moms," Marcus Robinson, senior spokesperson for The Democrats, posted on X.

"Given his long history of inflammatory/outrageous posts, a question: Did the administration not know about these statements when he was nominated, or did they know about them and nominate him anyway?" journalist Paul Farhi posted on X.

"I was looking forward to serving my country in this new role. Unfortunately I turned out to be a Nazi, according to me. So I'm bagging on the nomination hearing. Since I'm not good at writing sentences in English it's not clear whether I'm bagging the hearing or my nomination," Josh Marshall, founder of Talking Points Memo, posted on X.


THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

A CNN panelist on Tuesday night called President Donald Trump's pursuit of a $230 million payment from the Justice Department as restitution for the previous prosecutions "disgusting" and "tone-deaf."

CNN political commentator Ana Navarro joined "NewsNight with Abby Phillip" on Tuesday and discussed Trump's attempt to get the Justice Department to pay him. According to reports, the two people who would be responsible for approving the payment are both lawyers who either represented Trump or one of his allies.

The Justice Department also did not clarify whether the two lawyers would recuse themselves from the case, if Trump officially asks for payment, according to reports.

Navarro said Trump's seeking payment from the Justice Department is "tone-deaf," given that many Americans are unable to pay for rent and groceries.

"This is just one more stripe on the tiger," she said. "You've got the crypto grift. You've got Melania getting paid $40 million from Amazon for a documentary. You've got Melania selling Christmas ornaments. You've got Trump hawking watches. You've got the $400 million jet from Qatar. I mean, the list is long and with no oversight."

"The tone deafness here is disgusting," she continued. "But at the same time, it is the level of corruption that has almost become normal because of the lack of Republican willingness to be the oversight on what is happening."

The conservative Wall Street Journal editorial board told young MAGA fans on Tuesday that the failure of the Trump administration to confirm right-wing podcaster Paul Ingrassia to the Office of the Special Counsel should serve as a "potent" warning for those who seek to emulate the extreme behavior he displayed.

On Monday, Politico reported on a series of leaked text messages of Ingrassia's, where he denounced the federal Martin Luther King Jr. holiday and said he had "a bit of a Nazi streak" in him. Ingrassia's lawyers have denied the authenticity of the texts.

Ingrassia faced a steep confirmation process in Congress because of his history of making incendiary statements. Even so, the process seemed to give Republicans a "useful" opportunity to denounce that kind of behavior within the party, according to the editorial.

"At least four Republican Senators have come out against confirming Paul Ingrassia to lead the Office of Special Counsel, after the publication of odious text messages he apparently sent," the editorial board wrote. "Beyond the failure of vetting, it would be useful if President Trump made clear that this kind of garbage isn’t wanted in his MAGA political movement."

"The demise of Mr. Ingrassia’s nomination would show that the GOP won’t tolerate his brand of extremist political behavior and rhetoric," the editorial continued. "It could also be a potent lesson for MAGA youth in what not to do."

Read the entire report by clicking here.

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}