'Romeo and Juliet' child actors sue over 1968 nude scene

'Romeo and Juliet' child actors sue over 1968 nude scene
Leonard Whiting and Olivia Hussey, seen here in 2018, claim in their suit that the nude scene in 'Romeo and Juliet' was exploitative(AFP)

The actors who played star-crossed lovers Romeo and Juliet in Franco Zeffirelli's 1968 film are suing Paramount Pictures for child abuse over their brief nude scene, their lawyer said Tuesday.

Olivia Hussey was 15 and Leonard Whiting 16 when they starred in the Oscar-winning version of William Shakespeare's tragedy.

The actors, now both in their 70s, claim in a suit filed in Santa Monica last week that a bedroom scene in which buttocks and bare breasts are visible amounts to sexual exploitation by movie studio Paramount, and that the company was guilty of distributing nude pictures of adolescents.

The suit says Zeffirelli -- who died in 2019 -- cajoled them into performing the scene, telling them without it "the picture would fail", having originally insisted there would be no actual nudity, with both actors covered by flesh-colored underwear.

"Defendants were dishonest and secretly filmed the nude or partially nude minor children without their knowledge, in violation of the state and federal laws regulating indecency and exploitation of minors for profit," the suit says.

The complaint, which claims damages of hundreds of millions of dollars, says the two performers have suffered mental anguish and emotional distress in the five-and-a-half decades since the film came out, and that both had only limited professional success in its wake.

Both won Golden Globes for their performances.

Solomon Gresen, representing the actors, told AFP the years that have elapsed since the film was made did not lessen the damage done, especially as it has been re-released since.

"(Paramount) have images that they know are images of underage nudity that should be removed from the film. That would be the beginning for sure," he said.

"Sexually explicit images of children are bad and they shouldn't be tolerated.

"If they were under 16, then they're under 16. It's a sexually explicit image of an underage person, it should be forbidden."

December 31 was the final date for historical child sex abuse lawsuits to be filed in California under a temporary waiver of the statutes of limitation.

A raft of claims were lodged during the waiver, including one last week by a woman who says she was the teenage lover of Aerosmith frontman Steven Tyler in the 1970s.

There was no immediate response from Paramount to AFP's request for comment.

Variety reported that during its 2018 interview with Hussey, she had defended the nude scene, which she insisted Zeffirelli had done tastefully.

"It was needed for the film," she told the outlet at the time.

© 2023 AFP

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

A former attorney in the Department of Justice slapped some GOP senators with damning allegations during a new podcast interview on Sunday.

Liz Oyer, the former pardon attorney for the Trump administration, told Bill Kristol of The Bulwark on a new episode of "Bulwark on Sunday" that she has been receiving death threats since she spoke out against Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche last week during his confirmation hearing. Oyer described the behavior of some GOP senators, such as Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) and Eric Schmitt (R-MO), as "vitriolic" and "dangerous," and shared how they impacted her son, who was in attendance.

"The attacks were just so vitriolic and disingenuous that my 17-year-old son, who was with me at the hearing, said to me afterward, 'They made it sound like you murdered those people,' and he was genuinely really upset. He's a young adult. He's going to be a senior in high school. Just to hear the way that two United States senators were talking about the issue and talking about me and my role in it, I think it was very confusing to him how that could be presented in that light."

Oyer told senators during the hearing that Blanche was unqualified for the Attorney General position that President Donald Trump nominated him for, and that Blanche has used "law enforcement powers to pursue petty grudges harbored by the president."

In response, senators like Hawley and Schmitt began attacking Oyer for some of the pardon decisions she had signed off on.

"It really was just so disingenuous, and actually it's really dangerous," Oyer said. "That's the other thing that bothers me about it. I've literally been getting death threats since that happened."

"It takes a toll the way that this political discourse is escalating under Donald Trump and people like Josh Hawley and Eric Schmitt egging it on," she continued. "It makes it impossible to have a legitimate conversation about issues without putting yourself and your family at risk."

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

President Donald Trump let fly another claim about the war against Iran that outraged observers on Sunday.

Trump was greeted by reporters at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland after he returned home from attending the World Cup Final in New York earlier in the day. During a quick press conference, the president was asked about the progress of the war. His answers seemed to upset several people who watched the event.

"Mr. President, you said at the start of the war that it would be four or five weeks ..." the reporter began, shouting over the humming engines of the presidential helicopter, Marine One.

"Well, this is a far bigger job that we're doing," Trump interjected. "We were doing a little job, stopping them from having a certain capability. Now, we're just ending it. So, it's really not the same thing."

Trump's comments horrified political analysts and observers, who shared their reactions on social media.

"Pete Hegseth has convinced this demented moron that he can “win” if he just sends ground troops and uses the rest of our munitions. This is so psycho," Jim Stewartson, a political commentator and writer, posted to his more than 151,000 followers on X.

"He also said 53 times that the Ukraine war would end 24 hours into taking office," Dan Koh, a former Biden administration staffer who is running for Congress in Massachusetts, told his more than 25,000 followers on X.

"What a dumb and horrible human being. Not a political message by me. Just an objective fact," Ben Meiselas, founder of MeidasTouch, posted to his 285,000 followers on X.

"The 'far bigger job' is un-f------ the Strait he messed up for no reason," the liberal outlet The Tennessee Holler posted to its 302,000 followers on X.

The Wall Street Journal's conservative editorial board sharply criticized President Donald Trump on Sunday for trying to kill a story that is arguably doing him a favor.

The Trump administration has been trying to discredit a New York Times story about the president switching from his Qatari-gifted Air Force One to the traditional one while in the United Kingdom on his return from a summit in Turkey. In response to the story, the Trump Department of Justice has subpoenaed the reporters in an attempt to get them to reveal their sources.

In a new editorial, the WSJ editors took Trump to task for attacking the reporters and the story, arguing that it could be a boon to his effort to sell the American people on the Iran war.

"The White House hasn’t confirmed the Air Force One switch, but it hasn’t denied the story either," the editorial reads in part. "Notably, the Justice Department has subpoenaed New York Times writers who reported the story to disclose their sources. That’s harassment against the press that won’t make the U.S. safer. The story arguably did Mr. Trump a favor by reminding the public that Iran’s regime hasn’t turned over a 'new leaf,' to borrow Vice President JD Vance’s term."

The editors also argued that the story shows Trump is taking threats against his life seriously, as he should. The same can't be said for some people who were once close to Trump, like John Bolton, his former national security advisor.

The Trump administration has prosecuted Bolton for mishandling classified documents, and the DOJ is seeking a sentence of up to five years, the editorial noted. That kind of "raw vindictiveness" could leave blood on the administration's hands, the editors warned.

"Mr. Trump has the Secret Service to protect him, but these other public servants don’t," the editorial reads. "They have to do without security or pay for it themselves, as Mr. Bolton has. Let’s hope Judge Chuang dispenses with the Justice Department’s unjust prison demand and issues a suspended sentence."

"As for Mr. Trump, he’s already exacted revenge against his former adviser with the prosecution and fine," it adds. "He knows Iran has a kill 'list' that includes him and his advisers. If Mr. Bolton is killed in prison, the President and his Justice Department will be partly responsible."

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}