Top Stories Daily Listen Now
RawStory
RawStory

All posts tagged "dan sullivan"

Top Republicans plead ignorance on Trump voting promise

WASHINGTON — Senate Republicans say they can hardly imagine former President Donald Trump trying to stay in power for a third term if he’s reelected for a second in November — even after Trump has twice suggested he’d become a president for life.

“I have no idea what you're talking about,” Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-AK) told Raw Story. “I'm sure it's not as worrisome as some of you guys are making it out to be.”

ALSO READ: We asked 10 Republican senators: ‘Is Kamala Harris Black?’ Things got weird fast.

Trump recently told attendees at a Turning Point Action event in West Palm Beach, Fla.: "Christians, get out and vote, just this time. You won't have to do it anymore. Four more years, you know what, it will be fixed, it will be fine, you won't have to vote anymore, my beautiful Christians."

Last week, when given repeated chances to correct the record with Fox News host Laura Ingraham, Trump tripled down.

“I said, ‘vote for me, you’re not going to have to do it ever again.’ It’s true,” Trump told Ingraham.

Even Trump’s closest allies in the Senate — and Raw Story exclusively interviewed 10 Senate Republicans on the topic in recent days — were left stunned when we ran the former president’s own words by them.

“What do you make of Trump saying, ‘vote for me once and you’ll never, ever vote again’?” Raw Story asked.

“I’ve got no comment on that,” Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) told Raw Story. “I'm sure that's out of context.”

The disbelief teeters toward confusion for many.

“I didn’t hear it,” Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL) told Raw Story. “I’ll have to look.”

“Democrats are worried he’ll never release the reins of power,” Raw Story pressed.

“I don't think that's true,” Scott said. “I didn't see it, though.”

‘Sounds preposterous’

Even the Republicans who did catch Trump’s comments are confused.

“I don't understand that statement,” Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) told Raw Story. “I personally want every voter to vote in every election.”

ALSO READ: Texas sheriffs engage conspiracy theorist who created Trump enemies 'target list'

“Democrats say, ‘Look, this is proof that he wants to pull a 2020 again and not give up the reigns of power,’” Raw Story said.

“I don't think you can conclude that,” Collins said.

Still other Republicans were left asking Raw Story to parse the former president’s comments.

“No, I didn't. I saw it in a headline,” Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) told Raw Story. “What did it mean? What did he say exactly?”

“I don’t know. I can’t interpret him,” Raw Story replied. “But it’s: ‘vote in November and you never have to vote again.’”

“Like, ever in your whole life?” Murkowski inquired.

“That's kind of what he implied,” Raw Story said.

“I'm assuming what it must mean is ‘you'll never have to vote for me again, because I'll be termed out,’” Murkowski said.

“Maybe, but that's an assumption your Democratic colleagues don't give after what happened in 2020,” Raw Story replied.

“Oh, no, no. Come on. He's served once, and if he’s successful and he serves twice, there are those that think that he would find a way to give himself a third term?” Murkowski asked.

“Yeah,” Raw Story replied as the senator’s face contorted with constitutional confusion. “So that sounds preposterous to you?”

“Yes. It sounds preposterous to me,” Murkowski said. “Yes.”

Assuming the best

Just like Senate Republicans did throughout Trump’s four years in the White House, most now refuse to publicly contemplate the worst from Trump — and instead just assume the best from the party’s standard bearer.

“You know, I don’t try to interpret what President Trump means. I assume he just means, get him in there and he’ll fix all the issues,” Sen. Mike Braun (R-IN) told Raw Story. “If you take things literally with him, you're always gonna need interpretation.”

And plenty of Republicans are interpreting Trump’s comments in the best light.

“It sounded to me like he was saying, ‘I'm not gonna be on the ballot again, so you don't have to vote for me again,’” Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) told Raw Story. “So, you know, I didn't see the full context of it, but I don't take it seriously.”

Other Republicans take Trump seriously, if not literally.

“I caught it,” Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) acknowledged to Raw Story. “When the president gives speeches and answers questions and interviews, he often adopts a stream of consciousness model, and I think that was just part of his stream of consciousness.”

“Is that one where the media — we take it too literally?” Raw Story asked.

“With President Trump, you can't take everything literally,” Kennedy said. “He's very forthcoming in terms of answering questions, and there's both risk and reward to that.”

Even after being passed up as Trump’s running mate, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) is still quick to defend his fellow Floridian.

“It’s being taken out of context like everything else he says,” Rubio told Raw Story. “He doesn't speak in the dialect of Washington.”

While Rubio failed to illuminate what the former president meant, Democrats say, in the wake of the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol, instead of making excuses for Trump, their Republican colleagues should start listening to him and then take him both seriously and literally.

“Here's a president who doesn't just joke about undermining our democracy but has taken actions to do that with … his decision to stop the certification of our last election,” Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) told Raw Story. “So when he makes jokes like that they have a chilling effect on our nation, and I think it's really problematic.”

We asked 12 U.S. senators if they — like Bob Menendez — stockpile gold bars and cash stacks at home

WASHINGTON — Sen. Bob Menendez (D-NJ) pleaded not guilty to bribery in New York today after allegedly pocketing hundreds of thousands of dollars in cash, gold bars and a sleek Mercedes-Benz.

At a press conference this week, the senator refused to resign and explained that the close-to-$500,000 in cash stuffed in his clothes was his rainy day fund, legally withdrawn from his bank — although he didn’t elaborate on where the upward of $100,000 in gold came from, let alone the black Benz.

So, are piles of cash and gold just a normal part of life in the secretive club that is the United States Senate?

Raw Story asked a dozen of Menendez’ colleagues if they too have piles of cash and stacks of gold tucked away at their homes.

“Hell, I ain’t got none. My wife might keep it,” Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) told Raw Story.

“Why would you even ask me a question like that,” Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) replied when asked. “There are certain questions that are appropriate and some that are completely inappropriate, that’d be a completely inappropriate question.”


“I don’t have anything for you,” Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA).

“I don’t do gold bars. I admitted that on national TV today. No gold bars,” Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-AK) said. “I don’t understand Jersey. Ask some Democrats.”

“No I don’t, in fact, because you need to be prepared for emergencies, we got an extra flashlight at Costco,” Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA) told Raw Story.

RELATED ARTICLE: Fetterman to return campaign donation to Menendez in envelopes stuffed with cash

Per her usual, Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) refused to answer, though she cracked up at the question, while Finance Committee chairman, Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR), smirked, he shook his head “no comment.”

More than half of Senate Democrats, including Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ), are now on the record calling for Menendez to resign, but that doesn’t mean they want to discuss their indicted colleague.

“Too soon. Too soon,” Booker told Raw Story. “I’m not going to talk anymore beyond — right now — beyond my statement.”

ALSO READ: Senators threw a fashion show on the brink of a government shutdown. And then they flew home.

While it’s well-established that members of Congress are, on average, much more wealthy than the average American, and many of them love to play the stock market, back to the basic question: Are stockpiles of cash and gold bars part of Senate culture?

“No. I don’t know. It’s not for me,” Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH) told Raw Story. “I can’t answer for anyone else.”

Brown, the chair of the Senate Banking Committee, says there’s no question in his mind Menendez has to go now.

“It’s clear cut to me,” Brown said. “I spent much of my career doing the right things — all my career — and I have been critical of corruption in the state legislature, I’ve been critical of the White House. It doesn’t matter that Menendez is a Democrat when it comes to this.”

While Democrats have piled on Menendez — seeking his quick resignation as the party heads into a hard 2024 Senate election cycle — many Senate Republicans are quick to point out that he’s yet to face a jury of his peers.

“We don’t try people on how it looks. The evidence has to withstand scrutiny. He has the chance to defend himself,” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) told Raw Story. “We’ll see how it plays out.”

Graham, a former JAG lawyer and top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, says he wasn’t all that surprised prosecutors dropped charges against Menendez in 2018 after a hung jury in 2017.

“I understand the jury system pretty well,” Graham said.

For the second time in the past decade, Sen. Ben Cardin (D-MD) has been tapped to take over for Menendez as chair of the Foreign Relations Committee while the New Jersey senator fights corruption charges in court.

“This is heart wrenching for all of us, because the impact it has on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, the impact it has on the Senate, the impact it has on public service – all of the above. It is hard,” Cardin told Raw Story.

That means, once again, Cardin is left playing clean up. He’s just getting re-settled as chairman and hasn’t heard from any ambassadors — yet.

“No. Not yet, but I’m sure they will be,” Cardin said.

Seems most senators didn’t really tune in to Menendez’ first trial.

“I didn’t watch it. I didn’t know what was going on there,” Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) told Raw Story. “But this is so obvious, you follow me?”

After the first bribery case, the Senate Ethics Committee did release an uncharacteristically bruising report “severely admonishing” Menendez for accepting gifts from a wealthy donor.

To many senators, even being asked if they have stacks of cash and gold bars in their homes is startling.

“What do you mean?” Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) whipped around and asked Raw Story as he exited the Capitol Tuesday evening. “Oh, you’re being facetious!”

Grassley is the former chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. He says his opinion doesn’t matter — the evidence and the trial are what matter.

“I think it's pretty simple. He's been accused of something. You're innocent until proven guilty. I take the position with a lot of politicians that are in trouble, you let the judicial process work its way through and then the electorate makes a final decision,” Grassley said.

Still, Grassley offers this admonition to all his colleagues.

“I want to make something very clear related to Menendez or anybody else,” Grassley lectured, “Bribery is wrong!”

Pablo Manríquez contributed to this report.

Alaska GOP candidate defends comparing unions to slavery: 'No racial connotations'

A Republican candidate for lieutenant governor in Alaska on Wednesday insisted that slavery had "no racial connotations" in the United States after he used the term to blast unions.

Keep reading...Show less