All posts tagged "laura loomer"

'I am surprised you posted this': Trump official publicly feuds with MAGA leader

A top Donald Trump official is feuding with a MAGA ally who has been loyal to the president, with the administration adviser declaring publicly Sunday, "I'm surprised you posted this."

MAGA influencer Laura Loomer, who is known to have to ear of the president and has been called the Trump Whisperer, took to social media over the weekend to condemn Sebastian Gorka, who serves as Trump's senior director for counterterrorism. Specifically, Loomer focused the official reportedly attending the grand opening for the US Embassy of Qatar in DC.

"I have watched the video posted by the [Qatar US embassy] for their grand opening, and this looks exactly like Gorka and his wife. Care to comment, Sebastian?" she wrote Saturday. "Gorka is the Deputy Assistant to the President and Senior Director for Counterterrorism. Why is the Senior Director for Counterterrorism attending parties in DC with the Qataris, the funders of the Muslim Brotherhood and HAMAS?"

That accusation didn't sit well with Gorka, who responded publicly the same day.

"EXCLUSIVE? Hardly," he wrote on X of Loomer's "exclusive" report. "Qatar was central to the return of our hostages in Gaza. And hostages fall under my portfolio as Senior Director of Counterterrorism for President Trump. I presume you are happy our hostages like Edan Alexander are back home alive from the hell of Hamas captivity."

He went on to say, "It’s my duty to bring all US citizens home, including you if you were ever kidnapped. And I will be gracious to those who assist me in saving Americans especially since President Trump has made the return of all Americans his top priority."

Gorka further noted that designating the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization, something Loomer has pushed for, is "in the works."

"Lastly, I am surprised you posted this without checking with me first. Rule No. 1 of journalism is to get the subject’s response first and you know how to reach me," he concluded.

Loomer also responded on X, asking, "Why is the matter of designating the Muslim Brotherhood 'in the works'? We are 9 months into the Trump administration."

"This is actually ridiculous. And it’s more excuse making," she added. "It’s very simple. Just designate them. Is it in the works the same way it was in the works during the first Trump admin when we were told it was happening and it never happened thanks to Qatari lobbying?"

'I'm not a fan': MAGA lawmaker breaks with Trump after major announcement

A MAGA lawmaker broke with President Donald Trump after a major announcement, saying in a conversation with a Republican influencer Monday, "I'm not a fan."

Rep. Randy Fine (R-FL) told Laura Loomer on her podcast that he did not agree with Trump's move to allow Qatar to build a military facility in Idaho.

"Look, I trust President Trump's judgment. And I think he has adopted the approach that by trying to embrace them, by trying to pull them and show them the benefits of working with America, he can get them to be a good actor on the world stage. But I am not a fan of Qatar. Let me be clear," he said.

Fine pointed to Qatar's financial ties to Hamas and surmised the country is responsible for fueling anti-semitism and protests in the United States.

"I think they fund most of the institutions that are damaging the country. I think they're responsible for much of what we see on our colleges and universities," Fine said. "I think they're responsible for many of these protests. I think they're responsible for these groups like CAIR, and these others that are just big problems. I think they are funding a lot of the problem. I'm not a fan. But I believe that President Trump knows what he's doing, and I think he's hoping by embracing them, bringing them closer to us, maybe they will abandon some of the horrible things that they are funding around the world."

Other Republicans, including top Trump ally Steve Bannon, have bashed the administration's decision to allow Qatar to build a military facility on American soil. Loomer also argued she trusts the president but is skeptical of "Islamic regimes."

'Spoiled goods': MAGA feud heats up between Marjorie Taylor Greene and outside Trump ally

Right-wing influencer Laura Loomer called Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) "spoiled goods" as a MAGA feud heats up between the two conservatives.

The Trump ally targeted Greene Wednesday after she spoke out against Republicans during the ongoing government shutdown and called for action on expiring Obamacare subsidies, which she complained would cause insurance premiums to double next year for her constituents, as well as her own adult children. The move signaled Greene is now growing more critical of her own party.

"MTG @mtgreenee built her entire political brand off of MAGA and pretending to support Trump. She never really supported Trump (I told you all this 2 years ago by the way when I proved how she set Trump up with her campaign manager at Mar a Lago and wanted to support Ye’s campaign to undermine Trump)," Loomer wrote on X.

"She is spoiled goods. I can’t wait for Trump’s inevitable Truth social post that blasts her back to irrelevancy. MTG trash. I’m just glad I saw this coming years ago. She wouldn’t be in office without Trump," she added.

Loomer also made unsubstantiated claims that Greene — who has spoken out in favor of releasing the Jeffrey Epstein files, criticized the Trump administration's attacks on Iran and called the war in Gaza a genocide — had traded stocks to earn additional money during her time in Washington, D.C.

"I guess she’s made enough money trading stocks in Congress to feel comfortable with burning her bridges with President Trump. Nobody asked her to be 'a slave'. She is determined to undermine Trump. Even the White House knows this to be true," Loomer wrote.

Greene argued that she is not turning on Republicans, saying, "I want Republicans to actually govern the way they campaign and solve problems plaguing the American people."

Laura Loomer turns on MAGA ally over 'depraved' Charlie Kirk conspiracies

Far-right influencer Laura Loomer is turning on a MAGA ally over what she calls "depraved conspiracies" about Charlie Kirk's killing.

Loomer responded Friday to Candace Owens' claims that Turning Point USA should release footage from the 31-year-old MAGA influencer's fatal shooting at Utah Valley University during a speaking event on Sept. 10.

"In a new conspiracy, @RealCandaceO is now publicly attacking TPUSA and is suggesting that @TPUSA played a role in murdering Charlie Kirk," Loomer wrote on X.

"Her name still appears on the TPUSA website because of her partnership with them through BLEXIT. How much longer will TPUSA tolerate these lies from Candace? Candace appears to be spiraling after TPUSA disproved her lie that Charlie was converting to Catholicism. There doesn’t seem to be an end to her depraved conspiracies. Whatever makes her money I suppose."

Owens is among several right-wing podcasters who have expressed doubt and conspiracy theories over Kirk's killing, according to reports.

"I don't understand it, every excuse that I've been handed for why they won't release it makes no sense to me," Owens said in a video. "If you are under pressure, if people are starting to look at you funny as an organization, if they're thinking, whether rightfully or wrongfully, if they are suspecting, because they see this footage of someone quickly remove the SD cards, that you guys had something to do with the assassination of Charlie Kirk, and you quite literally have footage that in theory should vindicate yourself, why wouldn't you release it?"

In her livestreamed video on Thursday, Owens also shared that Kirk allegedly had concerns about the finances of the organization he founded. Owens has also claimed that Kirk was being threatened by the Israeli government, among other conspiracies, The Guardian reports.

Owens said "it makes no sense" and that she doesn't accept that the footage has not been released.

Turning Point USA has not commented on Owens' questions.

These sinister rants show Trumpworld isn't mourning — it's unleashed

Everyone who follows politics from any sort of middle ground suffered comprehensive dread after Donald Trump's second election. We knew of Project 2025 and its "in your face" drive toward totalitarianism. It was baked in — a guarantee.

The nightmare unspooled as it became all too clear that Trump's new administration wouldn't tolerate minders, deep thinkers, the conscientious. There would be no adults in the room. Trump presented a cabinet of laughably unqualified "loyalists" and America pretended it was normal. Expected as it was, the foreboding was no less real.

However, the last 10 days have taken matters to a new level — one even more extreme, perhaps planned all along, but now most definitely here.

Charlie Kirk's murder, along with some admittedly heartless responses, ushered in a new phase, one for which Trumpworld may have been planning all along, but now set upon us over days. In so doing, they ushered in near zoo-level incompetence from a cabinet picked for loyalty despite abject incompetence. The "in your face" aggression, coupled with newfound confidence, brought about the most dangerous week yet in Trump 2.0.

The White House is emboldened, using Kirk's assassination to unapologetically twist the dial, more aggressively crazed than ever. This is dangerous.

The most obvious newly evolving move is the labeling of the entire left as a terrorist movement that threatens American stability. This is gaslighting so pure as to be almost elegant, coming as it does from terrorists who attacked our Capitol. Opposition to Trump has become that much more dangerous. And if one listens closely, they almost took joy in the killing as leaving them finally "freed." What an opportunity.

Stephen Miller, never more self-righteous and raw, the most openly authoritarian-racist member of the administration, recently said:

"With God as my witness, we are going to use every resource we have at the Department of Justice, Homeland Security and throughout this government to identify, disrupt, dismantle, and destroy these networks, and make America safe again for the American people. It will happen, and we will do it in Charlie’s name."

Sorry, but that sounds less like grief than relief.

There are no left-wing networks. As a member of the Democratic Party, I'd say we probably need more and better-defined networks to spread an anti-Trump message, but they don't yet exist. Not as Miller meant.

No matter, Miller wants an excuse to "attack" the left, wanting to spring loose the semi-fascist brownshirts in Homeland Security and National Guard on anyone they don't like. Breathtaking in its boldness, one can feel his rush to rage-filled hatred, ready for an open-field run.

Watch out.

But Miller is only following the example set at the top. Trump has been all over the place, spitting vitriol at the left, using Kirk's death to go next-level. Post-Kirk, he has a treasured launching pad toward Orwellian control, example "A" being Jimmy Kimmel. Emboldened, Trump went after even bigger game — network news, as evidenced by recent interactions with the media, as reported by Politico:

President Donald Trump on Friday reiterated his claim that critical television coverage of him is “illegal” and pushed back on criticisms that his administration was taking actions that chill free speech.

The administration quickly established the fact-free narrative that the left metaphysically groomed the suspect in the Kirk killing, Tyler Robinson, despite all evidence pointing to an isolated, uniquely sick loner, practically apolitical, a young man who simply hated Kirk's intolerance toward LGBTQ Americans. Hardly a political leftist.

But the idea took hold on the right, an excuse to attack all opposition as terrorists threatening Americans. This is as dangerous as it is self-serving.

Meanwhile, the cabinet seemed newly confident, and with increased energy came new evidence of jaw-dropping incompetence. None is in over their head more than FBI Director Kash Patel. Little more than a flame-throwing podcaster, he appeared in front of Congress backed by a new level of anti-left rage, and promptly humiliated himself as the most hapless, fully politicized, and laughable FBI director in history. As noted by USA Today:

During his equally contentious Sept. 16 hearing before a Senate committee, Patel went off the rails, labeling [Sen. Adam] Schiff “a political buffoon at best” and saying, “You are the biggest fraud to ever sit in the United States Senate.”

Try to imagine Fox News's reaction to a Democratic administration, or simply a normal FBI director, trying that. Despite almost non-existent expectations, Patel managed to still surprise as a newly freed, shameless, hapless, moron. This, of course, after erroneously announcing the arrest of a “subject” in the Kirk killing.

It goes on, even down to the Department of Health and Human Services and Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s absurd crusade against vaccines — the single most powerful public health tool in history, short perhaps of proper sewerage. But conspiracy freaks are going to freak, and the "post-science experts" at a key CDC meeting devolved into clueless chaos.

Per a report in The New York Times:

“Thursday’s session ended with the panel members at odds. A hot microphone caught one panelist calling another committee member 'an idiot,' although it was unclear who was speaking.”

Take your pick.

True, the administration was always vicious, uncaring, and self-satisfied, but it went to a new and dangerous level prior to even Charlie Kirk's memorial service at an NFL stadium in Phoenix. State control and censorship reached late-night comedy, leaving those left on air quivering. All over mildly disrespectful talk — but only talk.

It is likely that the plotters in Project 2025 counted on some seminal moments all along, using each to tighten their grip. They surely envisioned protests, some perhaps descending into violence as their launch pad to the next level. Instead, they are rallying around two grotesque but extremely isolated killings: Kirk as "proof" that political violence is the province of the left, and the murder of Iryna Zarutska, a Ukrainian immigrant, as "proof" that white people are under attack. That incident in Charlotte, North Carolina lubricated a shift to more surface-level racism — always useful to the right.

It all worked better than they could have hoped, and they're showing it with barely suppressed excitement.

The pattern was set in January. Perhaps even ahead of schedule, it is now viciously in your face — a government that is authoritarian, post-law, post-decency, post-unity, in what were the United States. They always fantasized about a war within. Now they get to move, seeing themselves as blameless, responding to a first shot, one taken by "all" Trump opposition. How useful.

MAGA provides its voters self-identity. It's not what they believe. It is shared hatred, never more acute, thus never more united, never more willing to quash all that previously made America great. Those charged with leadership don't need to be good, only "committed."

Unfortunately, the impact will be felt as they move with a greater sense of mission, greater hatred, less confusion, and more dopamine. Never forget: they hate you more than any international faction on earth, more than all of them put together.

Now, though, they have a theme — they're under attack by a violent resistance as a whole. Tragic as one young man's senseless killing may be, they seem more fulfilled, even relieved to have a tragedy transition to a precious tool, never on clearer display than the last week.

And it is just so f–––––– dangerous.

Don't believe me? Listen to them.

“Stephen Miller understands the assignment,” Laura Loomer wrote on Sunday. “Many others don’t. Crush. The. Left. So they never rise again.”

  • Jason Miciak is a former Associate Editor at Occupy Democrats, author, and American attorney. He can also regularly be found on Politizoom.

'Trump-whisperer' says president's latest post was ominous warning: 'We have cameras'

Donald Trump was sending a message with his latest post on Truth Social, according to a right-wing influencer who has the president's ear.

Trump over the weekend told what some considered to be a bizarre story about a subcontractor who purportedly damaged part of the Rose Garden while doing work in the area. Trump also included a video of the alleged incident, resulting in outrage from observers online.

But one Trump ally and associate flagged what could potentially be a "message" in Trump's social media post.

Laura Loomer, known for her controversial feuds and conspiracy theories, first responded to Trump's post by writing, "I’m glad we have a meticulous President who cares about quality."

In a separate post, Loomer, who has been called a "Trump-whisperer," suggested a possible deeper meaning.

"I feel like this message was sent as a way to make certain people read between the lines," Loomer wrote Saturday. "As in, don’t even think about it."

She then added, "We have cameras watching you and your every move. And we will catch you."

Trump ally Laura Loomer just violated court's 'unambiguous order': lawyers

The ongoing case between far-right activist Laura Loomer and HBO host Bill Maher continued this week after she posted on X about her deposition.

Bulwark reporter Will Sommer posted an excerpt of court documents that cited the post.

"The claims that Plaintiff makes in her Tweets are not only false and misleading, but fly in the face of the Court's unambiguous order that deposition materials should be used only for the purpose of litigation. Plaintiff has continued her pattern of seeking to use discovery as a vehicle for increasing her own fame and profits," the HBO legal team says.

Loomer's post on X claims that she wanted her deposition to be public and that the HBO lawyers wanted it to be sealed.

"Doesn’t it speak volumes that I was willing to have mine go public, but he wants his sealed? What is @billmaher so afraid of?" she asked.

"Everyone who reads my deposition will see first hand (sic) how Bill Maher defamed me," she continued. "I answered every single question. People always want to hide what they don’t want others seeing (sic) when they have something to hide. I sat for over 8 hours and answered every question from that Trump hating (sic) leftist lawyer Kate Bolger, a Democrat donor who happens to be the same lawyer who is now representing Rupert Murdoch in the defamation lawsuit Trump just filed against him. I have nothing to hide because I told the truth. I’m not the one who SEALED IT."

Sommer noted that Loomer already angered the judge after she made an Arby's deposition public. He noted that due to this incident, she "may ALSO violate court rules and want to complain to the judge."

See the post here.


‘Exposed her’: Laura Loomer boasts after top NSA lawyer ousted

Far-right conspiracy theorist Laura Loomer likely had a role in getting the top lawyer for the National Security Agency fired, according to The New York Times.

A new article reported that "an official briefed on the matter" said Loomer’s online criticism of April Falcon Doss, appointed to the general counsel post during the Biden administration, "appeared to have a role" in her firing.

The report recounted the timeline that led to Doss's demise:

"On July 23, the Daily Wire, a conservative website, wrote about Ms. Doss and her former work for the Senate Intelligence Committee’s Democratic staff. Later that day, Laura Loomer, a far-right conspiracy theorist, amplified a social media post critical of Ms. Doss that cited the Daily Wire article.

"In a text message on Tuesday, Ms. Loomer said that she had 'reposted a tweet that exposed her last week and flagged it for the right people.'”

The report added that the NSA web page containing Doss's biography "now redirects to an error page."

Doss could not be reached for comment, while NSA "declined to comment and referred questions to the Defense Department." The Pentagon hadn't responded by publication, the report said.

Last spring, Loomer was given credit for Trump's firing of Gen. Timothy Haugh, who headed U.S. Cyber Command, along with his civilian NSA deputy Wendy Noble.

Loomer confirmed that she had "urged" Trump during a White House meeting to fire the two. She posted to social media at the time, “NSA Director Tim Haugh and his deputy Wendy Noble have been disloyal to President Trump. That is why they have been fired.”

Read The New York Times article here.

Avowed Trump ally warns Epstein may 'consume' presidency as MAGA 'rupture' grows

President Donald Trump can't seem to stop talking about the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, and right-wing activist Laura Loomer is warning that the issue is threatening to "consume his presidency," according to Politico.

In an interview on Wednesday, Loomer contradicted Trump's assertion that talk of a "client list" cobbled together by the convicted sex offender, who died by his own hand in a Manhattan jail cell, was a "hoax" perpetuated by Democrats.

“Obviously, this is not a complete hoax given the fact that Ghislaine Maxwell is currently serving 20 years in prison in Florida for her crimes and activities with Jeffrey Epstein, who we know is a convicted sexual predator,” Loomer told Politico. “This is why I said, and I’ll reiterate it again, the best thing that the president can do is appoint a special counsel to handle the Epstein files investigation.”

She added, “I don’t want it to consume his presidency.”

The article called Loomer's rebuke an illustration of "the growing rupture in the MAGA coalition."

Trump lashed out at his most ardent supporters Wednesday, both on Truth Social and during an Oval Office session with reporters.

"It's all been a hoax perpetrated by the Democrats and some stupid Republicans, and foolish Republicans fall into the net," Trump said. On social media, he called his supporters "weaklings" for believing there was more to the Epstein saga.

CNN's Kristen Holmes called it a "slap in the face" to Trump's biggest supporters like Loomer, Dan Bongino, and Kash Patel, who campaigned for Trump on the basis that he would release the Epstein files if he were re-elected. But, after "hyping the promised release," the FBI and Department of Justice denied that a government conspiracy was afoot before closing the case.

Loomer, whose recommendations have led Trump to fire several national security officials, refused to condemn the president completely, however.

“I’m not going to dogpile the president,” she said, adding, “he can’t allow for all of his focus and attention to be on the Jeffrey Epstein files. Do I think this has been handled poorly? Absolutely.”

Read the Politico article here.

Is this the scandal that finally takes Trump down?

“I don’t know what I want, but I want it now.”

That 70s rock classic from the Raspberries was described by its author Eric Carmen as a “teen frustration anthem.”

Today it’s back as a MAGA soundtrack.

And it’s all about Jeffrey Epstein again. Just a month short of the sixth anniversary of his death in a prison cell, Epstein is all the rage again among Trump cultists for whom rage is the default setting.

On July 6, 2019, Epstein was arrested at a New Jersey airport upon returning from Paris. Two days later the feds unsealed an indictment alleging he ran a multi-state sex trafficking ring, abusing dozens of underage girls between 2002 and 2005.

Fifteen days later, Epstein was found injured and semi-conscious in his jail cell — initially ruled a possible suicide attempt. Eighteen days after that — on August 10 — he was found dead in his cell. It was again treated as a suicide, an explanation that raised eyebrows among many and sprung an entire cottage industry of new conspiracy theorists.

The MAGA firestorm that ensured was unprecedented. This was proof positive of everything demented theory ever uttered about Bill and Hillary Clinton — and for that matter, Barack Obama — even though he wasn’t even remotely part of the story.

Yes, MAGA was hellbent on getting to the bottom of this story, especially since it could at last bring down the Clintons, all their Hollywood Communist pals and the dozens of well-known figures known to have cavorted with Epstein.

That list was headed by Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew and Donald Trump.

Well, not so much Trump.

The theories that Epstein was murdered to protect powerful elites left Trump off the suspect list. Personally, with no dog in the fight, that seemed reasonable enough to me.

Besides, how could Trump have anything to fear? Why, immediately after Epstein’s death, Trump took the somber presidential step of retweeting a post suggesting Clinton was involved. Also, it was claimed by Trump acolytes that he kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago. There’s no record of that, but so what?

All of this proved Trump’s innocence of having anything to do with Epstein. In fact, it even exposed as fake news a New York Magazine story from October 28, 2002, in which Trump stated about Epstein, according to the fake interviewer:

“I’ve known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy,” Trump booms from a speakerphone. “He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it — Jeffrey enjoys his social life.”

With Trump so clearly having removed himself from the story, MAGA could focus on more important matters, such as determining whether the scandal consumed every Democratic politician in America, or just most of them.

And it spawned the search for The List.

If I understand this part correctly, The List is a client list, but not your everyday accused pedophile’s client list, since Epstein was a prominent financier of the rich and famous. And lots of them showed up — mostly benignly — on flight logs from his private planes and all sorts of other sources.

No, The List was assumed to be some sort of dishonor roll of people who partied hard with Epstein. Or perhaps a self-incriminating “pedophiles like me” catalog.

I don’t really understand that part. So I was among the people not stunned on July 1 when Attorney General Pam Bondi announced her Epstein probe had found no charges to file and no client list to release.

Then again, I’m not Laura Loomer or Steve Bannon, both of whom have been melting down on social media in real time. So I prefer to sit back and enjoy the collective MAGA tantrum — one that brings back fond memories of my children taking part in pre-school soccer games that quickly devolved into delightful scrums.

But the audience for this one isn’t comprised of cheering parents. It boasts MAGA influencers, MAGA faithful, MAGA feuders, and an awkward gaggle of Democrats who can’t quite figure out whether to engage, deflect, or duck.

And, of course, the media, which cannot discern if this is a MAGA civil war, a distraction, a dark comedy, or a moment in history demanding deep reflection into the nation’s collective soul.

I don’t know what the hell this is — and for the most part, I don’t care.

But in a political world where nothing makes sense anymore, this particular tantrum seems absurd and irrational enough as to pose a problem for Trump.

For no particular reason, this one might stick.

  • Ray Hartmann is a veteran journalist, best known as the founder of the Riverfront Times and a longtime outspoken columnist and commentator. His writings can be found at https://rayhartmann.substack.com/.