Top Stories Daily Listen Now
RawStory
RawStory

All posts tagged "maga"

Trump's devotees are petrified about what's about to come

I confess. I don’t fully understand why anyone steeped in the culture of MAGA would be having doubts. Donald Trump is the same man he was the first time he was elected. Literally nothing about him has changed. If you didn’t mind what you saw after 2016, why would you mind what you’re seeing after 2024?

And yet it appears to be the case that MAGA is cracking. It hasn’t broken apart. It hasn’t crumbled. Not yet. But cracks are discernible not only in polling (Trump’s approval rating has been underwater for more than 300 days), but in the U.S. Congress.

The Republicans appear nervous about the fact that Trump is paying more attention to Venezuela’s problems than America’s. More importantly, they appear nervous about his broken promises. He said he’d bring down the cost of living on Day One. Nope. He said he’d release the Epstein files. Nope. He said he’d focus on America and leave the rest of the world alone. Nope.

In general, he said he’d make America great again, but even to his most devoted followers, America still doesn’t feel that great.

Republicans in Congress have reacted with a pace that seems to be increasing. First, it was the Epstein files. All but one voted for their release. Then it was health insurance. Seventeen House Republicans voted to renew ACA subsidies for three years. (That bill now goes to the Senate.) Then it was Greenland and Venezuela. The Senate is poised to vote on a war powers resolution aiming to restrain a president gone rogue.

Cracks, however, are just cracks. The edifice of MAGA stands firm for now. Trump can send his paramilitary (ICE, CBP) to execute frightened widowed mothers but still expect at least 33 percent of the population to back him. (The most recent Gallup survey that I have seen shows his approval rating to be 36 percent.)

And yet something is happening. Trump’s blatant abuse of power really does seem to be radicalizing moderates and causing Trumpers to experience cognitive dissonance (a mental collision of diametric beliefs). I haven’t seen Republicans this anxious since a mob sacked and looted the Capitol. Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) voted for the war powers resolution faster than he ran away from insurgents.

If congressional Republicans are indeed scared, maybe there’s an opportunity. What that might be, exactly, I really don’t know. What I do know is that, in the long term, the Democrats cannot save democracy on their own. They need some Republicans to join them. Perhaps now is the time to help some MAGA voters step away from the edge, for their sakes and everyone’s sake.

This is the hope of Rich Logis. He’s the founder of a group that helps MAGA voters betrayed by Trump to come to their senses, though he doesn’t put it that way in this interview with me.

Instead, Rich told me that some issues, like the invasion of Venezuela and the kidnapping of its leader, are so contrary to the MAGA worldview (in this case, “America First”) that “over time, more and more in MAGA will realize that Trump's actions are not for the benefit of most Americans — including his supporters.”

I got in touch with Rich, because he himself reached out to liberals. In a piece for Salon in November, he explained his own indoctrination in MAGA, why it held him until about 2017, why it still holds millions more, and how liberals can help get them out.

I went fairly hard on Rich, as you will see. But I think his answers are strong. You might find them persuasive. Anyway, he’s right.

“If we are going to successfully fight back,” Rich told me, “against the administration's anti-democratic (lower-case d) and unconstitutional actions (defying court orders, apprehending and deporting without due process, among others), it will require unlikely, but necessary alliances.”

JS: Liberals believed the Epstein files are breaking MAGA. The president is struggling to regain the previously unconditional support of his base. Is that true? What signs are you seeing?

RL: I do think there are fissures within the MAGA community. Our organization, Leaving MAGA, has been approached by remorseful 2024 MAGA voters. It would seem from recent polling (even though I am somewhat skeptical of polls) that Trump is losing support among Latinos in particular. What is remarkable about the Epstein story is: in our current media environment, in which stories tend to come and go, the Epstein saga isn't going away. I believe many in MAGA are experiencing cognitive dissonance over the story, and are beginning to wonder if Trump has been lying to them.

In Salon, you said: "I believe most in MAGA are good people who have been led astray, exploited and manipulated." Trump hasn't changed. His first term showed who he is. Are you letting his supporters off the hook?

I will not defend my, or anyone else's, ignorance. I, like all MAGA Americans, support(ed) Trump of our own volition. None of us were coaxed or coerced into voting for Trump and defending him. One of the reasons MAGA is an extremist group is because vilifying, demonizing and dehumanizing those with whom we disagree is encouraged.

It is also important, however, to acknowledge that all of us are susceptible to being influenced. Personally speaking, I allowed myself to be inculcated into the MAGA black-and-white way of thinking, primarily because I consumed only MAGA-friendly media and spent most of my time with other MAGA supporters.

You say liberals must create conditions in which MAGA apostates are welcomed? You can understand that liberals often don't want to welcome those who can't or won't take responsibility for their actions. What's your advice?

Liberals are not wrong about the damage MAGA and Trump have wrought. I understand why liberals may be weary to befriend MAGA voters. Trump has traumatized America for more than a decade.

But if we are going to successfully fight back against the administration's anti-democratic (lower-case d) and unconstitutional actions (defying court orders, apprehending and deporting without due process, among others), it will require unlikely, but necessary alliances.

I don't ask that MAGA Americans be coddled. But if one believes all is not lost — after all, many of those in MAGA are our friends and family — then I would ask my fellow anti-MAGA countrymen and women: what is gained by publicly judging and ostracizing them? I guarantee that invective against MAGA supporters strengthens the already-strong tie that binds them to Trump.

You mention MAGA media. It is everywhere and it's on all the time. It is why otherwise decent and intelligent people believe lies. It is why MAGA adherents stay adhered to MAGA. There are rich Democrats who could create their own media universe. If you had five minutes of Warren Buffet's time (for example), what would you say to him?

I'm biased, since our organization features stories of those who left MAGA. What is needed is more content and media about those who have left, as well as those having doubts about their support for Trump.

If I started a well-funded media company, I would craft my content to find MAGA Americans who are feeling remorse over their past votes, not to censure them, but to give them a voice that legacy media doesn't seem much interested in providing. There are plenty of published reports focused on reasons Americans had for supporting Trump. But what about those who are now questioning their beliefs? They are among us and we need to get in front of them, and go to where they are.

MAGA media and MAGA influencers have a stranglehold on the national political discourse. Mis- and disinformation were the primary reasons Trump was reelected. To combat this, there need to be more efforts to engage the apolitical, who follow and consume very little political news.

Apoliticism is its own bubble, and effective pro-democracy media would seek to pop it.

Many liberals believe MAGA wants what its getting — a president who is trying to make America white again. And I think this is largely true. What you're saying is there are some MAGA who are reachable. How can they be reached if they didn't see the bigotry that was obvious to others? What kinds of policies are appealing? What values?

I have no problem with people enduring the consequences of their electoral choices. This is how the real world works. And, like any large group, there are some in MAGA who revel in bigotry and hatred. But I think for the balance of MAGA supporters, there are deeds and rhetoric of Trump's that have given them pause. In my case, one of the earliest such moments was Trump's response to Charlottesville.

For so many, MAGA is their identity, and they are heavily personally and politically invested in MAGA, which is why they justify the unjustifiable. I am not defending them, but I cannot emphasize enough how MAGA has shaped their being and personhood, and how frightening it is to admit that one erred in one's ways and allowed one's self to believe lies.

I understand why someone might say, "Trump voters are getting what they deserved" or "how could they not have known what Trump would do?" However, many MAGA voters didn't know much of what Trump would do because the information sources they consume didn't tell them.

MAGA media didn't tell them that American citizens would be kidnapped by ICE. Many didn't know that they would be personally and financially harmed by tariffs, as examples.

Having lived a MAGA life for seven years, I’m unsurprised by anything that has happened this year. Perhaps that is cynical of me to say. But I am still optimistic headed into 2026, because I believe that more and more people in the MAGA community are having doubts about their support for Trump and the movement.

It will take time, but please remember that epiphanies usually occur gradually, and then suddenly, all at once.

'Catastrophic' new data increases GOP's terror of midterm 'bloodbath': analyst

A former GOP strategist Friday said that new polls have increased Republican fears that a "bloodbath" is coming this November.

Rick Wilson, co-founder of the anti-Donald Trump The Lincoln Project, wrote in his Substack that recent poll results indicate that the president's approval ratings are spelling trouble for the party's chances in the midterm elections. Wilson boiled it down to a simple fact: voters hate Trump and his MAGA coalition is falling apart.

"Apropos of the 2026 elections, Trump is increasingly a boat anchor around the necks of Republican candidates," Wilson wrote. "I’ve been a professional consumer of polling for three decades, and the absolute crashout of Trump’s polling is like nothing I’ve ever seen."

The New York Times/Siena Poll published on Jan. 17 has pointed to troubling signs for the GOP, with 56% of those polled disapproving of Trump's job as president.

"Catastrophic. 2026 is teeing up to be a bloodbath," Wilson wrote.

Trump has faced a series of unfavorable polling results in recent weeks and has even called for criminal charges to be filed against pollsters after The New York Times published results he didn't like after a new survey this week found his reputation spinning into freefall.

Chances of Pam Bondi going to jail grows 'exponentially daily': ex-White House reporter

An analyst Friday predicted that it's likely White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller and Attorney General Pam Bondi will spend time behind bars.

In an opinion piece for Salon, White House columnist Brian Karem described how the Trump administration has viewed President Donald Trump falling "further into delusion" and what could happen next following his "Mean Don" remarks at the World Economic Forum at Davos, Switzerland, and "word-salad monologue" at the White House press briefing room to mark his first year since his second inauguration. The change from Trump in his first administration to Trump 2.0 is noticeably different — and the people backing him could ultimately be the people he turns against.

"That Trump was more cogent and could read a room a lot better than the current version, leading one to wonder if he’s just fronting for the worst instincts of people who work for him who have far darker visions of America than even he does," Karem wrote. "Yes, I’m talking about Stephen Miller. He’s practically the deputy president right now, and every action taken by Immigration and Customs Enforcement is apparently organized, orchestrated and implemented by him. I wouldn’t be surprised if Miller was in charge of the president’s vitamin E injections."

Miller's influence has only grown, as has Vice President JD Vance's sway.

"Trump is quickly becoming irrelevant to the MAGA movement," Karem wrote. "Peter Thiel’s surrogate is warming up in the bullpen, which is a potentially worse scenario than having Trump for the next 1094 days."

What Trump has done in the past could reflect what he does in the future, including who stays or goes, and whether his inner circle will remain. Karem argued that he could turn on his closest advisers, simply because he has done it before.

"The question isn’t whether we have had enough of Donald Trump. The question is what will Donald Trump do when he finally realizes that? If what Trump did to Michael Cohen is any indication, the chances of Stephen Miller, Pam Bondi and others spending time behind bars grow exponentially daily," Karem wrote. "The president knows no loyalty. If he believes it would be better to throw his confidants under a bus, his past actions show he will do so eagerly. Maybe the Democrats, along with some Republicans, should try to convince him to flush a few."

Revealed: Vegas odds that Vances name unborn baby after Trump or Charlie Kirk

Second lady Usha Vance and Vice President JD Vance announced they were expecting their fourth child this week and gamblers are predicting what they'll name the baby — placing bets that a MAGA leader could be the possible namesake.

Bettors have indicated a likelihood that the Vances would potentially name their son after President Donald Trump or late MAGA influencer Charlie Kirk, The Daily Beast reported.

"Bettors can currently get 22/1 odds that J.D. and Usha Vance will name their unborn son 'Donald.' The odds that the couple will name their fourth child after President Donald Trump are second to the 20/1 odds that they will name the baby 'Charlie,' after slain conservative influencer Charlie Kirk," The Beast reported.

"Bettors can also get 25/1 odds on 'Christian,' 30/1 odds on 'Pete/Peter,' and 40/1 odds on 'Hill/Billy.' The Vice President and Second Lady said the baby is expected in 'late July,' but did not mention any plans for the child’s name," according to The Beast.

The couple's other children are not named after any political leaders.

The Vances have faced a number of rumors online over their marriage after Vance was seen giving an intimate hug to Kirk's wife, Erika Kirk, and Usha was photographed not wearing her wedding ring.

In the statement provided to Raw Story, a spokesperson from Usha's Vance's office said she "is a mother of three young children, who does a lot of dishes, gives lots of baths, and forgets her ring sometimes."

Trump 'embodies a mess' for MAGA future as US driven 'towards the abyss': analysis

The actions of Donald Trump during his second term in office will have major, long-term consequences for MAGA voters, a political analyst has claimed.

Though the president may be an important figurehead for the movement, The Guardian columnist Rafael Behr believes the political base will recede rapidly once Trump has left office. This is not just because Trump is the image the MAGA movement are keen to prop up, but because his toxic actions in office will have a lasting effect on the voter base.

Behr explained, "Trump is unpopular and old; visibly declining. He also looks irreplaceable as a figurehead for an ideologically incoherent MAGA movement.

"He embodies a mess of protectionist, free market, interventionist, isolationist, chauvinist and libertarian impulses that none of his mooted successors could contain.

"But in the meantime he can drive the US hard towards the abyss, past all of history’s signposts, before a stiffening of democratic spines in Congress or the grim reaper stops him."

Behr used the recent rhetoric Trump has presented on Greenland as an example of how a post-Trump MAGA outline may be difficult to hold together.

He continued, "It is not stupidity or arrogance that prevent the current White House honouring the transatlantic partnership, or not those traits alone. The parables of history that teach Europeans to see multilateral governance as a brake on ultranationalism are direct rebukes to the doctrine that now guides US power.

"There is no misunderstanding. Trump is not neglecting the old alliance. He despises it as antithetical to his politics and his character.

"If Europeans are right about the values they want the US to uphold, it follows that the country also needs regime change. If they have history on their side, the current president must fail, and he knows it. Sycophancy doesn’t bridge the gap. European leaders flatter only themselves if they think it can.

"Trump is not ignoring the lessons that European democracies have learned from their past. He chooses to fight for the other side."

Trump hit by new allegations of blatant corruption: 'He just doesn’t seem to care'

Questions have mounted over whether President Donald Trump has sold off pardons in exchange for donations to his MAGA allies.

The controversy surrounding these presidential pardons has "just got louder," wrote Steve Benen, producer of “The Rachel Maddow Show” and editor of MaddowBlog, in an analysis published Monday.

Trump has rewarded "generous donors with clemency," which was revealed in a Wall Street Journal report in December that detailed some of the alleged inner workings that have "spawned a pardon-shopping industry where lobbyists say their going rate is $1 million. Pardon-seekers have offered some lobbyists close to the president success fees of as much as $6 million if they can close the deal, according to people familiar with the offers.”

Benen pointed to Julio Herrera Velutini, a Venezuelan-Italian banker who was facing felony bribery and other charges, and the recent donations from his daughter, Isabela Herrera, who donated $2.5 million to MAGA Inc.

In exchange for the move, "Herrera agreed to plead guilty to a misdemeanor campaign finance charge, disappointing career prosecutors who had pushed for a harsher sentence," according to The New York Times.

"Two months later, Isabela Herrera donated another $1 million to MAGA Inc., culminating in a pardon from Trump late last week. (The White House claimed the political contributions did not lead to the pardon)," Benen wrote.

"Well, sure, when you put it that way — which is to say, accurately — it sounds bad," Benen commented.

And on Friday, Trump also pardoned former Puerto Rico Gov. Wanda Vázquez Garced. Garced had "pleaded guilty to a corruption charge related to her 2020 campaign — a scandal that also included campaign contributions from the aforementioned Julio Herrera Velutini."

The move has raised eyebrows over how Trump and his legal team determine who to pardon — and why.

"As for the bigger picture, the bottom line appears increasingly unavoidable: Trump is abusing his pardon power; he apparently knows that he’s abusing his pardon power; he knows that we know he’s abusing his pardon power; and he just doesn’t seem to care," Benen wrote.

MAGA being torn apart by right-wing squabbles as Elon Musk's X makeover backfires: report

Elon Musk's takeover and rebrand of Twitter — now X — is now ripping apart the MAGA movement, according to a report Monday.

Musk rebranded the platform in 2023, changing its moderation rules and prompting a rise in hate speech that has created a series of complaints among conservatives, Politico reported.

"Three years later, Musk’s control of the platform, now re-branded as 'X,' has delivered its fair share of benefits for conservatives — not least of which was Musk’s successful full-court press to elect Donald Trump in 2024," according to Politico. "But as the elite echelons of the MAGA movement slowly descend into obscure online disagreements and testy turf wars between rival influencers, conservatives are starting to confront an unpleasant possibility: that the right’s domination of X is doing more to divide the MAGA movement than unite it."

Several notable MAGA voices have made "digital exits" and left the app, citing their concerns about its divisive nature, including Ohio governor candidate Vivek Ramaswamy and Breitbart editor Raheem Kassam.

Changes under Musk, including his push to stop bots, has also unveiled something MAGA did not expect to happen.

"Musk’s efforts to combat bot activity have in turn backfired on conservatives: A new feature rolled out earlier this year displaying the country where an account is based inadvertently revealed that many of the most active pro-Trump and MAGA accounts are based abroad," Politico reported.

And that's not the only worry among MAGA followers.

"Increasingly, some big names on the right are coming to worry that X’s algorithm — which elevates short-form video and audio clips over links to articles or essays — is undermining the right’s political cohesion by promoting the most outlandish and conspiracy-minded members of Trump’s coalition," according to Politico.

Charlie Kirk's death and the rising conspiracy theories surrounding his killing have also revealed rising battles among MAGA influencers and just how much infighting has emerged in the movement.

"The turmoil and division generated on X is becoming a problem for elected Republicans, too," Politico reported. "Even as MAGA voters remain largely united behind Trump and his agenda, Republicans are being forced to spend time and political capital addressing squabbling among MAGA’s elite activists and influencers."

MAGA allies thank Trump after overdoses decline — but the report tells a different story

Donald Trump's allies and supporters were quick to thank the president after a new report showed that U.S. overdose deaths fell throughout the first year of the second Trump presidency, but the report itself suggests that MAGA policies could actually be making the situation worse.

In a report called "US overdose deaths fell through most of 2025, federal data reveals," ABC noted, "U.S. overdose deaths fell through the most of last year, suggesting a lasting improvement in an epidemic that had been worsening for decades."

MAGA fans apparently didn't read the second line of the article, which states, "Federal data released Wednesday showed that overdose deaths have been falling for more than two years — the longest drop in decades — but also that the decline was slowing."

They took to social media to credit Trump's decision to blow up cocaine trafficking boats that experts agree were not heading for the U.S.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement itself wrote, "Securing the border and removing criminal illegal alien gang members and drug traffickers from the U.S. yields fantastic results. Thank you, President Trump."

MAGA influencer Andy Ngo wrote, "I wonder why," and asked, "What changed in the last year?"

Right-wing pundit Kathleen McKinley wrote, "It’s called closed borders. You are welcome!"

Pro-Trump CEO Bill Ackman said, "A weak president with bad policies can literally kill tens of thousands of people with no accountability for the massive loss of life."

Ex-Trump official Vianca Rodriguez chimed in by saying, "Wow -- it's almost like Trump admin's anti-drug trafficking policies are working!"

Andrew Pollack added, "Trump’s approval rating would be 60%+ if these damn publications just gave him credit."

FBI Director Kash Patel said, "This is a whole of government effort and the result of Trump leadership letting good cops be cops. At the FBI for example we had a 31% increase in fentanyl seizures 2025, 2,100 kilos - what would’ve been enough to kill 150+ million Americans."

"Real lives being saved," he added.

But those lives might not have been saved by Trump. In fact, the report they celebrated notes that the new data revealed overdoses "have been falling for more than two years" and that the decline was now "slowing."

As for potential reasons for the slow down, the article points to Trump policies.

"The Maryland and Pittsburgh researchers raised questions about whether Trump administration policies could slow momentum. They noted relations between the U.S. and China strained last year when Trump placed sharply higher tariffs on imports from China, and speculated China might ease efforts to police fentanyl precursors," according to the report. "They also noted Trump has promised a $2,000 check to Americans to help offset the rising prices resulting from tariffs placed on China. Those checks could cause some drug users to splurge and overdose, said [Dr. Donald Burke], who urged federal officials to think through how the money is disbursed."

Read the full ABC report here.

'Losing his marbles': Former Bush adviser warns of Trump's 'quickening spiral'

A former top aide to President George W. Bush has warned that President Donald Trump has shown signs that he's spiraling.

David Frum, staff writer for The Atlantic and host of The David Frum Show podcast, revealed how Trump's retribution attack on Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, latest Venezuela actions and his response to the fatal killing of Renee Good at the hands of ICE agent Jonathan Ross have showed "the menacing crises the Trump presidency is inflicting on the United States and its own movement to start 2026."

"ICE seems to be acting more and more not like a proper federal law-enforcement agency, with all the high professionalism and exacting standards that Americans rightfully expect and usually get from federal law enforcement," Frum wrote. "It’s acting like an armed MAGA militia, like the armed force of a political party, occupying part of the country and part of the voting population on behalf of another part of the country and another bloc of the voting population."

Frum argued that despite Trump's outlandish comments, his words should be taken seriously.

"This seems part of a quickening spiral, but it’s not all," Frum said. "The president has been issuing other kinds of crazy commands and fatwas into the economy, decreeing with no legal authority that credit card rates be cut, talking about American oil companies that he’s trying to bully into crazy and unprofitable investments in Venezuela. Over the weekend, he issued a Truth Social post in which he described himself as the “Acting President of Venezuela,” which is kind of a spoof, but also a scene out of Woody Allen’s Bananas where the aging authoritarian president seems to be losing his marbles. He’s not the acting president of Venezuela. No American president should even joke about such a thing. But this one may not be joking."

MAGA influencer who stirred ICE attacks reveals ‘grim’ future: columnist

An analyst Wednesday described how the ICE attacks in Minneapolis and deadly shooting of Renee Good were all prompted by a MAGA influencer "chasing clicks" — and showed the potentially grim future of MAGA journalism.

The Bulwark's Andrew Egger revealed how MAGA influencer Nick Shirley's "highly misleading gonzo video" led to the chaos in Minnesota. Shirley was confronting workers at Somali-run daycares and health care centers over claims of fraud in a now-viral video created unfounded allegations that spurred into a new campaign under the Trump administration to target the Somali community.

"Within days, the White House was surging immigration enforcement to Minneapolis; Vice President JD Vance said Shirley had 'done far more useful journalism than any of the winners of the 2024 [Pulitzer] prizes,'" Egger wrote.

"If this sort of person doing this sort of work can be so richly rewarded on the right right now, it’s safe to say both that Shirley will be a major fixture of the online right for a while, and that many others will try to follow in his footsteps," Egger added. "But if he’s the future of right-wing journalism, the future is very bleak indeed."

In the past, and in traditional media, Shirley would have had oversight or rules to abide by. But that's not the case now.

"Much of the old press model has collapsed entirely, especially on the right," Eggers wrote. "Guys like Nick Shirley aren’t trying to join a publication, they’re picking up a camera and trying to go viral on their own. They have no safety net, no sounding board, no mentorship, no way to grow beyond what they’re doing this minute. All they have is the zero-sum game of the algorithm: Get noticed or die. Of course they’re going to do what the algorithm demands—which, on today’s right, means snappy, confrontational, fact-agnostic propaganda for the regime. That’s what the ecosystem rewards, so we’re going to get more and more of it. If you think that’s grim today, wait till you see the future."