All posts tagged "susan collins"

'Didn't even know': GOP lawmakers talk repeal after being shocked by Big Beautiful Bill provision

Some Republican lawmakers are starting to regret voting for President Donald Trump's megabill now that they're hearing about some of its provisions for the very first time, NBC News reported.

Sahil Kapur, NBC News senior national political reporter, said one of the problematic provisions is a "tax hike on gamblers" that one professional sports better called "potentially catastrophic for the industry."

The clause "would reduce the tax deduction on wagering losses from 100% to 90% starting in 2026," Kapur said in a report for Politics Now.

"Long story short, gamblers could be stuck with a tax bill even if they have zero net winnings in a year."

Kapur said several lawmakers who voted for the legislation now want to repeal it.

"That includes the House's top tax writer, Congressman Jason Smith (R-MO), who told me this tax hike is a mistake by the Senate and that it needs to be undone," Kapur said.

In addition, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) called the provision "unfair" and claimed that "most Republicans didn't even know this was in the bill when they voted to pass it," according to the report.

The Senate passed its final version of Trump's 2026 budget legislation at the beginning of July. The vote was 50-50, with Vice President JD Vance breaking the tie.

Republican senators who voted against the bill were Thom Tillis (R-NC), Rand Paul (R-KY), and Susan Collins (R-ME).

Watch the clip below via NBC News.

'Alarmed': Lawmakers reportedly flooded with calls demanding 'marooned' migrant's return

Voters who used a particular phone app had one major request for their representatives: Return Kilmar Abrego Garcia to his family in the United States, new data from a San Francisco nonprofit revealed.

Abrego Garcia has been held in El Salvador's notorious Terrorism Confinement Center prison ever since he was mistakenly deported without receiving due process through a court hearing. Last week, Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) traveled to El Salvador to meet with Abrego Garcia and advocate for his release. Neither President Donald Trump nor Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele would commit to securing his return to the United States.

The app, called 5 Calls, provides information on hot-button issues, plus a suggested script for concerned constituents to use when they call their lawmakers.

5 Calls shared this week's data with journalist Adam Klasfeld's "All Rise News."

ALSO READ: 'Alarming': Small colleges bullied into silence as Trump poses 'existential threat'

The "top takeaway," according to Klasfeld's blog, is that "people are alarmed about Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the Maryland man grabbed from his car in front of his 5-year-old autistic child and marooned inside a dangerous prison in El Salvador."

The data showed that the 5 Calls prompt, "Bring Abrego Garcia Home and Stop Trump's Plan to Traffic Civilians to a Foreign Gulag," brought in 83,340 calls in just four days.

“That's a LOT of calls," said data visualizations expert Katie Dektar.

According to the data, not all calls reached their intended congressional targets. Dektar noted that she "scaled the data by state population using recent Census statistics to reveal which elected officials received high call volume proportionally to their constituents."

The office with the highest call volume regarding Abrego Garcia belonged to Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME). Collins's office "received the most calls per 1,000 people of any senator," according to "All Rise News."

Read the report here.

'They are nasty': Cops reveal barrage of threats as Congress voted on Cabinet picks

A new report by Mother Jones revealed a rise in violent threats against members of Congress around the same time some lawmakers wavered on whether to confirm controversial Trump cabinet nominees like Pete Hegseth, Tulsi Gabbard and Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

"The US Capitol Police released the information in response to a public records request by Mother Jones," although they did not specify whether targeted lawmakers were in the House or Senate, or which political party they belonged to, wrote reporter Pema Levy.

"As it turns out, threats of violence against members of Congress rose in January and February, at the same time that Trump and his allies were strong-arming lawmakers over confirmations," Levy wrote. "In January, the US Capitol Police counted 42 threats against members of the House and Senate, followed by 33 in February. During the same months in 2024, the numbers were 16 and 17, respectively."

Levy claimed, "Violent threats were part of the MAGA confirmation playbook confirmation playbook." She cited Politico reporting that, "When weighing Hegseth," Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA) and her staff "received a barrage of threatening messages. Some people even reached out to her family, according to one person who heard frustration from Ernst — though her office downplayed the badgering.”

ALSO READ: The new guy in charge of USAID doesn't believe in foreign aid

In addition, Levy wrote that “Trump and Hegseth allies on the outside started going after reporters who covered the accusations — many of whom received death threats and had to receive additional security.”

In February, "Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) cited such threats as a reason Republicans confirmed Hegseth," Levy wrote.

She quoted Gillibrand saying, “We got three Republicans to vote with us, Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, and Mitch McConnell. We needed a fourth, and we were unable to get it because the Trump MAGA machine is powerful. They are aggressive. They are nasty. They issue death threats. They threaten people. They threaten them with retaliation. They have really gotten under the skin of a lot of Republicans who are unfortunately now unwilling to stand up to Trump, which is highly problematic.”

Levy concluded, "Pressing charges is one way to punish the threats to lawmakers and possibly quell them." But the question remains, "will Donald Trump’s Justice Department prosecute the threats that may be powering his agenda? An independent DOJ certainly would...But this one, as it carries out Trump’s political agenda, is another beast altogether."

Read the Mother Jones article here.

'Rolled over': Analyst slams Republican senators who 'abandoned' their duty

Sens. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) and Susan Collins (R-ME) publicly expressed "concerns" over Donald Trump's cabinet nominees, but these worries amounted to absolutely nothing when they voted to confirm, according to a new article by MSNBC writer Paul Waldman.

Cassidy, a medical doctor, fretted about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s record on vaccines, while Collins claimed Tulsi Gabbard had "obvious issues."

"But lo and behold, the senators got over their concerns, just as their GOP colleagues have again and again when it came time to vote on the nominees President Donald Trump has sent to the Senate," Waldman wrote.

Without hesitation, Cassidy joined Republicans on the Senate Finance Committee to approve Kennedy's nomination for Health Secretary, while Collins joined Republicans on the Intelligence Committee to back Gabbard for director of national intelligence.

ALSO READ: 'Making America less safe': Democrats warn of disaster as Trump purges the CIA

"In short, Senate Republicans, including the members most eager to trumpet their independence, have abandoned their constitutional responsibility to 'advise and consent,' and instead laid down and rolled over," Waldman wrote.

Waldman argued that Senate Republicans wield plenty of power to stand up to Donald Trump — but haven't.

"Republicans have a 53-47 majority today, any four of them could decide to vote against a nomination and force the president to choose a more qualified nominee," Waldman said.

But harassment and the very real threat of physical harm have kept them in line. Waldman wrote, "The senators were subjected to an intense pressure campaign from the White House and its allies, which in today’s Republican Party carries the literal threat of violence against those who oppose Trump."

"In the end," Waldman wrote, "all we’re left with is their 'concern.' Which adds up to exactly nothing. So when the nominees these senators rubber-stamp do damage to the public interest — as they inevitably will — no one should forget who gave them the critical support they needed to get confirmed."

Read the MSNBC article here.

'Deadly serious': Trump warned he needs a 'McConnell strategy' to prevent a GOP revolt

The Trump administration needs to come up with a "McConnell strategy" if it doesn't want a full-on Republican revolt to stall the Trump agenda, according to CNN's Manu Raju.

Last week, Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) defied Trump by breaking with Republicans during the vote to confirm Pete Hegseth as secretary of defense. McConnell's "no" vote, along with that of Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) and Susan Collins (R-ME) necessitated a tie-breaker vote from Vice President JD Vance to put Hegseth over the top.

On Sunday's Inside Politics, Raju said, "This is something that a former Senate leadership aide told me yesterday about McConnell. He said that, 'There isn't a single ideological similarity between McConnell and the Murkowski/Collins wing of the party, which tells me this. He's deadly serious about being totally uncompromising in his defense and foreign policy views. And two, somebody in the Trump world is going to need to come up with a McConnell strategy because he could be a real problem for their entire agenda if they don't come up with something.'"

ALSO READ: Inside the parade of right-wing world leaders flocking to D.C. for Trump's inauguration

Panelist Anstead Herndon of The New York Times commented, "It feels to me like he's prioritizing his legacy, right? Like, post-January 6th, we know that there's been a rift between them, and now that he's out of leadership, it feels like on the issues he cares the most about, he can make a point about the ways the party has changed. The ways that we know he has been uncomfortable with."

Herndon said McConnell's actions remind him of how the late Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) and former Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT) used their seniority to make a statement on certain issues.

"But I don't think we've seen Mitch McConnell be willing to put Republicans in a losing position because of it, right?" Herndon continued. "There has not been a time that I can remember where he is, like, moved to sink legislation because of it. So until that, I would think I would be a little skeptical of him being someone that will doom the second Trump administration."

Watch the clip below via CNN or at the link.

Chicago letter carriers face bullets and beatings while postal service sidelines police

CHICAGO — As a little girl in the 1980s, Khalalisa Norris aspired to become a letter carrier. She’d sit on her front porch in Chicago’s Austin neighborhood and wait for her local mailman, and eventual mail lady, each day.

In her 20s, Norris realized her dream, and ever since, she’s delivered mail on Chicago’s West Side.

But that dream became a nightmare.

Norris was working an overtime shift in the Austin neighborhood when she saw two men run past her toward a corner liquor store. As Norris exited an apartment building and returned to her mail cart, one man jumped in front of her, stopping the cart and pointing a gun in her face. The other walked alongside her and stuck a gun to her temple.

Both had their fingers on the trigger and said “we just want the keys,” Norris, now 46, told Raw Story in an exclusive interview. Norris took her set of arrow keys — the universal keys letter carriers use to open blue letter boxes that dot America’s street corners — and threw them at the robbers.

Norris froze in place until the criminals fled, fearing that if she attempted to run, they would “shoot me in my back.”

The violent day in January 2023 left Norris traumatized and changed.

“They took more from me than just those keys,” she said.

Norris’ ordeal is becoming too common: Letter carrier robberies skyrocketed by 543 percent between 2019 and 2022, according to a February 2024 United States Postal Service publication.

Such lawlessness and violence has made the job of letter carriers — once coveted for its government benefits and respected for its service to America since the country’s founding — an increasingly hazardous job.

Mail carriers, especially those such as Norris who’ve been assaulted, want their federal government employer, the United States Postal Service, to do more — much more — to protect them.

That, however, may not be possible because of restrictions on who can actually patrol the streets where letter carriers work.

Because of a 2020 statute reinterpretation from the Postal Service, its own dwindling uniformed police force of 450 officers no longer patrols streets where letter carriers like Norris deliver the mail.

Instead, postal police officers, whose numbers exceeded 2,600 in the 1970s, are relegated to only working on postal properties, such as neighborhood post offices and regional distribution centers. This shift in policing responsibilities, largely unknown to the general public, has embroiled the Postal Service and the Postal Police Officers Association union in a four-year-long dispute that remains unresolved.

Mail robberies, meanwhile, take a hefty financial toll on citizens and financial institutions alike, contributing to nearly $100 million in stolen checks per month, according to research from David Maimon, a professor who runs the Evidence-based Cybersecurity Research Group at Georgia State University.

“We have nobody. We’re out there by ourselves. We can get accosted and jumped,” said Elise Foster, a letter carrier and president for the Chicago branch of the National Association of Letter Carriers. “They can, with a gun, do whatever they want.”

Norris, union leaders and criminologists tell Raw Story the solution is simple: The United States Postal Inspection Service — the law enforcement arm of the Postal Service — should use its uniformed postal police officers on mail routes to deter criminals.

Yet, the agency currently refuses to put its postal police officers back on the streets, arguing that doing so increases liability. Its separate postal inspector force, as opposed to rank-and-file officers, can protect carriers, the agency contends.

So far, that hasn’t been the case, postal employees tell Raw Story.

Rising crime against letter carriers

Mailbox arrow keys are a prized commodity among criminals. Thieves are brazen in their pursuit of them. Steal one, and you can access street-side mailboxes and mailboxes in communal buildings that are filled with packages, credit cards, checks, cash and personal information to create fraudulent accounts.

Yes, a single arrow key can indeed open multiple blue boxes and communal mailboxes in a given area, half a dozen postal employees confirmed to Raw Story.

arrow keysCriminals sell arrow keys, as pictured, for thousands of dollars on black market websites. This screen grab from the dark web, obtained by the Evidence-based Cybersecurity Research Group at Georgia State University, shows arrow keys in California being sold for $1,500 last year. (Photo courtesy of David Maimon)

The mail has become “another avenue for bad actors to try and enrich themselves,” said Spencer Block, a postal inspector and public information officer at the Chicago division headquarters of the United States Postal Inspection Service.

Between the 2019 and 2022 fiscal years, robbery investigations jumped from 94 to 423 nationwide, according to the U.S. Postal Inspection Service’s annual reports.

During fiscal year 2022, fewer than one in four robbery cases resulted in arrests, and fewer than one in six ended in a conviction, according to the U.S. Postal Inspection Service’s annual reports.

Letter carrier robberies, specifically, grew more than sixfold, increasing from 64 cases in fiscal year 2019 to 412 in fiscal year 2022, according to the February 2024 edition of The Eagle, the quarterly magazine for Postal Service employees. There were 326,760 letter carriers employed by the Postal Service as of mid-2022, according to. the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

“Our presence wasn't carrying the weight that it once had in terms of … we're federal employees and nothing’s going to happen to us," said Mack Julion, a letter carrier and assistant secretary-treasurer for the National Association of Letter Carriers. “They're not afraid to rob, to assault, to do whatever. If they're involved in criminal activity, we're not hands off.”

Postal police officer patrols used to deter criminals while letter carriers delivered their routes, five postal service employees told Raw Story.

Norris remembers six or seven years ago when postal police officers would still sit in patrol cars marked with the U.S. Postal Service logo in high-crime areas. Sometimes, they got out of their vehicles and walked around in uniform. They carried guns and could make arrests. They could escort a letter carrier if the letter carrier felt unsafe.

postal police officer in Detroit A postal police officer in Detroit greets a letter carrier. (Photo courtesy of the Postal Police Officers Association)

Now, Norris said criminals “don't feel or see their presence.” She and her fellow letter carriers are in “survival mode” when they do their jobs. She estimated she hasn’t seen a postal police officer on the streets since 2017 or 2018 — at the very least since the COVID-19 pandemic started four years ago.

“Once they stopped seeing them, that's when the crime went up, especially with the taking of the arrow keys, robbing us at gunpoint,” Norris said. “They made it very easy and convenient for them because they would rob one area, go to the next. By the time they figure out from the carrier that got robbed at gunpoint, they will be in another ZIP code doing it again.”

The limitations on postal police officers go as far as prohibiting them from intervening if they witness an assault or crime off postal property, postal employees told Raw Story.

“They tell us to keep going and call Chicago police. Just call 911,” said Marlon Barber, a postal police officer since 2019, who works downtown.

It’s not just Chicago where letter carriers are under attack. It’s a problem from Salt Lake City to Miami, where mail carriers are also being robbed, Julion said.

In 2022, two men allegedly shot and killed letter carrier Aundre Cross as he delivered mail in Milwaukee. Four individuals have been charged in relation to the alleged “targeted attack,” according to Milwaukee TV station WTMJ 4.

Crimes against letter carriers are less likely to be seen outside of cities, with the vast majority occurring in major metro areas, but suburbs and rural areas have experienced crime too, according to news reports compiled by the Postal Police Officers Association union.

ALSO READ: Inside the neo-Nazi hate network grooming children for a race war

John Cruz, a letter carrier and president of the National Association of Letter Carriers’ Brooklyn and Staten Island branch in New York, said it’s “tough time right now” for letter carriers who are often “scared” and “frustrated” with their jobs. It also comes during a period of significant turbulence for the Postal Service, which is in the midst of a massive, and controversial reorganization amid ongoing financial difficulties. Postal facility consolidations were ultimately paused in May 2024 through at least January 2025.

Cruz said a letter carrier in Brooklyn, N.Y.’s Brownsville neighborhood was assaulted on the job during a robbery — she was hit on the head where she had a previous surgery wound.

Now, she doesn’t want to return to work, especially since the alleged assailant has been released from jail.

“They want to go home to their family the same way they walked in. Safe,” Cruz said. “Unfortunately, we don't even know what's going to happen today or tomorrow.”

Members of the Postal Service Board of Governors, an 11-member governing body whose members are nominated by the president and confirmed by the U.S. Senate, were not made available for interview, including Postmaster General Louis DeJoy.

Surging check fraud

The Postal Service itself acknowledged that it finds itself in the midst of a “crime wave.”

This entails a ”significant rise in mail theft and crimes against postal employees,” according to the February 2024 edition of Postal Service's magazine, The Eagle.

“High-volume theft from mail receptacles” increased by 87 percent between 2019 and 2022, rising from 20,574 reports to 38,535 reports, the magazine said.

Yet, as mail thefts skyrocketed, related arrests declined nearly 40 percent between 2019 and 2022, according to Postal Inspection Service annual reports.

In fiscal year 2022, there were 1,124 cases of mail theft with 1,258 arrests — some cases involved multiple suspects — and 1,188 convictions.

By comparison, in fiscal year 2019, there were 1,278 mail theft cases, 2,078 arrests and 2,067 convictions.

In fiscal year 2023, there were 1,197 mail theft cases initiated, resulting in 1,559 arrests and 1,210 convictions, according to the latest annual report from the United States Postal Inspect Service.

The U.S. Postal Service Office of Inspector General — an independent entity that investigates fraud, waste and abuse in the postal agency — published a critical report in September about the Postal Service’s response to mail theft.

U.S. Treasury checksA photo of piles of U.S. Treasury checks in Philadelphia appears on the dark web, obtained by the Evidence-based Cybersecurity Research Group at Georgia State University, which crossed out personal information. (Photo courtesy of David Maimon)

The Inspector General report found that while the Postal Service is attempting to improve security measures around collection boxes and arrow keys, the efforts aren’t enough to effectively thwart mail theft. The Postal Service, investigators wrote, lacked “actionable milestones” for its mail theft initiatives, faced challenges with staffing to address the issue and hadn’t defined a purpose for its Mail Theft Analytics Program.

Perhaps most notably, the report said the Postal Service “lacks accountability for their arrow keys, which are often a target in carrier robberies and are used to commit mail theft.”

Postal Service leaders submitted a written response to the Inspector General’s report, in which they disagreed with four of seven recommendations, including having the chief postal inspector assess staffing resources for the mail theft program and making a plan to “fully deploy eArrow locks” — electronic versions — and “high security mailbox initiatives.”

Tara Linne, a spokesperson for the U.S. Postal Service Office of Inspector General, said its recommendation to evaluate “proposed quantities, projected cost and actionable milestones to fully deploy mail theft measures, including high security collection boxes and eArrow locks,” remained open as of March 14.

“Our office is seeking additional information from the Postal Service regarding their proposed actions through our audit resolution process,” Linne said.

Block, of the United States Postal Inspection Service, told Raw Story in a phone interview that mail theft is the “bread and butter” of the U.S. Postal Service’s investigations.

“Our overall mission is to ensure the sanctity and integrity of the mail and of the Postal Service to make sure that the public has confidence that when they put something in their mailbox that it's going to end up at its final destination, and by a significant margin, it does,” Block said.

ALSO READ: Racism, arrests, extreme MAGA love: Meet Lauren Boebert’s primary opponents

In February 2023, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, a bureau within the U.S. Treasury Department, issued an alert about “mail theft-related check fraud schemes targeting the U.S. mail.” It noted that the Postal Inspection Service received 299,020 mail theft complaints between March 2020 and February 2021, representing a 161 percent increase from the year prior.

Six months after the February 2023 alert, the bureau analyzed reports of more than $688 million in mail-theft related check fraud, finding that 44 percent of checks stolen from the mail were altered and deposited; 26 percent were used as a template to create other counterfeit checksl and 20 percent were fraudulently signed and deposited, accoring to a September 2024 release from the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network.

Meanwhile, suspicious activity reports related to check fraud grew by nearly 140 percent between 2019 and 2022, according to a 2023 report from the Thomson Reuters Institute. There were 285,716 such reports in 2019. By 2022, the figure had ballooned to 683,541.

“Criminals increasingly targeted U.S. mail carriers during the COVID-19 pandemic,” the report said, noting that robbers often stole personal checks, business checks, tax refund checks and government checks such as Social Security and unemployment benefits.

“The act of stealing the check and cashing it is just the first criminal thing in a really long, long, long chain of events that victims will be taken for,” Maimon, of Georgia State University, explained.

Maimon, who is also head of fraud insights at SentiLink, a fraud software company for financial institutions, said he saw the problem of mail theft first spike in late 2021 and early 2022, when he conservatively estimated stolen checks totaled in the low eight figures per month. Now it’s close to $100 million per month.

“All the banks are bleeding at this point,” Maimon said. “The criminals are using identities in order to apply for benefits they do not deserve, so the government will start losing money, and they are losing money because we're seeing the criminals taking the identities and applying for tax benefits, tax refunds on behalf of the victims. Everybody's losing.”

Block argued that the theft of personally identifiable information from the mail is “infinitesimal,” and postal customers generally shouldn’t be worried about having their personal information stolen from the mail.

But the Postal Inspection Service does consider check washing — the act of altering information on a stolen check in order to commit fraud — “a big deal,” Block said. The Postal Inspection Service recovers $1 billion in counterfeit checks and money orders each year, according to its website. Postal Inspectors work with bank investigators and use tools to hunt these criminals.

Thieves posted a photo in February from a mail heist Thieves posted a photo in February from a mail heist in Upper Marlboro, Md., on the dark web, which was obtained by the Evidence-based Cybersecurity Research Group at Georgia State University. The researchers crossed out personal information. (Photo courtesy of David Maimon)

How bad have financial crimes via mail theft become?

Rep. Ken Calvert (R-CA) — who is co-sponsoring legislation to increase penalties for mail crimes — lost nearly $10,000 due to mail theft in October, Raw Story first reported.

A thief stole from the mail a $3,000 check from the campaign of then-House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) in July 2023.

“We definitely need better protection of our mail in order to make sure that this does not continue, but in addition to that, we need to find a way to prevent USPS customers’ identities from being stolen, being used for other nefarious reasons,” Maimon said.

Where are the postal police?

In August 2020, as the COVID-19 pandemic raged and the Postal Service’s finances deteriorated, postal leaders made a fateful decision.

David Bowers, deputy chief inspector for the Postal Inspection Service, decreed that postal police officers would no longer be assigned to street patrol. Instead, officers would be stationed only on “real property” — “land and buildings owned, occupied or otherwise controlled by the United States Postal service,” according to a 2020 internal document from a talk given to postal police officers and shared with Raw Story.

Postal police officers previously could patrol high crime areas in neighborhoods and make arrests if they witnessed a crime on the streets.

That’s no longer the case. Today, postal police officers are effectively banned from policing the streets where mail carriers make their rounds and most mail theft occurs.

“Effective immediately, any off property responses to robberies, physical assaults, mail theft or other postal related crimes are prohibited,” the 2020 internal document said.

“They reinterpreted the statute … and basically benched us, which was crazy because that's exactly when postal-related crimes started to rise, and now it's spreading like wildfire across America,” said Frank Albergo, president of the Postal Police Officers Association.

Already, the number of postal police officers had been steadily declining.

In 1974, the federal government employed 2,648 postal police officers. As of 2023, there were 450, according to Albergo, which includes lieutenants and sergeants. The U.S. Postal Service’s Office of the Inspector General said there were 348 active postal police officers with the bargaining unit, as of April 2023.

Postal police officers are located in 20 cities but used to be in as many as 66 in the 1970s and 1980s, Albergo said.

postal police officer A postal police officer stands on a corner in Detroit. (Photo courtesy of the Postal Police Officers Association)

The number of postal inspectors has been shrinking, too, but not nearly as much. Postal inspectors decreased from 1,755 in 1974 to 1,259 in 2023, Albergo said.

The main difference between postal inspectors and postal police officers is that inspectors “develop cases and prevent crime while protecting the American public,” where the officers “ensure the security of high-value deliveries, property and postal buildings,” the Postal Inspection Service’s website said.

An appropriate analogy is that postal police officers are like patrol officers and inspectors are like detectives, two postal employees told Raw Story. Postal police officers wear uniforms and drive in marked vehicles, where inspectors are often in plain clothes and unmarked cars.

The Postal Service isn’t the only federal agency to have its only police force — dozens of agencies such as the U.S. National Park Service and Amtrak have their own police.

Until the last decade, most criminals would never dare touch a letter carrier and showed more respect toward postal employees, Norris and Julion concurred.

After all, letter carriers are employees of the U.S. government, and committing a crime involving the mail is a federal felony offense.

“They wouldn't assault us. That was like a big no-no for them,” Norris said. “The community knew you just don't mess with the mailman or mail lady.”

Legal tug-of-war between the postal service and union

The Postal Service said the “legal jurisdiction” for postal police officers did not change in 2020 as a part of the statute reinterpretation, acknowledging that some divisions used to use the police officers off-property, according to Michael Martel, a postal inspector and national public information officer for the United States Postal Inspection Service.

Questions were raised about “whether these patrols conformed to the law and whether they were effective,” Martel told Raw Story via email.

This led to the Postal Inspection Service deciding to “comprehensively curtail” the use of postal police officers “outside the immediate environs of Postal Service real property,” which it says was necessary to protect the officers and Postal Service “more broadly from legal liability,“ Martel said.

In 2020 a federal court dismissed a lawsuit from the Postal Police Officers Association against the Postal Service calling the statute in question “ambiguous” and saying the Postal Service “did not act unreasonably” in its reinterpretation of the statute.

Postal inspectors, not postal police, are responsible for “off-site protection of the mail and our letter carriers” and “regularly conduct surveillance and appropriate enforcement actions in areas where high numbers of letter carrier robberies and mail thefts have been reported,” Martel said.

But in January 2021, an arbitrator determined that postal police officers’ duties are “very similar to the vast majority of patrol police officers’ duties" and awarded the officers a two-grade salary increase, with raises totaling about $1,700.

“The Postal Service retaliated by eliminating our authority to perform those duties, but obviously, this doesn't make sense because they had already paid for those duties,” Albergo said.

The Postal Service "remains confident in its position" that the law enforcement authority for postal police officers is "limited to postal premises under the law, and no court or arbitrator has disagreed with that conclusion," said David Walton, a spokesperson for the Postal Service, in a statement to Raw Story.

A second arbitration came in 2023, determining that postal police officers have some jurisdiction outside of postal properties and that postal police officers are to be governed by the handbook, not the 2020 memo. However, the arbitrator made clear that "nothing in this award should be construed" as requiring the Postal Service to deploy postal police officers away from postal "real property."

Of postal police officers’ current responsibilities, Block said, they “include physical security at our larger postal plants,” providing a “visible presence in marked cars” and doing station visits at local post offices.

The Postal Inspection Service’s website emphasizes that postal police officers are “a crucial part of the Inspection Service team.”

“Stationed in postal facilities across the nation, they stand on the frontlines in the fight to protect postal employees, customers and property,” the website said.

“What good are they just guarding facilities? I mean, really, playing like flashlight cops to facilities and literally after-hours checking to make sure the gate is locked and stuff like that?” Julion said.

A 2017 postal police officer job description shared with Raw Story includes responsibilities such as responding to “emergency situations (e.g., burglaries, robberies, natural disasters, medical emergencies, Postal Service vehicle accidents)” and enhancing the Postal Inspection Service’s “community policing, crime prevention and security efforts,” which includes acting as a “visible deterrent to criminal attack.”

In February 2024, a federal court upheld the 2023 arbitration, denying the Postal Service’s motion to dismiss. Albergo called the ruling a “win,” but there’s still been no change in postal police officers’ ability to work off-property, and Albergo said he expects continued resistance.

“This is not about our law enforcement authority. This is not about protecting letter carriers or protecting the mail,” Albergo said. “This is about the Postal Service beating the smallest postal union in a labor dispute. That apparently is more important to them than protecting the sanctity of the mail and the safety of letter carriers.”

The Postal Service disagreed, saying the recent district court decision "did not express a contrary view, but instead merely returned a matter to an arbitrator to obtain clarification of his award, which we believe will be construed favorably to the Postal Service," Walton said.

A separate class action suit was filed against Postmaster General Louis DeJoy in January 2024, alleging that DeJoy “discriminated against Black and Hispanic postal police officers by failing to provide them with the same access to the Postal Service’s Self-Referral Counseling Program as postal inspectors.” Albergo said at least 80 percent of postal police officers are “black and brown.”

What is the Postal Service doing to curb crime against letter carriers?

DeJoy, the postmaster general, insists that the Postal Service is protecting its letter carriers, particularly with its new “Project Safe Delivery” program aimed at reducing mail crimes with enhanced security for its collection boxes and postal locks.

“We have been unrelenting in our pursuit of criminals who target postal employees and the U.S. Mail,” said DeJoy in a March 2024 press release. “We will continue to make major investments to secure the postal network while directing the full weight of our law enforcement resources to protecting our employees and the mail.”

The program includes the replacement of 49,000 antiquated arrow keys, according to a May 2023 press release.

However that’s just 0.5 percent of 9 million arrow keys overall — in other words, only one out of every 200 arrow keys will be replaced.

A full mailbox locking modernization program would cost more than $2.6 billion in hardware alone, according to an estimate contained in the Office of the Inspector General’s report.

The program also includes the installation of 12,000 high-security blue collection boxes through fiscal year 2024 in “high security risk areas,” the 2023 release said.

To date, more than 15,000 new high-security blue collection boxes have been replaced, along modernizing with 28,000 antiquated arrow locks" using electronic mechanisms, "with more to come," Walton said.

“As we devalue those postal keys and other postal property, we would think that criminals would move on to some other avenue away from the Postal Service,” Block said.

Letter carriers say the modernization is long overdue as the arrow key technology dates back to the 1950s, Julion said, calling the keys “antiquated at best.” Adapting fob technology similar to what’s used in hotels would be ideal, he said.

As for criminal investigations, in fiscal year 2022, the Postal Inspection Service handled 5,499 cases, which led to 4,291 arrests and 3,947 convictions, according to its annual report.

That’s less than a third of the arrests the Postal Inspection Service made at its peak in 1992, with 14,578 that year, according to research published by the State University of New York at Albany. In 1992, the population of the United States stood at 255.4 million — about 80 million people less than the nation’s current population, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

Postal Inspection Service arrests were greater than 10,000 each year between 1988 and 2005.

The Postal Inspection Service reported more than 1,200 arrests for letter carrier robberies and mail theft since May 2023. In the past five months, letter carrier robberies decreased by 19 percent, and mail theft complaints fell by 34 percent, the March 2024 release said.

The Postal Service also reported making 73 percent more arrests for letter carrier robberies than it did in the same time period last year, according to the March 2024 press release.

Still, the Postal Inspection Service must constantly “adapt as criminals adapt” and accept the limitations that it can’t stop every criminal, Block said.

“We're not able to be everywhere at once and also conduct criminal investigations,” Block said. “We're not a protective force. We're here as an investigative body.”

“There aren't enough postal inspectors to provide every letter carrier with around the clock protection, just as there aren't enough police officers in any city across the country to provide around the clock protection to citizens,” Block continued.

Block said lots is happening behind the scenes to keep employees safe as well.

That includes “stand-up” or “service” talks with letter carriers from postal inspectors like Block about what to do to stay safe when out on their routes. Advice often includes warning letter carriers to be aware of their surroundings, to note anything unusual on their routes and to be vigilant, he said.

“Robberies or attacking letter carriers, that's an unfortunate thing that has increased over the last few years,” Block said.

The Postal Inspection Service increased its staffing to address the increased attacks and is providing more education in case a letter carrier experiences a crime while delivering, Block said. The agency has also done a “really good job at making ourselves known to postal employees and how they can get in contact with us,” Block said, noting that there’s a 24/7 hotline both postal employees and customers can call if there’s danger (877-876-2455).

“If you do, unfortunately, end up in a situation where you become a robbery victim or a victim of some other crime while conducting your responsibilities, then the most important thing aside from trying to guarantee your safety is to be a good witness, to remember the things that could serve us well in an investigation to try and find these people and bring them to justice,” Block said.

With legislation, is it likely ‘common sense will prevail’?

Mail theft and crimes against letter carriers has grabbed the attention of lawmakers and government agencies.

Chuck Young, a spokesperson for the U.S. Government Accountability Office, told Raw Story that his agency was investigating the Postal Inspection Service’s postal inspectors and postal police officers.

The report would focus on “the extent and nature of crimes against postal employees and property” and the responsibilities of postal inspectors and postal police “in addressing serious crimes against postal employees and property” — along with the adequacy of the Postal Inspection Service’s processes, Young told Raw Story via email.

Released in June, the report found that “serious crime” — including homicides, assaults, burglaries and robberies — nearly doubled during a six-year span, from 656 in 2017 to 1,198 in 2023. Robberies alone grew nearly sevenfold between fiscal years 2019 through 2023, according to the report.

Albergo said he hopes “common sense will prevail,” and the report will spur Congress to act.

There are currently three bills in Congress that are pushing to restore postal police officers’ off-property duties, two called the Postal Police Reform Act. The latest, the Protect our Letter Carriers Act, was introduced in March.

Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA) and Greg Landsman (D-OH) introduced the Protect our Letter Carriers Act, calling for more severe punishment for those who assault letter carriers and replacing outdated mailboxes and arrow keys.

“The increasing amount of robberies and assaults against letter carriers is highly concerning and ensuring their safety must be properly addressed by Congress,” Fitzpatrick told Raw Story in a statement. “We must step in to ensure that proper oversight is conducted and the resources our letter carriers need for safety are accessible.”

The House version of the Postal Police Reform Act was reintroduced in May 2023 by Rep. Andrew Garbarino (R-NY). Reps. Calvert and Bill Pascrell (D-NJ), along with Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC), co-sponsored the bill.

Pascrell called DeJoy's tenure as postmaster general "catastrophic," and said postal employees "have been plunged into existential danger."

"Postal Police Officers are being blocked from protecting postal employees and property, leading to a spike in theft of property and frightening assaults against letter carriers. This is an absolute disgrace," Pascrell told Raw Story in a statement. "Postal employees must be shielded to go about their business. Our commonsense legislation would let brave postal police do their jobs without interference. USPS can only remain a national crown jewel when its employees’ safety and Americans’ property both are fully protected."

Sens. Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Susan Collins (R-ME) introduced the Senate bill in November 2023, which has been referred to the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

Other co-sponsors of the bill include Sens. Jerry Moran (R-KS), Ben Cardin (D-MD), Sherrod Brown (D-OH), Ron Wyden (D-OR), John Hickenlooper (D-CO), Tammy Duckworth (D-IL), Chris Coons (D-DE), Tim Kaine (D-VA), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV) and Angus King (I-ME).

Durbin, for one, expressed frustration.

“Letter carriers perform an essential service of our government, but delivering mail has become an increasingly dangerous job. It’s shameful that Postmaster General Louis DeJoy continues to turn a blind eye to the rampant and violent crimes against his employees,” said Durbin in a statement to Raw Story. “No letter carrier should be worried about being robbed at gunpoint while on their route, which I’ve reminded Postmaster General DeJoy through numerous letters on the issue.”

So, too, did Cortez Masto, who specifically blamed DeJoy, a nominee of former President Donald Trump, who has led a postal service cost-cutting and restructuring effort since becoming postmaster general.

“This bipartisan bill reverses Postmaster General DeJoy’s dangerous rule limiting postal police officers’ jurisdiction and will help combat an unacceptable increase in attacks on letter carriers across the country,” Cortez Masto told Raw Story in a statement. “I’ll keep working to pass this bill and make sure postal workers can continue to safely deliver the prescriptions, checks and other necessities Nevadans rely on.”

When introducing the bill, Wyden said Congress would have to step up if DeJoy didn’t respond to the increase in crime.

“For over 200 years the United States Postal Service has been a central fixture of the American government. The recent cases of mail theft and the alarming uptick in assaults against postal workers is unacceptable,” Wyden said in a statement. “If Postmaster DeJoy refuses to act, Congress must do everything it can to improve protections for these essential workers.”

Brown told Raw Story that mail theft has affected “too many Ohioans" and "too many postal workers face threats on the job." He wrote letters to DeJoy and Inspector General Whitcomb Hull in 2022 about rising postal robberies, and after receiving no response, he wrote to the Postal Service's Board of Governors, too.

"Postal robberies and mail theft are federal crimes, and the responsibility to protect postal workers and their mail should not be pushed onto overwhelmed local law enforcement personnel across Ohio," Brown said in a statement. "Since Postmaster General Louis DeJoy has limited Postal Police Officers’ ability to do their jobs, this bill is necessary to empower the Postal Police to keep our postal workers safe and ensure Ohioans receive their mail.”

Duckworth said rising violence and crime against letter carriers in Illinois is "deeply troubling," and they should feel "safe and protected on the job without worrying their safety could be threatened at any moment," particularly when doing essential work that provides necessities to veterans, small businesses and seniors.

Duckworth said she co-sponsored the bill to "counter Postmaster General DeJoy’s reckless changes that restricted Postal Police Officers to USPS properties."

"This bill would help maximize USPS resources and help ensure these officers can better protect our letter carriers along their routes," Duckworth said. "The success of USPS depends on the ability of letter carriers to carry out their duties safely, quickly and accurately, and I will continue working with my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to pass this important legislation to support them in that mission.”

Norton, Moran and Kaine were unavailable for an interview, and all other members of Congress did not respond to Raw Story’s questions.

‘Get back to me’: Supporting letter carrier safety

Norris’ attack in January 2023 wasn’t the first time she witnessed violence in the job as a letter carrier. In 2011, she was caught in the crossfire of a drive-by shooting.

“No sooner than I started ducking, ‘pow pow pow pow,’ a barrage of bullets, gunfire,” Norris said. “It was over like 20 to 30 shots. A young man that was on the corner did die. I had to slide up under a truck for safety, and I just laid there and the gunshots stopped.”

At the time, Norris said her supervisor pushed her to finish her route that day, until her union representative stepped in. With her most recent attack, Norris said the Postal Service was more supportive, but she still feels “a bit of hurt” toward postal inspectors.

After Norris’ attack in January 2023, she didn’t return to work until the first week of May, but she was paid during that time.

“They robbed me sociably. I couldn't work. I didn’t want to be around anyone,” Norris said. “I isolated myself sociably. I didn't go to anything. No weddings, no grocery store, no parties. I became a loner. I went through a depressive stage. I stayed in the house, so they took more from me than just that key.”

Norris said she skipped her grandson’s birthday trip to Disney World last year as she was still depressed from the incident.

Workers’ compensation covered Norris’ bills for a psychiatrist, who she still continues to see today.

When Norris returned to work, her psychiatrist recommended she work inside a postal facility because of her fears of delivering mail on the streets — particularly in the winter when people are more often wearing masks.

She is fearful for her son, too, who has himself worked as a letter carrier for seven years. Norris said she calls him at least three times a day to make sure he’s safe.

“It really irks me that I can't go out there and protect them because I was once one of them,” said Barber, a postal police officer who previously worked as a letter carrier in downtown Chicago for 12 years. “At heart, I still am.”

Norris gradually worked her way up from four-hour shifts back to full-time hours, but she’s still working inside. As a self-described “people person,” Norris said she misses her customers and the peace that mail delivering used to bring her.

No arrests have been made in relation to the January 2023 attack, Block said. Lack of justice is one of the biggest concerns for Foster, the president of the Chicago branch of the National Association of Letter Carriers.

Khalalisa NorrisKhalalisa Norris stands on the sidewalk outside a post office in Oak Park, Ill. She has worked inside a postal facility since she was assaulted in 2023 and hopes to return to her mail route soon. (Photo by Alexandria Jacobson/Raw Story)

“Just want to see more prosecutions, more foot patrol out there in any kind of way they can,” Foster said. “Saturate the areas where most of the crimes are coming from to protect their letter carriers so that they can see that something is being done.”

As for Norris, she hoped to return to her mail route in April or May — more than a year after her assault.

“I have to take my life back. I can't allow them to have me stuck here in this place,” Norris said. “It's still happening. They're still doing it, so for me it was like I need to know if this is something I can continue to do.”

September 23, 2024: This story has been with statistics from new reports released after publication.

Top Republicans plead ignorance on Trump voting promise

WASHINGTON — Senate Republicans say they can hardly imagine former President Donald Trump trying to stay in power for a third term if he’s reelected for a second in November — even after Trump has twice suggested he’d become a president for life.

“I have no idea what you're talking about,” Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-AK) told Raw Story. “I'm sure it's not as worrisome as some of you guys are making it out to be.”

ALSO READ: We asked 10 Republican senators: ‘Is Kamala Harris Black?’ Things got weird fast.

Trump recently told attendees at a Turning Point Action event in West Palm Beach, Fla.: "Christians, get out and vote, just this time. You won't have to do it anymore. Four more years, you know what, it will be fixed, it will be fine, you won't have to vote anymore, my beautiful Christians."

Last week, when given repeated chances to correct the record with Fox News host Laura Ingraham, Trump tripled down.

“I said, ‘vote for me, you’re not going to have to do it ever again.’ It’s true,” Trump told Ingraham.

Even Trump’s closest allies in the Senate — and Raw Story exclusively interviewed 10 Senate Republicans on the topic in recent days — were left stunned when we ran the former president’s own words by them.

“What do you make of Trump saying, ‘vote for me once and you’ll never, ever vote again’?” Raw Story asked.

“I’ve got no comment on that,” Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) told Raw Story. “I'm sure that's out of context.”

The disbelief teeters toward confusion for many.

“I didn’t hear it,” Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL) told Raw Story. “I’ll have to look.”

“Democrats are worried he’ll never release the reins of power,” Raw Story pressed.

“I don't think that's true,” Scott said. “I didn't see it, though.”

‘Sounds preposterous’

Even the Republicans who did catch Trump’s comments are confused.

“I don't understand that statement,” Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) told Raw Story. “I personally want every voter to vote in every election.”

ALSO READ: Texas sheriffs engage conspiracy theorist who created Trump enemies 'target list'

“Democrats say, ‘Look, this is proof that he wants to pull a 2020 again and not give up the reigns of power,’” Raw Story said.

“I don't think you can conclude that,” Collins said.

Still other Republicans were left asking Raw Story to parse the former president’s comments.

“No, I didn't. I saw it in a headline,” Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) told Raw Story. “What did it mean? What did he say exactly?”

“I don’t know. I can’t interpret him,” Raw Story replied. “But it’s: ‘vote in November and you never have to vote again.’”

“Like, ever in your whole life?” Murkowski inquired.

“That's kind of what he implied,” Raw Story said.

“I'm assuming what it must mean is ‘you'll never have to vote for me again, because I'll be termed out,’” Murkowski said.

“Maybe, but that's an assumption your Democratic colleagues don't give after what happened in 2020,” Raw Story replied.

“Oh, no, no. Come on. He's served once, and if he’s successful and he serves twice, there are those that think that he would find a way to give himself a third term?” Murkowski asked.

“Yeah,” Raw Story replied as the senator’s face contorted with constitutional confusion. “So that sounds preposterous to you?”

“Yes. It sounds preposterous to me,” Murkowski said. “Yes.”

Assuming the best

Just like Senate Republicans did throughout Trump’s four years in the White House, most now refuse to publicly contemplate the worst from Trump — and instead just assume the best from the party’s standard bearer.

“You know, I don’t try to interpret what President Trump means. I assume he just means, get him in there and he’ll fix all the issues,” Sen. Mike Braun (R-IN) told Raw Story. “If you take things literally with him, you're always gonna need interpretation.”

And plenty of Republicans are interpreting Trump’s comments in the best light.

“It sounded to me like he was saying, ‘I'm not gonna be on the ballot again, so you don't have to vote for me again,’” Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) told Raw Story. “So, you know, I didn't see the full context of it, but I don't take it seriously.”

Other Republicans take Trump seriously, if not literally.

“I caught it,” Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) acknowledged to Raw Story. “When the president gives speeches and answers questions and interviews, he often adopts a stream of consciousness model, and I think that was just part of his stream of consciousness.”

“Is that one where the media — we take it too literally?” Raw Story asked.

“With President Trump, you can't take everything literally,” Kennedy said. “He's very forthcoming in terms of answering questions, and there's both risk and reward to that.”

Even after being passed up as Trump’s running mate, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) is still quick to defend his fellow Floridian.

“It’s being taken out of context like everything else he says,” Rubio told Raw Story. “He doesn't speak in the dialect of Washington.”

While Rubio failed to illuminate what the former president meant, Democrats say, in the wake of the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol, instead of making excuses for Trump, their Republican colleagues should start listening to him and then take him both seriously and literally.

“Here's a president who doesn't just joke about undermining our democracy but has taken actions to do that with … his decision to stop the certification of our last election,” Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) told Raw Story. “So when he makes jokes like that they have a chilling effect on our nation, and I think it's really problematic.”

GOP Senator Susan Collins admits she's throwing her presidential vote away

Infamously indecisive Maine Sen. Susan Collins (R) revealed to state reporters that she won't be casting a ballot for Donald Trump.

Speaking to a group, she said that instead, she'll cast a ballot for someone who has endorsed Trump: Nikki Haley. The former Trump opponent isn't on the ballot, so Collins said she'll write Haley in, WGME reported Friday.

Collins notably told CBS News in Feb. 2020 that she voted against Trump's impeachment for the Ukraine bribery scheme because Trump learned a "pretty big lesson" from impeachment and will be "much more cautious" in the future.

EXCLUSIVE: Trump’s ‘secretary of retribution’ has a ‘target list’ of 350 people he wants arrested

Trump then claimed the 2020 election was stolen, attempted to overturn the election with a group of loyalist lawyers and legislators, and then encouraged a large, violent group of supporters to "march to the Capitol," where they staged an insurrection.

Collins explained that she still "likes" Haley and that's the reason she intends to cast a ballot for her over President Joe Biden, a Democrat who she views to be in "cognitive decline."

"I publicly endorsed Nikki Haley, and I wanted her to win. She’s still my favorite candidate, and I think she could do a great job. She’s my choice, and that’s how I’m going to express it," Collins told WMTW-TV.

Collins has purportedly been a Biden fan in the past, but has spent three years rejecting all judicial nominees in a partisan vote.

"It is often said that if you don’t love Joe Biden, it is time for some serious introspection,” Collins said in 2020.

Colins will not have a speaking position at the Republican National Convention next week.

'She knows damn well': Legal expert comes 'unglued' in outburst over Senator Susan Collins

Former top Justice Department prosecutor Andrew Weissmann raised concerns about the 2.0 version of Donald Trump's White House.

MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace asked Weissmann about a world in which Trump knew what he knows now about controlling the government by firing his foes.

"There wouldn't be a Jeff Sessions," said Wallace, referring to the former attorney general, who recused himself from anything having to do with Trump, and appointed special counsel Robert Mueller.

"I mean, no one would last five minutes if they displeased him. Jim Comey is fired for not letting [Rep. Michael] Flynn go. Mike Flynn would never be charged! It's such a departure from Trump 1.0, and I think there would be areas that would be a million times worse. I think this is one that demands our focus in this moment."

Read Also: Trump’s felony convictions force Republicans into telling even bigger lies

Weissmann, a top prosecutor on Mueller's team, agreed, saying that many top people present during the administration's early years were safeguards against Trump's worst demands. He also agreed that Sessions believed that the DOJ must be independent, like him or not.

"As we reported in the Mueller record, he himself gave the information about what it was that the then President Trump wanted him to do with respect to Hillary Clinton," Weissmann recalled. "At that point, they got rid of him, and Bill Barr was his lackey. That's what would be the scope of a Trump 2.0."

Barr has spent the better part of the past three years trashing Trump but has now publicly confessed that he's voting Trump.

You don't really have to worry about what will happen. You're seeing it right now," Weissmann warned. "In other words, all of the people who are — who know much, much better and are going along with this."

He explained that he keeps using Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) as an example because "she knows damn well that this is fundamentally inconsistent request what it means to be a democracy under the rule of law, and is not saying anything. That is the road to hell for this country."

It all comes at a time when the Justice Department is being accused of being a partisan political arm of the president when there are Democrats, including the president's son, under indictment.

Wallace warned that Trump and his MAGA ilk are preparing to take a "wrecking ball to what is left to the rule of law" in the United States.

@MantaHunk had this to say on social media:

"Wow, normally mild-mannered Andrew Weissmann is coming unglued about 'all of the people who know better' who are not standing up for the rule of law. Attacking Senator Collins saying 'She is paving the road to hell.' Said the word damn. Got to be bad to trigger Andrew."

See the clip in the video below or at the link here.

'The road to hell for this country': Legal expert sounds the alarm about America's futureyoutu.be

‘Don't have enough’: Wealthy Trump allies balk at helping Donald pay legal bills

WASHINGTON — Some of former President Donald Trump’s fiercest allies in Congress may be multi-millionaires, but that doesn’t mean they’re opening up their wallets for the reality TV star turned contestant for America's most indicted.

“There’s only so much money,” Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) told Raw Story.

With creditors demanding a $454 million bond as his appeals slowly wind through the courts, Trump’s personal deficits have been the talk of the Capitol in recent days.

“Hopefully, I never get into that problem myself,” Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) told Raw Story while riding an elevator in the Capitol.


ALSO READ: A criminologist explains why half of America does not care about Trump's crimes

“You’re not planning to cut him a check?” Raw Story asked.

“No. I don't have enough. Mine would be just a blip,” Tuberville — who’s been estimated to have a net worth of around $20 million — said. “But if I could help, I’d help, maybe.”

Most Republicans on Capitol Hill now parrot the former president’s rhetoric, dismissing Trump’s legal problems as “lawfare” — think lawsuits instead of bullets — by the left and presenting him as a modern day martyr.

“Listen, I’m sympathetic with the lawfare that is being waged against him. Actually quite sympathetic. This is the price he's paying for being involved in politics and running for the office again,” Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) told Raw Story. “You could argue it's grossly unfair for him to have to pick up the full tab, so I personally don't have a problem with him explicitly asking for support.”

“Are you gonna donate?” Raw Story asked the former CEO worth an estimated $78 million.

“I've paid my price,” Johnson — who the Select Jan. 6 Committee implicated in helping carry out Wisconsin Republicans’ fake elector scheme in 2021 — said through a smile and chuckle.

While Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL) is estimated to be worth more than $300 million — making him the wealthiest sitting U.S. senatorTrump shouldn’t come shaking his tin cup around the former chief executive of the Sunshine State.

“I’m optimistic he’ll figure it out. He's a pretty resourceful guy,” Scott (R-FL) told reporters just off the Senate floor Thursday.

“Would you donate?” Raw Story asked.

“He's a resourceful guy,” Scott answered with a laugh before heading into the chamber to vote.

Personal and political money troubles collide

Trump hasn’t directly asked his Senate allies to chip in to help him pay his civil penalties, fines and lawyers, which now top half a billion dollars — including interest, which Forbes reports is ticking up at $111,984 a day.

But the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee finds himself in a potentially cataclysmic financial mess that mixes both his personal fortune and the finances of his presidential campaign.

During the past two years, Trump’s political operation has spent upward of $80 million on legal fees — an astounding sum for anyone, let alone a presidential candidate. Every dollar Trump’s political machine spends on his four separate criminal cases and various civil court matters is a dollar not spent on attacking Democrats or boosting Republicans.

ALSO READ: 11 ways Trump doesn’t become president

Conversations in conservative circles have often focused on fundraising for Trump’s legal defense instead of beating President Joe Biden, which has some Republicans fearing the GOP will suffer up and down the ballot come November.

And while it’s still early in this general election and Trump’s poll numbers have looked decent, his fundraising has been anemic. Similarly, Biden’s poll numbers are lagging, even as his campaign coffers are overflowing.

Biden’s warchest is currently triple that of Trump's. The latest Federal Election Commission filings show Biden’s campaign and joint fundraising committee are sitting on $155 million compared to the $41.9 million cash on hand at Trump’s disposal. Such figures don't include money raised by committees the candidates don't directly control, such as supportive super PACs.

Trump may have had a good fundraising month in February, netting upward of $20 million in tandem with his joint fundraising committee, but he still found himself outraised by $3 million by former Gov. Nikki Haley (R-SC) before she dropped out of the GOP presidential primary — withholding both her endorsement and her dollars.

“I think we just have to look at the hard math. Democrats are hitting on all cylinders in terms of fundraising, so we've already got a structural challenge where we're not raising as much as them,” Sen. Tillis of North Carolina said as he entered an elevator in the Capitol. “These races are big races. They cost a lot of money. You gotta mobilize voters, so I'm sure it's a concern for them, too.”

Besides begging for longshot loans, selling off assets and engaging in other creative monetary maneuvers, the former president is now leaning on the sale of $399 gold sneakers and a GoFundMe with an eye-popping $355 million goal.

It’s still unclear if Trump can wiggle out of the straight jacket ensnaring him through the newly announced merger between his fledgling social media company, Truth Social, and Digital World Acquisition Corporation. While the deal could eventually net Trump some $3 billion, his hands are currently tied by an agreement constraining him from selling his shares for the next six months — when the earliest of 2024 early votes are slated to be cast.

Instead of focusing on his reelection, Fox News hosts, such as Laura Ingraham and Mark Levin, have been pushing their massive audiences to donate to Trump’s legal fund.

They’re not the only ones thinking about Donald’s debt these days.

'Trump’s a movement'

Per his usual, Trump has his fierce defenders who say everything’s fine.

“Trump’s a movement. It’s not just the candidate. He’s a movement,” Rep. Ryan Zinke (R-MT) — who served as Trump’s first Interior secretary until scandals ended his tenure in the executive branch — told Raw Story. “I'm not worried.”

“You gonna cut a check for his legal fund?” Raw Story inquired.

“I’ll support my president,” Zinke — who’s estimated to own assets topping $30 million — said.

Other rich Republicans also aren’t entirely slamming the door shut on providing future legal aid to Trump.

ALSO READ: Bipartisan lawmakers demand action after Raw Story mail crime investigation

“I am confident the [former] president will be able to figure out how to manage his campaign and finances to be successful,” Sen. Pete Ricketts (R-NE) told Raw Story while walking through the Capitol.

“You have plans to donate to Trump?”

“We’ll see,” said Ricketts, who’s estimated his net worth around $50 million and comes from a family of billionaires who, for example, own the Chicago Cubs.

While he may not be as wealthy as his Senate counterparts, Sen. Ted Budd (R-NC) has made millions through his gun store and firing range, which means he can’t give Trump in-kind donations because it’s illegal for the former president to even “receive” a firearm or ammunition while under felony indictments.

ALSO READ: A neuroscientist reveals how Trump and Biden's cognitive impairments are different

Budd’s not looking to arm Trump for warfare though.

“Oh my goodness, it's complete lawfare,” Budd (R-NC) told Raw Story on his way to a Senate vote.

The freshman senator dismisses fears from some in the GOP that Trump’s legal fundraising is handicapping the party ahead of November.

“No. Completely separate,” Budd said.

Many in the GOP are banking on Biden foiling his own reelection bid. They expect the grassroots to be there for Trump — no matter the mind-numbing sums he’s scrambling to raise — just as they’ve been there for him in past fundraising appeals.

“I think that his support that he has at the grassroots will give him the money he needs,” Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) told Raw Story. “And I think that there's a big anti-Biden movement. A downturn in money's not going to make a big difference.”

Other Republicans are indifferent or awkwardly distancing themselves from the troubled Trump — and the entire GOP through him, the party’s defendant-in-chief — brand.

“I haven’t thought about it at all,” Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) told Raw Story.

“What about the RNC losing 60 staffers?”

“I didn't know about that either,” Collins said in reference to the “bloodbath” earlier this month when Trump ousted Republican National Committee Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel and installed his daughter-in-law, Lara Trump, as Republican National Committee — or RNC — co-chairwoman.

“Oh, yeah?” Raw Story asked. “Are you still a Republican?”

“It’s not uncommon when there's a new chair for there to be a major staff turnover,” Collins replied without answering our question.

RNC shakeup sends shivers through old Republican guard

Campaigns are more than dollars and cents though, and Trump’s ongoing personal shakeup of the RNC has unsettled many veteran Republicans.

Among country club Republicans and critics alike, this is just par for Trump’s political course.

“I don't think there's any norm or barrier that former President Trump won't be ready and willing to cross if it's in his personal, financial or egotistical interest,” Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT) told Raw Story while walking to a vote on the Senate floor.

Romney is dismissed as a disloyal “Never Trump”-er by many in his own party. Besides McDaniel being his niece, the 2012 GOP presidential nominee is retiring at the end of this term.

Romney may be a critic, but he says he’s not given up on his party yet, even as the Republican Party has morphed into something unrecognizable from his time as the GOP standard-bearer.

Romney says he loves his party and fears Trump’s self-serving moves will be felt by conservatives for decades.

“The party has to exist beyond and after Donald Trump and I are gone, and so weakening the party, making it a personal appendage, is not a good thing,” Romney — who’s estimated to be worth more than $170 million, making him one of the top 10 wealthiest senators — said.

Even though he lost to then-President Barack Obama in 2012, Romney credits the RNC with helping turn out his supporters.

“It was a very helpful organization in turning out the vote, so it helped raise money for me and it turned out the vote. To win elections, it’s all about organization. Ground game still makes a difference,” Romney said. “Once I became the presumptive nominee, we worked hand in glove.”

ALSO READ: Convicted January 6 felon wants to storm the Capitol again — as an elected congressman

Romney did that without placing any of his children at the helm of the RNC.

“Having family members serve in the administration looked like nepotism. Didn't seem to bother him. Didn't seem to bother the voters who put him there,” Romney said.

Not all Democrats are dancing

On the other side of the proverbial aisle, many liberal talking heads are giddy watching Trump scramble for millions and millions of pennies. But Democrats in tight races this fall know they can’t count on Trump’s legal woes to win.

Sen. Jon Tester (D-MT) is fighting for his political life in Montana. He’s raised upwards of $5 million four quarters in a row now, and he’s not letting up just because of Trump’s mounting legal bills.

“I don’t know that it makes a lot of difference, actually,” Sen. Jon Tester (D-MT) told Raw Story.

Democrats also have other fears.

“Depends on whether he’s busy raising money for his legal fees instead of for his campaign, but it does concern me that it will be added financial pressure compromising him,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) told Raw Story on his way to meetings on the Senate side of the Capitol Thursday.

Schiff, who recently clinched a spot on the ballot in California’s U.S. Senate general election in November, is a Harvard educated lawyer who was the impeachment manager for Trump’s first impeachment.

“He’s always been all about the money,” Schiff said. “But now there will be even greater risk that he trades American interests for money.”