Top Stories Daily Listen Now
RawStory

Trump News

'Potential dysfunction' of a second Trump presidency has Wall Street in a panic: report

With one Wall Street executive and GOP megadonor lamenting, "The street still hopes for somebody else,” Politico reports Monday that financiers and business executives are not pleased with the potential presidential candidate leaders — specifically Donald Trump.

As the report notes, one thing Wall Street prizes above all — besides profits — is stability, and based on Trump's wild swings on trade and finance during his first term, it was in short supply.

Keep reading... Show less

Perjury traps loomed over Trump testimony — and a Forbes reporter has the receipts

Former President Donald Trump's last-minute decision to back out of testifying at his civil fraud trial in New York sparked speculation about what could have prompted him to change his mind.

Forbes reporter Dan Alexander reacted to this news by posting a lengthy thread on Twitter in which he outlined the multiple perjury traps Trump faced if he had decided to go through with his testimony, and he cited his own publication's work to show questions prosecutors could have used to trip up the former president.

Keep reading... Show less

Trump's attempt to 'graymail' Jack Smith into dropping charges will flop: expert

Donald Trump's attempts to use discovery to access sensitive government documents in the Washington D.C. trial for attempts to subvert the 2020 election results is nothing more than a ploy to get Jack Smith to drop charges against the former president, writes former U.S. Attorney Joyce Vance.

In a posting to her Substack platform, Vance agreed with Smith's office that the ex-president's legal team is engaging in a fishing expedition in its requests for evidence complied by the government-related to outside interference in the election Trump lost by over 7 million votes.

According to Vance, Trump and his people are engaging in what is known as "graymail" in an effort to get the special counsel to back off — and that it will go nowhere with Smith.

"The defendant [Trump] demands an unprecedented expansion of the Government’s discovery obligations that would provide special treatment for him and result in delay," wrote Smith in a recent filing. "He asks this Court to find that a wide array of entities both inside and outside the Executive Branch are part of the Government’s prosecution team."

Vance went on to explain what Trump could be really trying to achieve with this filing.

"There’s a concept called graymail. That’s what happens when a defendant demands that the government handover classified material in discovery, in hopes that rather than expose important national secrets, prosecutors will dismiss some or all of the charges against them," she wrote before adding, "Smith works through all of Trump’s allegations regarding election fraud—everything from allegations of infrastructure compromise to allegations there were government agents at the Capitol on January 6—in a meticulous fashion, demonstrating that there is no evidence to be had because there was no fraud."

Predicting the judge would deny the former president's move, she added, "The bottom line is that his efforts to expand the universe of entities within the prosecution team is baseless and he fails to show that information he seeks would be material."

You can read more here.

'Ongoing security risks' due to Trump detailed in new Letitia James filing

Late Sunday the office of New York Attorney General Letitia James issued a new filing aimed at tightening up the gag order imposed on Donald Trump citing the continuing flood of threats being faced by court employees and her staff.

According to a report from Newsweek's Sean O'Driscoll, the filing takes pains to point out that the former president's untrammeled attacks are directly responsible "ongoing security risks."

The filing made to the New York First Division Appellate Court makes liberal use of a statement from Charles Hollon, of New York's Judicial Threats Assessment Unit which pointed to, "the hundreds of threatening, harassing, and anti-Semitic messages that Supreme Court and its staff have received as an evident result of the personal attacks that triggered the [gag] orders."

Cleland B. Welton II, an assistant solicitor general in the AG's office wrote Trump's "asserted free-speech injuries are insubstantial in light of the narrow scope of the challenged orders. Those orders do not prevent petitioners or their counsel from criticizing the [New York] Supreme Court, the presiding justice, the plaintiff, the witnesses, or the substance of the proceedings."

Welton also noted, for the court's consideration that the earlier gag order "led to a decrease in the number of threatening messages that the court and its staff received," while asking the court to keep the gag order in place.

You can read more here.

Trump is demanding prosecutors find 'evidence that probably doesn't exist': legal expert

Former President Donald Trump recently made a demand that special counsel Jack Smith turn over evidence as part of the discovery process to help him prove the 2020 election was really "stolen" from him.

While such evidence would likely be helpful to Trump at his upcoming election subversion trial, it also is highly unlikely to actually exist since multiple recounts and audits have repeatedly affirmed that Trump legitimately lost the 2020 election.

Keep reading... Show less

'All hat, no cattle' Trump likely ducked testimony to avoid embarrassing himself: expert

Donald Trump's last-minute decision to not appear as a witness for his own defense in the $250 million financial fraud trial being conducted in a Manhattan courtroom was likely due to his fears of having to plead the 5th Amendment while being grilled by prosecutors.

That is the opinion of former U.S. Attorney Joyce Vance, who suggested the former president and his legal team talked a big game up until it was go-time before pulling the plug on Monday's court appearance.

Keep reading... Show less

Geraldo wants Americans to focus on Republican Trump enablers, not the dictatorship pledge

In a debate over whether Donald Trump's fantasies about having a dictatorship were serious enough to warrant the past week of concern, former Fox host Geraldo Rivera said that the focus should instead be put on Republican lawmakers in the House and Senate who continued to enable Trump.

Speaking to CNN's Jim Acosta with former Mike Pence adviser Olivia Troye, Rivera said that they should be focusing on how Trump has already behaved like a dictator.

Keep reading... Show less

The same Republicans downplaying Trump 'dictatorship' lines begged Pence to stop him: aide

In a discussion between Geraldo Rivera and Olivia Troye, host Jim Acosta couldn't help but blame Republican lawmakers for being the ones to encourage Donald Trump's dictatorship fantasies.

On Thursday, CNN's Manu Raju interviewed several lawmakers asking about Trump's comment that he wanted to be a dictator for "one day" so he could build his wall and drill wherever he wanted.

Keep reading... Show less

Michael Cohen mocks Trump for 'not having the guts to appear'

Donald Trump invoked his former lawyer, Michael Cohen, in his Sunday rant on social media, and the Trump foe is hitting back.

In his all-caps post, Trump claimed that as a "star" witness, the "sleazebag and disbarred former lawyer Michael Cohen admitted in court to repeatedly lying under oath. It was a total breakdown, a non-recoverable Perry Mason moment. That alone ends this Biden Driven Witch Hunt. Election Interference!"

Keep reading... Show less

'Bogus excuse': Ex-prosecutor debunks Trump's claim the gag order prevents his testimony

A former prosecutor is debunking Donald Trump's claim that he can't testify on Monday because of the gag order.

Responding to Trump's lawyer, Alina Habba, saying she wouldn't recommend testifying with a gag order in place. But CNN legal analyst Elie Honig called it a fake excuse.

Keep reading... Show less

Jack Smith tells judge: Nothing in Trump's appeal stops the Jan. 6 trial

Special counsel Jack Smith filed a short response to Donald Trump's demand to delay his trial about the 2020 election and the Jan. 6 attacks. According to Smith, there's no good reason to delay pending appeal.

"The Court should not assume at this juncture that no issue can arise that is not involved in the appeal," wrote the Justice Department team. "Likewise, nothing about the defendant’s appeal prevents the Court from continuing to enforce — including, if necessary, by ordering briefing or holding hearings — the protective orders governing discovery ... and the order imposing conditions of release on the defendant. ... In addition, while the appeal is pending, the Court can make headway on the motions already before it, including the defendant’s motions to dismiss based on statutory grounds and selective and vindictive prosecution."

Keep reading... Show less

'People who are afraid cower': Trump's lawyer Alina Habba before he backed off testifying

It didn't take long for the former president to withdraw his lawyer's promise.

It's been just a few days since Donald Trump's lawyer Alina Habba proclaimed he was not afraid and that's why he would testify on Monday.

Keep reading... Show less

Legal analyst: Trump 'generally gets himself in more and more trouble' opening his mouth

MSNBC news reporter Adam Reiss explained on Sunday that Donald Trump "couldn't control himself" the last time he tried to testify before the New York fraud trial. It's unclear if that's the reason Trump withdrew from testifying on Monday, but there are some educated guesses from two analysts.

"We had this exact conversation as to whether or would he not testify on Monday," said Sunday host Yasmin Vossoughian. "You said to me, listen, at this point, he's going to testify. But you really never know with the former president. We will really know, and he actually shows up on Monday morning for that testimony. You predicted, accurately, that he was not going to be there. He's not going to testify."

Keep reading... Show less