Trump's claim that he truly believed he'd won election was just destroyed: J6 investigator

Trump's claim that he truly believed he'd won election was just destroyed: J6 investigator
MSNBC

Newly leaked tapes of an interview of President Donald Trump's one-time associate Sidney Powell by Fulton County prosecutors is incredibly damning for Trump in the Georgia election racketeering case, said January 6 investigator Tim Heaphy on MSNBC Tuesday.

For one thing, Heaphy told anchor Nicolle Wallace, Powell reveals on the tapes that Trump deliberately ignored counsel telling him he lost the election — undermining his argument that he truly believed in good faith the election was rigged.

"There was really never any serious effort to uncover voter fraud or any serious belief in its existence," said Heaphy.

"It sounds very much like this was a political strategy from the beginning. Generate fake electors, go to the state legislators and state officials, the Republican members of Congress, that's the path forward. It doesn't really matter if we keep losing these claims."

"That is shocking. That's illegal. We got toward that, but this is more direct evidence. The other thing that comes through to me in all of these new debriefing tapes that are coming out is how much engaged the president was himself. A key fact for Jack Smith, Fani Willis, will be a personal involvement. He was briefed by [attorney Kenneth] Chesebro directly on the fake electors plans. He's talking directly to Sidney Powell about these theories of election fraud, which are debunked. He is not a passive observer being advised by lawyers. He's engaged in discussions and controlling and understanding a plot. Those are two significant things, very relevant in both cases."

"Trump has been charged with the civil rights era crime of denying the vote and their actual votes and the right to vote," said Wallace. "It seems that knowing there was never any fraud goes a long way toward proving that Trump intended to deny people their votes."

ALSO READ: Far-right Texas congressman's ex-staffer paid back nearly $40K in ‘unauthorized charges'

"Yes, exactly right," agreed Heaphy. "If the civil rights charge requires mindful deprivation of a right, the fact that he disregards the actual evidence of fraud and moves straight to the political coup, those flanks in the multiprong approach to disrupt the joint session is very telling on his intent."

"The other thing that Powell indicates very directly is she was present in repeated explanations to the president," said Heaphy. "Again, go back to [former Attorney General] Bill Barr's analogy about the clown car. There are capable lawyers that had been with the president throughout his time. His campaign lawyers, even on the political side, yet he listens to or adopts the flawed reasoning of people like the clown car. Sidney Powell, Jenna Ellis, who is not far out of law school, had no experience — these are the people on which he's going to claim to rely when the pros in the room are continually telling him in the presence of the clown car. All significant evidence of his understanding and his intent."

Watch the video below or at the link here.

Tim Heaphy on Sidney Powell's testimony www.youtube.com

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

The Trump administration’s Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued an “unprecedented” order Wednesday morning shuttering all airspace around El Paso, Texas for ten days, an order that left one aviation expert stunned.

“I think it's safe to say it's something very big, either from a national security standpoint or perhaps testing something; equipment, or something going into the air,” said Kyle Bailey, a former FAA Safety Team member, aviation expert and pilot, speaking with Fox News Wednesday.

Early Wednesday morning, the FAA issued what’s known as a Temporary Flight Restriction (TFR) around El Paso, a restriction with a 10-mile radius and up to 18,000 feet. The FAA cited “special security reasons” as the reason for the TFR, which will remain in effect for 10 days, through Feb. 21.

“Normally temporary flight restrictions could be a day, be two days if it's for VIPs, but it's unprecedented for a 10-day temporary flight restriction,” Bailey continued.

“From the surface up to 18,000 feet and a ten-mile radius... if it was like a space ship launch or something like that, that would be unlimited, but 18,000 feet itself is very, very high for a temporary flight restriction. So it's definitely something big, like a national security event [or] a very high-level VIP.”

The Trump administration has yet to comment on the reason for the TFR, and Fox News’ Ainsley Earhardt noted the unprecedented nature of the order.

“Overnight, the FAA [shut down] all airspace over El Paso, Texas for the next ten days for unspecified 'security' reasons, warning any planes violating [it] can be shot down,” Earhardt said. “Closing airspace over a major U.S. city for this reason is very rare and has not happened since after 9/11.”

Earhardt asked Bailey if the TFR could have been issued due to staffing shortages of air traffic controllers. He immediately ruled that theory out given the relatively low air traffic seen around El Paso. Instead, he again suspected the order could have been issued due to the U.S. military – which has two bases in El Paso, Biggs Army Airfield and Fort Bliss – “testing something that’s going into the air.”

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

Donald Trump’s presidency now has a human body count.

“We really feel like we’re being hunted, we’re being hunted like animals,” an undocumented farm worker in Ventura county, California, told a reporter for The Guardian.

I’ve seen this movie before. Or at least where it leads.

Back in the late 1980s and early 1990s, I spent a fair amount of time in Colombia on behalf of the German-based international relief organization I’ve worked with for more than half my life. I shared the story in my book about those experiences, The Prophet’s Way, detailing one of the “hunt clubs” I ran across in Bogotá.

These were mostly middle-class European-ancestry (white) men, many of them off-duty cops, who go out at night in camo with high-powered rifles and night-vision gear to hunt dark-skinned “los gamines,” the million or so street children who commit much of the petty (and often serious) crime in the city.

Afterwards, they go drinking and partying, celebrating their kills. Some of the clubs even have names, like “the deer hunters” (cazadores de ciervos).

“Hunt clubs” is my term (and that of my host in Bogotá); during that era, what these men were doing was called “social cleansing” or “limpieza social” and in addition to killing kids, they also targeted for beatings or death homeless people, sex workers, LGBTQ people, drug users, and others they labeled “undesirable.”

As Amnesty International noted in a 1993 press release:

“There is concern for the safety of thousands of street children in Bogota following the appearance on 11 August 1993 of posters in the city centre inviting them to attend their own funerals.

“These posters, which announce the extermination of ‘delinquent street children’ are signed in the name of industrialists, shopkeepers and civic groups. There have been an increasing number of reports of killings of so-called ‘social undesirables’ (desechables sociales) in what are routinely called ‘social clean-up operations,’ generally attributed to shadowy ‘death-squads.’”

But the hunt clubs of Colombia in the 1980s and 1990s were pikers, compared to what Trump, Miller, Homan, Noem, et al are running today in America.

So far since Trump took over their operations, they’ve killed at least 40 people, both in their so-called “detention facilities” and on the streets of our cities, and imprisoned more than 70,000 men, women, and children in over 230 concentration camps. And Trump just cut off funding for medical services for those in the camps, so expect the death numbers to grow quickly.

Unlike the “volunteers” in Bogotá, Trump’s thugs are well-paid, making up to $200K when you include signing bonuses, bounties, and other benefits.

And they get to go hunting!

  • Supervisory Border Patrol agent Charles Exum, for example, reportedly bragged to his fellow ICE hunt club members that when he shot Miramar Martinez in Chicago suburb Brighton Park there were “5 shots, 7 holes.” The following day, he shared with his ICE buddies a text message saying, “Cool. I’m up for another round of ‘fuck around and find out.’”
  • After shooting Renee Good five times for daring to tell him to “have a nice day,” ICE hunt club member Jonathan Ross called her a “fucking bitch.”
  • And when two ICE thugs murdered Alex Pretti, they rolled his body over to count the bullet holes as nearby agents laughed and applauded.

Like the hunt club members in Bogotá, today’s ICE hunt club members — under color of law and with the approval of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh and the applause of Trump’s senior officials — pick out people based on how dark their skin is and routinely kick in brown-skinned people’s doors or drag them out of their cars before assaulting and even killing them.

And, while the hunt club members in Bogotá only occasionally wear masks or balaclavas to conceal their identity, ICE hunt club members can do it all the time.

America has — at least for the past few generations — always considered itself better than this.

These ICE hunt clubs don’t operate in secret. They wear (concealed) badges. They draw salaries from your and my tax dollars. They joke about murder and violence in their text messages. They pose for photos with their victims.

And they know — absolutely know — that powerful people will protect them. After all, the vice president of the United States claimed they have “absolute immunity” from prosecution.

But that protection only works if the rest of us stay quiet.

Colombia’s hunt clubs didn’t (largely) vanish because they had a moral awakening. They ended when the public finally said no and forced accountability. And the country today shudders every time that story is told. History tells us, unambiguously, how this sort of disgrace ends.

Every modern society that normalizes “hunts” of the poor, the dark-skinned, the undocumented, or the politically inconvenient eventually discovers that the culturally-acceptable definition of “undesirable” keeps expanding.

Today it’s brown-skinned migrants. Tomorrow it’s white protesters (they’ve already started that, building a database of “domestic terrorists” who film them and even revoking their access to TSA PreCheck). Then journalists (they just raided the home of Washington Post reporter Hannah Natanson). Then judges (they arrested Judge Hannah Dugan).

Then anyone who won’t clap loudly enough.

Colombia learned this lesson the hard way. As did Germany, Chile, and Argentina. So did the American South after Reconstruction, when “posses” and “night riders” were praised as patriots until, in the 1950s and 1960s, we finally admitted to ourselves what they really were and did something about it.

But here we are again.

The people running today’s ICE hunt clubs may feel untouchable now. After all, people like them always do. But history keeps receipts and is utterly merciless with those who choose to hunt human beings.

Sen. Cynthia Lummis' (R-WY) admission on Monday that she now gets “what the big deal is” after she took the time to review the unredacted Jeffrey Epstein files earned her a hammering by Axios founder Jim VandeHei as he wondered why she would admit such a thing.

According to Lummis, a Senate backbencher, “I’ve not been one of the members who has glommed on to this as an issue. I’ve sort of intentionally deferred to others to find out about it. But 9-year-old victims … wow.”

Speaking with “Morning Joe” co-host Mika Brzezinski on Wednesday morning, an exasperated VandeHei pounced on her comments.

Noting that the Epstein revelations are “definitely breaking through,” he added, “And it's great that the senator now is calling for a full release of the documents. But what the hell is she talking about?”

“It's been long known that this creep was running a Ponzi scheme, exploiting not 1 or 2 underage girls, but literally scores of underage girls," he exclaimed. “It was the worst kept secret in Palm Beach, so anyone who was living there was well aware of what was going on. The fact that [Commerce Secretary Howard] Lutnick knew he was a creep, everybody knew that he was a creep, and yet they continued to do business with them or to have relationships with him. That isn't necessarily criminal. I'd say it's morally criminal.”

“I can't believe how many people had contact with this guy, had relationships with this guy after it was well known, the type of person he was after,” he added. “It was known that he was convicted of the grossest, most heinous types of crimes you possibly could.”

- YouTube youtu.be

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}