Trump vows big tariffs on Mexico, Canada and China

U.S. President-elect Donald Trump said Monday he intends to impose sweeping tariffs on goods from Mexico, Canada and China, prompting a swift warning from Beijing that "no one will win a trade war."

In a series of posts to his Truth Social account, Trump vowed to hit some of the United States' largest trading partners with duties on all goods entering the country.

"On January 20th, as one of my many first Executive Orders, I will sign all necessary documents to charge Mexico and Canada a 25 percent tariff on ALL products coming into the United States," he wrote.

In another post, Trump said he would also be slapping China with a 10 percent tariff, "above any additional Tariffs," in response to what he said was its failure to tackle fentanyl smuggling.

Tariffs are a key part of Trump's economic agenda, with the Republican vowing wide-ranging duties on allies and adversaries alike while he was on the campaign trail.

Both China and Canada issued swift responses, each calling their trade relationships with the United States "mutually beneficial."

"No one will win a trade war," Liu Pengyu, a spokesman for China's embassy in the United States, told AFP by email, defending Beijing's efforts to curb fentanyl smuggling.

"China believes that China-US economic and trade cooperation is mutually beneficial in nature," Liu added.

Canada said it was "essential" to US energy supplies, and insisted the relationship benefits American workers.

"We will of course continue to discuss these issues with the incoming administration," said the statement from Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland.

Trump's first term in the White House was marked by an aggressive and protectionist trade agenda that also targeted China, Mexico and Canada, as well as Europe.

While in the White House, Trump launched an all-out trade war with China, imposing significant tariffs on hundreds of billions of dollars of Chinese goods.

At the time he cited unfair trade practices, intellectual property theft, and the trade deficit as justifications.

China responded with retaliatory tariffs on American products, particularly affecting U.S. farmers.

The U.S., Mexico and Canada are tied to a three-decade-old free trade agreement, now called the USMCA, that was renegotiated under Trump after he complained that the US businesses, especially automakers, were losing out.

"Mexico and Canada remain heavily dependent on the US market so their ability to walk away from President-elect Trump's threats remains limited," Wendy Cutler, vice president at the Asia Society Policy Institute, and former US trade official, told AFP.

By citing the fentanyl crisis and illegal immigration, Trump appeared to be using national security concerns as a means to break that deal, something that is usually allowed under the rules set by the World Trade Organization or in trade deals.

But most countries and the WTO treat national security exceptions as something to be used sparingly, not as a routine tool of trade policy.

Trump in 2018 cited national security justifications to impose tariffs on steel and aluminum imports that targeted close allies like Canada, Mexico, and the European Union.

This led to retaliatory measures from the trading partners.

- 'Bet on China tariffs' -

Many economists have warned that tariffs would hurt growth and push up inflation, since they are primarily paid by importers bringing the goods into the US, who often pass those costs on to consumers.

But those in Trump's inner circle have insisted that the tariffs are a useful bargaining chip for the US to push its trading partners to agree to more favorable terms, and to bring back manufacturing jobs from overseas.

Trump has said he will put his commerce secretary designate Howard Lutnick, a China hawk, in charge of trade policy.

Lutnick has expressed support for a tariff level of 60 percent on Chinese goods alongside a 10 percent tariff on all other imports.

William Reinsch, senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said that that move was classic Trump: "threaten, and then negotiate."

"In terms of what might actually happen, I'd bet on some China tariffs going into effect. That's legally easier and politically more palatable," he said.

"On Canada and Mexico there was going to be a renegotiation of their trade deal (the USMCA) anyway in 2026."

da-bys-arp-st/jgc

© Agence France-Presse

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

President Donald Trump's first choice to be his press secretary turned him down for a better-paying gig, according to a new report.

Before he settled on ousted White House Press Secretary Katie Zacharia, the president wanted former Fox News host Maria Bartiromo for the job, Axios reported Friday, citing two senior Trump administration officials. Bartiromo let it be known she wasn't interested, and one official chalked it up to money.

"She's no longer on air, but she's still on the Fox payroll and the taxpayers can't compete with that," the official said.

The revelation landed the same day Zacharia was pushed out after just five days in the West Wing, giving her the briefest run of any press secretary in modern memory.

Trump announced her hire on October 9, and she reported for duty the following Monday. Her first and apparently last briefing came a day later, and a White House official told Axios she appeared rattled at the podium and failed to impress the president.

Trouble deepened when The Wall Street Journal reported Zacharia wasn't licensed to practice law in any state, despite Trump touting her as an "attorney" on Truth Social. Zacharia told Fox News she failed the bar exam and never tried again because she was relocating to China. According to Axios, Trump was "blindsided" by the news and unconvinced by her explanations.

Trump told reporters Friday he had nudged her toward the exit.

"The news has been so nasty to her. I've never seen anything like it actually," Trump said. "And I said to her, 'Honestly, if I were you, I'd reconsider. You think about it, but I would reconsider.'"

Zacharia's hire was Trump's call alone, Axios reported, pushed along by his personal assistant Natalie Harp. Conservative commentator Scott Jennings was also considered but never got an offer.

Zacharia struck a gracious tone on her way out, calling Trump "the most hardworking man" in a post on X.

"It was an honor to work for him," she wrote.

Marc Caputo, one of the Axios reporters behind the story, said on X that he had been sitting on the Bartiromo detail and couldn't find it published anywhere else.

Trump is in "no rush" to name a replacement, Fox News correspondent Peter Doocy said after speaking with the president Friday.

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

Katie Zacharia's brutal exit as President Donald Trump's press secretary didn't happen by accident, insiders say, pointing to a powerful figure pulling the strings.

White House chief of staff Susie Wiles orchestrated the ouster of Zacharia, who lasted just five days on the job, The Daily Mail reported Friday. Wiles had reportedly been bypassed when the president plucked Zacharia, a 41-year-old former communications adviser at his media company, from relative obscurity last week.

One senior Trump administration official told The Daily Mail that "Susie gave Fox News the kill order," while adding that Zacharia "was an obviously bad choice."

That order, according to the report, set the stage for a live Thursday night interview in which Sean Hannity, whom Zacharia considered an ally, grilled her over her shaky debut briefing and her legal credentials. Trump had called her an attorney, but she never passed the bar exam. Zacharia told Hannity the result was "inconsequential" because she knew she would be living in China.

The pressure continued Friday morning on "Fox & Friends," where co-host Lawrence Jones opened by asking whether she wished she had told the president about the bar exam.

A second senior Trump official told The Daily Mail that someone at the White House "set her up," adding, "It only could have been Susie or the president himself."

Fox News insiders rejected the "kill order" account, arguing Zacharia had sunk herself by the end of the Hannity segment. Zacharia did not respond to the outlet's requests for comment.

White House communications director Steven Cheung announced Friday that Zacharia would move into a new role to be named later. Only days earlier, Cheung had brushed off reports of internal doubts about her as "trash."

Trump, who hailed her first briefing as "excellent" on Tuesday, struck a gentle tone with reporters after their Friday meeting.

"I want her to have a good life," he said.

Behind closed doors, however, Politico reported that Trump told officials she "had no talent and shouldn't be on television."

Wiles is now reportedly circling back to Scott Jennings, the Trump-friendly CNN contributor she favored before Zacharia was picked to replace Karoline Leavitt, who stepped down in August. A former Trump official confirmed to the outlet that Jennings is the frontrunner. Jennings did not comment.

A CNN pundit who once made President Donald Trump's shortlist for a high-profile job squirmed when an anchor asked if he still wanted it.

Republican strategist Scott Jennings was pressed Friday on CNN's "The Source" about the White House press secretary job, hours after Trump pushed out Katie Zacharia just five days into the role. Jim Sciutto, filling in for host Kaitlan Collins, twice asked Jennings whether he was angling for it.

Jennings had been laying out what Trump should look for in a replacement, arguing the president needs "the most qualified person you can get with the most experience, somebody who can stand behind that podium with credibility and not just carry your message, but also handle the incoming that is sure to come if the Republicans don't do well in the midterms."

He added that the next press secretary should have spent time around Washington, have TV experience "and maybe a little management experience, because that office does have a pretty big staff."

Sciutto then turned the question on him.

"So, Scott, given that your name was on the short list prior, were you making a pitch for yourself just then?" Sciutto asked.

"Oh, me? No, I wouldn't negotiate my personal prospects with you here on television," Jennings said, before launching right back into his staffing pitch. "Find the most experienced, competent person that you can find because you deserve it. You're the president of the United States."

Before wrapping, Sciutto circled back to Jennings.

"Scott, I do want to press you here. Are you interested in the job still?" he asked.

Jennings paused, then again stopped short of a direct answer. CNN media analyst Brian Stelter, who was also on the panel, was noticeably gleeful while Jennings answered.

"I haven't spoken to anybody about it tonight or today," Jennings said, adding that he learned the news while hosting his radio show. "The only person I've spoken about it today with is right now with you. So these are my views at the moment."

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}