Trump vows big tariffs on Mexico, Canada and China

Trump vows big tariffs on Mexico, Canada and China
Donald Trump warned repeatedly during the election campaign that he would impose tariffs, but experts warn that the costs could be passed on to American consumers (Allison ROBBERT/AFP)

U.S. President-elect Donald Trump said Monday he intends to impose sweeping tariffs on goods from Mexico, Canada and China, prompting a swift warning from Beijing that "no one will win a trade war."

In a series of posts to his Truth Social account, Trump vowed to hit some of the United States' largest trading partners with duties on all goods entering the country.

"On January 20th, as one of my many first Executive Orders, I will sign all necessary documents to charge Mexico and Canada a 25 percent tariff on ALL products coming into the United States," he wrote.

In another post, Trump said he would also be slapping China with a 10 percent tariff, "above any additional Tariffs," in response to what he said was its failure to tackle fentanyl smuggling.

Tariffs are a key part of Trump's economic agenda, with the Republican vowing wide-ranging duties on allies and adversaries alike while he was on the campaign trail.

Both China and Canada issued swift responses, each calling their trade relationships with the United States "mutually beneficial."

"No one will win a trade war," Liu Pengyu, a spokesman for China's embassy in the United States, told AFP by email, defending Beijing's efforts to curb fentanyl smuggling.

"China believes that China-US economic and trade cooperation is mutually beneficial in nature," Liu added.

Canada said it was "essential" to US energy supplies, and insisted the relationship benefits American workers.

"We will of course continue to discuss these issues with the incoming administration," said the statement from Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland.

Trump's first term in the White House was marked by an aggressive and protectionist trade agenda that also targeted China, Mexico and Canada, as well as Europe.

While in the White House, Trump launched an all-out trade war with China, imposing significant tariffs on hundreds of billions of dollars of Chinese goods.

At the time he cited unfair trade practices, intellectual property theft, and the trade deficit as justifications.

China responded with retaliatory tariffs on American products, particularly affecting U.S. farmers.

The U.S., Mexico and Canada are tied to a three-decade-old free trade agreement, now called the USMCA, that was renegotiated under Trump after he complained that the US businesses, especially automakers, were losing out.

"Mexico and Canada remain heavily dependent on the US market so their ability to walk away from President-elect Trump's threats remains limited," Wendy Cutler, vice president at the Asia Society Policy Institute, and former US trade official, told AFP.

By citing the fentanyl crisis and illegal immigration, Trump appeared to be using national security concerns as a means to break that deal, something that is usually allowed under the rules set by the World Trade Organization or in trade deals.

But most countries and the WTO treat national security exceptions as something to be used sparingly, not as a routine tool of trade policy.

Trump in 2018 cited national security justifications to impose tariffs on steel and aluminum imports that targeted close allies like Canada, Mexico, and the European Union.

This led to retaliatory measures from the trading partners.

- 'Bet on China tariffs' -

Many economists have warned that tariffs would hurt growth and push up inflation, since they are primarily paid by importers bringing the goods into the US, who often pass those costs on to consumers.

But those in Trump's inner circle have insisted that the tariffs are a useful bargaining chip for the US to push its trading partners to agree to more favorable terms, and to bring back manufacturing jobs from overseas.

Trump has said he will put his commerce secretary designate Howard Lutnick, a China hawk, in charge of trade policy.

Lutnick has expressed support for a tariff level of 60 percent on Chinese goods alongside a 10 percent tariff on all other imports.

William Reinsch, senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said that that move was classic Trump: "threaten, and then negotiate."

"In terms of what might actually happen, I'd bet on some China tariffs going into effect. That's legally easier and politically more palatable," he said.

"On Canada and Mexico there was going to be a renegotiation of their trade deal (the USMCA) anyway in 2026."

da-bys-arp-st/jgc

© Agence France-Presse

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

Rep. Mike Levin (D-Calif.) sounded the alarm this weekend over a purported sweetheart deal that gave President Donald Trump direct financial control over a public Florida airport, telling his X followers the story has not received the attention it deserves.

In a post on social media, Levin laid out how a Florida county effectively handed Trump the trademark and licensing rights to a public airport, with the president now positioned to profit off branded merchandise tied to the facility.

"Not enough people are talking about this," Levin wrote. "A Florida airport was renamed after Donald Trump. He walked away with the trademark, the licensing rights, and a deal that lets him profit off every piece of merchandise sold there."

The deal Levin referenced is the same agreement the Guardian's Richard Luscombe reported on earlier this month, detailing how Palm Beach International Airport was rebranded as the President Donald J. Trump International Airport in a narrow vote of the Palm Beach County Commission. The airport sits less than five miles from Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate.

According to the Guardian, the licensing agreement was signed by Trump last weekend and approved by the commission on a 4-3 vote in which the deciding ballot was cast by Maria Sachs, a Democrat. The remaining six commissioners split along party lines.

The agreement was struck with DTTM Operations LLC, the Delaware-based Trump Organization affiliate run by Donald Trump Jr. that handles licensing, marketing, and intellectual property for the family, according to the report.

Trademark attorney Josh Gerben, who has no connection to the deal, told the Guardian that the structure was "unusual." Trump gets to pick the vendors who manufacture branded merchandise, can monetize the new airport name however he wants, and can license the trademark to any third party of his choosing. Although the agreement bars "direct financial compensation" from goods sold at the airport, the Trump Organization can cash in on the same merchandise sold anywhere else, including on Trump's own online store.

Trump also retains final approval over how his name, image, and likeness are portrayed at the airport.

"The clause effectively limits the county's editorial discretion, ensuring that portrayals of Trump, as both an individual and a former president, align with his personal preferences," Gerben told the Guardian.

Levin honed in on how the deal got done as much as on the deal itself.

According to Levin, county staff warned commissioners that rejecting the renaming proposal could trigger retaliation from Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, with state transportation funding at risk. The Guardian's reporting confirms that account, noting that staff told the hearing that failure to comply with state law could jeopardize transportation funding and grant assurances from the state.

"DeSantis has already removed state attorneys and school board members who dared to cross him," Levin wrote. "That is the reality the Democratic commissioner who cast the deciding vote was living in when she made her choice: hand Donald Trump control of a public airport or watch Florida Republicans strip funding from the very people she was elected to represent."

Sachs defended her vote in a statement to the Guardian, saying the commission was not voting on whether to change the airport's name but rather "approving a licensing agreement necessary to protect the county from trademark liability."

Levin did not see the situation that way.

"That is absolutely insane," he wrote Saturday. "Florida Republicans handed Trump a money machine and called it a naming rights deal, and the people of Palm Beach County never got a say in any of it."

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

The White House keeps undermining an issue that could give way to a rare bipartisan win in Congress, according to a new report.

According to a Saturday article by Politico, permitting reform is an issue that "enjoys wide support" among Republicans and Democrats, but a bipartisan deal is threatened by Trump's "crusade against renewable energy, particularly wind."

Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-NM), ranking member of the Energy and Natural Resources Committee, told Politico that "the administration continues jeopardizing" negotiations for permitting reform because of that crusade.

"The thing that is the biggest threat to permitting reform right now is that the Trump administration backslid into a series of stalled-out permits," Heinrich said. "They're permitting fossil fuel projects left and right, and they're not moving solar, wind, and batteries."

Democrats in the Senate Environment and Public Works committee cut negotiations short in December after the Trump administration put the kibosh on East Coast wind farms, according to Politico's reporting.

Still, the GOP wants to move forward on permitting reform, not just for energy but for infrastructure and buildings as well, sources told Politico.

"We see this as a window of opportunity, given the need to be able to build things, the challenges we have for either transmission or energy production or building of anything," Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R-IA), the chair of the Conservative Climate Caucus, told Politico.

Democrats are also seeing GOP support for permitting reform from Environment and Public Works Chair Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) and Energy and Natural Resources Chair Mike Lee (R-UT), Politico added.

Anthony Scaramucci, who briefly served as White House communications director during President Donald Trump's first term, posted a striking prediction on X this week. When he dies, Scaramucci said, he fully expects Trump to insult him from beyond his grave.

In a post on X, the former Trump insider unloaded on his ex-boss with a blanket assessment of the president's character before pivoting to the morbid prediction.

"Nobody really likes Donald Trump. That's just the truth," Scaramucci wrote. "He's powerful, effective, charismatic in his way. He used his narcissism and his bullying to get the top job in America."

"But he's not genuinely liked by anyone and deep down he knows it," he added.

Scaramucci, who has become one of the louder anti-Trump voices among former administration figures, then framed the president's reaction to criticism as part of a predictable pattern.

"When people call him out for who he is, he lashes back," he wrote.

Then came the prediction.

"Only the good die young, so this son of a b---- will probably live forever, but if I go before him, he'll almost certainly say something terrible about me," Scaramucci wrote. "I would find that very amusing."

He closed with a line that gave the whole post a darkly comic edge.

"Even from wherever I end up," Scaramucci wrote.

The former Wall Street financier spent only about ten days in the White House before being fired by then-chief of staff John Kelly in 2017. The brief stint made his name nationally famous and left him with what he has described as a permanent perch as a Trump critic. He has since hosted podcasts, written books, and made regular cable news appearances dissecting the president's behavior.

Saturday's post is part of a longer pattern of Scaramucci offering on-the-record psychological assessments of his former boss. What makes this one stand out is the specific framing. Scaramucci is not just predicting that Trump will outlive him. He is predicting that Trump will use the occasion of his death to insult him one more time, and he is announcing in advance that he will enjoy it happening.

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}