Former Putin adviser explains why Moskva flagship was vitally important to Russia
Former Putin adviser explains why Moskva flagship was vitally important to Russia www.youtube.com
Former Putin adviser explains why Moskva flagship was vitally important to Russia www.youtube.com
Marjorie Taylor Greene unfairly compares Ilhan Omar to 911 terrorists www.youtube.com
The public corruption implications of Saudi Arabia giving Jared Kushner $2 billion could have been even worse according to a new report by journalist Jonathan Alter.
Alter was on MSNBC to discuss the scandal when he broke news on-air about the funding of Jared Kushner by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.
"What do you make of this payout from the Saudi wealth fund — that is directly managed, or at least overseen, by the crown prince — to Jared Kushner?" MSNBC's Ayman Mohyeldin asked Alter.
"First of all, I can tell you something tonight that has not been reported before that comes from sources inside the private equity industry, and that is the original number was ten billion and it was reduced," Alter reported. "Ten billion was the original number that MBS and Jared Kushner were talking about."
"Now, to put this in a little bit of context, Jared Kushner has no background in private equity," he explained. "So this is an enormously corrupt payoff from a killer who just was quoted in the Atlantic recently saying that [Jamal] Khashoggi wouldn't have even been in the top ten of people that he would have liked to have seen killed."
Alter described the scandal as the "worst" thing a relative of a president has ever done.
On MSNBC, @jonathanalter broke the news #SaudiArabia crown prince Mohammed bin Salman discussed giving Jared Kushner $10 billion.\n\nAlter went on to tell @AymanM it was the "worst" thing a relative of a president has ever done.\n#HouseOfSaud #MBSpic.twitter.com/6UQ3P3X4hv— Bob Brigham (@Bob Brigham) 1650160845
Gay Missouri Dem delivers emotional rebuke to GOP colleague over anti-trans bill www.youtube.com
Ukraine flag projected on Russian embassy — Russia tried to respond and hilarity ensued www.youtube.com
Fox Corp's LGBTQ staff livid over 'hateful' coverage of 'Don't Say Gay' bill www.youtube.com
A civil rights lawsuit against a former Tennessee sheriff's deputy has been approved by a U.S. District Court judge last Thursday, accusing the deputy of baptizing a woman against her will during a 2019 traffic stop, the Chattanooga Times Free-Press reports.
"It had nothing to do with God [or]... with saving [her or]... with [anyone] being a good person. It had something to do with power and control," the woman, Marie Riley, alleges.
The former deputy, Daniel Wilkey, was indicted in 2019 on 44 charges including rape, assault, and official oppression after he pulled over Riley and during the course of the traffic stop found her to be in possession of marijuana and placed her under arrest. While searching her as she was in handcuffs, Riley says he inappropriately touched her crotch. He then told Riley to pull up her shirt and shake out her shirt and bra, but he did not find any additional contraband.
"Wilkey and Riley next discussed religion. They spoke for another thirty minutes, and McRae left sometime during this conversation. Riley testified that Wilkey asked her whether she had been baptized. She responded with concern that she may not be ready. But, according to Riley’s testimony, Wilkey told her 'God [was] talking to him' and assured her that, if she got baptized, he would only write her a citation and she would be free to go about her business," the judge's ruling explains. "According to Riley, Wilkey also indicated that he would speak at court on her behalf if she agreed. Riley decided to go along with this plan because she '[did not] want to go to jail.' She also 'thought [Wilkey] was a God-fearing, church-like man who saw something . . . in [her], that God talked to him,' and testified that 'it felt good to believe that for a minute.'"
IN OTHER NEWS: Fox News host rants about 'ghost hammers' in response to subway shooting: 'Are we going after those?'
When later asked whether Wilkey “gave [her] the option not to do this,” Riley answered: What do you mean gave me the option? I mean it wasn’t, it wasn’t by gunpoint . . . or anything. . . . I don’t know, like - I’m not sure he told me - I mean, . . . I don’t know if those words [came] out. But I mean, I know that I didn’t have to do it. I mean, I know that I’m a grown woman and I know I didn’t have to do it," according to the judge's background on what happened.
The traffic stop happened in front of Riley's ex-mother-in-law's house, and Wilkey suggested that Riley retrieve towels from the house for the baptism. After she got the towels, both Wilkey and Riley returned to their respective vehicles. They both then drove to Soddy Lake. On the way, Wilkey requested that another deputy, Jacob Goforth, come to Soddy Lake to witness the baptism.
"Goforth believed Wilkey was baptizing someone who he knew personally. Goforth did not learn that Riley had been cited for a criminal offense until he arrived at the boat ramp," reports the Times Free-Press. "Goforth avers that he 'asked [Wilkey] if he had thought about [baptizing Riley] in an effort to provoke reconsideration,' but that Wilkey 'wanted to proceed.'"
The lawsuit accuses both men of excessive force, assault and intimidation, among other charges.
You can read more details of the case at the Chattanooga Times Free-Press.
Weatherman stops live broadcast to call his children and warn them about tornado over their house youtu.be
Bob Woodward: Unlikely that 'telephone addict' Trump didn’t call anyone for 7 hours during Jan. 6 youtu.be
‘Trump is mentally unwell’: CNN analyst goes off on Trump for asking Putin for dirt on the Bidens youtu.be
Trump’s new right-wing social media app tanks with 93% decline youtu.be
Copyright © 2025 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 |
Masthead
|
Privacy Policy
|
Manage Preferences
|
Debug Logs
For corrections contact
corrections@rawstory.com
, for support contact
support@rawstory.com
.