Quantcast
Connect with us

Beck defends clause counting blacks as three-fifths of a person

Published

on

WASHINGTON — Glenn Beck offered listeners a rather unique version of U.S. Constitutional history on his radio show Tuesday.

In response to a question from an African-American caller, Beck defended the original “Three-Fifth Clause” in the Constitution, which deemed African-Americans to be “three-fifths of all other persons.”

It was a compromise reached between the North and South in the Philadelphia Convention of 1787, and served in many ways as the justification for slavery while it lasted.

“I noticed you reference the founding fathers a lot,” said the caller. “And to me it’s kind of offensive because most of those guys were slave-owners. The Constitution that they wrote up — they didn’t even recognize my people as even human.”

“Where’d you learn that, Josh?” Beck soon responded, after asking him to explain his question. The caller said he “learned that in school.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“Well, you didn’t, really,” Beck retorted, launching into his curious defense of the Constitutional clause the United States later abolished and deemed unequivocally immoral.

“That is the common misconception,” Beck said, recommending that the caller learn the truth by reading “a really good history book not written by progressives.”

“Do you know who wanted slaves to be counted as a full person?” he asked. “Slave owners.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Josh argued with that assertion, but Beck wouldn’t have any of it.

“The reason why they wanted that is because of the balance of power,” Beck explained. “The South could control the numbers in Congress. Their representation would go through the roof.”

“That’s why,” he continued “in the Constitution, African-Americans were deemed three-fifths people, because the Founders wanted to end slavery and they knew if the South could count slaves as full individuals you would never get the control to be able to abolish it.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Beck’s interpretation of the motives of the Founding Fathers for writing the three-fifths clause is highly curious, as it did ultimately serve as a key Constitutional justification for establishing African-Americans an unequal and thus holding them as slaves.

His assertion that Founding Fathers cleverly designed the clause to set the stage for the abolition of slavery is also a dubious version of history.

This is not the first time that Beck has made controversial comments about the Constitutionality and justifications for slavery.

ADVERTISEMENT

The audio was captured by Think Progress:


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected]. Send news tips to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Black couple’s marriage proposal party interrupted multiple times by white security guards accusing them of theft

Published

on

According to a report at WHEC, a black couple who drove to a park where the man intended to propose were interrupted and harassed three times by security guards who accused them of stealing a T-shirt at a gift shop.

In a Facebook post, Cathy-Marie Hamlet explained that she and her fiancé, Clyde Jackson, were sitting at a table outside the Angry Orchard gift shop when a female security guard approached them and accused Jackson of stealing the shirt and asked to check his pockets.

Continue Reading

Facebook

Prime Minister Imran Khan claims Pakistani intelligence led CIA to bin Laden

Published

on

Pakistan's main spy agency provided the US with a lead that helped them find and kill Al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, Prime Minister Imran Khan said Monday.

Pakistan has until now officially denied having any knowledge of the terror chief until he was shot dead in a night time raid by US special forces on May 2, 2011, an incident that was a major national embarrassment and caused ties between the two countries to plummet.

Khan, who is visiting Washington on his first official trip, made his claim in an interview with Fox News when he was asked whether his country would release a jailed doctor whose fake immunization drive helped the US track and kill bin Laden in 2011.

Continue Reading
 

Facebook

MSNBC’s Morning Joe wants to know why Mueller went easy on Don Trump Jr: ‘Why wasn’t he investigated?’

Published

on

MSNBC's Joe Scarborough said special counsel Robert Mueller had some big questions to answer to assure Americans that the rule of law still existed.

The "Morning Joe" host asked NBC News reporter Carol Lee about her new report asking why Donald Trump Jr. had not been questioned as part of the special counsel probe, and h laid out the biggest questions facing Mueller ahead of his congressional testimony.

"There are only three questions that most Americans want the answer to," Scarborough said. "Was there obstruction, was there collusion and would Donald Trump have been indicted had he not been the president of the United States? Those are three pretty simple questions, but I don't think he'll -- I don't think you'll get the answers tomorrow, sadly."

Continue Reading
 
 
 

Copyright © 2019 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 | Masthead | Privacy Policy | For corrections or concerns, please email [email protected]

close-image
Join Me. Try Raw Story Investigates for $1. Invest in Journalism. Escape Ads.
close-image