Quantcast
Connect with us

GOP Rep.: ‘I don’t know what could be more important’ than Obama’s safety

Published

on

Desiree RogersIn the wake of the White House dinner gate-crashing controversy, some Republican members of Congress are showing an unexpected amount of concern for the president’s safety. But if the words of Rep. Peter King (R-NY) are anything to go by, it may all just be a ploy for a political attack on a White House staffer.

“This is not [about] gate-crashing, this is [about] the security of the president of the United States,” Rep. King told NBC’s Matt Lauer Friday. “When [Obama adviser] Valerie Jarrett says this is not that important an issue — I don’t know what could be more important than the security of the president of the United States.”

ADVERTISEMENT

But King may have betrayed a political motive behind his concern for President Obama when he told Lauer that he wasn’t interested in hearing from the Salahis — the couple who gate-crashed a White House state dinner last week — but did want to hear from Desiree Rogers, the White House social secretary.

“I’m not that concerned about the Salahis,” King said. “If they show up, fine, but it is important to have Desiree Rogers there, because in his testimony … Director Sullivan said the security arrangements were worked out with the social secretary’s office, and at every dinner we’ve been able to track … for at least the last 20 years, the social director has been there with the Secret Service agents, she decided to pull them away and we want to know why.”

Democratic Representative Loretta Sanchez told Lauer she thought that “maybe we shouldn’t even have this,” referring to House homeland security committee hearings into the incident. But Sanchez appeared to reverse herself and argue that she would like to hear from Rogers as well.

“I would certainly like to hear from her what steps are being taken to ensure that, in fact, there is not only a Secret Service agent there with the list, but there is somebody always there from the White House,” said Sanchez. “I mean, even Wal-Mart has a greeter. So you know, I would like to hear from her,” she said.

The Huffington Post‘s Sam Stein reports that friends and colleagues have stepped forward to defend Rogers.

ADVERTISEMENT

People close to Rogers say that the emerging caricatures of her as a spotlight-seeking diva who invited herself to the dinner for Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and skirted her responsibilities while there are drastically off the mark.

“What are the odds she was going to be lackadaisical at the biggest moment of her life?” the source asked. “Zero. That’s why these stories don’t make any sense. Her reputation is at stake.”

The source spoke in defense of Rogers because the social secretary had been told not to speak to the press. “I think the way it is being characterize[d] and the way it is coming off that she is too big a personality for the White House, it just doesn’t make sense,” the source said.

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs has also expressed support for the social secretary. “The president, the first lady and the entire White House staff are grateful for the job that she does and thinks she has done a terrific and wonderful job pulling off a lot of big and important jobs here at the White House,” Gibbs said Wednesday.

This video is from NBC’s Today Show, broadcast Dec. 4, 2009.

ADVERTISEMENT



Download video via RawReplay.com

ADVERTISEMENT

Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Trump declares it was a ‘great day for the GOP’ — and is mercilessly ridiculed for his absurd claim

Published

on

President Donald Trump responded to the end of the day's impeachment hearings by saying that it was a great day for the Republican Party and for the United States. There were many people who disagreed, however.

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1196958035127783427

Every person who testified before Congress has said that Trump's obsession with Joe Biden was concerning enough to alert others. Even National Security Council aide Tim Morrison stressed that he didn’t believe there was anything inappropriate about the call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. But when Rep. Val Demmings (D-FL) asked him why then he felt the need to report it if there was nothing wrong, Morrison struggled to find an answer.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Four shootings in Philly — in 20-minutes — leave one dead and five wounded

Published

on

Police in Philadelphia are spending Monday evening responding to multiple shootings.

"Police are investigating four separate shootings that left one man dead as gunfire erupted across Philadelphia Tuesday night," CBS Philly reports.

One man was killed and two wounded in a triple shooting in the Logan section.

Another man was shot four times in East Mount Airy.

A man is in stable condition after being shot in the chest in Kingsessing.

Continue Reading
 

CNN

NSC aide Morrison flounders as lawmaker asks why he reported Trump’s phone call if he didn’t think it was a big deal

Published

on

At the impeachment hearings on Tuesday, National Security Council aide Tim Morrison stressed that he didn't believe there was anything inappropriate about the call between President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. But when Rep. Val Demings (D-FL) asked him why he reported the call to government lawyers, he had no answer.

"You responded to a series of questions about the call and saw nothing wrong with it, yet you skipped your chain of command to go to legal counsel to find out — I guess to find out what to do, because you were concerned about the political fallout, not about anything being appropriate or wrong with the call, is that correct?" asked Demings.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image