Quantcast
Connect with us

NOW may oppose Senate health bill: still ‘damaging to women’

Published

on

WASHINGTON — Despite the failure of the Nelson-Hatch amendment, which would have placed stronger restrictions on abortion coverage in the health reform legislation, a leading voice in the cause of women’s reproductive rights said Wednesday the bill remains “highly discriminatory.”

“There are still anti-abortion provisions in this bill that are damaging to women,” Terry O’Neill, President of the National Organization for Women, told Raw Story in an interview.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The base legislation in the Senate essentially codifies the Hyde Amendment” that bans federal dollars from being used for abortions, she said, “and that is a huge, huge problem for women.”

While the Senate bill’s abortion restrictions are now fewer than those in the House version, it bans all abortion coverage for the additional Americans who will receive care under changes to Medicaid and the federal subsidies, both of which are efforts to bring more people into the system.

“With all due respect to our pro-choice friends in elected office who say the Hyde Amendment is settled law, a codification of Hyde is a basic health care statute — it’s not federal law,” O’Neill told Raw Story. “And even if it were, it’s very wrong settled law.”

“And by codifying Hyde, you can’t avoid an expansion of the concept,” she said, suggesting that it may serve as a precedent to continue weakening abortion rights. “We know that the Hyde amendment has resulted in the deaths of women.”

ADVERTISEMENT

While O’Neill praised the Senate’s voting down of Nelson-Hatch as “a positive step” after the success of the similar Stupak-Pitts amendment in the House bill, she said NOW reserves its judgment on the final legislation and in the meantime will continue to fight for abortion rights for women.

“Abortion is health care,” O’Neill said. “Any effort that denies women the right to make decisions about her body is terribly morally wrong.”

“We have longstanding policy in NOW that we don’t trade off the rights of some women for the benefit of other women,” O’Neill said, and hinted that NOW may not support the Senate bill despite the failure of Tuesday’s anti-abortion amendment.

ADVERTISEMENT

She said the House legislation, which includes the Stupak-Pitts amendment, is not “health care for women, it’s an abortion ban for women, and we are utterly opposed to any legislation containing the Stupak-Pitts language.”


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

‘We lost New Mexico to Mexico’: Internet breaks into hysterics over Trump wanting to build border wall on Colorado

Published

on

The president of the United States indicated he accidentally forgot where the state of Colorado was during his speech to an energy conference of fracking companies Wednesday.

Trump told the audience he was building a "wall" in Colorado, which is the state just north of New Mexico. If Trump was referring to his U.S.-Mexico border wall, it's the southern New Mexico border on which he intends to build the wall.

It prompted many to wonder if the president whipped out his fact-changing Sharpie yet again.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Giuliani henchmen caught on tape doing statewide tour for Indiana Republicans during 2018 election

Published

on

New images of Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman with prominent Republicans emerged on Wednesday.

"Two associates of Rudy Giuliani who are accused of illegally funneling foreign money into U.S. campaigns attended an Indiana Republican event promoting U.S. Sen. Mike Braun and others just days before the 2018 election," the Indy Star reports.

"The reason remains a mystery," the newspaper noted.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

House Homeland Security chairman directs sergeant at arms to ‘take action’ against Republicans who raided SCIF

Published

on

On Wednesday, House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson (D-MS) sent a letter to the Congressional sergeant at arms, Paul Irving, asking him to "take action" against the gang of House Republicans who invaded the classified information facility during an impeachment hearing.

"This unprecedented breach of security raises serious concerns for Committee Chairmen, including me, responsible for maintaining SCIFs," wrote Thompson. "As such, I am requesting you take action with respect to the Members involved in the breach. More broadly, I urge you to take House-wide action to remind all Members about the dangers of such reckless action and the potential national security risks of such behavior."

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image