Quantcast
Connect with us

White House hits back at Cheney, blames Bush for security failures

Published

on

‘Obama doesn’t need to beat his chest’ to prove US is at war, White House says

The White House has issued a stinging rebuke to Dick Cheney after the former vice president accused President Barack Obama of trying to “pretend” that the US isn’t fighting a war against terrorists.

And in a sign that it plans to engage in the political battle over the attempted Christmas Day terrorist attack on flight 253, the White House made it clear it sees the Bush administration as being responsible for the relative lack of success in what it now refers to as the “war against al-Qaeda.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“The former vice president makes the clearly untrue claim that the President — who is this nation’s Commander-in-Chief — needs to realize we are at war. I don’t think anyone realizes this very hard reality more than President Obama,” wrote White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer.

In a written statement to the Politico news site Tuesday, Cheney said: “We are at war and when President Obama pretends we aren’t, it makes us less safe. … Why doesn’t he want to admit we’re at war?”

Pfeiffer responded by pointing to “numerous” instances in which the president has stated that he considers the US to be at war, and added: “The difference is this: President Obama doesn’t need to beat his chest to prove it, and – unlike the last Administration – we are not at war with a tactic (“terrorism”), we at war with something that is tangible: al-Qaeda and its violent extremist allies. And we will prosecute that war as long as the American people are endangered.”

Pfeiffer also outlined an interpretation of the war formerly known as the “war on terror” that places the blame for the continuing existence of al-Qaeda on the Bush administration.

[F]or seven years after 9/11, while our national security was overwhelmingly focused on Iraq — a country that had no al-Qaeda presence before our invasion — Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda’s leadership was able to set up camp in the border region of Pakistan and Afghanistan, where they continued to plot attacks against the United States. … It was President Obama who finally implemented a strategy of winding down the war in Iraq, and actually focusing our resources on the war against al-Qaeda – more than doubling our troops in Afghanistan, and building partnerships to target al-Qaeda’s safe-havens in Yemen and Somalia.

ADVERTISEMENT

Pfeiffer added that “it is telling that Vice President Cheney and others seem to be more focused on criticizing the Administration than condemning the attackers.”

In the debate over the attempted flight 253 attack, some Democratic politicians have spotted weaknesses in Republican arguments against Obama. The National Journal reports that the head of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, Chris Van Hollen, and US House Rep. Eric Massa (D-NY) are attacking the Bush administration for failing to address the al-Qaeda threat.

“In general, we are facing the consequences of the Bush administration’s failures to deal with al-Qaeda,” Van Hollen told the National Journal. “The Republicans have no business in pointing fingers at the Obama administration on terrorism and national security.”

ADVERTISEMENT

In recent days the Obama administration has made it clear it doesn’t intend to shift its foreign policy goals in light of the December 25 attempted attack on Northwest Airlines flight 253, allegedly carried out by Nigerian national Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab. Greg Sargent at the Plum Line reports that the White House has rejected calls by senators Joe Lieberman, John McCain and others to stop the planned shut-down of the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay in the wake of the foiled attack.

“The detention facility at Guantanamo has been used by al-Qaeda as a rallying cry and recruiting tool — including its affiliate al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. As our military leaders have recognized, closing the detention facility at Guantanamo is a national security imperative,” said “a senior administration official” in an email obtained by Sargent.

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Trump admits defeat in effort to entirely eliminate federal agency with 5,500 employees: report

Published

on

President Donald Trump has given up on fulfilling another one of his campaign vows as he runs for re-election on a platform of "promises made, promises kept."

"President Trump has abandoned his administration’s faltering effort to dissolve a key federal agency, a major setback in his three-year battle to keep his campaign promise to make government leaner and more efficient," The Washington Post reported Wednesday. "The Office of Personnel Management will remain the human resources manager of the civilian workforce of 2.1 million employees and its functions will not — for the foreseeable future at least — be parceled out to the White House and the General Services Administration."

Continue Reading

Facebook

Former Fed Chair Paul Volcker wrote a blistering critique of Trump shortly before his death

Published

on

Paul Volcker, who was 92 when he died in New York City on Sunday, December 8, was an economic policy adviser under both Democratic and Republican presidents. The New Jersey native served as chairman of the Federal Reserve under President Jimmy Carter from 1979-1981 and President Ronald Reagan from 1981-1987 and headed the Economic Recovery Advisory Board under President Barack Obama from 2009-2011. But one U.S. president Volcker was not fond of was Donald Trump, and CNBC’s Jeff Cox reports that three months before he died, Volcker wrote a “scathing critique” of Trumpism.

Continue Reading
 

Alternet 2020

There’s a big problem if Joe Biden only wants to serve one term as president

Published

on

Former Vice President Joe Biden may intend to only serve one term if elected president in 2020, a new report from Politico found on Wednesday.

The idea of eschewing a second term had previously buzzed around the campaign, as well as the related notion that Biden could announce a one-term pledge. But according to Politico, Biden is currently against the “pledge” and is instead only saying privately that he “will almost certainly not run for a second term.”

If this is true, it’s a huge mistake.

Continue Reading