WASHINGTON — US President Barack Obama Monday questioned whether his foe Mitt Romney would have taken out Osama bin Laden, but denied indulging in “excessive celebration” over the terror leader’s death.
Obama personally stepped into a fierce election-year row sparked by the anniversary of bin Laden’s death in a raid in Pakistan by US special forces, in a sharp, implicit criticism of his presumptive Republican White House rival.
“I said that I would go after bin Laden if we had a clear shot at him and I did it,” a steely Obama said in a White House press conference, taking place on the eve of the anniversary of the US Navy SEAL raid which killed bin Laden.
“If there are others who said one thing and now suggest they would do something else, I would let them explain it,” Obama said.
Obama did not mention Romney by name in his comments, which escalated a blazing campaign row over who should get credit for the daring helicopter-borne raid deep into Pakistan which killed the terrorist mastermind a year ago.
But he was clearly referring to comments Romney made in 2007, when the Republican questioned whether it would be right to infringe Pakistani territory if Islamabad refused to act on intelligence on terror suspects.
“It’s wrong for a person running for the president of the United States to get on TV and say, ‘We’re going to go into your country unilaterally’,” Romney said in August 2007.
Obama implicitly accused Romney of changing his story for political gain, in a manner which ultimately called into question the Republican candidate’s leadership capacity and ability to serve as commander-in-chief.
“As far as my personal role and what other folks would do, I just recommend that everybody take a look at people’s previous statements in terms of whether they thought it was appropriate to go into Pakistan and take out bin Laden,” Obama said.
“I assume people meant what they said when they said it. That has been at least my practice.”
Earlier, Romney was asked at an appearance in New Hampshire whether he would have given the order to eliminate bin Laden, which Obama took in launching a high-risk raid on a compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan on May 2, 2011.
“Of course, even Jimmy Carter would have given that order,” Romney said referring to the 1970s Democratic president that Republicans brand as a failure on national security.
Obama also responded to Republican claims that his reelection campaign has been trumpeting the killing of bin Laden a year ago in an inappropriate manner to boost his prospects of winning a second White House term in November.
“I hardly think that you’ve seen any excessive celebration taking place here,” he said during a press conference with Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda.
“The American people rightly remember what we as a country accomplished, in bringing to justice somebody who killed over 3,000 of our citizens,” Obama said.
“It is a mark of the excellence of our intelligence team and our military teams, a political process that worked, and I think for us to use that time for some reflection, to give thanks to those who participated, is entirely appropriate.”
However, the Obama campaign has clearly been seeking political gain from the raid as it tries to build a narrative that Obama’s qualities make him a tested commander-in-chief and that Romney is lacking in the area.
Last week, the campaign debuted an advertisement featuring former president Bill Clinton lauding Obama for taking the call to mount the raid.
“He had to decide. And that’s what you hire a president to do. You hire the president to make the calls when no one else can do it,” Clinton said.
Entitled “One Chance,” the ad used news footage including quotes from Romney during the 2008 election in which the former Massachusetts governor appeared ambivalent about going after the Al-Qaeda leader.
It also featured a screen grab from a news report quoting Romney as doubting the merits of searching for bin Laden.
“It’s not worth moving heaven and earth spending billions of dollars just trying to catch one person,” Romney was quoted as saying in a report included on a CNN program.
Republicans are furious at Obama’s approach to the bin Laden anniversary, with the president’s defeated 2008 foe Senator John McCain being particularly vocal.
“Shame on Barack Obama for diminishing the memory of September 11th and the killing of Osama bin Laden by turning it into a cheap political attack ad,” McCain said last week.
Here are 7 wild, bizarre and pathetic moments from Trump’s ‘campaign launch’
On Tuesday night, President Donald Trump held a rally that was billed as the official launch his re-election campaign — though he has never really stopped holding campaign rallies.
As expected, the president ranted, lied, and engaged in the raucous attacks that are central to his connection with Republican voters. Some of it was actually just sad, such as his continued obsession with Hillary Clinton.
Here are seven of the wildest, disturbing and pathetic moments from the rally:
1. He said Democrats "want to destroy our country as we know it."
Trump casually accuses Democrats of "want[ing] to destroy you and they want to destroy our country as we know it." pic.twitter.com/4K79KlbEeR
British PM candidates clash over Brexit as Boris Johnson skips debate
Candidates to become Britain's next prime minister clashed over Brexit strategy at their first debate on Sunday but the frontrunner, Boris Johnson, dodged the confrontation.
The 90-minute debate on Channel 4 featured the five remaining candidates and an empty podium for Johnson, the gaffe-prone former foreign secretary and former mayor of London.
In sometimes ill-tempered exchanges, four of the five candidates said they would seek to renegotiate the draft Brexit divorce deal agreed with Brussels even though EU leaders have repeatedly ruled this out.
Michael Cohen ordered back to Congress on March 6
President Donald Trump's so-called "fixer" is being asked to return to Congress for more questioning on March 6.
Outside of the closed-door committee hearing Thursday, Cohen said that the House Intelligence Committee is seeking further information, according to Washington Examiner writer Byron York.
Michael Cohen finished closed-door testimony before House Intel Committee, says he's coming back for another session March 6. Again: No reason for secrecy. Transcripts should be released ASAP.
— Byron York (@ByronYork) February 28, 2019