Clint Eastwood has admitted he winged it at the Republican National Convention, deciding only at the last minute to ad lib a conversation with an empty chair, in remarks published Friday.
In his first public comment on the furor triggered by his eye-brow-raising routine, the Hollywood icon said he made it clear to Mitt Romney’s aides that they could not dictate what he would do.
“They vet most of the people … but I told them, ‘You can’t do that with me, because I don’t know what I’m going to say’,” he told his local paper, the Carmel Pine Cone, in an interview.
“I had three points I wanted to make: That not everybody in Hollywood is on the left, that Obama has broken a lot of the promises he made when he took office, and that the people should feel free to get rid of any politician who’s not doing a good job.
“But I didn’t make up my mind exactly what I was going to say until I said it,” he said.
The 82-year-old actor-director sketched out his planned remarks after a quick nap at his hotel room, shortly before going to the Republican National Convention venue in Tampa, Florida, about 15-20 minutes before he was due on.
And the empty chair routine — in which he chatted with an invisible President Barack Obama — only occurred to him when he was backstage, shortly before he was due to go on.
“There was a stool there, and some fella kept asking me if I wanted to sit down,” Eastwood said.
“When I saw the stool sitting there, it gave me the idea. I’ll just put the stool out there and I’ll talk to Mr. Obama and ask him why he didn’t keep all of the promises he made to everybody.”
He then asked a stagehand to put the stool on stage, near the podium. “The guy said, ‘You mean you want it at the podium?’ and I said, ‘No, just put it right there next to it’.”
Eastwood excused himself for talking for too long: he was only supposed to talk for five minutes, in a primetime spot shortly before Romney himself was due on stage, but ended up going on for more than double that.
“When you’re out there, it’s kind of hard to tell how much time is going by,” he said, noting that the audience responded very positively. “They really seemed to be enjoying themselves.”
Does the panic on Team Trump mean Robert Mueller closing in on criminal conspiracy charges?
As Rudy Giuliani spins a story no one can follow and his boss melts down on Twitter, intriguing hints emerge
As the whole world knows, CNN reported last Thursday that Michael Cohen was prepared to testify that Donald Trump knew in advance about the June 2016 meeting at Trump Tower with Russian emissaries supposedly bearing dirt on Hillary Clinton. And ever since then, the atmosphere around the Russia scandal has changed. If there is any real evidence that Trump knew about that meeting and approved it, it goes a long way toward proving one element of a criminal conspiracy that includes the president of the United States, and confirms many other suspicions surrounding that event.
Disney announces new Star Wars trilogy
The media rush to blame the working class for Trump shows they have no idea what they’re talking about
To hear the voices of American media tell it, Donald Trump’s base supporters are working-class whites. Article after article details this mob, who cheer Trump’s racist, sexist, xenophobic pronouncements, as members of Rust Belt communities who, having lost their high-paying factory jobs to outsourcing, now look to scapegoat anyone and everyone they feel may have been responsible for the diminution of America on the world stage. Donald Trump stokes their anger against an elite that looks down on them.
But reporters’ views of the working class confirm the very bias that Trump exploits. Each time that the press refers to the working class as a voting bloc that is mindlessly voting its “feelings,” it also reminds its audience of Trump’s notorious statement to his audience at a Nevada rally, “I love the poorly educated.” Since then, the press has taken that statement as permission to conflate the categories “working class” and the “poorly educated” as if they were one and the same.