Quantcast
Connect with us

Former FEC chair tells Moyers superPACs are ‘shadow party committees’

Published

on

The man who told Stephen Colbert how to set up his own super PAC told Bill Moyers this week that regardless of judicial intent, fundraising groups of that type are not independent of their candidates of choice.

“When the courts midwifed these things, they said, ‘They can’t corrupt because they’re totally independent of candidates and parties,'” former former Federal Election Commission chairperson Trevor Potter said, referring to the 2010 Citizens United verdict. “‘That’s why you can give them an unlimited amount, because you’re not buying access, the candidates may not like them, they’re wholly independent.'” Well that’s baloney. They’re not independent in any way.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Instead, Potter said, because candidates are allowed to endorse them, super PACs have become “sort of shadow party committees.”

Last year, Potter advised Colbert, host of Comedy Central’s The Colbert Report, on how to start his own super PAC, which he handed over in January to Daily Show host Jon Stewart while considering a presidential campaign. The “Definitely Not Collaborating With Stephen Colbert super PAC” would subsequently receive more than $1 million in donations and earn Colbert two Peabody Awards as he used the campaign to lampoon the 2010 Citizens United ruling, which found political spending constituted free speech.

“Money equals speech,” Colbert said in January. “Therefore the more money you have, the more you can speak. That just stands to reason. If corporations are people, corporation should be able to speak. That’s why I believe in super PACs.”

Moyers said he found Colbert’s antics funny, but that the whole super PAC process was “no laughing matter.” However, Potter told Moyers that what he called the escalating “arms race’ between super PACs for Mitt Romney and Barack Obama could ultimately lead to positive changes in fundraising laws.

“In a way, and I know this will sound a little odd, that’s not entirely a bad outcome for this election,” said Potter, who also served as Rep. John McCain’s (R-AZ) general counsel during the 2008 presidential campaign. “Because what — where we have been is that the Republicans have proven they have an enormous advantage of raising money — and I’m a Republican. But the party has essentially said, ‘We have such a tactical advantage, that we’re not going to change this system.'”

ADVERTISEMENT

If Democratic groups raise enough money during this election, Potter said, both sides would then step back to review campaign contribution rules. Moyers’ interview with Potter, published Friday, can be seen below.

ADVERTISEMENT

Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Adam Schiff: GOP senators should allow Bolton to testify or face the music when his book comes out

Published

on

Appearing on CNN's "New Day," Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) -- who is leading the impeachment prosecution of Donald Trump on the Senate floor -- said Republicans can now either agree to let former national security adviser John Bolton to testify about the president's Ukraine scandal or face the wrath of voters when the former White House aide's book comes out.

Late Sunday the New York Times reported, "President Trump directly tied the withholding of almost $400 million in American security aid to investigations that he sought from Ukrainian officials, according to an unpublished manuscript of a book that John R. Bolton, Mr. Trump’s former national security adviser, wrote about his time in the White House." 

Continue Reading

CNN

CNN’s Avlon mocks Republicans after their victory lap talking points were ‘shredded’ by Bolton’s book

Published

on

On Monday, CNN fact-checker John Avlon noted that former National Security Adviser John Bolton's book has blown up the talking points Republicans in Congress were using to paint the arguments in the Senate trial as a victory for President Donald Trump.

"After the defense team's arguments opened on Saturday, Republicans greeted cameras with talking points at the ready," said Avlon, playing clips of Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA) and Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) both saying that White House lawyers "shredded" the case made by impeachment managers, as well as displaying a tweet from Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC) that also used the word "shredded."

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

‘Rattled’ White House was blindsided by Bolton revelations: report

Published

on

In an appearance on CNN's "New Day," on Monday morning, Axios reporter Jonathan Swan revealed that the Donald Trump's White House was "rattled" by revelations contained in former national security advisor John Bolton's upcoming book -- and that they appeared to be unaware of them until they read them in the New York Times.

Speaking with hosts Alisyn Camerota, and John Berman, Swan was asked how the White House was responding to the bombshell revelations that blow a huge hole in Trump's impeachment defense.

"The New York Times knew about the content of the Bolton book before you say the press shop at the White House did. What itself is the significance there?" host Berman asked.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image